ElliptiGO seatless bike launched
The ElliptiGO, a seatless bike that emulates running, will be launched early in 2010 after several years in development.
Instead of pedals, the ElliptiGO has two platforms on which you stand and press to provide the drive to the crank.
Its originator, Bryan Pate, came up with the idea after losing the ability to run for fitness through hip and knee injuries. He wanted to carry on exercising but found the riding position on a conventional bike uncomfortable and didn’t want to be restricted to gym-style, stationary elliptical trainers.
Specification includes Shimano Alfine 8-speed gearing, aluminium frame and carbon fibre cranks. Claimed weight is 37 pounds (just under 17kg), and it will retail at US$1,999.
It's not just aimed at runners seeking a 'low-impact' alternative though - Pate told BikeRadar that the reaction from cyclists was far more enthusiastic than expected: "We are positioning the ElliptiGO to appeal to general fitness enthusiasts and specifically current or former runners. Our initial conclusions were that hardcore cyclists wouldn't be interested."
"My co-founder (Brent Teal) and I are both former Ironman triathletes, so we've spent thousands of miles in the saddle on both road and tri bikes as well as done quite a bit of mountain biking. We thought that cyclists would treat an ElliptiGO rider like they do a recumbent-rider - either ignore him or make a snide comment. To our surprise, the majority of cyclists have been really receptive to the idea. We've found that the more difficult the ride/event we are on, the more supportive cyclists are. In terms of our customers, so far about half describe themselves as 'general fitness enthusiasts', about a quarter describe themselves as runners and the other quarter as cyclists."
The ElliptiGO has completed several endurance cycling events, including the 'Death Ride', a 120 mile ride that includes more than 15,000 feet of climbing through the Californian Sierras.
Pate stressed what he felt were the benefits of the ElliptiGO after
completing the event: "Other cyclists see the size of the bike and the fact that there is no seat
and they conclude that it must be much more difficult to climb on than their
He also sees widespread commuter / urban appeal for the seatless machine, once they can reduce the retail price, stressing three major advantages over conventional bikes:
- The rider is better able to observe his surroundings because his line of sight is almost never blocked by cars or other objects. As a result, he is more likely to see a potential hazard earlier and therefore have more time to avoid it. This provides such a better feeling of security on urban roads because the rider feels more in control of his surroundings and more empowered. Plus, there are few better feelings than looking down on the driver of a Hummer when pulling up to a stoplight.
- The upright riding position also makes the rider significantly more visible to motorists, cyclists and pedestrians, making it less likely that they will hit him.
- Because of the configuration of the pedaling system and lack of a seat, the ElliptiGO is much better for people wearing non-cycling attire. The lack of a seat means that there is no wet seat to sit on and it means that women can wear skirts or dresses without having them get all bunched up or exposing themselves to the world. We didn't realise that was a problem, but we've had dozens of women mention it. Also, because the chain is out of the way and there is no structural member above the plane of the pedaling motion, there is nothing there to soil suits or jeans.
The concept of a 'jogging bike',
however, isn't new. The Streetstepper
What's your opinion? Are seatless bikes a useful development or a cycling dead end?
You can follow BikeRadar on Twitter at twitter.com/bikeradar.
There are 8 comments on this post
Showing 1 - 8 of 8 comments
Phffff! It's like skipping instead of running.
IMHO: a dead end.
Everyone is looking for the next holy grail in cycling development, but I doubt this is it.
The bicycle is, in terms of development, at the stage a car was in the 50's: they got the basic shape sorted, now it's about comfort, handling, reliability, performance, features.
There is so much more to do on the current bicycle idea, that a new one is, IMHO, a step backwards.
After cycling uphill I NEED!! to sit down!
i think it would make a very exciting sprint finish in race, with that sort of centre of gravity
"The bicycle is, in terms of development, at the stage a car was in the 50's: they got the basic shape sorted, now it's about comfort, handling, reliability, performance, features."
I think they had the basic shape of the bicycle sorted in the '50s, too. And rather earlier than that. Evolutionary improvements have trickled through since then, but anything really interesting (MTBs apart) has remained firmly outside the mainstream.
Conservatism, UCI blocking, or just bad ideas?
It's more comfortable after 6 hours because you don't have a seat.
I'll be honest after 6 hours I think I'd welcome a seat.
A vertical variation of the more common horizontal treadle bicycle drive (which was first used in about 1839) ? According to the product spec. on the website the cruising speed is 24 kph and the sprinting speed is 37 kph. Now I suspect that for this reason this bike will not catch on with a lot of cyclists, terrible speed merchants that most of us are.
you should try it before shooting it down. i tried it out at the berlin marathon and it felt as if i was running like superman. its pretty comfortable because you are not leaning forward and so you don't need a seat (well, ok, after 6 hours anyone would). i'm not sure i would feel comfortable going anywhere but in a cycle lane so its probably only going to be a hit in cycle friendly countries like denmark, holland, etc.