IDGA Logistics - Click Here!

M-ATV: A Win, at Last, for Oshkosh

Related content: Americas - USA, BAE, C4ISR, Contracts - Awards, Design Innovations, Electronics - General, Forces - Air, Forces - Land, Forces - Marines, Forces - Special Ops, General Dynamics, Materials Innovations, New Systems Tech, Other Corporation, Partnerships & Consortia, Policy - Procurement, RFPs, Raytheon, Trucks & Transport

Zebra Enterprise Solutions - Click Here!
Advertisement
Oshkosh M-ATV
Oshkosh M-ATV
(click to view full)

EFP protection kits; Field service; M-ATV maintenance issues? (Aug 13/10)

“The Government plans to acquire an MRAP All-Terrain Vehicle (M-ATV). The M-ATV is a lighter, off-road, and more maneuverable vehicle that incorporates current MRAP level [bullet and mine blast] protection. The M-ATV will require effectiveness in an off-road mission profile. The vehicle will include EFP (Explosively Formed Projectile land mine) and RPG protection (integral or removable kit). The M-ATV will maximize both protection levels and off-road mobility & maneuverability attributes, and must balance the effects of size and weight while attempting to achieve the stated requirements.”
  —US government FedBizOpps, November 2008

Oshkosh Defense’s M-ATV candidate secured a long-denied MRAP win, and the firm continues to remain ahead of production targets. The initial plan expected to spend up to $3.3 billion to order 5,244 M-ATVs for the US Army (2,598), Marine Corps (1,565), Special Operations Command (643), US Air Force (280) and the Navy (65), plus 93 test vehicles. FY 2010 budgets and purchases have pushed this total even higher, and orders now stand at over 8,000…

BCTM Increment 1: FCS Spinout Moves Ahead

Related content: Americas - USA, Boeing, Contracts - Awards, Electronics - General, Forces - Land, IT - General, IT - Networks & Bandwidth, People, R&D - Contracted, Robots, Soldier's Gear, T&C - SAIC, Trucks & Transport, UAVs

BCTM B-Kit on HMMWV
BCTM B-Kit in Hummer
(click to view full)

Boeing touts improvements – but is BTCM-1 really ready yet? (Aug 12/10)

Concerns about cost overruns, vehicle design, and contract structure prompted the Pentagon to cancel the US Army’s Future Combat System (FCS) program in June 2009.

Instead of a single FCS contract, the Pentagon directed the Army to set up a number of separate programs to undertake parts of the FCS program. One of those programs is the Brigade Combat Team Modernization (BCTM) Increment 1. The BCTM Increment 1 capabilities – which include ground robots, UAVs, ground sensors, and vehicle (B-Kit) network integration kits – are planned to be fielded to up to 9 Infantry Brigade Combat Teams beginning in 2011.

Continue Reading… »

Warrior ER/MP: An Enhanced Predator for the Army

Related content: Americas - USA, Budgets, C4ISR, Contracts - Awards, Contracts - Modifications, Delivery & Task Orders, Electronics - General, FOCUS Articles, Forces - Air, Forces - Land, General Atomics, Issues - Political, Lobbying, New Systems Tech, Other Corporation, Policy - Procurement, Transformation, UAVs

IDGA Military Logistics - Click Here!
Advertisement
MQ-1C Hellfires
ER/MP, armed
(click to view full)
DII

$38.5M support contract, as use ramps up. (May 25/10)

In August 2005, “Team Warrior” leader General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. in San Diego, CA won a $214.4 million cost-plus-incentive-fee contract for research, development, test and evaluation (RDT&E) of the Extended Range/ Multi Purpose Unmanned Aerial Vehicle System (ER/MP UAS).

The Sky Warrior ER/MP program is part of the US Army’s reinvestment of dollars from the canceled RAH-66 Comanche helicopter program, and directly supports the Army’s Aviation Modernization Plan. ER/MP could be a $1 billion effort, and recently strengthened its position when a 2007 program restructuring cut the Future Combat Systems Class III UAV competition. Now, in FY 2010, the MQ-1C “Gray Eagle” prepares to move into low-rate production, following tentative resolution of the first big “Key West” battle of the 21st century between the USAF and US Army.

Rapid Fire: 2010-03-29

Related content: ABM, Alliances, Americas - USA, Asia - Central, Britain/U.K., Contracts - Awards, Daily Rapid Fire, Delivery & Task Orders, Europe - France, Europe - Other, Forces - Land, Helicopters & Rotary, Honeywell, IT - General, Issues - International, Middle East - Other, Nuclear Weapons, Oceans - International, Policy - Doctrine, Russia, T&C - SAIC

  • NATO chief urges missile defense system against rogue states, calls on Russia to join. Reuters | Bloomberg | Haaretz
  • UK MoD gives go ahead for full production of the 5th Astute Class nuclear-powered fast attack submarines, early material & equipment buys for #6.
  • The Heritage Foundation calls on Congress for 1 day to walk to work, skip lunch, turn off Blackberries, and debate by candlelight, all to simulate an EMP attack. Like that’s going to happen (without another snowstorm).
  • USMC contract to Israel Military Industries for their Foot-Mobile Assault Bridge. For a better understanding of why that matters in Afghanistan, and the challenges faced by the USMC in theater, see below:

Future Stryker: US Army to Address Mobility, Piecemeal Upgrade Issues

Related content: After-Action Reviews, Americas - USA, Asia - Central, C4ISR, Contracts - Awards, Engineering Vehicles, Forces - Land, General Dynamics, Guns - Artillery & Mortars, Middle East - Other, Tanks & Mechanized

M1126 ICV Mosul Traffic Jam
Much better on pavement
(click to view full)

One complaint heard about the 8×8 wheeled Stryker armored vehicles in Afghanistan was that they had difficulties with the rough, mountainous off-road terrain. The Canadian forces in particular found that their Strykers’ mobility limitations created unacceptable difficulties.

Another complaint about Stryker vehicles is that upgrades designed to address combat needs have been done in a piecemeal fashion. This has resulted in significant inefficiencies, including having to turn off some systems to operate others.

To address Stryker vehicle limitations and overcome the piecemeal approach to vehicle improvements, the US Army TACOM Lifecycle Management Command has undertaken a Stryker modernization program…

Continue Reading… »

US Army Moves Ahead with BCT Facilities Construction in CONUS

Related content: Americas - USA, Bases & Infrastructure, Contracts - Awards, Forces - Land, Other Corporation, Transformation

LAND_SBCT_3rd_Brigade_2nd_Infantry_Division
Fort Lewis’ 3rd Brigade
on the move
(click to view full)

The US Army is planning to spend $589 million on new construction to accommodate the conversion of existing brigade combat teams (BCTs) to modern BCTs at Forts Wainwright, Carson, Bragg, and Lewis.

US Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District is already moving ahead with construction at Fort Lewis in Pierce and Thurston Counties, Washington, awarding a $26.9 milion firm-fixed-price contract to M.A. Mortenson Co. in Minneapolis, MN. The contract was issued under a maximum $450 million multiple award task order contract (MATOC) for company operations facilities in the US Northwest and Southwest (W912HN-08-D-0021).

This is a design/build project for company operations facilities supporting the BCT complex increments 3 and 4 at Fort Lewis…

Continue Reading… »

US Army Stationing Decisions, FY 2008-2013

Related content: Americas - USA, Force Structure, Forces - Land, Official Reports, Policy - Personnel

MIL_US_Army.jpg

Base infrastructure contracts are a quietly substantial portion of defense spending in any country, including the USA. Which is why DID covers them on a semi-regular basis, and notes trends in key areas, even though this coverage are only a fraction of the contracts issued. A December 2007 announcement by the US Army has significant implications for base infrastructure projects at a number of locations, however, as the push to grow the US Army by 74,200 troops and 6 brigade combat teams (BCTs)/ 8 support brigades continues, and so does partial relocation of US troops deployed abroad. A June 2009 announcement cut the number of new BCTs in half to 3, and will affect construction and stationing on 3 important Army bases.

The following lists offer updated breakdowns of the associated relocations and new unit stand-ups, first by timeline, and second by location:

Continue Reading… »

US Launches Army Sustainment Command

Related content: Americas - USA, Corporate Innovations, Force Structure, Forces - Land, Logistics, Power Projection, Support & Maintenance, Support Functions - Other, Testing & Evaluation, Training & Exercises, Transformation

MIL_US_Army_Sustainment_3-collage.jpg

On Sept. 22, 2006, a ceremony marked the launch of U.S. Army Sustainment Command at Rock Island Arsenal, IL, under US Army Materiel Command. It will be commanded by Maj. Gen. Jerome Johnson, who said at the ceremony that “Our mission is clear-cut and crucial: improve Soldier support at the tactical level… rapid research solutions, quicker acquisition and faster delivery to the battlefield…. sustaining, maintaining and accounting for materiel, freeing Soldiers to fight with better equipment to protect them and be more lethal to our enemies.”

ASC will continue the missions of the former Army Field Support Command (AFSC), including Army Prepositioned Stocks management, administration of the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program and the Logistics Assistance Program. Key emerging ASC missions include Reset synchronization (see DID coverage of RESET and related programs), distribution and materiel management services, contingency contracting and training equipment management. Seven deployable Army Field Support Brigades (AFSBs) are assigned to the ASC in strategic locations around the world including Iraq, Kuwait, Korea, and Europe as well as in the U.S. at Forts Bragg, Lewis and Hood. See full story at ARMY.MIL; the US Air Force also launched a dedicated sustainment command recently.

Continue Reading… »

US Army Awards for Top 10 Inventions of 2005

Related content: Americas - USA, Blimps & LTA Craft, Conferences & Events, Design Innovations, ECM, Field Innovations, Forces - Land, Grenades, MPs & Justice, Materials Innovations, Medical, New Systems Tech, Policy - Procurement, Sensors & Guidance, Signals Radio & Wireless, Warfare - Lessons

MIL_US_Army.jpg

Technical innovation is present in all militaries, but America’s combination of do-it-yourself types, large defense budgets, and a gadget-happy national character makes it particularly fertile ground. Now add a global war and its challenges, plus a defense sector with a strong small business component made up of ex-military types. The overall innovation transmission belt may not be as tight or as effective as Israel’s or Singapore’s, but the scale of the US defense establishment more than compensates in terms of the sheer number produced.

Adoption, of course, is another matter. One way to improve it is to raise the profile of sucessful innovations through awards. Along those lines, the US Army recently recognized some special innovators by naming its “Top 10 inventions of 2005,” a list that should be of interest to many militaries around the world.

It includes…

Continue Reading… »

US Army Mulling FY 2008-2013 Program Options

Related content: Americas - USA, Budgets, Force Structure, Forces - Land

The US Army is preparing its FY 2008 – 2013 program objective memorandum (POM), due Aug. 15 to the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Inside Defense reports that the Army is considering a number of possibilities, as the April 2006 fiscal guidance handed down by Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England directed the Army to eliminate $25 billion across the POM including a total of $17 billion from its FY-12 and FY-13 budgets. Cutting the Army by a division, canceling the Future Combat Systems program, and other options are on the table. Inside Defense reports.

Continue Reading… »


Images on Defense Industry Daily

Defense Industry Daily does not own the rights to the images displayed on our site. We use images under "fair use" copyright doctrine, from public sources and private organizations, or use images under Creative Commons/ GNU licenses that make them available to the general public, or with explicit and noted permission. All rights remain with the original image owners.

If you believe that a DID image may violate these conditions, please discuss it with us via an email to editorial@defenseindustrydaily.com

The sizes displayed on DID are the only sizes we have to offer.


Close