The scientific, spiritual, historical, and prophetic study of the amazing book named Oahspe.
Although there are groups and organizations associated with Oahspe, there are many who have studied Oahspe for years
and do not belong to any Oahspe based group or organization.
Although The Vortex motion of planets was discussed
in philosophical publications for several hundred years prior to Oahspe (the writings of Sir Isaac Newton and Rene Descartes,
etc..) none of these earlier publications described the size and comet-like shape of the earth's magnetosphere, nor the cause
of the Aurora Borealis, or that the solar vortex and the earth's vortex are connected, nor the configuration of spiral, bared-spiral
and elliptical galaxies throughout the universe. Nor did Newton or Descartes write that Nebulae was the birthplace of stars,
or that the substance of the living can be found in Nebula. None of the publications that preceded Oahspe had knowledge of
the modern Olympic games, and the United Nations and where they would meet. Newborough could not have "copied"
this information from earlier publications.
Interesting to note here is the fact that there is no physical mechanism
in the near-vacuum of outer space to compress gas into a ball. A cloud of hydrogen gas must be compressed to a small enough
size so that gravity can dominate it. For example, our own sun is a stable sphere of gas. But what force could initially press
it into a ball? Scientists have no answer. Experiments indicate that it would be next to impossible for floating gas molecules
out in space to clump together. There is nothing to compress it. How could the stars evolve from floating gasses? Gravity
is not a sufficient mechanism to do this. In outer space, the gas is millions of times more expansive than the critical compressed
size needed for gravity to hold it as a stable star. Because of this, outward gas pressures cause these clouds to keep spreading
outward! They do not pull together, but instead gradually move outward. In spite of all the starry theories of the evolutionists,
the fact remains that gas in outer space always has a density so rarified that it is far less than the emptiest atmospheric
vacuum bottle in any laboratory in the world! How could such rarified hydrogen "push itself" into planets and stars?
How then did the lumps [the galaxies, stars, planets, moons, and asteroids] get there?
Oahspe Book of Cosmology
and Prophecy: Chapter II: 12. But nowhere in etherea is there a solution of corpor sufficient to put itself in motion; nor
sufficient to condense itself; nor to provide the road of its travel.
"Few cosmologists [theorists about the
origin of matter and the universe] today would dispute the view that our expanding universe began with a bang—a big
hot bang—about 18 billion years ago. Paradoxically, no cosmologist could now tell you how the Big Bang ultimately gave
rise to galaxies, stars, and other cosmic lumps.
"As one sky scientist, IBM's Philip E. Seiden, put it, 'The
Standard Big Bang model does not give rise to lumpiness. That model assumes the universe started out as a globally smooth,
homogeneous expanding gas. If you apply the laws of physics to this model, you get a universe that is uniform, a cosmic vastness
of evenly distributed atoms with no organization of any kind . .
"How then did the lumps [the galaxies, stars,
planets, moons, and asteroids] get there? No one can say, at least not yet and perhaps not ever." —*Ben Patrusky,
"Why is the Cosmos Lumpy?" in Science 81, June 1981, p. 96.
I believe Oahspe's "etheic solution in rotary
motion" or vortex is the cause of compressing inter-stellar gas into a ball that creates stars and planets.
John Bell, interviewed by Paul Davies in "The Ghost in the Atom" has suggested that an aether theory might help
resolve the EPR paradox by allowing a reference frame in which signals go faster than light. He suggests Lorentz contraction
is perfectly coherent, not inconsistent with relativity, and could produce an aether theory perfectly consistent with the
Michelson-Morley experiment. Bell suggests the aether was wrongly rejected on purely philosophical grounds: "what is
unobservable does not exist" [p.49]. Einstein found the non-aether theory simpler and more elegant, but Bell suggests
that doesn't rule it out. Besides the arguments based on his interpretation of quantum mechanics, Bell also suggests resurrecting
the aether because it is a useful pedagogical device. That is, many problems are solved more easily by imagining the existence
of an aether.
Quantum mechanics can be used to describe spacetime as being "bitty" at extremely small
scales, fluctuating and generating particle pairs that appear and disappear incredibly quickly. Instead of being "smooth",
the vacuum is described as looking like "quantum foam". It has been suggested that this seething mass of virtual
particles may be the equivalent in modern physics of a particulate aether.
Dark energy is sometimes called quintessence
due to its similarity to the classical aether. Modern physics is full of concepts such as free space, spin foam, Planck particles,
quantum wave state (QWS), zero-point energy, quantum foam, and vacuum energy.
you in search of an understanding of the Universe and life? Would you like to know the origin, purpose, and destiny of mankind?
Then Oahspe is a book for you. Study Oahspe and find out just how amazing it is.
On page 2 of OAHSPE verses 24
and 25 it states clearly that OAHSPE is not a perfect book so it is not surprising that it contains some errors. OAHSPE also
states plainly that the revelations in it are not all new to mortals, so it would not be surprising to find some information
in it from previous sources. The author/messenger of OAHSPE is not important. It is the Message that is important, so anyone
who is or has attacked John Ballou Newbrough is wasting their time and is missing the message.
Ray Palmer said
Oahspe's BOOK OF COSMOGONY might have been written by today's space scientist [space age scientist from 1957 to present].
Much of the science in Oahspe has only recently been "discovered". Newbrough could not have "guessed"
so rightly especially in the face of all the authorities of his day. Today [since 1958] space satellites are discovering "how
it is" out in space, while in 1882 [first written in 1881] OAHSPE contained the same information! As an instance, the
now famous Van Allen radiation belts complete as to nature, shape, and height. The scientific reader is overwelmed by the
science of Oahspe.
Any comments about Oahspe or this website? Email Me
. I look forward to talking to you about Oahspe and this website
OAHSPE contains much information in it that has
proven to be true, example; Oahspe said that the Earth has a invisible vortex around it, and that the vortex was comet shaped.
The vortex was 42,000 miles from the surface of the earth to the rim of the nose with variations, the tail of the vortex streches
somewhat beyond the moon. OAHSPE said that magnetism was one of the manifestations of the vortex.
In 1958 when
the U.S. first sent up space satellites scientist discovered the invisible magnetosphere of the Earth. They discovered that
the magnetosphere was comet shaped and that it was aprox. 40,365 miles from the surface of the earth to the nose which fluctuates.
Scientist also discovered the magnetotail streched well beyond the moon. The magnetosphere was first theorized in 1931, but
OAHSPE had that information 1n 1881(original manuscript before publishing).
An Astronomer in 1997 said "The
OAHSPE author has described the interaction of presumably the solar vortex with planetary or cometary vortices and deduced
correctly what the effect of solar emmanations on a diffuse spherical structure would be." The other interesting thing
about that is not only was the magnetosphere unknown then, but so was the solar magnetic field and the solar wind. So not
only did the OAHSPE author "deduced correctly what the effect of solar emmanations on a diffuse spherical structure would
be", but the author also "deduced" correctly that there was a solar vortex.
There are typographical
errors and omissions in the Oahspe 1882 Edition of Book of Cosmogony and Prophesy Chapter 1, Verses 4 and 5.
typographical errors and omissions of these
verses were corrected in the Oahspe 1891 Edition by Newbrough and read:
||4.The semi-diameter of the moon's vortex is ten
times the moon's diameter, and the semi-diameter of the earth's
vortex is thirty times the earth's diameter, with variations which will be explained
5. The outer rim,
forty-two thousand miles broad, of
the moon's vortex, has a revolution axially with the earth once a month.
Which turn's out to be correct.
30 x 7,921 = 237,630, thus making the earth's vortex
475,260 miles broad.
30 x 2,162 = 21,620. thus making the moon's vortex
43,250 miles broad.
Now some may say, okay well 43,250
miles is close
enough to 42,000 miles, so Oahspe is rounding out the figure.
But consider this:
of Cosmogony and Prophecy, Chapter 2, 26-29
||26. By observing the new moon, it will be seen
that the light portion
thereof describes a larger circle than the dark portion. The bulge of the light side of the moon always points toward the
sun. It is an error to say that light comes from the sun and strikes on the moon, and is then reflected on the earth. As previously
shown, there is no such thing or substance as light; but that which is called light is a manifestation of vortexian power;
also that the c'vortex is comparatively all one light, with a central focus. The reason one side of the moon is dark and one
light, is because it has a positive
and negative manifestation of the c'vortexya; for the moon also manufactures its
27. As the moon advances to the next quarter, the
same discrepancy in the two apparent sizes is manifest;
and this continues until it is full moon. It is an error to say that dark bodies appear smaller, and light bodies larger,
because of absorption, or refraction. The cause is not absorption, or refraction, or reflection, but of
28. Light bodies (so-called) manufacture light of
their own, ever so infinitesimal, which is as an envelope external
to themselves. The eye of the observer sees this
as well as the corporeal body, and consequently it appears larger than
it really is.
29. The same rule applies in regard to the sun and his photosphere, and to comets, and to all bodies that
manifest light. Suitable deduction must be made, in
endeavoring to determine the size of a planet.||
more likely that Oahspe's figure is more
accurate than those we currently have from conventional scientific sources,
since the above mentioned allowance regarding the moon's light has not been taken into account. Making the diameter of the
moon closer to 2,100
OAHSPE BOOK OF COSMOGONY AND PROPHECY CH.I:2,5,8 says "The earth floateth
in the midst of a vortex, the outer extremity of which is somewhat beyond the moon. The outer rim, forty-two thousand miles
broad, of the Earth's vortex, the greater diameter of the vortex is east and west, the lesser diameter is north and south...At
this age of the comet, it showeth nearly the configuration of it's own vortex; it's tail being the m'vortex'ya. If it appear
to the east of the Sun it's tail turneth eastward; if west of the sun, it turneth westward."
From the book
EXPLORING THE UPPER ATMOSPHERE by Richard A. Craig copyright 1968 pages 136-137 says "The magnetosphere, beyond about
30 Earth radii, on the side of the Earth away from the sun,...On the side away form the Sun, there is a much more extended
region called a 'tail', which may reach out well beyond the moon; although this question is not yet settled...our understanding
of the magnetosphere is very limited because only the far-ranging space probes can study it. A vast amount of work remains
to be done."
From the book AURORA BOREALIS THE AMAZING NORTHEREN LIGHTS copyright 1979 by S.I. Akasofu page
69 says "Our understanding of the aurora began to improve dramatically about 10 years ago as a result of a very intensive
study. Scientist view this phenomena in terms of an electrical discharge [As did OAHSPE in 1881] powered by the magnetosphere
generator [The Earth's vortex Oahspe says]. They are now engaged in proving this theory with information gathered by satellites
and rockets - INFORMATION UNOBTAINABLE BEFORE THE SPACE AGE." Page 71 of Akasofu's book says "a cavity, shaped like
a comet is formed around the earth. It is the Earth's invisible magnetic field. The cavity is called the magnetosphere."
On page 72 of Akasofu's book it says "Professor Sydney Chapman, a physicist who, with his colleague, Vincenzo Ferraro,
was the FIRST to THEORIZE the formation of the MAGNETOSPHERE in 1931." OAHSPE BOOK OF COSMOGONY AND PROPHECY II:25 says
"A complete planetary vortex is a globe, or nearly so, and it's manifested light like a complete magnet."
November 16, 2005: Is Earth in a vortex of space-time?
Have a look in Oahspe. It said so in 1881
Comet Kohoutek, like most comets, exhibits a similar kind of
shape as the cavity called the magnetosphere. This cavity is formed around the earth when the solar wind "blows"
in our vicinity.Increase your traffic with TrafficSwarm
alt="Search Engine Submission and Internet Marketing" width="88" height="31" border="0">
In Akasofu's book it says "some of the magnetic field lines of the solar wind are CONNECTED to a bundle
of magnetic field lines of the earth across the boundary of the magnetosphere." OAHSPE BOOK OF COSMOGONY AND PROPHECY
III:2 says "The half of the Earth's vortex (for example) which faceth toward the sun is a concave lens to the earth.
A similar lens, but far larger, is at the sun-centre: The convex faces of the two lenses are toward each other forever. They
are ethereally [invisibly, subatomicly] CONNECTED by solutions of copor needles linear in position." Scientist in 1979
said the magnetic field lines of the solar [sun] wind are CONNECTED to a bundle of magnetic field lines of the Earth across
the magnetosphere. Oahspe in 1881 said the vortexia [magnetic] lens of the Sun is CONNECTED to the vortexian [magnetic] lens
of the earth ethereally [invisibly, subatomicly].