Oliver's lost army: Buried side by side, the Roundheads who fell victim to a terrible siege

By Chris Brooke
Last updated at 9:22 AM on 18th August 2010

They were crammed together and buried side by side, stripped of all clothing and personal possessions.

Force of circumstance determined this most impersonal and undignified resting place.

For the men buried in mass graves at a ruined York church were the soldiers of Oliver Cromwell's Parliamentary army.

Roundhead soldiers

Skeleton army: The remains found in York, one of 10 mass graves containing Roundhead soldiers

The Roundheads were not killed in combat but probably by infectious disease during the gruelling English Civil War siege of the city.

Oliver Cromwell

Leader: Oliver Cromwell led the Roundhead cavalry

Their comrades went on to defeat King Charles I's Cavaliers at the Battle of Marston Moor in 1644 and turn the tide of the war.

But history forgot the more than 100 souls who probably never made it to the battleground.

Now, more than 350 years later, archaeologists have unearthed the graves and their skeletons to reveal the story of Cromwell's forgotten soldiers.

Routine excavations in 2007 at the site of a medieval church, south of York's historic city walls, led to the uncovering of ten mass graves.

Archaeologists knew from previous discoveries that the 'lost' 11th century church of All Saints in Fishergate had once been there. However, these newlydiscovered graves took archaeologists forward 600 years to a time when the country was split in two by a bloody civil war.

The position of the graves showed they were dug at a time when only the shell of the abandoned church remained. They varied in size, with the smallest containing four skeletons and the largest 18.

Roundheads

Delicate work: An archaeologist examines one of the 350-year-old bodies

Roundheads

No ceremony: The bodies were evidently buried with some haste

The skeletons were arranged neatly in parallel rows, mostly laid on their side or face down in the dirt, and were packed together like sardines in a can. Larger graves had a second row where the heads of one row overlapped the feet of another.

PSALMS BEFORE BATTLE

Roundheads

Cromwell's Parliamentary army in 1644 was a loose collection of regional fighting groups, unified the following year as the New Model Army.

The intention was to enforce strict discipline in return for regular pay of eight pence per day for the infantry and two shillings for the cavalry.

It was the first British army to wear the famous red coat uniform. The infantry had muskets or pikes, the troopers carried a sword and two pistols.

Derided by Royalists as the 'new noddle' army, it became an effective force under the command of Sir Thomas Fairfax, with Cromwell initially in charge of the cavalry

Officers were appointed on merit rather than status. One colonel was a shoemaker.

Cromwell preferred soldiers who were devoted Puritans like himself and sang psalms before battle. Their close-cropped hair led to the term Roundheads.

No buckles, buttons or jewellery were found, indicating they were probably buried naked. In total there were 113 skeletons.

It was not possible to establish the sex of them all, but 87 were male, most between the ages of 35 and 49.

Details of the find are revealed in Current Archaeology magazine in a report by experts Lauren McIntyre and Graham Bruce.

Analysis of the skeletal remains indicated they were not wounded and did not die in battle. But most had conditions, such as spinal joint disease, caused by excessive physical labour.

'The skeletons are likely to represent a military group who all died within a short period,' said the authors.

'Given the probable 17th century date, it is likely that they relate to the Civil War.'

York was a Royalist stronghold and was besieged by a Parliamentary force of 30,000 between April and July 1644.

The siege ended soon after both armies clashed in fields outside York at Marston Moor  -  the largest single battle of the Civil War.

Evidence suggests that the 113 bodies could well have been Cromwell's soldiers who died from disease while laying siege to the city.

Although the Royalist army was well-provided for behind the city walls, the besieging Parliamentary forces suffered severe deprivation, making them susceptible to illness and diseases such as dysentery and typhoid.

The skeletons are being kept for further study at the University of Sheffield's archaeology department.

 

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

I dont know if anyone has noticed but it seems they didnt suffer with tooth decay Third picture down shows an almost perfect set of teeth with no holes,

What diet were they on , fluoride toothpaste didn't exist at that time. So how come no tooth decay?

It makes you wonder ,

Tiffany, London UK, 18/8/2010 11:22

No sugar = minimal tooth decay. Until fairly recently sugar was only for the rich, many graves much older than this have been excavated in which the skeletons have perfect teeth. As a student in the 1980s I worked on a dig where several Saxon graves were opened including one of a man who died somewhere in his late sixties and although his teeth were worn from the rough diet of the time there were no missing teeth and not a spot of decay.

Click to rate     Rating   3

lol and I thought Roundheads came from their helmets - which version is correct?

Click to rate     Rating   2

Anyone who wishes for Cromwell to come back and 'sort things out' needs to research Cromwell's rule. Democracy was abandoned.... freedom of speech vanished.
Philip, Birmingham, 18/8/2010 9:32

Actually neither existed before (Unless you count 1% of the poulation being able to vote for a parliment that met when the king felt like it). This is the 1600~s we're talking about.
- Robert, London, 18/8/2010 16:43

Although i totally agree with you about parliment - democracy and freedom of speach are not mutally exclusive, you can have one without the other, and until the last 100years it was always the case that only the 'right' members of society had the vote.
Freedom of speach and of expression are quite diffrent from the power to influence. In respect to freedom of speach and action Cromwell was a dictatator - remember he made his son his sucessor, he was a king in all but name and any good he did - any good lasting legacy that he has was far outwieghed by his tryanny.

Click to rate     Rating   2

If they died of disease rather than in battle how come a few of them in the top photo seem to have large holes in their skulls or completely smashed skulls?
It would be unusual for archeologists to cause this damage while excavating.

Click to rate     Rating   3

Interesting article.
I have ancestors who were on both sides of this history.
Many dozens of Puritan 9th great grand parents who came to America
in the 1630s.

Also two 9th great grandfathers, John MacBean and John Sinclair who were
16 year old Highland solders fighting for King Charles. They wre captured in
the Batle of Worceser, 1651 and as Cromwell's Prisoners of War were shipped
on the "Sarah & John" to America in 1652.
The clerk took the Mac off of the names of the Scots

They both ended up having descendents as major parts of history including
John Bean's 8th great grandson who was astronaut Alan Bean who was the
4th person to walk on the Moon.

Click to rate     Rating   15

Anyone who wishes for Cromwell to come back and 'sort things out' needs to research Cromwell's rule. Democracy was abandoned.... freedom of speech vanished.
Philip, Birmingham, 18/8/2010 9:32

Actually neither existed before (Unless you count 1% of the poulation being able to vote for a parliment that met when the king felt like it). This is the 1600~s we're talking about.

Click to rate     Rating   34

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Your name and location will appear next to your comment.
You have 1000 characters left.
We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.
For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.
Terms