Navigate the JREF Website Join Now

August 17, 2007

 "...the chief end I propose to myself in all my labours is to vex the world rather than divert it." - Jonathan Swift


  1. Hoagland News Flash
  2. Pecking at the Ankles of a Giant
  3. Clarins Bombed
  4. An Encounter
  5. Terminally Gullible
  6. Suggested Correction
  7. Center For Inquiry Annual Awards
  8. The Latest Popoff Puffery
  9. That Damn Cat
  10. That Weird Korean Obsession
  11. More Moon Madness
  12. More South African Woo-Woo
  13. Transposition
  14. Fellow Artists
  15. In the Woo-Woo Way
  16. Geller and Angel Teamed
  17. Challenge Delayed
  18. and In Closing…
An Evening with DawkinsThe Amaz!ng Meeting 5 DVD Set with Bonus Critical Thinking Workshop
and Sunday Papers

Video documenting the fifth Amaz!ng meeting in Las Vegas. Speakers include: Michael Shermer, Penn and Teller, The MythBusters, John Rennie, Scott Dikkers, Phil Plait, Matt Stone and Trey Parker, Neil Gershenfeld, Hal Bidlack, Richard Wiseman, Peter Sagal, Christopher Hitchens, Nick Gillespie and Ron Bailey, Eugenie Scott, Lori Lipman-Brown, Jamy Ian Swiss, James Randi, and many more! Includes all Sunday papers! 6 DVDs total spanning over 17 hours.

$69.00 (International Price: $76.00)*
US Orders  |  International Orders  |  View Cart
International shipping requires a phone number. Please enter in "comments" field during check out.


Want more? View past issues of Swift and Randi’s opinions. Click here.
 Help support the JREF through grants, donations, gifts and memberships.
Click for more.

Be reminded of Swift updates and other JREF news via The Randigram

To be added to the list:
send blank e-mail to

To be removed from the list:
send blank e-mail to

Or try our RSS feed! RSS


TAM 5.5 Registration NOW OPEN More info CLICK HERE


From an anonymous reader comes this information:

Richard Hoagland, he who found a human face on Mars (see and do a search for “Hoagland”) now says he's talked to Moon walkers Buzz Aldrin and Edgar Mitchell, and claims they say that they can't remember certain parts of their missions because NASA has erased parts of their memories so they can't tell anybody what they saw up there. Apparently, there's the remains of an ancient civilization up there that nobody is supposed to know about.

Wonder how Hoagland found out…?

Not sure if it was the same guy or not, but a week or two ago, one of the guests [on the radio] said the reason it would take so long to get back to the Moon is because of the ruins up there. If NASA spends enough money pretending to try to get there, interest will fade and they won't have to actually go and then hide � again � what's really up there.

I guess the bright side is that he did acknowledge that they have been there before.

But if former astronaut Ed Mitchell said it, how could we doubt…? He�s a paragon of rationality. See for the evidence...


A man named Neil Spencer � the official astrologer for the Observer in the UK, so not an intellect with whom to trifle! � has written an hilariously poor article, critical of the new Richard Dawkins two-part TV series, which debuted this last Monday and concludes on the 20th. Any in-depth review of the Spencer article would take more time than I can afford, but I'll touch a few of the highlights. In summary, it's the usual display of ignorance on the part of a confirmed woo-woo artist. It�s to be seen at,,2146775,00.html.

Spencer takes great delight in pointing out that both Galileo and Robert Boyle showed interest in astrology, thus simultaneously claiming to belong to their fraternity and scolding Dawkins for implying that these giants of science saw a Truth to which he remains impervious; similarly, Spencer takes refuge in citing Isaac Newton�s pursuit of alchemy � ignoring the fact that one of the greatest minds of our species existed in a period before chemical transmutation of elements was known to be beyond reach.

The author exults over his own ability to experience wonder "when contemplating nature or the night sky." The implication, of course, is that no one with a scientific point of view can have such delight. No, Mr. Spencer, our enjoyment of such phenomena is far better, the more we understand their true quality; we need not summon up the frills and the mythology, the pixies and the “vibrations,” to enjoy a universe with still so many exciting questions to be answered, and we know that those answers are to be found by a systematic examination of the evidence that presents itself � when sought after.

Says Spencer, "Scientism, of course, hates meaning. "This statement of his � by itself � establishes his ignorance. He uses "scientism" here as a demeaning term for "science," then continues to rant on with the usual erroneous summing-up of science�s present understanding of the world and how it works. He cannot be ignorant of the real position of science; he merely chooses to be so, to support his stance.

He writes, "…there are frauds, scamsters and incompetents in the mind/body/spirit arena, but the same is true of applied science." Yes, Mr. Spencer, but you fail to note that science � unlike your chosen flummery � is not only willing to correct its failings, but eager to do so. No matter how much astrology fails, and it fails unfailingly, we never hear of astrologers opting to reverse their convictions.

Turning to the tried-and-true ploy of misquotation, Neil Spencer quotes Richard Dawkins as saying, referring to the poet Yeats, "… he wrote a lot of pretty words, whether they mean anything is another matter." This, in Spencer's translation, turns into an accusation that Dawkins is referring to the poet's work as, "pretty but meaningless words."

Spencer refers to Dawkins� view of the world as, "one-eyed.” Sir, I assure you that Richard Dawkins has both eyes wide open, he seldom blinks, and he looks upon individuals like yourself as risible targets � especially because you specify in your article that you take pride in being classed with such "esteemed company" as “Dr. Peter Fisher, clinical director of the Royal Homeopathic Hospital and the Queen�s physician." Even a cursory examination of the state of the House of Windsor would indicate that perhaps such an appointment might not have been wise.

But Spencer is not merely commenting on Dawkins. He�s trying to neutralize the fact that he has studiously avoided accepting Dawkins� challenge to perform a definitive test of the power of horoscopes, a test which he has rejected. Dawkins is therefore a serious and present threat to Spencer and his “art.”

I rest my case.

Before we leave this subject of belief in nonsense, please go to to see an article by UK critic Charlie Brooker in the Guardian which sums up very neatly and exactly my opinions and stance on the matter. Dawkins is right to be impatient and angry with those who ignore the substantial peril that confronts reason today. I and the JREF stand alongside these warriors who fight nonsense, and they have our unqualified support. Bear that in mind when considering your support for this Foundation.


Back last December, we ran an item on one of the most juvenile claims we�ve ever seen about any product � coming close to homeopathy, but only slightly less silly. It involved a skin spray that would protect consumers against cell phone radiation. The cosmetics company � a French firm named Clarins � advertised that “electromagnetic rays” from handsets can cause skin wrinkles, and that its “Expertise 3P lotion” would protect the user from these nasty emanations. A 100ml spray bottle of this juice sells for �50 � that�s $30 a fluid ounce! I kid you not. Go to that item at and learn…

Alerted by UK reader Ian MacMillan, we see that the UK Advertising Standards Authority has just ruled that those ads should be banned because Clarins� claims are not backed up by evidence. Seems, to me, like an excellent reason. The Expertise 3P lotion spray was sold with these encouraging words:

If electromagnetic waves can penetrate walls, imagine what they can do to your skin. Today, electromagnetic waves generated by a host of modern day electronic devices join a list of well-known pollutants which can damage skin. For the first time, Clarins Research reveals the link between exposure to artificial electromagnetic waves and accelerated skin aging.

“Clarins Research” also claimed that its product could protect from the effects of other pollutants, including car exhaust fumes, industrial pollution, acid rain, and synthetic carpeting. But not, apparently, from terminal gullibility. The cosmetics firm, however, insisted that their claims were "factual and informative," and based on “years of research.”

Says reader MacMillan:

This is interesting, because back in April this year I submitted pretty much the same complaint [as shown in SWIFT] about the website and point of sale material of the Clarins spray, only to receive the following reply from Barrie Smillie of the ASA (Advertising Standards Agency) at

We cannot pursue your complaint because shop window displays and point of sale material fall outside the scope of the Code. We suggest that you take up the matter with your local Councillor/Citizens Advice Bureau or Trading Standards Department; their addresses and telephone numbers can be obtained from your Town Hall or local area phone book.

To which you [Randi] replied:

Interesting… It appears that this dragon has no teeth…

I had complained about the Clarins spray [by giving specific Code references and asking whether any peer-reviewed tests of the Clarins 3P Spray had been carried out.]

All's well that ends well, I suppose, but this still means that people can say what they like on the internet and in point of sale material, without facing censure from the ASA. This ruling came about only because Clarins placed an advert making the same claims in the press, which would be covered by the ASA code.

All too true, Mr. MacMillan. Ethics and honesty take back seats when the profit margin is being considered. Clarins got a rebuff this time, but we can be sure that their spin-doctors and merchandising experts are now busily casting about for another way they can sell nonsense…


Reader “Joe Kerr” sends us this:

I've been following your career for some time now. Before learning of you several years ago, I had always suspected psychics and such were frauds, but could never figure out how they managed to seemingly know things. Thanks to your videos, books and web site, I've found a ton of valuable information that I have used over the years to argue the skeptic point of view. So it is with great pleasure that I would like to relate to you the happenings of just a couple of days ago. It's somewhat long, but hopefully you'll find it worth your time to read it. And I also hope you enjoy reading it just as much as I enjoy telling it.

A couple of days ago I was in town getting groceries. There happens to be a pagan/mystickal/woo-woo store on the same block as the grocery store. Outside, there was a platform with a lady on it with a large crowd gathered around. After tossing my groceries in my trunk, I wandered over to see what was going on. One of the local "psychics" was putting on a show. She was doing the same old worn-out routine: calling out vague names, spotting a person in the audience that seemed to be attracted to the name, and pointing in that general direction. You know the rest.

As I watched, I got the idea to have a bit of fun, and the following ensued:

Psychic: I'm getting a message from a Bill. Or is it Billy. Perhaps, William?

Ok, it's a common name. Odds are someone in this audience is going to know a Bill, Billy, or William. Then it dawns on me: I know a Billy! So, remembering the Doris Collins video (available on Youtube) I knew exactly what to do!

As this so-called psychic was searching the audience for a face that might know a Bill, I stood there with a dumbfounded look on my face and stared at her, hoping I looked as if a connection had been made. And guess what? It worked like a charm. From the best of my recollection, the conversation went like this:

Psychic: You, sir, do you know a Bill? Or Billy?

Me: Yes... and I feel a strong connection.

Psychic: (Confidently) And you should. He's your… (she paused here, obviously hoping I'd finish her sentence, which I did not) He's... (another pause) an older gentleman, much older than you.

Me: Oh my god! (I cupped my hands to my mouth)

Now that she's clued in to an older gentleman, which apparently has (or had) a deep hold on me, she rushes full steam ahead.

Psychic: He's your grandfather, correct?

Me: Oh god, oh god! Can he see me? (Note: Notice that I did not answer.)

Psychic: Yes, he can see you. He says you've turned out to be a very handsome young man, and he's very proud of you.

Me: (excitedly) I can't believe this! My grandfather can see me?

Psychic: Oh, yes.

Me: Oh my god, I can't believe this.

Psychic: Oh, you can definitely believe it! He's standing here right beside me.

Me: But I can't see him. I want to see him, too.

Psychic: And you will. But not right now. (Short pause) He tells me to assure you that that you will see him again soon.

Me: (With a concerned look.) Soon? What do you mean SOON? How soon?

Psychic: (With a laugh.) Don't be startled. Your grandfather is on the temporal plane where time has no boundaries. To him, it will be soon. To you, it will be many years from now.

Me: So does that mean my grandfather is telling you I'll live a long life?

Psychic: (A thoughful pause.) Yes. Yes, you will live a long, healthy life.

Me: And my grandfather knows this and is telling you this?

Psychic: (Another thoughful pause.) He assures me that you will live a long, healthy life, and wants you not to worry.

Me: (At this point I decide to throw a loop in him just to see how well she handles it.) Wait. Which grandfather are you talking to?

Psychic: (Slight pause.) Your maternal grandfather.

Me: (With a quizzical look on my face.) But... he's still alive.

Psychic: (Slight pause.) I'm sorry. I misunderstood. It's your paternal grandfather. The words sound so much alike, you know.

Me: (Now it's time to end this.) But he's still alive, too. Both of my grandfathers are alive. I've just been BS�ing around with you to see how far you'd carry the farce. (Big smile.)

Psychic: (Dumbfounded look on her face, and obviously trying to recover.) But, but...

Me: Thanks for the entertainment. Have a good day.

And I walked away.

Mr. Randi, I hope you enjoyed reading about this stunt as much as I enjoyed pulling it. And I also wish you many, many more years of very entertaining debunking. May you bring others as much pleasure (and education) as you have brought me. I'd also like to add thanks to my old drama teacher, Mrs. Householder. Without her training, I would have never been able to pull this off. I'm still in contact with her, and I know she'd get a big kick out of seeing this on your site.


This communication arrived from a reader who will remain anonymous, and the name of the subjects � a recently-deceased man and his still-living wife � will not be revealed, to spare his wife embarrassment. The reader writes:

Not sure where to begin. I thought you might find this interesting, as some of the only information I could Google on [the subject] came from your website. So I would have to conclude that you knew who he was. I run a small computer repair call-out company. Last week I received a phone call from [the subject�s wife] who seemed fairly distressed, judging from her voice. The conversation ran something like this:

"I'm worried my computer isn't secure." Not a problem, I thought. "Easily solved with the right software and settings." But she protested, "I've had people staying over, they've been trying to steal my sensitive information." "Really?" I said, taken by surprise.

"Yes, I'm doing important research and people are trying to get hold of it at all costs." "Are you a scientist?" I inquired, with much hope that I might actually meet someone doing cutting-edge research into the universe.

"Heavens no, I'm continuing my late husbands work." I could only guess what, but I didn't like to ask.

"I'm receiving information from my dead husband. You can understand now why all these scientists are after me." Turned out I didn't have to ask!

At this point I switched to dry humoring. We booked a time, and the following day I went over. I knew I was in for “one of those” when she led me through to her office, which was so amazingly messy I could only imagine what any surface looked like. Some of the books looked like they might contain credible facts, but most were colorful and glossy, with subjects relating to psychics and the paranormal, which worried me. I checked that the window was open and made a guess at how long it would take me to scale a mountain of books with an old woman holding my ankles.

After only 10 minutes talking, my cheeks were hurting from suppressing a hearty laugh. The problem was not what she was saying � well okay, it was � but more that she was so inconsistent.

"I can't tell anybody about what I'm doing � it's super secret and will change the world."Then 2 minutes later..."Let me tell you what I'm doing."

She said she receives his thoughts every Sunday and types them up to go on her website. As I was leaving, we passed through the kitchen, and although it was immaculate, I couldn't help but notice the hundreds and hundreds (and hundreds) of pharmaceuticals on the worktop. I didn't manage to read any of the box labels, they could well have been herbal. But still, I draw my own conclusions. Not even a pharmacy carries that much medication.

Then we walked through the living room, and she turned to an urn I had completely failed to notice in the middle of the room. She patted it and said, "Just popping out for a bit, dear." In my uneducated opinion, I would have to diagnose: paranoia, delusions (including of grandeur), post-traumatic shock, and finally, she's completely insane. She claims on her website � I had fun reading that one � that her husband didn't even die, and she thinks the death certificate, which is online for all to see, is wrong.

However if she is sane, and I'm just out-of-touch with reality myself, then she said the date to watch out for is September 11th, 2007. Something big is going to happen, and don't go to Los Angeles any time soon, as there is going to be an earthquake.

I survived to tell the tale. But as you may guess from my tone, I may be one of the biggest skeptics alive, and I tend to question everything. I feel sorry for this woman, but then again, I'm sure that these people do it for attention, or for a sense of belonging to a group or purpose bigger than themselves, when there really are no big answers, only big annoying questions.

Anyway, I trust this email has gone to someone who cares, I won't be writing to anyone else. I just felt like sharing my experience in the home of a psychic warrior.

My correspondent sent a subsequent note:

I forgot to mention, there was a second lady present the whole time, but she barely spoke, she was dressed in almost completely see-through clothing, and wore a lot of jingly bangles. She interjected occasionally to feed into [the subject�s wife�s] fantasy. A hanger-on perhaps, or someone conning her out of her cash…

Do you know anything about a man named [anonymous]? He is trying to convince [the subject�s wife] that a wireless laptop will help her receive spirit communications. Personally I don't think I can get hold of wireless adapters with that capability!

No, I was not familiar with the man named, but I�m watching for September 11th to arrive…!


From a recent UPI news flash relating to a UFO museum:

The museum�s Web site describes the incident as “the crash of an alleged flying saucer, the recovery of debris and bodies, and the ensuing cover up by the military.”

I think this would have been more correct as:

The museum�s Web site describes the incident as “the alleged crash of a flying saucer, the recovery of debris and bodies, and the seeming cover up by the military.”


The Independent Investigations Group (IIG) at the Center for Inquiry/Los Angeles has announced their annual awards recognizing the advancement of science in movies and television, and people in the entertainment field who promote scientific knowledge and values. Says the Executive Director of the Center, James Underdown:

It�s time we acknowledged those film and television producers, writers, directors, and others in entertainment who have advanced the cause of science and helped expose superstition and other nonsense. This awards program is our small token of gratitude to those productions and people that have made a positive contribution in this area.

The awards presentation will be held on Saturday, August 18, at the Steve Allen Theater at the Center for Inquiry-West at 4773 Hollywood Blvd, at 1 pm. The awards are presented in two categories, good and bad. “Good” movies and TV shows are those that have promoted scientific values. “Bad” movies and shows are those that incorrectly represent science, promote pseudoscience, or help foster belief in the supernatural, paranormal, or other nonsense.

The winners of “Good” awards for 2006 are:

“Psych,” USA Network, Episode: Pilot.

“The Simpsons,” Fox TV, Episode #1721, “The Monkey Suit”

The winners of “Bad” awards for 2006 are:

“The Montel Williams Show” � for episodes featuring Sylvia Browne

“Psychic Detectives,” Court TV

In addition, the IIG announces the induction into their Hall of Honor of both Harry Houdini (Ehrich Weiss) and Carl Sagan as individuals from the entertainment field, for their significant lifetime contribution of promoting scientific knowledge and/or exposing charlatans and hoaxers, for the benefit of the public.

For more information: contact James Underdown at (323) 666-9797 ext. 101, or


Reader Paul Christus informs us:

Peter Popoff says on his television show that he has the key to success and healing: a small plastic packet filled with Miracle Spring Water. I just saw his new ad and now he�s offering Miracle Spring Water in a "Larger Size." I guess that means either more or bigger miracles. I can't decide which.


Referring to last week�s item at, reader Steve Mann, who tells us he�s “catless in New York,” writes of a possible angle to the story:

I can think of one reason the cat seems to do what people claim: If you weren�t at death�s door and got a visit from the Death Cat, wouldn�t you beat it off with all your might? Only those too far gone to repel this vile harbinger of doom will have the dubious pleasure of its company long enough for anyone else to notice, thus skewing the stats.

Science and reason march on… Thanks, Steve.


Re our item at reader Jon Dunbar in Korea tells us:

I e-mailed you a few months ago at the beginning of the Fan Death season in Korea. As you recall, it's the pseudoscientific belief that sleeping in an enclosed room with a fan on is fatal. This year we have had the usual number of fan deaths, with the truly hot weather yet to arrive. Months ago, a group of Korean men attempted suicide by locking themselves in a hotel room and turning on the fan. They survived the first night, and on the second night one of them chickened out and turned off the fan, which is attributed with saving their lives. Unfortunately there is no English source for this remarkably ridiculous story.

Korean broadcaster KBS recently aired a daring report questioning the validity of fan death. A translation has been provided by the folks of Korea Beat at: Here are some interesting excerpts from the transcript:

In the last three years there have been about 20 such reports of fan death. Many people believe that most of the deaths were due to hypothermia or suffocation.

Quoting from an observer:

It's because of the wind generated by the fan. The air goes outside and has to come back inside but it can't, so the person can suffocate…

Don�t ask me. I, too, read it several times…!

People say that the pressure difference created above your nose will make it difficult to breathe. And many people are worried that fans will diminish the amount of air for breathing. Another quotation:

The amount of air is limited but machines stir it all up and so no matter how little oxygen there is, it poses a danger. Here the fan causes temperatures to lower so that there is a risk of death by hypothermia.

To test these claims, KBS ran a single test and concluded that fan death is, to quote yourself, “woo-woo." Three healthy men were put in separate rooms, first where nothing was moving, then later in rooms with fans and air conditioning turned on, and their conditions were carefully monitored as they slept. In the motionless rooms the sleeping mens' internal oxygen levels were measured to be 90% and, perhaps due to the heat, they were not able to get more than 83% deep, efficient sleep. When they slept with fans turned on, the men had a 94% oxygen level, a gradual increase inside their bodies, and the rate of deep sleep was also higher, at 85%.

With the air conditioners turned on, the oxygen levels stayed steady at 94% while the rate of deep sleep was the best at 95%.KBS concluded that fans do not suck out oxygen. If in fact fans do move so quickly that the face is deprived of oxygen, then on windy days or in a moving car with open windows people ought to suffocate also.

Are you still with me? It's nothing we couldn't have assumed based on our own folk knowledge of physics. The shocking part is yet to come. Read some of the reactions of alarmed netizens to this public service announcement.

A quotation from a victim of this dreadful influence who saw the KBS show:

When I was about 20 years old I once drank too much and went into a small “yeogwon” room and fell asleep with the fan on. I'd heard every summer on tv about people who died from fan death, so I slept facing the wall and in the morning, I got up and my face was all puffy, kind of bloated. I'm really glad for those broadcasts which saved me from being directly exposed to the risk of fan death and now I always turn off the fan before I go to bed. This show was totally irresponsible. If only 1 person dies as a result they should spend 10,000 years in suffering.

Umm, the boozing had nothing to do with this, huh? And facing the wall is better? Why…?

And there you have it. Debunk superstitions, spend ten millennia in pain. I leave you with this image, found on the instructions of my new electric fan (which blows air directly on my face all night long). I think the picture is self-explanatory.

Skeptics in Korea are starting to speak up, but this is one scrappy pseudoscientific superstition.


Following up on last week�s lead item, recent UK police work in Sussex seems to verify my observation that a full Moon facilitates anti-social behavior, which they find rises noticeably on the brightest nights, though they don�t seem to recognize that the simple presence of more illumination makes crime easier. They just characterize the facts as, “too striking to dismiss as coincidence,” after comparing the number of violent crimes recorded in the region last year with the date of each full moon, and discovering “a distinct correlation” between the two factors.

They noted, too, that ambulance personnel say they�ve also noticed a similar correlation.

A 2000 study by German scientists also claimed that the full Moon seemed to bring on a rise in “binge drinking.” Most of their drunks had been caught during the five-day full moon cycle, but again there was no reference to the fact that, not only were drunks more visible in better light, but they were easier to catch! My discovery is being ignored!

But the woo-woo crowd has much to offer on such a hare-brained idea, as usual. Jonathan Cainer, (see the Daily Mail's official astrologer, sent forth from his perch atop Mount Strange, this thick slice of wisdom:

The ocean tides rise and fall with the moon and so do the tides of human emotion. At new moon our inner seas are deep but still. At full moon it is as if they are being furiously whipped up by a wind. Full moon aggression can, however, be turned into motivation. That's why many people achieve more during a full moon. But the reason why we have the word "lunatic" is because people famously go crazy when the moon is full. So, now that we have official confirmation of how a full moon can provoke violent crime, the only solution is to give the moon an “Asbo.” It's clearly inciting people to disobey the law and behave in a reckless manner.

In the UK, an Asbo is a civil order made against a person who has been shown to have engaged in anti-social behavior. As in following football games, even in broad daylight… Or when a homeopathic remedy is withheld…


Still fiercely resisting common sense and rationality in favor of superstition, South Africa pursues its path of retreat from the real world. Reader Paul Roberts tells us:

Recently the deputy Health minister has been sacked, ostensibly for making an overseas trip to an AIDS conference without the sanction of the State President, well known woo-woo, Thabo Mbeki. It actually appears that while her boss, Dr. Tshabalala-Msimang, renowned for her beetroot and garlic AIDS “cure,” has been in hospital getting a liver transplant (with or without the help of medicinal vegetables, I wonder), the deputy minister has actually been getting on with the job of distributing anti-retrovirals, etc. Silly woman! What was she thinking?

The full story can be read at:

Reader Martin Delaney, in Canada, also commented on this matter:

It gets worse every week. This set off a world wide campaign of petitions and institutional letters to President Mbeki demanding that he reverse the firing of the Deputy Health Minister, the most sane person in his government on the subject of AIDS. She has been fired for “not being a team player.” In other words, for not accepting his personal views and medical quackery as the last word on AIDS. This travesty is an incredible insult to all those who fought and died for an end to apartheid, only to discover today “Meet the new boss; same as the old boss.”

I guess they did get fooled again.


An anonymous reader observes, re

I had to laugh at the badge shown on your pages � “Certified Warm Former.” By the simple transposition of two letters, it could be changed to something useful � “Certified Worm Farmer.” Whether as a green method of making good quality garden compost, or to provide bait for anglers, worm farming is certainly a far more useful occupation than pointlessly ruining perfectly good cutlery.

Love Swift, keep up the good work.


During my recent trip to Japan for a test of a claim on the JREF million-dollar prize, I was delighted to have a pair of visitors call by at the Tokyo studio � Bona Ueki and Parte Koshi � old friends from �way back who have entertained audiences all over the world for the last 30 years. They�re known professionally as “The Napoleons,” the Japanese equivalent of our own Penn & Teller duo. I�ve worked with them on several occasions at conventions of magicians (yes, even we have such gatherings!) and they�ve always “brought the house down.” They�re still busy amazing their fans, and not slowing down one bit!


Reader Chuck Darwin comments:

The hucksters behind the QLink Pendant claim that it

…utilises Sympathetic Resonance Technology to rebalance the energetic systems of the body.

Apparently, some scientists and engineers think �69.99 [US$140] is a fair price for a necklace consisting of a copper coil and a zero-ohm resistor � neither of which are actually connected to anything. The inventor claims that the QLink does not use electronics components “in a conventional electronic way” yet it "increases your capacity to function in EMF saturated environments." I guess golfers will buy anything that promises an improved score. It's the perfect accessory for my new Faraday suit.

My brother was sent one for free, and I just had a close look at the thing... it's hilariously science-free.

In any case, as several readers pointed out, a “zero-ohm resistor” would bring an absolutely certain Nobel Prize and perpetual motion. I�ll settle for the resistor, connected or not…


Reader Robin Kuschniersch informs us:

I'm a member of the "Magischer Zirkel von Deutschland," the German Magic Circle. Yesterday, I got the new issue of our association's monthly published magazine "MAGIE."

Here's an excerpt taken from the editorial (!):

Now there are even casting-shows for magicians: The show “The Successor,” in which Uri Geller presents young illusionists, ran with great success in Israel. ProSiebenSat.1 [a German broadcasting corporation] was able to license this format to a large American network, and some more contracts are expected to be signed. In the American version, which will be titled “Phenomenon,” Uri Geller will have the illusionist Criss Angel by his side. We are eager to know what might be planned for Germany.

Much too euphoric, in my opinion, for a magician's magazine. I'm really afraid that the German Magic Circle might support the whole thing, just as the Israeli club did.

Your life will not get boring in the next years...

Thank you, Robin. For two weeks now, I�ve been inundated by notices of this impending program, about which I�ve been kept informed by insiders who are rather astonished at NBC co-chairman Ben Silverman�s decision to sign such a deal. I received a call from Criss Angel assuring me that he does not intend to endorse as “supernatural” anything that Geller or the others might choose to do, but I don�t know how much choice he�ll have in that respect… Why NBC has agreed to cast the 3-trick-pony to head up this show, I cannot tell. I guess we�ll just have to sit back and watch the train wreck…


I originally contracted to be in the NYC area October 14th to speak for the “NYASK” group, at which time I would have been available to perform Mr. Jack Myers� challenge, which I have already accepted as outlined at, if this would have been a suitable date for Mr. Myers to be present. In effect, I would be � once again � essentially poisoning myself by taking a massive overdose of sleeping tablets, as I�ve done several times before in various parts of the world. Not to worry. These are homeopathic sleeping pills, which of course have no active ingredients and work by suggestion only. Mr. Myers has agreed to donate $1,000 to the JREF if I survive the ordeal… Any yawning you might see from me would only be from boredom, not from the ingestion of the pills, I assure you.

However, I�ve now had to cancel that date, since NYASK has run into problems with the arrangements. As soon as I can get to NYC, I�ll be snapping up those pills, count on it…

A new skeptics group is forming up in New York City, so I�m hoping that they might be able to get me there for the pill-popping event… Mr. Myers has gone back to “holding” mode…


Go to: Hallelujah! Here�s a definitive, double-blind, almost-perfect, 4-minute/43-second, video clip from Monday�s Dawkins program, of a test by Professor Chris French examining the dowsing phenomenon. I hasten to add that I refer to it as “almost-perfect” because I feel that they should have included (a) an “open” test � a preliminary one in which the targets were to be clearly seen, to show that the dowsing powers were working on that occasion, and (b) a signed agreement of approval of the protocol, set-up, conditions, atmospheric variations, magnetic fields, etc., etc., should have been obtained in advance from each dowser…

Please tune in to see Ellen Johnson, President of American Atheists, on the CBS News program "CBS Sunday Morning" this coming Sunday, August 19, 2007, airing at 9:00 AM ET; check your local listings. Ellen will be discussing the latest wave of popular books on atheism, and the role that religion and atheism now plays in the USA. Other guests will include Julia Sweeney, Christopher Hitchens, and Boston University Professor Stephen Prothero.

I hope that our readers will tune in and then send their comments to CBS-TV at

And with great pride and delight…

The 2007 JREF Scholarships winners have been selected. And they are

  • Catherine Holloway from Nova Scotia Canada
  • Matthey Dentith from New Zealand
  • Robin Zebrowski from Portland Oregon
  • Whitney Webster from Odessa Texas

For a detailed bio please visit the JREF Scholarship page

View the Commentary archive

©James Randi Educational Foundation
Typos? Format Problems? Please contact the Webmaster