Drinking water in thousands of homes 'contaminated with harmful levels of methane'

By Daily Mail Reporter

Last updated at 3:33 PM on 10th May 2011

  • Comments (27)
  • Add to My Stories

  • Contamination due to fracking, a process of hydraulic-fracturing drilling used in gas extraction
  • Scientists tested 68 drinking water samples from Pennsylvania and New York

A controversial natural gas production technique is contaminating drinking water in tens of thousands of homes, according to a study.

Scientists collected 68 drinking water samples from near gas drilling sites in Pennsylvania and New York.

They found potentially harmful levels of methane in the water due to its proximity to the process of hydraulic-fracturing, or fracking.

Scroll down for video

Dangerous: Earlier this year, residents in areas where drilling for shale gas is taking place filmed themselves setting fire to their drinking water

Dangerous: Earlier this year, residents in areas where drilling for shale gas is taking place filmed themselves setting fire to their tap water. Scientists have now confirmed potentially harmful levels of methane in drinking water in Pennsylvania and New York

The gas from the tap ignites. It is extracted by drilling down and then horizontally through the ground and then by 'fracking', a process of hydraulic fracturing of the shale using high pressure liquid containing chemicals to release the gas

The gas from the tap ignites. It is extracted by drilling down and then horizontally through the ground and then by 'fracking', a process of hydraulic fracturing of the shale using high pressure liquid containing chemicals to release the gas

The report, released by the National Academy Of Sciences, said: 'In aquifers overlying the Marcellus and Utica shale formations of north-eastern Pennsylvania and upstate New York, we document systematic evidence for methane contamination of drinking water associated with shale gas extraction.'

Fracking involves releasing natural gas trapped in shale formations by blasting a mix of water, sand and chemicals into the rock.

 

It has unlocked reserves that could supply the U.S. for 100 years, although environmentalists say that fracking can contaminate water supplies.

Methane concentrations were detected in 51 of 60 drinking water wells across the region, regardless of gas industry operations, but concentrations were much higher closer to natural-gas wells, the report said.

Levels were 17 times higher on average in shallow wells from active drilling areas than in wells from non-active areas, the report said.

The researchers concluded that 'greater stewardship, data, and possibly regulation are needed to ensure the sustainable future of shale gas extraction and to improve public confidence in its use'.

Outside a shale mine in Pennsylvania. The mining process of fracking involves releasing natural gas trapped in shale formations by blasting a mix of water, sand and chemicals into the rock

Outside a shale mine in Pennsylvania. The mining process of fracking involves releasing natural gas trapped in shale formations by blasting a mix of water, sand and chemicals into the rock

Last week, President Barack Obama asked the U.S. Department Of Energy to form a panel of academic and environmental experts to identify any immediate steps that can be taken to improve the safety and environmental performance of fracking after a series of high-profile natural gas drilling spills.

Fracking has opened up vast new supplies of natural gas that will reduce imports of the fuel, and drillers argue that methane contamination was present in drinking water before drilling began.

Backers also say it could reduce oil imports in the future, if vehicles are converted to run on natural gas.

But residents near drilling wells have complained fracking has polluted ground water supplies enough that they can light their drinking water on fire.

In addition, accidents at wells have led to fires and floods of fracking fluids have reached streams.


 

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

Yes, fracking continues, despite the fact that world's source of fresh water is under serious threat from the practice. A lot of scientists and wealthy foundations think that humanity is the biggest threat to the planet, and they ARE doing something about it. Anyone can find this information, it just takes some effort and a lot of reading and critiquing, which of course means most people won't bother.

Click to rate     Rating   (0)

The grand misnomer is that the shale layers are flat and that the gas persists way below the water table. This is a childish assumption at best. Cut-away any section of the hillside and you can observe two striking realities. First, the layers roll along as freely as carpet, or fabric being lain. Secondly, natural fissures run vertically, most often diagonally, eliminating any possible claims that the well-bore could persist in an isolated chamber. Here in Arkansas, one house blew up after their weir water well began spewing 'natural' gas. Ambient air readings throughout the area show a leap in all sorts of VOC's. Endocrine disorders persist, even for those of us simply involved in chasing down the truth.

Click to rate     Rating   6

About half the water wells in northeastern Illinois have measurable levels of methane in them. This in an area where there has never been any fracking. It doesn't cause any problems. The picture of the shale mine is completely irrelevant; fracking is performed a mile below the surface. The shale mine probably supplies material to make brick. What a put up job!

Click to rate     Rating   (0)

Thank you Dave from Oban for your comments. Obviously the issues shown in the film Gaslands were all fabricated and the people concerned have an overactive imagination... !!! Nothing to worry about then folks move along....

Click to rate     Rating   2

Excuse me, everyone, but methane (CH4) is NOT toxic to humans. It can be an asphyxiant if concentrated in the air you breathe, and of course it is flammable and in some concentrations explosive in air. Still, the fact is, it is NOT a poison and is not toxic. And to Dave, Oban - Thanks for your pragmatic comments.

Click to rate     Rating   2

1. Since fracking was introduced in 1949, over 2 million frack treatments have been pumped without a single documented case of treatments polluting a water aquifer. 2. 90 percent of all gas wells drilled in the United States since 1949 have been fracked. 3. The depth of most shale gas deposits drilled is between 6,000 and 10,000 feet – water aquifers exist at an average depth of 500 feet. 4. Claims of ‘migration’ between the shale gas layers and water aquifers due to fracking or for any other reason, are patently absurd as the gas would have to pass through millions of tons of impermeable rock. If the rock was that porous, neither the water nor the gas would have been there in the first place. The lengths that eco-nutters will go to prevent technological advancement is amazing - yet they'd be the first to complain if we switched off THEIR heating/energy sources.

Click to rate     Rating   (0)

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Your name and location will appear next to your comment.
You have 1000 characters left.
We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.
For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.
Terms