Sen. Bernie Sanders

Sen. Bernie Sanders

Posted: July 23, 2010 11:11 AM

No to Oligarchy

What's Your Reaction:

The American people are hurting. As a result of the greed, recklessness and illegal behavior on Wall Street, millions of Americans have lost their jobs, homes, life savings and their ability to get a higher education. Today, some 22 percent of our children live in poverty, and millions more have become dependent on food stamps for their food.

And while the Great Wall Street Recession has devastated the middle class, the truth is that working families have been experiencing a decline for decades. During the Bush years alone, from 2000-2008, median family income dropped by nearly $2,200 and millions lost their health insurance. Today, because of stagnating wages and higher costs for basic necessities, the average two-wage-earner family has less disposable income than a one-wage-earner family did a generation ago. The average American today is underpaid, overworked and stressed out as to what the future will bring for his or her children. For many, the American dream has become a nightmare.

But, not everybody is hurting. While the middle class disappears and poverty increases the wealthiest people in our country are not only doing extremely well, they are using their wealth and political power to protect and expand their very privileged status at the expense of everyone else. This upper-crust of extremely wealthy families are hell-bent on destroying the democratic vision of a strong middle-class which has made the United States the envy of the world. In its place they are determined to create an oligarchy in which a small number of families control the economic and political life of our country.

The 400 richest families in America, who saw their wealth increase by some $400 billion during the Bush years, have now accumulated $1.27 trillion in wealth. Four hundred families! During the last 15 years, while these enormously rich people became much richer their effective tax rates were slashed almost in half. While the highest paid 400 Americans had an average income of $345 million in 2007, as a result of Bush tax policy they now pay an effective tax rate of 16.6 percent, the lowest on record.

Last year, the top 25 hedge fund managers made a combined $25 billion but because of tax policy their lobbyists helped write, they pay a lower effective tax rate than many teachers, nurses, and police officers. As a result of tax havens in the Cayman Islands, Bermuda and elsewhere, the wealthy and large corporations are evading some $100 billion a year in U.S. taxes. Warren Buffett, one of the richest people on earth, has often commented that he pays a lower effective tax rate than his secretary.

But it's not just wealthy individuals who grotesquely manipulate the system for their benefit. It's the multi-national corporations they own and control. In 2009, Exxon Mobil, the most profitable corporation in history made $19 billion in profits and not only paid no federal income tax -- they actually received a $156 million refund from the government. In 2005, one out of every four large corporations in the United States paid no federal income taxes while earning $1.1 trillion in revenue.

But, perhaps the most outrageous tax break given to multi-millionaires and billionaires happened this January when the estate tax, established in 1916, was repealed for one year as a result of President Bush's 2001 tax legislation. This tax applies only to the wealthiest three-tenths of 1 percent of our population. This is what Teddy Roosevelt, a leading proponent of the estate tax, said in 1910. "The absence of effective state, and, especially, national restraint upon unfair money-getting has tended to create a small class of enormously wealthy and economically powerful men, whose chief object is to hold and increase their power. The prime need is to change the conditions which enable these men to accumulate power which is not for the general welfare that they should hold or exercise.... Therefore, I believe in a ... graduated inheritance tax on big fortunes, properly safeguarded against evasion and increasing rapidly in amount with the size of the estate." And that's what we've had for the last 95 years -- until 2010.

Today, not content with huge tax breaks on their income; not content with massive corporate tax loopholes; not content with trade laws enabling them to outsource the jobs of millions of American workers to low-wage countries and not content with tax havens around the world, the ruling elite and their lobbyists are working feverishly to either eliminate the estate tax or substantially lower it. If they are successful at wiping out the estate tax, as they came close to doing in 2006 with every Republican but two voting to do, it would increase the national debt by over $1 trillion during a 10-year period. At a time when we already have a $13 trillion debt, enormous unmet needs and the highest level of wealth inequality in the industrialized world, it is simply obscene to provide more tax breaks to multi-millionaires and billionaires.

That is why I have introduced the Responsible Estate Tax Act (S.3533). This legislation would raise $318 billion over the next decade by establishing a graduated inheritance tax on estates over $3.5 million retroactive to this year. This bill ensures that the wealthiest 0.3 percent of Americans pays their fair share of estate taxes, while making sure that 99.7 percent of Americans never have to pay a dime when they lose a loved one. It also makes certain that the overwhelming majority of family farmers and small businesses never have to pay an estate tax.

This legislation must be passed because, with a $13 trillion national debt and huge unmet needs, we cannot afford more tax breaks for millionaire and billionaire families. But even more importantly, it must be passed because the United States must not become an oligarchy in which a handful of wealthy and powerful families control the destiny of our nation. Too many people, from the inception of this country, have struggled and died to maintain our democratic vision. We owe it to them and to our children to maintain it.

This piece was first published in The Nation.

 

Follow Sen. Bernie Sanders on Twitter: www.twitter.com/senatorsanders

 
Comments
702
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next ›  Last »   (14 pages total)
Show: 
photo
Josh Bilder   01:19 PM on 7/26/2010
I don't know who these "families" are or who "the rich people" are but not everyone who owns a company and employs people is evil. I own a small 3rd generation family business and If we didn't pay our taxes we'd end up in jail. When did it become a crime to be successful in this country? Last time I checked the government regulated all aspects of our financial system. Bush is just one man..look at Congress. And explain to me again how paying 90% combination inheritance tax/ income tax and putting my company and thousands like it, out of business is beneficial to the United States? Seems to me the United States would want to perpetuate a company that has been paying taxes because when they go out of business there are no more taxes to be paid. All Im saying is you can't just broad stroke something like this..its peoples lives. If my company goes out of business as go the 20 people who work for me. If that happens to a thousand companies of the same size as mine that's 20,000 people. And what about the people who I do business with but don't directly employ? I don't see republican or democrat I see a group of people who rely on Washington think tanks to make their determinations. We're just finger pointing now. In a few years it will be another group we're supposed to hate and blame. Just read 1984. Thank you.
photo
fallouteatinboy   09:40 PM on 7/25/2010
"This bill ensures that the wealthiest 0.3 percent of Americans pays their fair share of estate taxes, while making sure that 99.7 percent of Americans never have to pay a dime when they lose a loved one." and that's fair how? Wouldn't "fair" be everyone paying an equal amount? Wouldn't "fair" be not taxing money, duly earned by a family member (maybe a family member long since deceased), twice?
procrustes13   10:32 PM on 7/25/2010
I'm sure that a couple of hundred dollars in the bank will help make someone a feudal lord and his family a new dynasty lording it over the politicians.
photo
fallouteatinboy   10:49 PM on 7/25/2010
not the point...point is "fair". Sanders and all the others crying "rich pay more...it's not fair that you (or your family) worked hard and made money while others don't have as much as you, so you must pay more!!" why not the fair tax? That would truly be fair.
All this talk of fair is quite oxymoronish...(emphasis on moronish), we will show you just how "fair" the system is...we will tax you at a higher rate because you make more money...ahh, 65% (cumulative fed, state, local, property) should be fair. And to make it even more fair we will GIVE money to someone who doesn't make anything and call it a 'refund'."
Where is the "fairness" in that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProudObamacan   01:23 AM on 7/26/2010
Are you serious, here? Do you understand what a graduated tax system is? And, I guess the Death Tax Fox News Camp has brainwashed you, too.
photo
fallouteatinboy   07:06 AM on 7/26/2010
Yes, I understand our tax system...but to say that a system that on .03% of people pay something is fair is absolutely stupid! Had MSNBC brainwashed you? See sounds dumb when I type it too.
seeksthetruth   02:38 AM on 7/26/2010
The wealthy benefit disproportionately from "The Commons" and should give something back. We were not meant to be an aristocracy.
photo
fallouteatinboy   07:17 AM on 7/26/2010
I would say that we're not an aristocracy, but a system where people can change their "class"...all we have to do is look at the stories that we celebrate. There is nothing stopping me from becoming wealthy, from inventing the next windows operating system, facebook, or even Huffington Post.
I just have a hard time with the idea of working hard so that I can leave my son and his heirs a sizable estate, and it gets taxed at an obnoxious rate and then someone call that "fair".
The wealthy do "give back". Who gives to charities? The middle class give (a lot) but so do the wealthy.
sawbuck   09:39 PM on 7/25/2010
so, some miner, or construction worker, busting his a$$ on a dangerous job 60 hours a week for $30 bucks an hour, should pay income tax, ssi, state taxes etc, but some mega rich do-nothing like paris hilton should be able to sit on her a$$ in luxury as she parties and jet sets around the world, contributing absolutely nothing to society, and pay nothing when she inherits billions.

there's your republican priorities right there.
wmnorton   11:35 PM on 7/25/2010
In Paris Hiltons defense, she only inherited $30 million. Her dad was the one who got the bulk of the money.Of course when he dies, she'll get a lot more. And just for the record they got the money because they conested her grandfathers will which left the bulk of his estae to the Catholic Church.
seeksthetruth   02:40 AM on 7/26/2010
"Only" $30 million? That's plenty to live on without ever having to lift a finger.
photo
WOODSTOCKER51   07:13 AM on 7/26/2010
.....XACTLY..........HOW MANY OF THESE 'WEALTHY"....ARE BORN INTO IT....CREATE NOTHING.AND LIVE THE LIFE OF KINGS AND QUEENS?.........

.RETHUGS LIKE BEING FRIENDS WITH THEM BEST..IT GIVES THEM A SHOT AT BEING ONE OF THEM!
nobody in particular   08:21 PM on 7/25/2010
Bernie Sanders is one of the great Senators of our time.

Here is AZ, we have Kyl and McCain "representing" us. Oh, to have a Bernie Sanders here.
photo
eeasyrider   09:02 PM on 7/25/2010
Right on! Fanned.
wmnorton   11:40 PM on 7/25/2010
Are you contributing to his Democratic opponent and working for his/her campaign. If not, don't complain about how McCain doesn't repesent you. Her in Missouri I'm doing that.
seeksthetruth   02:41 AM on 7/26/2010
My sympathies!
fortressfountain   08:00 PM on 7/25/2010
It is a fake economy. Wall street is being proped up by someone or something. When more people stop buying the bottom will fall out.
Do not buy from big corporations, help the small local and make sure they are what they say they are.
photo
The Muckracker   10:56 PM on 7/25/2010
that's right. promote small businesses.
Teadoff   07:45 PM on 7/25/2010
Senator Sanders, just throw out the entire tax code.
Replace it with: The Fair Tax.
There is a bill in Congress for it.
fairtax.org
photo
fallouteatinboy   10:07 PM on 7/25/2010
Right on!!
wmnorton   11:44 PM on 7/25/2010
The "Fair Tax" is really just another way for the rich to pay less and everyone else to pay more. Same is true for the flat tax and the value added tax.
photo
fallouteatinboy   11:56 PM on 7/25/2010
I'm not rich, and I would pay less.
lippylaroux   02:27 PM on 7/26/2010
All the welfare freeloaders need to pay their fair share too.
photo
sundog58   06:21 PM on 7/25/2010
Bernie Sanders is a National Treasure.

D*mn! I wish I could Vote for the Dude.
photo
fallouteatinboy   10:06 PM on 7/25/2010
right on!
seeksthetruth   02:42 AM on 7/26/2010
He's the best; a tireless advocate for the people! If only we had 49 more like him, we'd be in great shape!
photo
WOODSTOCKER51   07:15 AM on 7/26/2010
BERNIE IS ONE OF THE FEW "STATESMEN" IN OUR GOVERNMENT..........KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK BERNIE!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maattwo   05:25 PM on 7/25/2010
Since I work for a living, my entire salary is taxed before I get the check. If I buy stock in a company and its people make a profit, I get taxed on the dividends. If the value of the company increases because of their work, I pay a lower tax on capital gains for which I did nothing except make an investment. If I am the heir of a person who dies with great wealth, the Republicans would have me pay no tax on money for which I did nothing except be born into a rich family. Most of the value of these large estates is in capital gains and has never been taxed before the change of ownership of the assets. Under the Democratic proposals, I could still become a millionaire through inheritance and still pay no tax, but would have to share the load on a large estate. The tax code given to us by the politicians consistently values wealth over work, and this discrimination is at its most extreme under the Republicans.

Go for it Bernie! Let's give tax preferences to work rather than wealth!
Teadoff   07:51 PM on 7/25/2010
Your beliefs are based on the premise of redistribution. Do not worry about the wealthy, you will be happier.
But since you do worry, look into this: fairtax.org
The wealthy have the money to lobby for a tax code that favors them. Or for places to hide money. Trusts. The fair tax takes that influence away.
procrustes13   10:34 PM on 7/25/2010
Actually, most class envy now is directed towards public sector workers. Most class envy is within ones class... Keeping up with the Joneses. Homer hates Flanders more than he hates Burns.
wmnorton   11:49 PM on 7/25/2010
The estate tax has always had a "Standard Deduction" In 2009 it was $3.5 million for an individual and $7 million for a couple.If you are the heir to an estate that has to pay an inheritance tax you get to get millions with no taxes on it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProudObamacan   05:23 PM on 7/25/2010
As a Fiscally conservative Republican, I cannot find fault in Senator Sander's comments. He is a real, American Treasure. OK, Right Wingers, bring it on - where is he wrong?
photo
Baphemetis   05:47 PM on 7/25/2010
Both fiscal conservatives and the democrats have a common enemy in the neocons - The neocons is the biggest threat the nation has ever seen, check their background yourself, look up what Irving Kristol stood for.
Teadoff   07:53 PM on 7/25/2010
proud, you seem confused.
He should try: fairtax.org
stopping all this bickering on who should pay what.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProudObamacan   08:26 PM on 7/25/2010
Interesting group. Who funded them again? Sounds like a bunch of Scientologist to me...
Have you personally been involved with this group? Are you a multimillionaire? I am always interested when people promote groups that they have not done the due diligence on.
photo
fallouteatinboy   10:02 PM on 7/25/2010
He's wrong because it's not "fair" to tax one and not another. Also Congress is the real "oligarchy". See campaign finance reform titled to favor incumbents, see failure to enact term limits.
procrustes13   10:35 PM on 7/25/2010
Is the distribution of income and wealth fair? Is it right that a hedge fund manager who does nothing of use gets billions and people who look after the sick get very little?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fastronaut   05:12 PM on 7/25/2010
We must not *become* an oligarchy?
photo
tomc444   03:54 PM on 7/25/2010
Thank you Senator Sanders.

You represent not only Vermont, but all of us in the middle class.

You have been one of the few to always point out that the "emporors" have no clothes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haval2   04:11 PM on 7/25/2010
Completely correct. Bernie Sanders is always on the good side of the issues and does what he was elected to do ...for the people. Bernie in the Senate and Anthony Weiner in the House ...voices of truth, justice and what used to be the American way...sorry for the Superman comparison.
Teadoff   07:56 PM on 7/25/2010
uhh, not always what I would call good.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haval2   04:11 PM on 7/25/2010
Fanned and Faved.
oped1961   03:05 PM on 7/25/2010
Obama's part of the problem.
He has yet to tax the wealthy, while he has given them billions in the last year.
He looks foward instead of investigating crime.
Jwpham   03:01 PM on 7/25/2010
Go get 'em Bernie! When did greed, vulgarity and protecting the richest become an admirable American trait? OK, probably with the founding of this courntry. But it is not right and is moving our country to a third world status 22% of our future (children) live in poverty? That is so sad. Some day the middle and lower classes are going to say enough. But that will only happen when they stop voting against their own interest.
photo
Givethemhellharry   03:08 PM on 7/25/2010
With the new voting machines it won't matter. The results will be pre-programed.
Teadoff   07:58 PM on 7/25/2010
I bet 65 percent lived in poverty 120 years ago.
wmnorton   12:01 AM on 7/26/2010
No, 120 years ago 90% of the people lived on family farms which they owned. If you want to see how they lived go visit the Amish. You will find well fed children with smiling faces and almost none in poverty.
IH8REPUBS   02:53 PM on 7/25/2010
Republicans should be taxed double than anyone else! I hate them!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProudObamacan   05:24 PM on 7/25/2010
Why? Do you mean conservatives? I am a Republican and I love Bernie Sanders.
photo
canadian-liberal   02:50 PM on 7/25/2010
Bernie for President 2012.

enough said

Twitter Edition