TRUTHABOUT - ECONOMICS
On May 12, 2006 in Peoria, Illinois, the attorney for the U.S. Department
of Justice (DOJ) begged the court to dismiss all charges against IRS
victim Robert Lawrence in federal District Court. The motion for dismissal
came on the heels of a surprise tactic by Lawrence's defense attorney Oscar
Stilley. The tactic threatened exposure of IRS's on-going efforts to
defraud the public. The move put DOJ attorneys in a state of panic that
left them with only one alternative: beg for dismissal with prejudice.
tactic paid off. Sixty days earlier, the DOJ had indicted Lawrence on three
counts of willful failure to file a 1040 form, and three felony counts
of income tax evasion. The federal Judge dismissed all charges with
prejudice , meaning the DOJ cannot charge Lawrence with those crimes again.
trial was to have started on Monday morning, May 15th. On Wednesday, May 10,
Stilley mailed a set of documents to the DOJ in response to DOJ's discovery
demands. The documents revealed to DOJ for
first time that Lawrence was basing his entire defense on an act of Congress, 44
U.S.C. 3500 - 3520, also known as the "Paperwork Reduction Act" (PRA).
Section 3512 of the Act, titled "Public Protection," it says that no
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with an agency's
collection of information request (such as a 1040 form), if the request does
not display a valid control number assigned by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in accordance with the requirements of the Act, or if the
agency fails to inform the person who is to respond
the collection of information that he is not required to respond to the
collection of information request unless it displays a valid control number.
In Section 3512 Congress went on to authorize that the protection
by Section 3512 may be raised in the form of a complete defense at any
time during an agency's administrative process (such as an IRS Tax Court or
Collection and Due Process Hearing) or during a judicial proceeding (such as
Lawrence's criminal trial).
sum, the PRA requires that all government agencies display valid OMB
control numbers and certain disclosures directly on all information collection
forms that the public is requested to file. Lawrence's sole defense was he
was not required to file an IRS Form 1040 because it displays an invalid
OMB control number. Government officials knew that if the case went to
trial, it would expose the fraudulent, counterfeit 1040. They also must have
known that a trial would expose the ongoing conspiracy between OMB and IRS
to publish 1040 forms each year that those agencies knew were in violation of
the PRA. That would raise the issue that the Form 1040, with its invalid
control number, is being used by the Government to cover up the underlying
constitutional tort -- that is, the enforcement of a direct, unapportioned tax
on the labor of every working man, women and child in America.
information collection form, such as IRS Form 1040, which lacks bona fide
statutory authority or which conflicts with the Constitution, cannot be issued
an OMB control number. If a control number were issued for such a form,
the form would be invalid and of no force and effect. Under the facts and
circumstances of the last 24 years, it is safe to say that IRS Form 1040 is
a fraudulent, counterfeit, bootleg form. Government officials responsible
for this fraud should be investigated and face indictment for willfully making
and sponsoring false instruments. Caught between a rock and a hard place, the
DOJ and IRS decided not to let the Lawrence case proceed because it would
reveal one critical and damning fact: The PRA law protects those that fail to
file IRS bootleg Form 1040. The DOJ knew that it stood a significant chance of
losing the case, and if that happened, the press and others would quickly
spread the word, and leave only fools to ever file a 1040 again. Oscar
Stilley's pleadings and documents made these points quite clear:
IRS Form 1040 violates the federal Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and is
therefore a legally invalid form.
Under the Public Protection clause of the PRA, no person can be penalized for
failing to file a 1040 if the IRS fails to fully comply with the PRA.
The PRA statutes explicitly provide that a PRA challenge is a complete defense
and can be raised in any administrative or judicial proceeding.
The IRS Individual Form 1040 has not and cannot comply with the requirements
of the PRA because no existing statute authorizes the IRS to impose or collect
the federal income tax from individuals.
That lack of bona fide authority makes it impossible for IRS to avoid
violating the PRA.
The People Foundation has researched the facts, law and circumstances
surrounding this case, and has determined that:
public trial would have opened a "Pandora's Box" of legal evidence and
government testimony under oath that would establish the IRS 1040 form as both
fraudulent and counterfeit.
Oscar Stilley's PRA defense "checkmated" the DOJ and IRS
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) appears to have been complicit with
IRS in deceiving the public and in helping perpetuate the 1040 fraud by
promulgating federal regulations that negate the plain language of the PRA
laws passed by Congress and by allowing the IRS to continually skirt the
explicit requirements of those statutes.
Must Read "The Zen of No Tax" in order to fully understand
the importance of this case.
amazing book reveals why taxes cannot possibly supply sustainable
government funding, how they destroy our freedoms and our environment
, how the banks rely on taxes to perpetrate a continuing monopoly in
the creation of money out of thin air, and why taxes are directly
responsible for continuing debt slavery, warfare, death, and destruction
throughout the world.
can we gain support for a tax-free system if we don't understand the
that we have a legal remedy, it's all the more important that we know what the
can we fund government without taxes? The answer lies within "The Zen of No
We Need Taxes?
not only are taxes on labor unconstitutional, but they cannot
be legally enforced. This is going to make waves. BIG WAVES. Now
there is going to be a rush of new legislation in order to shore up the leaking
tax system. The problem is, nearly everyone thinks that govt. is funded
by taxation. And there are not a lot of people who want to give up any
present govt. services. The huge challenge right now (and it is an opportunity
as well as a challenge) is to provide an alternative to taxation and
government borrowing that ensures social stability, security, equality
of opportunity, peace, and a platform for prosperity. Unless we get this
message out there NOW, we are going to see a whole lot more taxes of
various natures, and/or a whole lot more government borrowing from
the Fed. together with the forced surrendering of more of our freedoms
HEAR THIS! Taxes have nothing at all to do with providing
sustainable government services, except in the negative sense. That's
right. All sustainable government funding comes from the creation of
new wealth (savings and investments) in the private sector. What is
happening right now with taxation is rampant robbery, enforced
slavery, and child sacrifice! What else would you call it when we
send our youth to die on foreign shores simply so a financial
oligarchy can profit from war, destruction, debt and mayhem? And those
same persons will not be satisfied until they control every aspect of your
life, your energy, and your productive capabilities. Even if it destroys
the environment and the natural world. Who needs the environment,
Zen of No Tax" holds the information you need to forever
change your beliefs about taxes and government funding.
here to learn who really caused 9-11
here to learn about the Illuminati, NWO, Tax & Banking Conspiracy
here to learn about the New Zealand No-Tax Revolution
There a Fair Tax that Can Replace the Income Tax?
idea of anything like a "fair tax" is conceptually flawed.
Every time one individual, group, or activity is targeted with a tax-related
incentive, there is a corresponding group/etc. outside the target area that
pays the price of that incentive. For any tax to be truly "fair", it must
impact upon every person with the same emotional and causal effect. It's just
not possible. The only "fair tax" is a "no tax".
This may seem outrageous. However, it is both achievable and necessary, if we
are to avoid the calamitous future towards which our civilization is
heading. The answer lies in promoting the necessary surplus (savings and
investment) in the private sector which government can then access with new
interest-free money. This is both simple and mathematically sound. It is
also a principle firmly grounded in long held Social Credit
understanding first put forward by Major C. H. Douglas around 1930.
Effects of Income Taxes
John Linden's "Fair Tax" proposal has
some merit. However, a sales (consumption) tax in the order of 10% in the
absence of income tax would be sufficient to jump start the US economy in
short order; provided that the US Government also nationalize the "US"
(not) Federal Reserve Bank . It is the interest on borrowed money that
continually shackles the US Government and the American people. America
does not "own" its own money supply! Until it does, inflation,
destruction of the environment, social disfunction, and poverty will be a part
of the American experience, and there never will be a truly "fair" tax.
must therefore create its own interest-free money in order to balance the
new savings and investments encouraged by the no-tax incentive. This also
prevents the destabilising deflation that would otherwise lead to
recession, depression, and business failures. How do you run a business if you
pay $1.00 for an apple, and have to sell it for $ .90?
"Fair-Tax/No-Tax" regime will support every element of society. Labor
will be supported by higher real wages, lower costs, lower interest rates
and better employment opportunities. Businesses will benefit from lower
costs, improved profit, bigger opportunities and less accounting expense. The
environment will benefit with a positive wealth creation effect, restoring
the damage already done. Better funded social services and higher real wages
will provide the basis for more and better real parenting. With the
"fair-tax/no-tax", the costs of home and business finance will drop, giving
more persons access to home and business ownership. Rents will fall,
reflecting the lower interest rates on mortgages.
"Fair-Tax/No-Tax" will bridge the gap between the rich and the poor.
Although the rich will no longer be able to capitalise on high interest rates,
many more investment opportunities will appear, simply requiring a more active
personal role in managing investments. Low interest rates will therefore
bridge much of the gap between the rich and the poor without adversely
affecting the wealthy. Need-related crime will largely disappear,
making the world a safer and happier place for all.
about Carl Peterson
Taxes Cause Environmental Destruction?