Unbelievable! Court Rules US Taxpayers, Not BP Or Transocean, Are Liable For Gulf Oil Spill Clean Up Costs
Posted by Alexander Higgins - June 18, 2011 at 12:22 pm - Permalink - Source via Alexander Higgins BlogUS District court has dismissed over 100,000 lawsuits brought against BP And Transocean to pay for oil spill clean up costs and environmental damages caused to the Gulf of Mexico from the BP Gulf Oil Spill. The court ruled that injury stopped the moment the well was sealed and the Federal Government, aka The US Taxpayer, is now liable for clean up costs along with any damages caused by deficiencies of the cleanup of the Gulf Of Mexico.
The US District Courts have ruled that since oil is no longer flowing from the Macando Well BP and Transocean are not liable for cleanup costs and damages from the BP Gulf Oil Spill since the “well has already been sealed and the injury has already been committed”.
In the ruling the court goes on note that Federal Government is in charge of the oil spill clean up efforts. Thus any damages related to the cleanup are now the burden of the Federal Government, meaning the US Taxpayer.
The ruling means that Taxpayers are not only liable for the clean up of the BP Gulf Oil Spill but it also means that any damages caused by deficiencies of the clean up in the Gulf is now also the responsibility of the US Taxpayer.
The lawsuits against BP have been bundled into separate packages with all of the lawsuits pertaining to BP’s liability for cleanup costs and environmental damages being dismissed with this ruling.
Activists Post reports :
BP wins a big one in oil spill litigation
Sabrina Canfield
Courthouse News Service
Friday, June 17, 2011Last Update: 9:13 AM PTNEW ORLEANS – Ruling in favor of Transocean and BP, a federal judge on Thursday dismissed third-party environmental claims in a giant pleading bundle in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill litigation, saying the fact that the oil flow has stopped makes those lawsuits irrelevant.
“The injunction at this stage would be useless, as not only is there no ongoing release from the well, but there is also no viable offshore facility from which any release could possibly occur,” U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier wrote. “The Macondo well is dead, and what remains of the Deepwater Horizon vessel is on the ocean floor, where it capsized and sank in 5,000 feet of water.
“Moreover, BP and the agencies comprising the Unified Area Command have been and are cleaning up the Gulf of Mexico. An injury is not redressable by a citizen suit when the injury is already being addressed.”
Judge Barbier is overseeing the massive, consolidated oil spill litigation, which has been divided into “bundles,” based upon the nature of the claims.
In instances where claims in the D1 bundle pertain to how the oil is being cleaned up, Barbier ruled that even if he allowed those claims to go forward, the claimants are not directly involved in the cleanup, so a ruling in their favor would not affect how the cleanup is progressing.
“The D1 defendants do not unilaterally direct the cleanup activities in the Gulf; such activities have been under the control of the National Incident Commander, Federal on-Scene Coordinator, Unified Area Command, and the Coast Guard in cooperation with other federal agencies. Thus, plaintiffs cannot show that an order from this court would actually resolve [to the defendants for] any potential deficiency in the ongoing cleanup,” Barbier wrote.
“In order to prevail on their claims for injunctive relief, plaintiffs must demonstrate an ongoing violation of various statutes on which plaintiffs’ claims for relief is based. Because the Macondo well is dead and is no longer discharging oil, plaintiffs’ only claims are confined to seeking environmental citizen suit injunctive relief of a prospective nature to stop noncompliance in the form of a continued release of oil. Thus, the citizen suit claims brought by the plaintiffs are moot, because no future-orientated injunction can provide any meaningful relief for plaintiffs in terms of stopping discharges that already concluded in mid-July 2010.”
Transocean’s Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, operated by BP, exploded and burned 50 miles off the Louisiana coast on April 20, 2010, killing 11 and setting off the worst oil spill in history. [Hundreds of] Millions of gallons of oil were spilled in the next 87 days.
More than 100,000 people have filed lawsuits seeking damages from the spill.
The lawsuits dismissed on Thursday belonged to the D1 pleading bundle.
D1 bundle claims were filed by third-party organizations that alleged environmental damages under the Clean Water Act; the Endangered Species Act; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act.
This was the first ruling arising from issues addressed during a May 26 hearing on the defendants’ motions to dismiss particular bundles.
Claims with varying types of damages were included in more than one bundle, depending on type of claim.
In dismissing the D1 claims, Barbier said the claims could still be heard if they seek damages for violations other than environmental claims.
“To the extent that plaintiffs assert claims under general maritime law and/or state law, the court will consider those claims separately when it addresses the pending motions to dismiss the B1 bundle master complaint,” Barbier wrote.
During the May 26 hearing, Barbier indicated that he might find the claims asserted in the D1 bundle were moot.
“The fundamental argument is that this is all moot because the well is sealed,” Barbier said.
During the hearing, Ervin Gonzales, of the plaintiff steering committee, said the cleanup has not been adequate and “the environment is suffering.”
Greg Buppert, an attorney for Defenders of Wildlife, told Barbier at the hearing that “the Endangered Species Act is not linked to the well spill; it is linked to the take of species.”
In response, Barbier cited the federal government’s investigation of the spill. Federal attorneys have said that criminal charges will be filed if the investigation turns up evidence of willful negligence by the defendants.
Because of the continuing investigation, the government has tried to keep certain issues undercover. For instance, autopsy results of the hundreds of dead baby dolphins that have washed up along the Gulf Coast have been kept private, and independent scientists have not been allowed to conduct their own autopsies.
“Isn’t that what the federal government is doing?” Barbier asked on May 26. “It sounds like you think they may not do it right.”
Later that day, Barbier told Buppert: “It’s speculative right now. You’re surmising that somebody is going to do something that you don’t like.”
Attorneys did not immediately return calls for comment.
Unbelievable. Shocking. The may need the entire congress to send twitter pics exposing themselves to distract the masses from this one. I guess the Judge believed that all of the oil magically disappeared from the Gulf the moment the well was sealed, just like the Federal Government told us it did. Never mind that fact that scientists reported the Feds confiscated the data of the underwater plumes and told the scientists to shut up about their research. Never mind the feds tried covering up the first plume that was discovered. You do remember that massive 22 mile long plume larger than the size of Manhattan don’t you?
And even after the Feds said they couldn’t find the oil the massive slick in the Gulf could still be seen from space. Then there were the fisherman that the Feds told to shut about the discovery of oil in Gulf seafood. Yep the damage, that all ended when the well was sealed, if what even sealed. Regardless of that debate that fact still remains that massive underwater lakes of oil are still in the Gulf and will remain there for years.
But none of that matters to our fascist government. Widespread sightings of oil washing up all over the Gulf continue to this very day. In fact NOAA has just recently confirmed a widespread “unexplained sickness” and lesions in sea life all across the Gulf that the Feds are desperately trying to keep a lid on.
That wouldn’t have anything to do with the almost 2 million gallons of the neurotoxin pesticide Corexit that was sprayed into the Gulf to limit BP’s cleanup costs for the Gulf.
Oh, the irony. Would BP have sprayed all of those toxins into the Gulf if they knew that the Federal courts would just let them off the hook for the clean up costs? The Feds would have never of needed to lie about the lethality of Corexit because the public couldn’t handle the truth.
The Irony. The Fascism. The Greed. The Corruption.
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] hours ago by JSIN33commentsharecancelloading…21•••Court Rules US Taxpayers, Not BP Or Transocean, Are Liable For Gulf Oil Spill Clean Up Costs (blog.alexanderhiggins.com)submitted 15 [...]
Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 12 0
Great! So if I start a fire in your house, as soon as I put it out I’m not liable. We are going down a slippery slope, at a fast pace.
Like or Dislike: 2 0
[...] Court Rules US Taxpayers, Not BP Or Transocean, Are Liable For Gulf Oil Spill Clean Up Costs June 18, 2011 [...]
Like or Dislike: 2 0
[...] Court Rules US Taxpayers, Not BP Or Transocean, Are Liable For Gulf Oil Spill Clean Up Costs. June 18th, 2011 | Category: Uncategorized | Leave a comment | [...]
Like or Dislike: 4 1
MARITIME LAW,,,called a conspiracy theory only, rears its ugly head here
(BRITISH COMMONWEALTH with freemasons in most positions of power and in every town in this country. Google Albert Pike’s 3 World Wars. They plan to murder a huge section of the planet to institute a world slavery system. It’s already too late to defeat them, even if we started right now. The good news is they are utter evil and will destroy themselves. Maybe there will still be an Earth left after that, but we need to start fighting them NOW if there’s going to be a future at all.)
Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 5 1
PS, you are one of the best journalists on the internet and one of my idols.
Freemasonry’s evil and the evil of the British empire is well-documented in history books just not the ones in THEIR schools
Like or Dislike: 3 0
[...] You've been Stumbled! [...]
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] ronron | June 19, 2011 at 2:43 am | nice http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/06/18/unbelievable-courts-rule-taxpayers-bp-transocean-liable-... [...]
Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 9 0
There should be an investigation into the judge to see how much kick backs and bribes they received for selling out US citizens and public health. Actually the puppet judge should be tarred and feathered and citizenship stripped from them. I can’t wait until enough Americans get tired of being Arse rapped by these corporate elite, it will be nice to see these people locked up or exiled from the solar system.
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] Harper’s Prisons and the NAU. Although this is American, one see which way society is headed; BP Taxpayers on hook for clean-up costs; 5:56 clip E.coli engineered?; Plans ’9/11 didn’t [...]
Like or Dislike: 1 0
Get ready to hand your kids over to Benny the Rat and Prince Chaaallz and the Bush family for special education.
Now aren’t you glad you have so many bloody stupid neighbors?
It is not in the bribes. It is the BIG PICTURE OF THE DESTRUCTION OF THE U.S. now that most of the public does not know it exists beyond words on TV.
This is the retuirn to imperial rule by the genetic slag of Europe. I say NO. Send in the Marines.
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] [...]
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] you're on the real Facebook web site. Also be sure to only download software from sites you trust.http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/06/18/unbelievable-courts-rule-taxpayers-bp-transocean-liable-…ContinueGo back to [...]
Like or Dislike: 0 0
Its time. Everyone who should know what this means knows what it means. Enough is enough.
Like or Dislike: 1 0
what a bunch of total cunts.
Like or Dislike: 0 0
You ask, “What do you think?” How can I think when my mind is blown by “WTF was HE thinking mindless, soulless Judge”? I can hardly handle reading this shit, let alone accepting it is true. Speechless. Peace & BLESSINGS to you, ALEXANDER. GOoD reporting for Mother Nature. Mahalo P.S. How do you feel about Fulvic Acid???
Like or Dislike: 1 0
There is a simple answer to this:
No more BP fuel in our vehicles.
I don’t usually feel the need to boycott since we are fairly austere to begin with, and, getting more so every day. But, BP is a clear cut issue to me. Can’t pay for the cleanup? Well, we can’t pay you.
My deepest apologies to the small fuel station owners that provide BP fuel. I’ve read your plight, but, cannot do BP fuel, anymore.
Like or Dislike: 1 0
[...] Court Rules US Taxpayers, Not BP Or Transocean, Are Liable For Gulf Oil Spill Clean Up Costs http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/06/18/unbelievable-courts-rule-t... 999AuroraBorealis: This will p**s you off! Unbelievable! Court Rules US Taxpayers, [...]
Like or Dislike: 4 2
The article completely misunderstood the court’s ruling. Dismissing injunctive claims does not mean that there is no liability. It merely means that it is too late to order that something stop being done, after it has already stopped. There was nothing in the ruling about dismissing claims for money damages.
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] [...]
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] [...]
Like or Dislike: 0 0
Unbelievable, this is just another example of big multinationals corps working our system, probably buying off judges and getting away to murder. When there’s a stack of money working against you, be ready to get hit by an avalanche. That judge should be FIRED. He does not work for the interest of the people or for justice. This whole thing is worst than the OJ trial and as bad as W’s presidency. Just as long as you can work the system and have a pile of money, you can murder, rape and pillege; the new moto of the good old USA!
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] Court Rules US Taxpayers, Not BP Or Transocean, Are Liable For Gulf Oil Spill Clean Up Costs Reposted from: http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/06/18/unbelievable-courts-rule-taxpayers-bp-transocean-liable-... [...]
Like or Dislike: 1 0
Devil’s advocate:
Didn’t BP pay the US Government penalties for the disaster? What is US Government going to do with that money? Invade some other country in the world?
Like or Dislike: 0 0
This is so fµçking wrong in so many fµçking ways…
Like or Dislike: 0 0
It is high time to start blacklisting crooked judges and printing wanted posters. The same for abusive and corruptbureaucrats,politicians and law enforcement.
Let them know, the people will not forget.
werner bock
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] Intel Hub By Alexander Higgins – Contributing Writer June 19th, [...]
Like or Dislike: 0 0
The source article does not say that 100,000 lawsuits were dismissed. There are over 100,000 lawsuits, total. Those 100,000 lawsuits were divided into ‘pleading bundles.’ I’ve so far seen mention of four different pleading bundles. The judge dismissed one of them.
Before you type out your bold-faced summary above your source articles, try reading the source article. Don’t cherry-pick sentences and string them together to fabricate inflammatory stories. Your summaries would fail an elementary school reading comprehension test.
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] Comments Tweet The Intel Hub By Alexander Higgins – Contributing Writer June 19th, [...]
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/06/18/unbelievable-courts-rule-taxpayers-bp-transocean-liable-... [...]
Like or Dislike: 0 0
HAHAHA haha ahhh you Americans are priceless.
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] isn't retarded enough to sell firearms to its civilian citizens like some other countries do. Nor will you ever see something as hilarious as this happen in Norway, because this shit only happen… I'm pretty sure there's a reason why the average Norwegian speaks over five languages fluently, [...]
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] hier het bewijs van de ANTICHRIST, BP-TRANSOCEAN-OBAMA eb de rest uit de HEL. straks met FUKUSHIMA ook hetzelfde. NA afsluiten van d e4 reactors, wat ze NIET zal lukken, moeten de BURGERS de ROTZOOI OPKNAPPEN en WEGWERKEN. de RECHTBANK heeft dat voor BP al besloten en een andere rechtbank zal dat voor TEPCO ook besluiten. waarschijnlijk vanwege het feit dat WIJ de afnemers zijn van die produkten. hier gaat de DUIVEL dus meteen met de LEUGEN aan d ehaal en verkoopt die als WAARHEID. dit is het ABSOLUTE BEWIJS dat wij er ALLEMAAL LANGZAAM AANGAAN, en dus het absolute bewijs, dat dat ook de BEDOELING IS. zie de guide stones. http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/06/18/unbelievable-courts-rule-taxpayers-bp-transocean-liable-... [...]
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] clean up costs along with any damages caused by deficiencies of the cleanup of the Gulf Of Mexico.http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/06/18/unbelievable-courts-rule-taxpayers-bp-transocean-liable-... Posted by The Birmingham Free Press at 4:26 PM if [...]
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] am Court Rules US Taxpayers, Not BP Or Transocean, Are Liable For Gulf Oil Spill Clean Up Costshttp://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/0 … sts-29071/God Bless the American tax payer.. Mind over matter. I don't mind cause you don't [...]
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] Bachmann came in third with 191 votes and Herman Cain finished behind her, taking 104 votes. Unbelievable! Court Rules US Taxpayers, Not BP Or Transocean, Are Liable For Gulf Oil Spill Clean U… US District court has dismissed over 100,000 lawsuits brought against BP And Transocean to pay for [...]
Like or Dislike: 0 0
[...] Court Rules US Taxpayers, Not BP Or Transocean, Are Liable For Gulf Oil Spill Clean Up Costs. [...]
Like or Dislike: 0 0
HOW is that GOP CON~servative Corporate Activism smelling to you in our Judicial System, America, bet you want that-Corporate Rule, get ready for PLUTARCHY-The HO’s are in place and the pimps are paying up!
I wonder HOW conservatives defend their entire Modern history as, DEFICIT CREATORS, when the FAKE CONS~servatives hate DEFICITS and LOVE balanced budgets-but they don’t have any balanced budgets Nationally or in my State Of Texas? Not ONE! HUM..oh that’s RIGHT,Party of “Door-Knockers”, like on Labyrinth.