Soya sauce stirs worry and discontentment among public
13:22' 28/05/2007 (GMT+7)

VietNamNet Bridge – The public is outraged that the though HCM City Department of Health discovered soya sauce products with high rates of 3-MCPD carcinogen in 2001 but it didn’t report the violations until recently and thus millions of consumers have used soya sauce products with the carcinogenic substance for nearly six years.

 

According to Tuoi Tre Newspaper, the HCM City health agency found 3-MCPD in 15 samples of soya sauce in November 2001, which were from 23 to 5,644 times over the permitted thresholds. In December 2001, 9 out of 10 samples tested violated safety levels, including one 6,090 times over safety levels.

 

In 2004, the HCM City Institute of Hygiene and Public Health found 33 of 41 sample of soya sauce with high rates of 3-MCPD, including six samples with up to 11,000 to 18,000 times more 3-MPCD than permitted. In 2005, the institute continued to test 137 samples and over 100 samples containing 3-MCPD that were from two to nearly ten thousand times more than the permitted level.

 

In the third quarter of 2005, the HCM City Department of Health sent samples of soya sauce of 30 producers to the institute for testing and products of 20 producers found with 3-MCPD, which were from several to thousands of times more than the safe level. The HCM City Centre for Chromatography Education and Training tested 38 samples in 2005 and discovered 21 samples with 3-MCPD rates higher than the permitted threshold.

 

In 2006, the HCM City Institute of Hygiene and Public Health continued to detect 28 of 135 samples with high rates of 3-MCPD. The HCM City Centre for Experimental Analysis Services, the HCM City Preventive Health Centre and the HCM City Centre for Chromatography Education and Training also found many samples with high contents of 3-MCPD in 2006 as well.

 

All testing results are reported to the HCM City Department of Health and the Health Ministry so in 2005 the Health Ministry issued a decision on the permitted level of 3-MCPD on soya sauce and some other kinds of sauce (less than 1mg/kg).

 

However, till now the list of violators in 2005 and 2007 have recently made public and the remaining cases of violation in the other years are still in secret. And the HCM City Department of Health only released the information after Deputy Prime Minister Nguyen Sinh Hung instructed the Health Ministry to order relevant agencies to timely and accurately provide verification results of food hygiene and safety to the press, including the verification of 3-MCPD.

 

Why didn’t the health sector reveal the information and let consumers use products with carcinogens?

 

At a press conference held on May 25, Deputy Director of the HCM City Department of Health, Le Truong Giang, said the Ministry of Health had not banned the toxin 3-MCPD until March 2005. He also said that several years ago HCM City didn’t have laboratories that could perform standard quality tests on such products, which led to inconsistent testing results and the department feared that if it made public the testing results, soya sauce producers could be affected unfairly.

 

Nguyen The Dung, Director of the HCM City Department of Health, said in an interview with Tuoi Tre Newspaper that the department was afraid that if it announces the information unlawfully, they will be sued. Is this explanation convincible?

 

After the media voiced the covering up of information on soya sauce testing results in HCM City in March 2007, the Health Ministry’s inspection agency requested the HCM City Department of Health to report the testing results and provide the names of violators to the media. But till May 7, the HCM City Department of Health submitted the report of its testing results of 11 soya sauce producing establishments to the Health Ministry.

 

The Ministry of Health has slammed the HCM City Department of Health for making a delayed announcement of the latest results.

 

At another press conference on May 25, the HCM City Health Department’s chief inspector Nguyen Duc An officially announced the results of the department’s inspection of quality of soya sauce in the city in 2007. Accordingly, 10 of 14 brands of soya sauces tested contain high rates of 3-MCPD, including Dong Phuong, Truong Thanh, Nam Phuong, Loi Ky, Lam Thuan, Thai Dai Loi, Thai Chan Chanh, Nosafood and Song Ma.

 

By May 26, only five of ten blacklisted firms reported to the HCM City Department of Health how did they deal with violated batches of products, including Nam Duong, Nosafood, Dong Phuong, Truong Thanh and Tu Huu.

 

Major supermarkets in HCM City and Hanoi have stopped selling carcinogenic soy sauces in the blacklist.

 

However, a source from the Health Ministry said that the number of soya sauce brands with high rates of 3-MCPD is not 10 but 92.

 

The report of the HCM City Institute of Hygiene and Public Health sent to the Food Hygiene and Safety Agency dated May 16, 2007 shows that of 210 samples tested from January 1, 2006 to April 2007, 66 samples exceeding the permitted 3-MCPD level.

 

The report of the Centre for Quality Standard and Measurement Technology No.3 dated May 15, 2007 says that 16 of 37 samples tested in 2006 and 2007 containing high rates of 3-MCPD. And the total number is 92.

 

The HCM City Department of Health said that it will test 3-MCPD of soya sauce products of all violated firms this week and it will withdraw quality certificate of the firms that continue violating the 3-MCPD standards. Within one week, all soya sauce producers must submit to the department the 3-MCPD testing results of their products within the past six months.

 

The Food Hygiene and Safety Agency on May 26 asked the HCM City Department of Health and the Institute for Hygiene and Public Health to perform some measures to ensure food hygiene and safety. Accordingly, any firm that continues to violate the 3-MCPD standard must be closed.

 

(Source: Tuoi Tre, Tien Phong, VietNamNet, Lao dong)

 

Please send us your comments and feedback:

Printer - friendly version Send via e-mail Send your feedback
Read on >>
Vietnam’s largest economic zone on the move (28/05/2007)
Copyright problems in the digital age (27/05/2007)
Software outsourcing, from expectation to reality (25/05/2007)
Mergers and acquisitions started up in Vietnam (24/05/2007)
The Steel (Mill) Age? (23/05/2007)
What is the truth of the “dinosaur” Lilama Land? (22/05/2007)
Vietnam’s advertising in WTO age (22/05/2007)
Vietnam’s mobile phone market to be re-divided? (21/05/2007)
Exam fever in HCMC: Hotels turned into cramming centres (18/05/2007)
Big-name fashions flock to Vietnam (18/05/2007)
Where will the $1bil loan go? (18/05/2007)
Foreigners use roundabout ways to access Vietnam’s financial market (17/05/2007)
Hope blossoming for third local airline (17/05/2007)
Establishing companies: new direction for Vietnamese singers (16/05/2007)
State-owned film studios in review (16/05/2007)