Help get JD Hayworth's money bomb thermometer up to $255,100 by midnight Wednesday to put his latest video on TV! CONTRIBUTE NOW and spread the word!

"It's a Tea Party revolt year, and taxpayers will be voting out career politicians like John McCain who voted for the billion dollar TARP pork bailouts." JD HAYWORTH V. MCCAIN NEWS

McCain calls Goldman Sachs "unethical" despite taking their money

JD Hayworth only US Senate candidate in Arizona to sign AFP's No Climate Tax pledge

Prominent Republicans seek refunds from Crist; McCain has close ties, refuses to

Hayworth re-issues debate challenge to McCain; 65 days since he first asked

Video: Have you met the two McCains?

Poll shows Hayworth leading McCain among conservatives

Margaret Carlson: McCain has entered witness protection program for politicians seeking to change their identity for election purposes

More speculation on whether McCain will run as an Independent like Crist

Video: JD Hayworth takes McCain and SB1070 on Fox News

Video: JD Hayworth responds to McCain's election year conversion on border security

Hayworth welcomes Gov. Brewer's signature on SB1070

Arizona Police Association endorses JD Hayworth for Senate

Michelle Malkin endorses JD Hayworth

Quid pro quo? Top contributors to McCain's campaign benefited from pork bailouts he voted for

McCain sends out desperate letter pleading for funds for radio & TV ads; pretends he doesn't support pork barrel spending

McCain's long history of flip-flopping on gay marrage

John McCain's whimsical world of conservatism

Left wing Salon admits Hayworth will also win a general election - yet still bashes McCain for flip-flopping

Tucson Border Patrol union denounces McCain's election year conversion on border security

TwiceRight.com: Young Conservative puts forth "My case for JD Hayworth"

Hayworth calls McCain's new immigration plan "Election Year Gimmick"

Which John McCain is the real John McCain? The maverick or someone who denies he's a maverick?

Syndicated Columnist Leonard Pitts: R.I.P.: Paying Final Tribute to John McCain's Deceased Integrity

Border Agents Accuse McCain of Being a "Sellout"

New Rasmussen Poll Shows McCain Collapsing

Rasmussen: McCain lead over Hayworth plummets to under 5 points

Video of McCain running from camera when asked about JD Hayworth!

Hayworth, Thomas and Schweikert among most prominent politicos at Tempe Tax Day Tea Party, McCain didn't even have a booth

Hayworth v. McCain: How to Put the Fear of God into the GOP



Hayworth Exceeds $1 Million in Donations in First Six Weeks - raising money faster than Rubio


JD Hayworth on Arizona's sanctuary city bill

McCain crude ad attacking Hayworth backfires; criticized by leading strategists on both sides

JD Hayworth calls on McCain to oppose possible Hillary Clinton appointment to Supreme Court; no response

Hayworth to McCain: Stop Stalling Debates

McCain campaign wastes time with goofy college kid ad attacking JD; ducking requests for substantive debate

Hayworth endorsed by National Association of Police Organizations

The Daily Caller: McCain should run as an Independent

Border-line Delusional: John McCain in his own words

Hundreds Attend Biggest AZ Republican and Conservative Events of the Year: JD Hayworth Keynote, McCain Missing

World Magazine: McCain's reputation for crossing party lines costing him with his base

Hayworth Pledges Obamacare Repeal, McCain Lags Behind

Former Attorney General refuses to apologize for violent remark: "A stake should be driven through Hayworth's heart"

Interview with Pajamas Media: JD drafted the tax cuts that McCain opposed

Jon Stewart's Daily Show documents McCain's flip-flops: Say Anything

New Non-Maverick McCain running for US Senate

Wall Street Journal calls McCain out on new flip-flop claiming he is not a maverick

Hayworth v. McCain analogous to Tea Party v. D.C.

More evidence of McCain flip-flopping on calling himself a maverick

McCain supporters inaccurately attack Maricopa GOP for hosting JD at event

Newsweek: Another McCain flip-flop - now denies he's a maverick

Samuel J. “Joe The Plumber” Wurzelbacher on JD Hayworth

Sarah Palin's Folly: Stumping for John McCain

The Terry Anderson Show features catchy folk song, "McCain's Gotta Go"

Another Tea Party group leaning towards Hayworth: Tea Party Express

Tea Party Express rally in Phoenix attracts thousands; JD Hayworth and Joe the Plumber main speakers with McCain nowhere to be found

Joe the Plumber and JD Hayworth headline Ax the Tax rally in Phoenix; McCain noticeably absent

McCain performing poorly in Fox News poll, "Can McCain save his seat?"

Palin unable to save McCain, only 2500 show up for rally in greater Phoenix area

Palin rally in Tucson full of dissenters and JD Hayworth supporters

Fox News coverage of the Sarah Palin Supporters for JD Hayworth facebook page

NY Daily News: McCain "fighting for his political life" against Hayworth

Hayworth endorses tough AZ immigration bill; McCain stays silent

Sign the Stop McCain Amnesty Petition

JD talks candidly with voters in Sierra Vista about his differences with McCain

Los Angeles Times: McCain facing toughest reelection battle in two decades

Who shares your values? McCain v. Hayworth

Top 10 reasons conservatives dislike McCain

McCain and Keating: 'Till Death Do Us Part'

Top 10 Reasons Conservatives Dislike McCain

McCain supporter leaves despicable comment insulting blue-collar workers

Right Wing News interview with JD Hayworth asks all the tough questions

Protest in Tucson against Sarah Palin campaigning for McCain gaining momentum

Prominent McCain endorser Grover Norquist funneled money from Abramoff

Joe the Plumber on collision course with McCain-Palin

Bad News for McCain campaign: National anti-illegal immigration group now raising money for JD Hayworth

McCain attacks Hayworth for voting for border security bill

McCain's millions buy typically misleading Washington ad

JD Hayworth trounces MSNBC's liberal Rachel Maddow

Tea Partiers produce powerful video for JD Hayworth

Tea Party movement finds McCain its least-liked Republican

New facebook group: John McCain Farewell Tour 2010

Even liberal AZ Republic slams McCain over flip-flopping

McCain claims amnesia then flip-flops on bill he proposed with Democrat

Arizona Vets for JD Hayworth

New Ad asks, "What has McCain done for Arizona?" Nothing

Border Patrol Council endorses JD Hayworth

Hayworth Opposes McCain's Anti-Small Business Legislation

Looks like Glenn Beck is endorsing JD Hayworth over McCain

McCain's false "birther" attacks on Hayworth

Tax Day Tea Party endorses Hayworth

McCain calls open borders opponents Nazis

Video of Mark Levin explaining his endorsement of Hayworth

JD Hayworth: Sole conservative candidate for US Senate

Major endorsement: Gun Owners of America endorses Hayworth

With Hayworth, has McCain met his Waterloo

John McCain's TARP claim cowardly

Los Angeles Times compares Hayworth-McCain race to Rubio-Crist race

Major immigration group endorses Hayworth

McCain blames everyone else except himself for voting for TARP pork bailouts

Hayworth endorsed by Phoenix Law Enforcement Union

Conservative Radio Show Host Rush Limbaugh Breaks Down McCain’s “Rhino-Republican” Tactics Against U.S. Senate Candidate J.D. Hayworth

McCain's endorsements? Hardly

McCain criticizes Hayworth for voting for funding "Snakes in Guam" - yet voted for them himself

Meghan McCain opposing traditional marriage on Twitter

Joe the Plumber goes off on McCain, said he "screwed up my life"

Why JD Hayworth will beat McCain for US Senate

Letter to Sarah Palin from a Maricopa County Republican Officer

Senator Jim DeMint's Senate Conservative Fund backs conservative candidates - but not McCain

McCain refused to sign Grover Norquist's anti-tax pledge

Dick Armey's FreedomWorks clarification: He did not endorse McCain

McCain flip-flops on cap and trade, global warming

Don Goldwater urges support for JD Hayworth

Sheriff Joe Arpaio launches national fundraising appeal for JD Hayworth

Meghan McCain blasts Tea Party movement, Palin on The View

Graph contrasts Hayworth's consistent conservative record with McCain's sporadic spiraling record

Treasury Secretary Paulson calls out McCain's financial crisis bluff in new book

JD Hayworth: Why I will Challenge John McCain

Wall Street Journal: McCain "facing a surprisingly strong primary challenge from the right"

John Kerry McCain? AZ Senator flip-flops on "Don't Ask Don't Tell" Ask him then, Ask him now, Two different answers

Joseph Farah of WorldNetDaily predicts Hayworth will beat McCain for US Senate

Arguments I never expected: Hayworth is no more conservative than McCain

McCain drain on taxpayers: 2007 Amnesty Plan would have cost taxpayers $2.6 Trillion (Heritage Foundation)

McCain approval ratings drop to Keating-Five levels

McCain straight derailed: Taxpayer group ranks Hayworth better on spending

Cindy McCain and gay marriage

JD Hayworth tied with McCain in Senate race poll - and he hasn't even entered the race yet





David Schweikert calls on Harry Mitchell to join him in supporting SB1070

David Schweikert discusses illegal immigration and anchor babies

Jim Ward breaks pledge not to play dirty in AZ CD5 race; runs push-poll

Schweikert finishes quarter with highest cash on hand

Susan Bitter Smith falsely implies that Arpaio has endorsed her - AGAIN!

Join David Schweikert on May 4th for a fun evening of Dessert Deserts with gourmet chef Jan D'Atri, KFYI's Barry Young and Cruella Michella Buffy Lee Larson

David Schweikert is first Congressional candidate in AZ to turn in signature petitions

Arpaio issues statement: Has NOT endorsed Susan Bitter Smith

http://sonoranalliance.com/2010/04/17/why-is-liberal-republican-susan-bitter-smith-running-for-congress-again/

April 15 has been redefined

Best photo of a David Schweikert yard sign wins Starbucks!

Ever wonder why liberal Democrat Congressman Harry Mitchell voted for the Healthcare takeover?

AZ Right to Life PAC endorses David Schweikert

Concerned Women PAC endorses David Schweikert

Who is Chris Salvino for Congress in CD-5?

Obamacare: The Truth About Mitchell's Vote

Harry Mitchell voted for Obamacare

Mitchell's "Yes" Sells Out District for Obama and Pelosi

Harry Mitchell's State of the District Address AKA an Excuse for Doing Nothing

Nancy Pelosi Rewards Harry Mitchell with $15,000

'Pelosi INdex' synchs Mitchell with Pelosi 67%

Polls show David Schweikert would easily beat Harry Mitchell

Harry Mitchell Watch


IC Editor Rachel Alexander on Twitter


Review of “Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years”

 It is true the earth had a slight increase in temperature during the first forty years of the 20th century. But global warming and cooling is cyclical and there has not been any proof that warming is caused by man-made CO2, which lags years behind global warming. Global warming and cooling correlates with sunspots, and the earth naturally regulates itself. 

S. Fred Singer, a climate physicist, and Dennis T. Avery, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, have written the definitive book about global warming. They carefully explain the complexities and facts so the average person can understand. It is true the earth goes through warming phases, but they are cyclical and not man made. Climate change is not a dramatic event but something as regular and dull as grass growing. A close look at the evidence reveals that climate change is probably due to variations in the sun's radiation – sunspots. Global warmings and coolings have occurred regularly about every 1,500 years. The earth's temperature increased in the early 20th century, before most man-made emissions began, but stopped increasing in the latter half of the century when man-made emissions were highest.

Higher levels of CO2 are not responsible for the current warming trend. Satellite and high-altitude weather balloon data confirm that the lower atmosphere is not trapping lots of additional heat due to higher CO2 concentrations. It is earth's surface that is warming, and it is warming more rapidly than the lower atmosphere where the CO2 is accumulating.

Global warming alarmists assume that the increase in CO2 is also due to an increase in water vapor. Water vapor makes up about 60% of the natural greenhouse effect, with CO2 only making up about 20%. Minor gases including ozone, nitrous oxide, and methane make up the remaining 20%. If there was only an increase in CO2, the difference in temperature would be minuscule, so alarmists are forced to assume that water vapor is increasing too. North Dakota state climatologist John Bluemle has stated that doubling CO2 levels would have a miniscule effect on temperature. It is true that warmer air can hold more water vapor. But there is no evidence that the water vapor is remaining in the air – contributing to the greenhouse effect – or whether it is raining down more quickly.

Antarctic ice cores reveal that there is a close correlation between CO2 levels and the earth's temperatures throughout the last three ice ages including global warmings. However, CO2 levels have lagged behind the global warmings by about 800 years, evidence that CO2 is not the causal factor. According to Hulburtus Fischer, an environmental physicist, and his research team from the Scripps Institute of Oceanography, when the ocean warms, it releases CO2, stimulating more plant and tree growth. As the vegetation absorbs the additional CO2, it becomes lusher and bigger in size. This process takes approximately 800 years. So in reality, whenever earth's temperatures have risen, things have improved on earth. A two degrees Celsius change would result in more beneficial conditions than now. "The Romans, Chinese and Medieval Europeans all tell us that the last two warming phases of the 1,500 cycle were prosperous times for humanity…The prosperity of the Medieval Warming is apparent to us today through the beautiful castles and cathedrals of Europe, which date mainly from that period. How could these have been built if the warmings were accompanied by the flooding, epidemics of malaria, massive famine, and constant storms assumed by the gloomy advocates of man-made warming?"

Unlike the computer simulation models environmental alarmists rely upon to create artificial worst-case scenarios, evidence shows that the earth has done a pretty good job regulating its atmospheric temperatures. Studies done by NASA's Goddard Space Center and a NASA-MIT study in 2001 led by atmospheric physicist Richard Lindzen found that the ocean's surface temperature always remains at 28-30 degrees Celsius due to self-regulation. When the temperature rises, more water evaporates into the air, which in turn creates more clouds that send cool, dry downdrafts of air that lower the sea temperature. "When the clouds deposit the increased moisture from that rapid evaporation on polar ice caps and glaciers around the world, the ice caps and glaciers will actually grow unless the local temperatures are warm enough to increase local melting."

The United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is responsible for much of the global warming alarmism. It has been highly criticized by genuine scientific organizations like the International Union for Quanternary Research (INQUA). INQUA is a 75-year old scientific think tank that researches global environmental and climate changes throughout history. INQUA asserts that the IPCC ignored the scientists who produced most of the data and observations on sea level science, substituting computer models which produce "the falsification of scientific observational facts."

The IPCC and its simulated computer models cannot explain why the earth became colder between 1940-1975. The frequently cited landmark 1996 global warming report issued by the IPCC simply omitted the portions contributed by scientists which expressed skepticism about global warming, instead relying principally upon the writings of global alarmist extremists like scientist Ben Santer of the U.S. government's Lawrence Livermore National Library. Sentences like this were deleted from the report by Santer, "None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed [climate] changes to the specific cause of increases in greenhouse gases."

There is plenty of evidence indicating that the earth has not been warming in recent years. The Indian Ocean's level was higher between 1900-1970 than it is today. The Maldives, 1,200 islands which sit in the Indian Ocean, are 20-30 cm lower today than they were in 1970. Lester R. Brown, an agricultural economist who has made wrong predictions about world famines since the 1960s, claims that First World countries are flooding the Pacific Islands due to greenhouse gases from power plants. In reality, since 1993, the island of Tuvalu has seen ocean levels decrease by four inches.

The environmental extremists' simulated computer models can be manipulated to generate any outcome wished. They are even further askew considering they are based on thermometers located in urban areas where there is a concrete jungle effect, increasing temperatures and overstating surface temperature increases by as much as 40 percent. Using the models' conclusions, there should have been a rise of several degrees Celsius at the poles since 1940. In reality, the temperature at both poles has been decreasing. Temperatures at and near the North and South poles are lower than they were in 1930. This is evidence the Greenhouse Theory is not correct, because manmade emissions began dramatically increasing around 1940. In fact, 97% of the Antarctic has been cooling since the mid-1960's. Alarmists point to the 3% that is warming because that is where most of the scientists and thermometers are, and it reinforces their Greenhouse Theory.

If the earth warms, wetlands won't dry up. They will simply move slightly upslope, as they have in years past when the climate warmed. Similarly, animals will change locations and relocate to areas most conducive to their habitat. By the time Arctic regions have warmed enough to shift penguins and polar bears around, they will begin cooling again and the animals will shift back to their previous habitats, without causing any extinction. Glaciers also naturally shift around, which includes both retreating and growing. Physicist and meteorologist professor Johann Oerlemans of Utrecth University in the Netherlands produced a graph in 2001 which showed that the major glaciers of the world started to shrink around 1850, but by 1940 only half of them were still shrinking, and many of them had started to grow again.

The U.N.'s Kyoto Protocol was little more than a scam designed to punish wealthier countries. It did not enforce restrictions upon big developing countries like China and India, which refused to sign it. The only evidence provided for the Protocol was that the temperature of the earth had increased by .6 Celsius over the last century (conveniently omitting that the increases had mostly been during the first forty years of the century), along with simulated computer models that created any conclusions chosen to be programmed.

Global warming extremists like to point to the "Scientists Statement on Global Climatic Disruption" petition from the group Ozone Action as evidence that a majority of scientists believe man made global warming is occurring. It was signed by 2,611 scientists worldwide in 1996 and sent to President Clinton. But according to Citizens for a Sound Economy, only about 10 percent of the signers had degrees in fields related to climate science – about 260 signers total. The signers included landscape architects, psychologists, a traditionally trained Chinese doctor, and a gynecologist.

On the other hand, these extremists ignore the Oregon Petition, which was signed by more than 17,000 scientists and expressed doubt about man-made global warming. More than 2,600 of its signers have climate science credentials. Global warming extremists tried to discredit it by saying a few of the signers were fake names, but there were only a few and were probably planted there by extremists in order to later discredit the petition.

In 2001, the IPCC issued a report that included a "hockey stick" graph showing global warming trends since the year 1000. The graph eliminated the Little Ice Age which occurred during the 17th and 19th centuries, and exaggerated the increase in global warming in the 20th century, making it appear as if this was the highest hike in global warming in the past 1000 years. This graph was discredited when it was pointed out that the earth's warming in the early 15th century greatly exceeded any warming in the 20th century.

There was also a greater warming at the beginning of the last 1000 years. About the time the Vikings discovered Newfoundland, they also discovered "Vinland," so named in 1001 A.S. due to the widespread growth of grape vines. This area has remained too cold to sustain grape vines, even up until today when environmental extremists tell us we are experiencing a dramatic increase in global warming unprecedented in the last 1000 years.

Sallie Baliunus, an astrophysicist with a degree from Harvard, and Willie Soon, also an astrophysicist, from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, looked at 102 studies which analyzed whether the 20th century was the warmest, and found that 78% of them did not. Another four studies found that the earliest part of the 20th century was the warmest – before most man made CO2 emissions.

Global warming alarmists warn that animal species will die out as the earth warms. In reality, not a single species has become extinct due to the .6 percent increase in the earth's temperature over the past 150 years. Most alarmists point to a single species they claim has become extinct due to global warming, the Golden Toad of Costa Rica. In reality, the toad became extinct due to clearing by natives of the lowlands it inhabited. Overall, there are less species becoming extinct today than in the past. The United Nations Environmental Program issued a report in 2002 which found that the world lost only half as many major species during the last 30 years of the 20th century as it did during the last 30 years of the 19th century.

The artificial divide set up by global warming extremists between the underdeveloped countries and First World developed countries falsely portrays industrialized countries as the ones responsible for air pollution. The environmental movement uses an emotional argument to make people feel guilty about its wealth. In reality, "richer people have fewer children, feed themselves with much less land per capita, gradually but largely reduce industrial pollution, generally plant more trees than they cut, do most of the research on environmental preservation, and make most of the investments in actual conservation." Whereas "primitive peoples have never lived in harmony with nature" as the urban legend would have us believe. They have, instead, exploited nature unsustainably because their populations always crept upward to the absolute limits of their resources – and then beyond…today [they] practice slash-and burn farming, cook and heat with wood from trees they don't replant…."

Global warming alarmists never discuss using nuclear power, the only non-CO2 producing energy alternative that would be a cost-effective alternative to today's energy uses. Unfortunately, activist lawsuits have driven up the costs of nuclear regulation. It is possible however; France currently gets about 3/4; of its energy from nuclear reactors. Many of the environmentalists' proposed energy solutions wouldn't work. For example, to convert energy use to rely upon windmills, a landmass the size of South Africa would have to be cleared of all forests in order to install enough windmills. And that wouldn't even cover the cloudy/windless/high-wind days.

There will always be environmental alarmists. In 1975, environmental alarmists warned that the earth was cooling. The National Academy of Scientists issued a report claiming "…a finite possibility that a serious worldwide cooling could befall the Earth within the next 100 years…"

It's better to look at rocks, fossils, and sediment cores as more reliable predictors of climate temperature than simulated computer models. They reveal that there is a correlation between variations in the sun's irradiation and the earth's temperature. When there are larger sunspots, the earth's temperature increases, and visa versa. In addition, some of the increased temperatures may be artificially due to urban heat islands, since the vast majority of higher temperatures have been reported in industrialized areas.

The authors conclude:

Human society should attempt to put binding constraints on human emissions of greenhouse gases only if the advocates of man-made warming can demonstrate three things:

1. That the greenhouse gases are certain to raise global temperatures significantly higher than they rose during previous natural climate warming cycles;
2. That the warming would severely harm human welfare and the ecology;
3. That rational human actions could actually forestall such overheating.

To date, the advocates of man-made warming have not been able to meet any of these minimum requirements. The IPCC's claim to have found the 'human fingerprint' in the Modern Warming was bogus when Ben Santer first altered the science chapter in the IPCC's 1996 report, and it remains bogus today. No one has been able to distinguish natural from man-made warming.

Click here to order the book from Amazon

  • Share/Bookmark

5 comments to Review of “Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years”

You must be logged in to post a comment.







IC Archives