Lady Gaga's meat dress angers animal rights groups

Campaigners kick up a stink after Lady Gaga attends MTV Video Music Awards in an outfit made of raw meat

•News: Lady Gaga storms the MTV VMAs
• In pictures: meat couture

Lady Gaga dressed in meat
Lady Gaga collects an award at the MTV Video Music Awards while Cher holds her purse. Photograph: Vince Bucci/Empics

There have been dresses adorned with Kermit the Frog, an outfit of transparent plastic bubbles, and a nude leotard teamed with tweed jacket and NHS specs – but when Lady Gaga took to the stage to accept an award at last night's MTV Video Music Awards in hat, dress and boots apparently made of various cuts of raw meat, it was a touch outré, even for the queen of extreme.

The singer's decision was fiercely criticised by animal rights campaigners. Ingrid Newkirk, the Peta founder, said the outfit – which is thought to have been real meat, although that has not been confirmed – could have a detrimental effect on the artist's record sales.

"In her line of business, Lady Gaga has a hard time being 'over the top', and wearing a dress made from cuts of dead cows is offensive enough to elicit comment, but someone should whisper in her ear that more people are upset by butchery than are impressed by it – and that means a lot of young people will not be buying her records if she keeps it up," she said.

Newkirk speculated that Gaga would have been surrounded by a distinctive perfume. "Meat is the decomposing flesh of an abused animal who didn't want to die, and after being under the TV lights, it would smell like the rotting flesh that it is and likely be crawling with maggots – not too attractive, really," she said.

Perhaps the most damaging criticism that could have been levelled at the provocative artist was the accusation that she is running out of ideas. It is not the first time Gaga has displayed a penchant for meaty attire, having recently posed in a "beef bikini" for the cover of Japan's Men's Vogue magazine.

The dress – cut asymetrically and with a cowl neck, for those with a sartorial bent – drew gasps from the crowds at the VMAs, where the singer claimed half of the available prizes. She won in eight categories, seven for her single Bad Romance. She also took home an award for best collaboration, for her record-breaking duet Telephone, featuring Beyoncé.

An emotional Gaga thanked her "little monsters" and the "gays" who remade the Bad Romance video, which has been watched nearly 278m times on YouTube and Vevo. She also highlighted her commitment to the Servicemembers Legal Defence Network, which campaigns on behalf of servicemen and women affected by the "don't ask, don't tell" policy passed by Congress in 1993, which the SLDN describes as "a law mandating the discharge of openly gay, lesbian, or bisexual service members."

She later confirmed that her new album would be called Born This Way, saying: "The message, the melodies, the direction, the meaning, what it will mean to my fans and what it will mean to me in my own life – it's utter liberation."

Referring to her outfit – and wearing her best poker face – Lady Gaga joked: "I never thought I'd be asking Cher to hold my meat purse."


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order (Total 241 comments)

Post a comment
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor
Showing first 50 comments | Show all comments | Go to latest comment
  • JVMFan

    13 September 2010 8:08PM

    Oh this is going to be good. Vegetarian host of "Issues" on Headline News channel will be covering this story tonight. She will take Lady Gaga to task!! They will be covering this story tonight on the show.

  • bcwh

    13 September 2010 8:09PM

    Why do we find this so distasteful? Probably because it represents needless waste of life; because, at a time when huge populations in some parts of the world are starving, we might feed, raise and kill an animal that gives us no nutritional benefit. The question we should be asking ourselves is whether this is at all different to actually eating it. We don't need it to survive, in the same way Lady Gaga didn't need to wear it. If this should make us shocked at anything, it is our own hypocrisy.

  • rumpetroll

    13 September 2010 8:18PM

    Meat dress is nothing new. Canadian artist Jana Sterbak is known for a sculptural work in the form of a dress sewn from slices of dried meat. The work was made over a decade ago. And even further back, Anne Bean, performance artist and one-time member of seventies glam-pop group The Moodies is reputed to have worn a dress made of raw bacon.

  • Vercoda

    13 September 2010 8:22PM

    What's PETA's beef with this? Just because they were too chicken to steak-out what people might wear, poor lambs. But, don't have a cow, PETA, I'm sure Lady GaGa won't crow about this...

    Wait - that last one didn't make sense. ("None of them did!") Never mind...

  • justsomeone

    13 September 2010 8:27PM

    how do we know the meat was wasted? who can say if it wasn't eaten afterward.

    also, how on earth can anyone be bothered to be bothered about someone using meat for any purpose when, if you go to any supermarket anywhere, you'll find very large amounts of meat. why shouldn't gaga wear it, or do anything else with it for that matter?

    finally, meat and all kinds of other foods get wasted *every day*.

  • bobrian

    13 September 2010 8:36PM

    The only thing I find distasteful in that picture is Cher. What the hell is she wearing ? I think Lady Gaga's is not the first meat purse that she's held.

  • puligny

    13 September 2010 8:45PM

    I know who Cher is - remember her with Sonny and have a Gershwin recording of her with Larry Adler - but what is Lady Gaga? Is she Gaga?

  • randandan

    13 September 2010 8:53PM

    While I find this whole idea for a meat dress just stupid, I weirdly find myself on her side as soon as those idiots at Peta start mouthing off.

  • ButterflyBlu

    13 September 2010 8:58PM

    Ooh look, another pop star trying to be shocking!!

    Why don't you were dead baby foetuses as a hat next time. That will get everyone talking about you. Yawn.

  • claclaclaudius

    13 September 2010 8:59PM

    Try hard much, queen? I think it's more appropriate to say that this dress signifies that she/her constructors have run out of ideas to steal. I don't give a damn about that dead flesh because in someone's mind those maggots gnawing at raw flesh represent some emotional trauma from the third grade (after all, she is really Paul from the Wonder Year). What's offensive is the Class-C music and lyrics that sound like studio session leftovers from some 90210 re-run where Dylan experiments with E for the first time at the Peach Pit After Dark. Close it down Nat!

  • User28

    13 September 2010 9:08PM

    Newkirk speculated that Gaga would have been surrounded by a distinctive perfume. "Meat is the decomposing flesh of an abused animal who didn't want to die, and after being under the TV lights, it would smell like the rotting flesh that it is and likely be crawling with maggots – not too attractive, really," she said.


    This says rather more about Ms Newkirk than it does about Lady Gaga.

  • Fulton

    13 September 2010 9:17PM

    PETA has had plenty of undressed meat on display in its ads over the years.

    Seems a bit hypocritical to start complaining about it now.

  • bluebunker

    13 September 2010 9:20PM

    we might feed, raise and kill an animal that gives us no nutritional benefit.

    Sorry mate but the jury's out on that one, history has proved that people who don't eat meat have shorter life spans.

    That's not to say the gluttony on offer from fast food chains can't be curbed though.

  • bradandest

    13 September 2010 9:28PM

    She is a genius. We are all reading about it. Job done Lady Gaga. I am not really into her music, but you have to hand it to her, what a brilliant business woman.

  • machiajelly

    13 September 2010 9:44PM

    I'm gaga at the thought of all the cereals that would be needed to feed all those cows (and the effect on the ozone layer of the methane that they would produce) if people kept them as pets instead of killing them when they were ready to be eaten...
    Soylent Green!

  • icarus80

    13 September 2010 9:45PM

    Bloody hell, how many Lady gaga articles can get writen here? Why don't you just scrap the music section and rename it gaga or else go out to some gigs and write about musicians who don't rely on stupid publicity stunts to get attention.

  • kennymac825

    13 September 2010 9:53PM

    Come on you think it was meat. Write the article after it has been confirmed.

    I didn't see anyone complaining about Chers' leather boots. But then again, she is more mainsteam and less threatening.

  • Lislorien

    13 September 2010 10:13PM

    Eww Gaga!
    Really?
    This comment has nothing to do with regards of my eating choice but the fact that I think this is just ewww! Wear leather at least then you won't smell so bad but what a shame on the cow having to deal being next to Gaga! If I were a cow I never wear her, she would not be good enough!
    Bloody Pop Stars!

  • AdrianaAmaya

    13 September 2010 10:22PM

    She's another revolting celebrity, who tries to disguise her lack of talent by being 'shocking'. What kind of message does she think she's sending out here? 'I'm sooooo controversial!' perhaps? 'I flaunt my disregard for life - by wearing it!', maybe? Or, 'I haven't made the headlines in a while, Katy Perry is back - must up the shock tactics!'
    Either way, she's setting a terrible example to young influential fans. If indeed she does voice her concern for any causes in the future, I will have zero respect for her, and find it impossible to believe that she could have genuine concern for anything other than her own manufactured public image.
    After all, charity begins at home, and people cannot seriously expect to bring peace and help stop the violence in the world when they are contributing to it in the most immediate sense, by killing and consuming/wearing innocent life.

  • MissBurgess

    13 September 2010 10:25PM

    I think it must be fake otherwise the dress must have stank.

    She was doing a lot of hugging in her meat-dress and I thought about what must have been going through the minds of those about to have a load of light-warmed carcass clinging to them.

  • boscombe

    13 September 2010 10:38PM

    Gaga's alluding to the fact that she is, as a celebrity, here to be devoured (and maybe shat out) by her public and is ultimately disposable. Well that's what my clever friend says anyway.

    Whatever she means by it I think she's fab and dares to be unconventional in a bland pop landscape...AND my friend and I are both vegetarians.

    Now if she were wearing fur I might have a different opinion...

  • truthspeaker

    13 September 2010 10:41PM

    I know PETA has delusions that people agree with them, but I'm surprised the Guardian would go to them first (or second, or third) for comment, and more surprised that they would give them two paragraphs.

    It is possible that the small minority of Gaga fans who are vegetarians would be offended.

  • DusterUK

    13 September 2010 10:43PM

    who tries to disguise her lack of talent by being 'shocking'

    She may or may not be many things, but to say Lady Gaga is talentless as an artist is ignorant at best and inverted snobbery at worst.

  • MrTinks

    13 September 2010 10:44PM

    Come on Guardian do a bit of research or are you just trying to provoke a reaction from Veggie Guardianistas? There's enough trolling on CIF without the need for the original journo doing it.

    The dress was not made from meat - it is fabric.

Showing first 50 comments | Show all comments | Go to latest comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

|

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Latest reviews

  • Dancer in the Dark opera
  • Dancer In the Dark

  • 2 out of 5
  • Copenhagen Opera House
    Poul Ruders's Dancer in the Dark, adapted from Lars von Trier's film, feels like a work in progress, with the emotional set pieces of the film jarring against the sketchy presentation of the rest of the narrative, writes Andrew Clements

More music reviews

Latest news on guardian.co.uk

Last updated less than one minute ago

Guardian Bookshop

This week's bestsellers

  1. 1.  Bob Dylan in America

    by Sean Wilentz £13.99

  2. 2.  Why Mahler

    by Norman Lebrecht £13.49

  3. 3.  Ninth

    by Harvey Sachs £9.74

  4. 4.  Cello Suites

    by Eric Siblin £11.24

  5. 5.  Electric Eden

    by Rob Young £12.99

Sponsored features

Browse all jobs

jobs by Indeed