Skip Links

Network World

TechDebate

Desktop virtualization: niche solution, or new desktop standard?

Desktop virtualization promises to simplify management, increase efficiency and improve security, but it doesn’t come cheap and requires a big rethink. Will the latter forever relegate desktop virtualization to a few corners of the enterprise, or will the allure of the former convince corporations it is time to start from scratch?

Moderator

John Dix, Network World Editor in Chief, sets up the debates and recruits the experts. Contact him with thoughts and ideas, jdix@nww.com.

The experts

Brian Duckering, Senior Manager of Endpoint Virtualization Group at Symantec

argues that desktop virtualization captivates IT because it addresses some of their core problems, but until it adds up to a win for users it will continue to be a niche solution.

John Fanelli, Vice President of Enterprise Desktops and Apps at Citrix

says the current desktop standard can’t keep up with the new demands of work and virtualization is the answer.

Virtual desktops are a niche tech

Virtual desktop technology appeals to IT because it promises to address IT problems. But most of those promises come up short and, worse, until the tech provides a positive advance for users, they will reject it. Taken together there are simply too many reasons for most people to avoid virtual desktops for it to be anything but niche for now.

There is no one best solution for everybody today, and IT managers should be encouraged to pick the best model for each user group. Heterogeneity will be with us for a long time.

Desktop virtualization cheat sheet

What is sometimes forgotten is that IT is really all about enabling the end user. For any organization, value is created when a user is able to access computing resources and be productive. Unfortunately, desktop virtualization often forces compromise, with the strongest arguments for virtualizing the desktop coming from the IT community.

IT likes desktop virtualization because it's all about centralizing and standardizing to simplify the management of these systems, which is often in opposition to end-user demand for greater mobility and flexibility. So, infrastructure decisions involving desktop virtualization must be done intelligently, carefully weighing the cost and convenience to IT with end-users' need to be productive anywhere or have dedicated and responsive computing power.

We must recognize that today end users hold a lot more influence over computing than at any time in the past, insisting on flexible work locations, personally owned devices, disconnected use, etc. And in the majority of these cases, there are legitimate business drivers supporting the decisions. It is largely up to IT to figure out how to allow these new models, without compromising security or manageability.

There are certainly environments where virtual desktops are the best solution, even if the user experience is not improved, like when data must be confined to the data center, or in highly regulated industries or even offshore engineering. User productivity and mobility may be compromised, but other factors weigh more heavily. This is a niche where IT requirements actually trump user preference.

One niche where users may actually embrace virtual desktops comes from the increasing popularity of tablets. From a tablet, you can access a virtual desktop while on the move, and run all of your business applications that won't run on the tablet OS, without having to carry a full PC. This case is becoming more popular as RDP for mobile devices continues to improve and become more prevalent. And in fact this use case may eventually move virtual desktops out of the niche category – but not until a host of other obstacles are overcome. These obstacles include:

* With virtual desktops storage costs increase dramatically as several gigabytes are transferred from cheap distributed storage to expensive data center storage for every converted desktop

* License management is challenging in any environment, but virtual desktops make it even harder. Traditional management systems weren't designed for this dynamic environment, and often more licenses are required to ensure compliance.

* Infrastructure costs can be enormous, with storage being only one factor. Add thin client devices, VDI licensing, various servers, plus additional OS licenses in the form of VECD or VDA. This is rarely a break-even financial decision, with CAPEX often outweighing any predicted OPEX savings. Financial arguments will rarely point to this as a solution.

* Maintenance costs are one of the biggest promises of virtual desktops. But reducing operating costs is really only possible at near 100% saturation. At 15% - 25% (the high end of most practical implementations), the existing landscape does not change much and these new costs become additive. Plus, everyone accessing a virtual desktop must do so from a physical one, potentially doubling the number of endpoints to be managed.

How long virtual desktops remain niche will depend on how long it takes to solve these problems and how long it will take to convince users they will be better off. In the meantime, there are other good alternatives, depending on the objective. 

If it is just a matter of centralizing computing, the terminal server approach works well for most, and is far less expensive. For better management of distributed systems, streaming is a mature and proven technology that centralizes management, automates user customization, improves delivery and removal of apps, and reduces helpdesk calls, among other things.

There is no one best solution for everybody today, and IT managers should be encouraged to pick the best model for each user group. Heterogeneity will be with us for a long time.

Symantec is a global leader in security, storage, virtualization and systems management solutions that help consumers and organizations secure and manage their information-driven world. Symantec's software and services protect against more risks at more points, more completely and efficiently, enabling confidence wherever information is used or stored. 

View More

Desktop virtualization benefits drive standardization

Consumerization of IT, business agility and the changing dynamics of work are mainstream requirements for IT and they are not being solved by today's PC management solutions. Desktop virtualization solves these and more requirements and will emerge as the standard for business computing over the next three years.

Desktop virtualization will fundamentally change how we run our businesses. It will change how we think about recruiting new talent. It will change how we think of preparing for a disaster. Overall, it will change how we think of IT in the context of enterprise computing.

As a result, IT organizations will get out of the business of managing hard-coded endpoints and instead, enable users to access desktops, applications and data from any device in any location.

Let me explain. Organizations today are struggling with the data security balancing act: on one hand they need to deploy technologies to help prevent data leakage/loss, while on the other they are trying to enable their workers to work from anywhere using the device of their choice.

How VDI affects the network 

Additionally, initiatives such as business continuity and Windows 7 migrations are top-of-mind, yet building the plan to make these strategies successful is a monstrous task. And then you have the business challenges of growth, both organic and inorganic. IT needs to be able to support both the hiring of the new workforce (with all of their demands) and the ability to rapidly integrate employees from mergers and acquisitions.

We know that every organization is struggling with the challenges of maintaining the traditional PC environment, not to mention using the traditional PC to meet the requirements described. This is not because PCs are inherently bad. It is because the process of managing and securing them has become too complex given the nature of how workers employ the devices.

Users need to be mobile. They need access to new apps faster than IT can certify them. They need to use their home computers to access corporate data when they can't get to the office (either because of a sick child or a tornado). Workers now require and expect new levels of flexibility that the traditional PC environment just can't deliver.

Desktop virtualization will fundamentally change how we run our businesses. It will change how we think about recruiting new talent. It will change how we think of preparing for a disaster. Overall, it will change how we think of IT in the context of enterprise computing.

As examples, desktop virtualization supports:

* Organizational requirements around consumerization. It is a reality that the technology available in the home is better than the technology provided by IT. Because of this, users want to use their devices and their applications to get their work done. Without desktop virtualization, enabling this flexibility is nearly impossible and the security implications are far worse.

* Business agility initiatives. For most organizations, building out business continuity/disaster recovery (BC/DR) plans is a top priority; so is supporting a virtual workforce and enabling business expansion through acquisitions and branch office expansion.

* The changing workforce. Today's emerging workforce has different expectations about IT than previous employees did. They expect to consume IT on their own terms - they expect to get access to their resources when they want them. But, unlike previous generations, if IT doesn't meet these needs, employees will find a way around it.

* Windows 7 migrations, and beyond. Hundreds of millions of dollars and hours will be spent over the next three years migrating from Windows XP and Windows 7, and organizations can't afford to wait. Mainstream support for Windows XP has already ended and extended support will end in April 2014. The question is, will IT have all PCs migrated by then?

Desktop virtualization will become the corporate computing standard by enabling each of these initiatives. It does this by decoupling the desktop from the physical hardware and separating the OS, apps and data to create an on-demand service. This service can be delivered to any user, on any device, anywhere.

This, in itself, enables consumerization and supports that changing workforce. But it also enables IT to easily make changes to desktop virtualization infrastructure, which supports IT in its BC/DR initiatives and makes an OS migration as easy as a few clicks.

As a reflection of the changing market forces, Citrix desktop virtualization solution, XenDesktop, has experienced significant growth in the last two years, with upwards of 6 million seats sold to approximately 10,000 organizations worldwide. Does this spell niche to you?

Citrix Systems is a leading provider of virtual computing solutions that help companies deliver IT as an on-demand service. Founded in 1989, Citrix combines virtualization, networking, and cloud computing technologies into a full portfolio of products that enable virtual workstyles for users and virtual datacenters for IT. More than 230,000 organizations worldwide rely on Citrix to help them build simpler and more cost-effective IT environments.

View More
Welcome, visitor. Register Log in

Apple iPad or Blackberry PlayBook for the enterprise?

The iPad has taken the world by storm, but RIM hopes to parlay its dominant Blackberry enterprise presence into a meaningful tablet advantage with the new PlayBook....

IPv6: jump in, or just put a toe in the water?

Now that we've officially run out of IPv4 Internet address blocks, the calls to migrate to IPv6 are getting louder and more desperate, especially among ISPs who...

Net neutrality, needed or not?

Network neutrality regulation is necessary, proponents say, to ensure that ISPs treat all traffic in a neutral fashion and don't try to enrich themselves by meddling...

Cloud providers will be better at security than you can ever be

Cloud service providers, the theory goes, will be able to provide better security than enterprises can muster because their scale will enable them to hire the best...

View more debates

Symantec missing the boat

Maybe Symantec is pooh-poohing VDI because they have a huge blind spot around it. No worries, they'll just acquire a smaller company that has a clue -- once they get one themselves.

Really?

Symantec has been doing this for several years at a fraction of the cost with integrated physical and virtual management capabilities for all endpoints: http://www.symantec.com/business/endpoint-virtualization-suite

Application flexibility

When moving to a VDI environment end user lose application flexiblity. From my understanding VDI is more for environments where most of the users use the same applications to do their job. Not all enviroments fit the VDI solution since they need that flexibility to add application on the fly either for support purposes or their abiblity to be unique with how they use their current device etc.

It's the Money, Honey!

Has anyone noticed yet that the ones who are really pushing VDI are those who stand to profit from it?

Think about it.....

Are Networks Ready for VDI?

Wow is this a great debate! Like one of the other readers commented, the key to understanding VDI and its adoption is realizing that not all users are created equal. Some groups of users can move to VDI today and actually see a significant improvement in their desktop computing experience. More advanced users and those with a strong physical desktop affinity aren’t going to be a good target for VDI conversion for quite a while yet (I can just imagine trying to pry the Macbook from the fingers of one of our UI designers while dodging bullets from the graphics team on the 2nd floor). The question nobody seems to be asking though is whether or not our networks are ready for VDI. If you haven’t lived through your first VDI boot storm yet then let me tell you – it ain’t all ponies and rainbows out there…

-Josh Stephens, Head Geek, SolarWinds
http://www.solarwinds.com

Sounds very Familar to me

WoW flash back to 1998 or so when Larry told us all that we did not need PC's.... It also sounds a good bit like the debate over Linux on the desktop. Its cheap, its safe, its easy to manage and best of all most end users have no idea how to mess about so its a big win for IT. When that ship sailed folks looked at lower hanging fruit.... Open Office will work for some users and will save us big on license costs.... How well did that work out?

Like all these movements there are use cases where there is a fit. Thin clients, Linux on the desktop and OO work well for some, its just not the next big thing. VDI has a place and will have use cases it will map to well, but IT has to figure out that its the business and end users that give us the requirements] now the other way around.

I've not seen any users comment on Consumeration though

Many good points have already been brought up, but I'll add one additional point for pondering.

VDI possesses the means to make a user experience ubiquitous regardless of their connectivity platform - i.e. tablets, smartphones, and of course the PC's that are more obvious. Licensing for productivity applications simplifies (I'm still not satisfied with the office apps for my Nexus.)

Consider PoS implications for retail too.

VDI has the potential to reshape the user "desktop" experience, but as noted in other commments, the IT community will be cautious until proven successful.

-mike

Differentiating between VDI, HDV, and App Hosting

Hosted Desktops in the internal or external cloud can provide a remote access solution that scales beyond the tradtional Terminal Server / Citrix solution, but it requires an investment in enabling employees to work remotely. Security needs to happen in multiple places.
The consumerization of this approach requires simplicity which translates into the desire to choose which device I want to accomplish my work. Downloading applications onto portable devices is one way (ala Apple, Google Chrome/Android, MS, Blackberry, etc.) and application portability (Citrix, Quest) is another way.
Choice is good, but much of this strategy for companies continues to be confusing, time consuming, and expensive.

Distributed Desktop Virtualisation

VDI holds great potential benefit but does come with quite a few difficulties of its own around infrastructure cost, performance, and loss of flexibility for an environment used to it. However, it is very suitable in certain instances.

VDI isn't the only option though as there are established vendors providing Distributed Desktop Virtualisation where the local processing power is made use of along with local storage but the OS sits on a Type 1 hypervisor to bring the standardisation benefits associated with VDI. Vendors such as Citrix and VMWare are starting to offer this but NxTop http://www.nxtop.co.uk led the way and brings into play the management side of this allowing block-level differencing for build updates, user data backup, data encryption, rapid recovery and hardware independence. On its own or combined with app virtualisation it is a strong alternative to the massive infrastructure requirements of VDI.

When the niche becomes the market

Key to desktop virtualization is use case. It is more than moving traditional PCs/notebooks to virtual images ... its mobile devices (iPads, tablets, smartphones). Orgs are deploying mobile devices, often before strategy is in place. Employees need to access their apps, driving the need for virtual desktops. 3 of 4 respondents to an IDG benchmark (questionnaire) say "It is important to our planning that software platforms and applications increasingly be network- and device-independent." Problem is, most orgs aren't rewriting to the cloud. They need a solution for deploying legacy apps without re-writing. The answer is a virtual desktop, with a presentation app that can adapt the UI to the form factor. Paul Calento

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <strong> <i> <br /> <br> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.