'Too creepy even for Google': Search engine boss warns governments against facial recognition technology

By Daily Mail Reporter

Last updated at 10:02 AM on 20th May 2011

  • Comments (20)
  • Add to My Stories

Concerns: Google boss Eric Schmidt warned against facial recognition

Concerns: Google boss Eric Schmidt warned against facial recognition

The executive chairman of Google has warned governments against facial recognition technology - saying it is 'too creepy' even for the search engine.

Eric Schmidt said that the technology has advanced rapidly in recent years and that it could be rolled out across the internet.

But the controversial technique has angered privacy campaigners who claim that it would be a further erosion of privacy and civil liberties.

Now Schmidt has dispelled any suggestions that internet giant Google would be the first company to employ the system.

But he warned that there were likely to be other organisations who might 'cross the line' and use facial recognition.

Speaking today at Google's Big Tent conference on internet privacy, technology and society, in Hertfordshire, Schmidt said that the accuracy of such technology was 'very concerning'.

Facial recognition would work by scanning in a photograph of somebody's face in order to potentially reveal personal information about them.

Crime fighters argue that it could be used to trace suspects who have been recorded on CCTV. But civil liberties groups say it is an invasion of privacy.

Mr Schmidt said that Google, which has been criticised in the past for gathering information, was 'unlikely' to employ facial recognition programs.

 

Schmidt was responding to a question about coining the phrase 'crossing the creepy line' which he came up with for privacy issues.

But he said 'some company by the way is going to cross that line'. Commentators suggested that Schmidt may have been referring to Facebook.

Controversial: Facial recognition could gather people's personal details

Controversial: Facial recognition could gather people's personal details

The social-networking site was recently embroiled in controversy after it emerged that it paid PR chiefs to start a smear campaign against Google.

Facebook also used facial recognition programs which allow users to 'tag' photos of people that are uploaded to the site.

Mr Schmidt warned lawmakers not to prevent such services as it could hamper creativity and innovation.

'Hopefully the French or any other country won’t pass laws that are so foolish they force Google to not be able to operate in those countries,' he said according to the Telegraph.

'Well-meaning people in government write something which is pretty broad and you have to be careful when you do this kind of regulation.'

Google has been criticised for its Street View service which has photographed hundreds of thousands of residential roads for its online map service.

A number of people were unwittingly captured in compromising positions and many more were upset that their photographs had been published online.

It also emerged last year that while the notorious black cars were driving around they gathered information about people's personal internet connections.

Google apologised for the breach in privacy and said that the data would be deleted.


 

 

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

Street View sees the same thing that everyone else does. If youare out in the open, you can't expect privacy. As far as facial recognition programs? What's the big deal here? If your privacy were secured to begin with, there'd be nothing that anyone could find even if they had the software. There would be no database to tap to make that darn program work. Your privacy was betrayed decades ago by government that responded to high paying corporate special interests... rather than the mere voting, private citizen. Privacy is shot. Freedom is shot. This is and has been 1984 since about 1994. If you missed that, it's your own fault for being so gullible.

Click to rate     Rating   3

I hate to burst your privacy bubble kids, but the government has been using this stuff for a while at large public venues.

Click to rate     Rating   3

Eric Schmidt lost his Google CEO position for his misbehaviors in a Stanford case in which Mr. Schmidt had supported crimes on innocent people. Eric Schmidt was backed up by powers from Germany and the German power almost set up a coup in Stanford during Schmidt's fight with Stanford people. When the authorities in the U.S. ruled against Eric Schmidt on his misbehaviors as google CEO, the power on Eric Schmidt's side had gone to the length to intimidate U.S. authorities with conspiracy and extortion. More recently, Eric Schmidt had betrayed and stabbed them in the back on the other two in 'the triumvirate' who once unconditionally supported Schmidt for his personal political interests.

Click to rate     Rating   (0)

Annie Linux, Sheffield......Is there nothing that the sheeple will not reject? Er, sorry Lin I can't see the relevance of your comment. The article and readers comments seem to demonstrate that while some people reject the technology others are impressed by it but are very suspicious of the probable users i.e. governments and other criminals. I have to say that I have a certain amount of sympathy for that view. Perhaps your comment was meant to demonstrate your command of the numptys word of the moment 'sheeple', sad!.

Click to rate     Rating   3

I have to say i think the technology is great and i would love to see it being used.But i don't think there is a government or a corporation on the planet that i would trust to use the technology properly. - joe, Ireland, 21/5/2011 18:03 ------------------------------------ Well that's the problem, innit? Because that's EXACTLY what they'll do.

Click to rate     Rating   12

' Every action causes reaction ' , Sir Isaac Newton. Will have to wear real-life face masks.

Click to rate     Rating   11

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Your name and location will appear next to your comment.
You have 1000 characters left.
We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.
For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.
Terms