Market Design: Book and Market Maker

There are two basic ways of handling incoming orders: keeping standing orders in a book against which market orders can be entered, or having a market maker that accepts orders at its current price and adjusts the price after each order. Its also possible to combine the two, though that hasnt been done in very many of the existing markets. (Pennock mentions that the combination is used in finance, but doesnt give examples.)

Book orders match our mental model of the stock market. The basic idea is that traders are allowed to enter an order to buy or sell at any price. If they offer to buy at a price above (or sell below) the current clearing price (and there are enough shares available), then they make an immediate trade. If they offer to buy at a lower price (or sell higher) then the order is recorded and displayed to later traders. Its also possible that the market will partially satisfy the new order because the new order specifies more volume than the matching book orders. Different policies might apply in those cases: partially filling the order and placing the remainder as a book order; dropping the remainder; or producing an error message and requiring that the trader specify either that the whole order should be filled or that a price limit shouldnt be exceeded. On the stock markets, these are called markets orders and limit orders. A market order buys from existing book orders, accepting the market price, while a limit order specifies the highest price at which the trader is willing to buy (or the lowest sell price).

There is one difference in interpretation that matters more in prediction markets than stock markets. Most prediction markets interpret the limit price as the highest incremental price that should apply: no shares should be purchased beyond that price. But its also possible to interpret the price as a limit on the aggregate price: if some shares are available below that price, then some could be purchased above the price as long as the average price for the order is below the limit. On a prediction market this might be against the traders intent, since it could have the effect of pushing the current price significantly above the limit the trader specified.

There is some risk to entering a book order: market conditions might change, new news might become available, making the trader wish she hadnt left the standing order. Presumably for this reason, many traders only enter market orders. But in thin markets (most prediction markets are thin; even most stocks are thinly traded most of the time) there can be a gap between the best buy offer and the best sell offer. If theres always a 5% gap between the best offers on each side, then price takers (those who accept the price the market makes available) pay 5% more than price makers (those who enter book orders, thereby setting the markets prices). Market volatility determines whether that price difference is a bigger effect than the effect of the changing markets. This makes it valuable for market operators to encourage traders to place book orders. TradeSports charges fees only for price takers.

Markets orders are usually limited by the amount of (real or play) money a trader has in her account. Book orders can be limited in different ways. Most markets allow total orders in all markets up to the users balance. The Foresight Exchange (FX) allows orders in each market up to the users balance. When trading reduces the users cash, FX reduces book orders in any market exceeding the new limit. TradeSports allows total orders up to the users balance, and gives additional allowance for the expected value of current holdings. Robin Hansons Combinatorial Information Market Design does an even better job of allowing the trader to invest in mutually exclusive outcomes because of the way it tracks assets.

These are all ways of further encouraging more book orders. As long as the market operator ensures that the users balance isnt exceeded, they dont entail more risk. To the trader, they will sometimes cause orders to disappear just as you try to trade with them, but this isnt different from someone else accepting the offer before you, or the owner canceling the order while you submit yours. TradeSports margin trading allows more trading, but requires that the market operator take on some risk.

The alternative to maintaining an order book is to have an automated market maker. Market makers in stock markets ensure the market is liquid by always having a published price at which they will buy or sell. They make money by maintaining a spread between the prices at which they buy and sell; the quoted price is the price at which you can buy from them. They set the price according to their beliefs about the current demand for the asset, and change the price as their opinion (or their exposure) changes.

Automated market makers set the price according to a rule that tells them how much to raise (lower) the price when a buy (sell) order is processed. A really simple rule would be to buy or sell a single coupon at the current price, and change the price by a constant amount. Run this way, the market makers price would bounce around a lot as different traders traded with it, so it often takes a larger volume of trading to move the price as you approach the extremes.

If the market maker bases its prices on a rule that produces consistent prices whether buying or selling, it can sell an unlimited number of shares while limiting its losses. This only works if the market maker is integrated with the market; a user agent can arbitrage, but cant limit the amount of its losses if it doesnt have priority in getting its orders into the queue.

The market maker can also follow completely different rules. Dave Pennocks Dynamic Parimutuel Market (DPM) adjusts the price to ensure that traders on the winning side of a question will split the total value invested up to that point. The standard price rules ensure that the currently quoted market odds are also the incremental price at which you can buy or sell shares, which gives traders an incentive to trade whenever the price is different from their estimate of the odds. The DPM market doesnt have this incentive structure, as the price and the current payoff vary from one another.

A weakness of algorithmic market makers is that they dont adjust well as the volume of trading changes. The algorithm is parameterized by a constant that controls how quickly prices move in response to trading. When the market has many participants, you want the prices to move more slowly in response to trading than when there are only a few traders. If you choose the wrong constant, then it will be too hard to move the price in a think market (the price will remain near 50 even when sentiment wants to move it away), or in a thick market it might move back and forth too often. Order books work well in thick markets (there are plenty of offers for people to trade with), but less well with fewer traders. Combining the two should produce markets that work well in both cases. (Robin Hanson made a similar point about combining simple scoring rules with simple markets to produce his market scoring rules.)

In order to run a market with both a market maker and book orders, you have to ensure that the market makers orders get priority and that the book orders are satisfied in the correct order as the market makers price changes. The intuitive model is that you track queues of buy orders and sell orders, each sorted by the offered price. The market maker can freely trade and adjust its price as long as the price remains between the highest offer to buy and the lowest offer to sell. If the market receives a new offer that would move the price past either best offer, the market maker trades first, until it reaches the price of the best offer, then the book orders are used up. If the new offer hasnt reached its limit, the process iterates. (Robin Hanson and I discussed how to implement this for his Combinatorial Market in early 2003, resulting in his draft article.) This is all fairly straightforward if the market sells fractional shares (the stock exchanges work that way, why would it confuse traders?). I dont know of a way to use continuous prices if the market insists on trading only whole shares.

Using a market maker will increase the number of trades that are possible, especially when the markets are thin or many traders are reluctant to enter book orders. Adding book orders makes it easier for the market to adjust to increasing volume. If the initial constant used by the market maker is appropriate for a thin market, the book orders will play a more significant role as the market gets thicker, ensuring that prices dont gyrate too wildly.

Book Only

Maker only

Both

Zocalo currently integrates the two. When creating a market, book orders are always allowed, and the market creator can decide whether to add a market maker or not. While writing this article, it occurred to me that I should also allow markets with a market maker and no book orders.

9 Responses to Market Design: Book and Market Maker

  1. alex kirtland - experience design, analysis, consulting » Public Prediction Markets Heuristic Review: Foresight Exchange Says:

    [...] The Tags Market Purpose: entertainment, event prediction Market Control: Consensus Point Targeted End User: general trader, prediction market aficionado Currency: FX-bucks (or credibills, I cant tell) Underlying Event Types: events (political, financial, news, AE, science technology, misc., but no sporting events) Contract Types: scaled, binary Trading Mechanism: book orders (thanks to The Now Economys recent posting explaining this in detail) Size of Market: ~8500 traders Number of Contracts: ~200 claims [...]

  2. Oddhead Blog: Prediction Markets, Gambling, Electronic Commerce, Artificial Intelligence: David Pennock: Yahoo! Research Says:

    [...] Finally, although I wont go into the details here, one can generalize the above so that the market maker can handle limit orders, for example an order to buy up to 100 shares of outcome 1, each at price less than or equal to $0.80. But if unfilled limit orders like this are allowed to persist, the market maker logic can get a little complicated. [...]

  3. Stock Market Information Says:

    Stock Market Information

    I couldnt understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting

  4. All of your investment needs Says:

    All of your investment needs

    EarthTalk@ The Good Human fills us in on eco- friendly 401K investing.

  5. forex spot Says:

    forex spot

    Forex currency trading is a great way to generate extra income. It is important to understand the basics first such as (1) you need leverage to achieve real success, (2) a forex broker is worth seeking and (3) forex trading software does exist but you

  6. Forex Trading System Says:

    Forex Trading System

    You do not have to be a professional to earn profits from this trade because the automated forex trading systems take care of all the work for you. When you trade through managed accounts, the

  7. How trading works on procurement futures | Procurement Futures Says:

    [...] Chris Hibberts view of market scoring rules [...]

  8. Choosing Your Forex Training Course and Broker Says:

    [...] The Now Economy » Blog Archive » Market Design: Book and Market Maker There are two basic ways of handling incoming orders: keeping standing orders in a book against which market orders can be entered, or having a market maker that accepts orders at its current price and adjusts the price after each order [...]

  9. Drapery curtain fabric wholesale Says:

    [...] The Now Economy » Blog Archive » Market Design: Book and Market Maker 28 Apr 2006. In order to run a market with both a market maker and book orders,. If the market receives a new offer that would move the price past.blog.commerce.net/?p=251 - The Now Economy » Blog Archive » Market Design: Book and Market Maker [...]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.