Based on Neal Adams' Prime Matter Positron-to-Proton Theory

The New Hydrogen Nucleus Structure is a geometric model which demonstrates a count calculation of the layered Prime Matter particles bound by the force of a core positron, to form a proton. As an electron is attracted to the new proton, a new Hydrogen atom is born.

In his elegant theory for emergence of new atomic matter in the universe, Neal Adams states that new protons effectively emerge in the cores of celestial bodies through layered accumulation of 918 Prime Matter particles around a positron, in a process commencing with Pair Production. A Prime Matter particle is the combined electron and positron fields which are theorized to neutralize each other upon converging in the Positronium state, thus rendering themselves undetectable and are assumed to annihilate. Each Prime Matter particle carries an electron weight of two (2), one positron and one electron. The accumulated electron weight of the predicted 918 Prime Matter particles in the model is therefore 1836, same as the electron weight of a proton.

A verifiable calculation of the number of particles in a geometrically sound model is considered crucial to the veracity of Positron-to-Proton Theory.

In science, as in every activity, it is worth the proverbial saying "to take this case with a grain of salt" and to carefully use scientific achievements functionally with our premises of the EE. Afterwards, we probably must ponder that our forum is not in unison for why and how the Earth's radius is enlarged. For example, we all negate the interpretation of convection and subduction as is expressed in the Pangea theory, but these processes and phenomena have their great role in the embryonic phase of core creation, and gradually, with the Growing process and crust thickening, their role in order to circulate the crust failed and, was progressively less important and finally was totally eliminated forever, at least for last Eon.

1. This is not tested. The few here giving lectures are the front line troops. The rest of us are REMF's - rear eschalon . . . staffers. A very good salesmen will not take what he is told from a staffer. He will hear it and pull from it only what fits for his personality, and his audience, and his objective. Any good lecturer who gives the same speech will modify the talk over time, keeping and enhancing what works, and tossing out that which doesn't. The point being is to take only what you want and then test it for effect.

2. The objective is to win. There is always a final score. The objective is not to give a lecture. The objective is to convince the largest number of minds that EE/GE is correct or at least should be seriously studied. Losing at the lecture is not good.

If you want to find out about things that contribute to growth of the Earth, you need to go to the final resting place of material that accumulate from space. These only occur on the abyssal plains of the major oceans far away from the contributions from eroding continents. Eroding continents add additional material to that contributed from space for a couple of hundred mile out from shore. Beyond that only what falls from the sky ends up distributed on the abyssal plains.

Our Moon. With small size and minimal gravity our Moon failed to retain the power to segregate into mantle and core. Instead, as the elements developed and the Moon cooled, a crust developed. It trapped a huge volume of gas, which eventually exploded creating thousands of huge craters over the entire Moon's surface. With further growth/expansion as the dense dark matter evolved into less dense elements, more pressure built up in parts of the Moon, creating thousands of fractures which allowed molten magma to flow out creating the maria and obliterating the older explosion craters beneath the maria. Lingering volcanism persisted until all of the dense matter evolved into elements and there was no energy for growth/expansion remaining after about 2.5 billion years. So our Moon became a dead planet, yet still retains some heat in the subsurface.

In Dec. 1982, I presented my 1980 discovery that the Asian trenches fitted North America, and the Australian trenches fitted South America. They fit perfectly, so, therefore, one MUST conclude that the entire Pacific Ocean basin has been added to Earth's surface area in the last ~200 Ma. But the establishment won't buy it because of their belief Earth's diameter has been the same for ~4.5 billion years and that subduction (UGHH!) keeps it the same size--despite the very rapid increase (~8-16 cm/yr) in the South Pacific seafloor along the East Pacific Rise AND continued expansion of the Atlantic by ~2-4 cm/yr--to say nothing of the seafloor increase in the Southern Ocean surrounding Antarctica that is increasing the entire Antarctic plate and expanding it outward from Earth's center.

I had a chance to chat about EE recently with a senior scientist with one of the world’s major oil companies. He is a Cal Tech physicist now working in the field of petroleum geology. He informed me that all the majors have numerous models of the Earth at “all” times past – although this was later clarified to mean only the period of interest for petroleum exploration---a “few hundred million years”. He immediately mentioned Pangaea, and I responded by pointing out that the continents fit together best on a smaller globe, eliminating by stages the newer ocean floor of both the Atlantic and Pacific.

Hydrogen was super-abundant when the solar-system formed, and it may have been similarly abundant in the original materials from which comets formed. If the Earth accreted from that same reservoir of materials at a rate sufficiently fast to have trapped alot of hydrogen in the zone which became the core, then the Hydrogen may have been absorbed into the abundant metals at pressures and temperatures that would have allowed the diffusion of the Hydrogen as a naked proton. (Remember that Hydrogen IS a metal, and unlike any other element, becomes an entity of Nuclear rather than Atomic dimensions with the loss of only one electron...) Russian theory and experiments suggest that the protons could fill the interstices between atoms and perhaps even some volumes inside the outermost valences of Iron and Nickel atoms.