The Movable Buffet

Dispatches from Las Vegas
by Richard Abowitz

Category: Sheldon Adelson

Casino mogul and nightclub fight as doors open

August 26, 2008 | 11:41 am

Palazzo Buffet readers will recall that I have been reporting on the strange case of the feud between Lavo, the new restaurant and club from the creators of the Venetian's wildly successful Tao, and the corporation of Sheldon Adelson that owns host property, Las Vegas Sands. On the surface this is a landlord vs. tenant dispute with Adelson wanting to revoke the lease because the club was not quick enough to open. In March, Adelson even had the locks changed to keep the creators of Lavo out of the space.

But what makes this feud so unexpected and inexplicable is the incredible business Tao has enjoyed at Adelson's Venetian.The fact is that Tao  is one of the most successful and buzz-generating nightclubs in Vegas as well as, according to the owners' claim, the highest grossing restaurant in the country. This summer Tao Beach successfully expanded the brand into the newly competitive world of day clubbing

Lavo has thus far prevailed enough in litigation to soft open. As the Buffet has documented before, Adelson can be tenacious in litigation. So when I got the press release announcing Lavo's opening, I immediately e-mailed to find out if the court fight between landlord and tenant was over.  I was promptly told by Lavo's representative: "The case is over. There is no further legal action on either side." I was also assured, by Lavo, that now that the restaurant and club was definitely opening, Palazzo was being very supportive of the property.

That certainly did not jive  with my view of Adelson.  In July I made the first of a series of attempts to confirm with the Sands people that they were now being supportive of Lavo and had given up on legal action to remove the club. I never received a response. There turns out to be a good reason for that. Things are not as group-hug as the Lavo team had led me to believe between them and their landlord.

In fact,  according to the Sun today, it turns out the legal maneuvering is not at an end and never really ceased. The Sun reports that settlement talks between the sides that started just a few weeks ago offered no breakthroughs before falling apart. The Sun adds, "Adelson is refusing to give a...$3 million loan they (the owners of Lavo) contend was agreed upon  in their 2006 contract to put finishing touches on Lavo. So, Ferrario (Lavo's attorney) is adding that claim to the litigation."

So for now Lavo is open with the new club's grand opening still set for Sept. 13. Yet, although Lavo may be reluctant to admit it, this much-anticipated club, which marks a serious expansion by Tao to  join Light Group and Pure Management Group, among elite creators of multiple Vegas restaurants and nightclubs on the Strip, still has to contend with a wild card in the form of landlord Sheldon Adelson. But why is Adelson taking such a hard line against the winning team at his Venetian Tao? Now that is one of the major mysteries of Vegas.

(Photo by Sarah Gerke)


The New Yorker takes on Sheldon Adelson

June 24, 2008 |  1:31 pm
I am a huge fan of the New Yorker. I read it every week. And I have not met anyone else who does that in Las Vegas. That turns out to be unsurprising as the New Yorker has fewer than 3,000 subscribers in the Las Vegas area (yes, I checked). But all Las Vegas is abuzz for the first time since I moved here about my favorite magazine.

Why?

The New Yorker has a stunningly long profile of Sheldon Adelson, the media-shy owner of the Venetian and recently opened Palazzo. I am nervous attempting to summarize a story that exceeds 10,000 words. There is nothing in the story revealed about Adelson's Venetian or Palazzo in Vegas that seems new. Many of the incidents covered have also been reported on the Buffet. But the article really isn't about Adelson's well-known activities in Vegas; rather, the focus is on Adelson's political influence in Israel and the United States. Parsing that story falls outside the expertise of this blogger. Sorry if that is a copout.

I still found the article essential reading, and I found no errors in the Vegas parts of the story. My favorite anecdote, which I love even if it turns out to be apocryphal, sums up the spirit of the sort of men who own casinos on the Strip (and I include Adelson's rival Steve Wynn in this category). This story concerns Alan Rice, whom the New Yorker describes as a friend of Adelson's from childhood:

"Rice taped Adelson at one meeting when he was issuing orders. “About a month later, Sheldon came back and said, ‘You guys have done this all wrong, you didn’t follow my directions!’ ” Jason Chudnofsky recalled. “Alan Rice said, ‘Stop for a second, Shel — I’m going to play a tape of the meeting for you.’ And Sheldon said the following: ‘What are you guys, crazy? Who are you gonna believe, me or the tape?’ ” (Rice declined to comment on the incident.)"

And even if this specific story from the New Yorker article is inaccurate, in a nutshell that is what a casino mogul can be like to deal with directly.

Anyway, I reached out to the Venetian to request an interview with Sheldon Adelson (whom I have never interviewed) about the New Yorker's long profile of him. I received this response from Ron Reese, vice president of communication for Las Vegas Sands (the corporate parent of Venetian and Palazzo, the name dating to the original casino on the real estate):

"Mr. Adelson neither seeks nor desires media coverage of his private life and as such declined to be interviewed for this story.  The New Yorker, however, had already conceived the story they wanted to print and left no stone unturned in their efforts to seek out any source (mostly unnamed) with a personal or professional bias against Mr. Adelson.

"Just like sorting through the rhetoric of a heated political campaign, those who read this story will see through the unnamed sources and third-hand accounts and recognize it for what it is –- a fictional depiction of a successful, principled businessman who prefers to keep his private life exactly that."

I wonder if Adelson will sue the New Yorker?  As is recounted by the New Yorker and previously reported on the Buffet, Adelson has even sued before over an article in a newspaper that was not factually wrong. Steve Firess blogged that some sentences were taken out of a USA Today story he wrote in part because of a fear of Adelson suing. 

Las Vegas wild card trashes Atlantic City

April 1, 2008 |  9:21 am
Venetian Sheldon Adelson, the richest man in Las Vegas, at a benefit for John McCain at the Venetian last week, slammed the idea of gambling and resort building in Atlantic City.

In characteristically blunt terms, Adelson, while talking about why his company (owners of Venetian and Palazzo) would never expand to Atlantic City, said:
 
"We think we are one of the most, if not the most, aggressive opportunists in gaming and integrated resort expansion in the world... We would not even consider Atlantic City. Never made any sense and never will make any sense."
 
Adelson also made local news in the same talk by casting aspersions on the motives behind MGM-Mirage's plans to build a new resort in Atlantic City. Of course, a top MGM-Mirage executive was Adelson's co-host of the McCain fundraiser.
 
Unlike his more flamboyant rival, Steve Wynn, Adelson often flies bellow the radar, and not just nationally. Despite his incredible success here, Adelson is seen as an outsider and underrated, even among the elite group of resort owners on the Strip. Perhaps the best illustration of Adelson's contrariness is that he operates the only resort on the Strip that is non-union.
 
But I had assumed, considering Adelson's wealth and cranky quotability, that no accounting of "the powers that be" in Vegas could ignore Adelson. So, I was truly surprised that he was not given more attention in a new book by Wall Street Journal reporter Christina Binkley, "Winner Takes All: Steve Wynn, Kirk Kerkorian, Gary Loveman and the Race to Own Las Vegas."
 
Adelson makes only a few appearances in the book, which covers the time during which he built and opened the Venetian and pioneered expansion of Vegas gambling to Macau. 
 
So, I got in touch with Binkley to ask her why she assigned Adelson such a small role in her book. Binkley told me:
 
"What I wanted to do with this book was take people who had really substantial stakes in Las Vegas at the time I was doing the book and were going to continue to do so in the future, in terms of Las Vegas' growth. Sheldon Adelson has one significant property, and it is a very significant property; and he also brought one innovation to Las Vegas, which was not entirely new -- but he certainly made it make sense for everybody and did it in a bigger way -- and that was to use your convention center to fill your hotel rooms during the week. He is built out in Las Vegas. He doesn't have any more property left on the Strip to build on. The future growth of his company is really in Asia and the rest of the world. So, he would have been a great chapter. But I did not want to do a survey of all the great men and builders of Las Vegas."
Power and influence in Vegas is not all about size, just mostly about size. I respectfully disagree with Binkley about Adelson's crucial role in Strip politics and development.
 
Adelson, by being a wild card, has always been someone out there who other Strip executives could never count on to go along with the pack. And that has given him a huge voice in how the Strip works.

Though competitors on the Strip, the truth is that Wynn (Steve Wynn), Harrah's (Gary Loveman) and MGM-Mirage (Kirk Kerkorian), tend to agree on most common issues resorts share. Adelson has proved, again and again, totally comfortable being the one voice to destroy that united front, from union deals to room taxes. And as the voice of dissent, the one who sees things differently, Adelson is a force few on the Strip can ever really ignore.
 
 

Win or Lose, Always Sue

March 27, 2007 |  8:56 am
Both of my parents are lawyers (and my sister and a scattering of aunts, uncles and cousins), and so I get the job requires you to offer arguments that can defy common sense. Still, there comes a point when you have to tell your client that the law is not on his side, especially if it is a big law like the First Amendment. Of course, if your client is the company owned by the richest man in Las Vegas, Sheldon Adelson...well, if it be his will, then the billable hours continue no matter the outcome.
 
Almost a year ago the Las Vegas Sun (owned by the parent company of Las Vegas Weekly, where I am on staff) published a column criticizing Adelson's Venetian saying it had a "sorry Nevada regulatory record." According to today's Sun: "That was a reference to Venetian gaming violations for which the company was fined $1 million by the Nevada Gaming Commission in 2004." Sounds "sorry" to me. But Adelson's Las Vegas Sands Corp sued. Interestingly, the worry for the Sands was that this story would damage the Sands' attempt to compete against other local resort companies trying to score a gaming licence in Singapore that the Sands actually won.
 
Looking at the facts, Judge Michelle Leavitt rejected the lawsuit in November. In her most recent decision in the case she even noted that far from defamatory the Sun's language was "very kind" and "minor" when compared to the actual words of Nevada's Gaming Control Commission Chairman who levied the fine against Sands in 2004. End of story? Not when billionaires are involved! Instead of calling it quits, the Sands filed an amended complaint arguing with the help of Los Angeles lawyer Martin Singer that the Sun was guilty of "defamation by omission" by not looking into every other resort's regulatory history in the same story. Judge Leavitt seemed incredulous, asking Singer, the Sand's lawyer, "If they want to write something bad about me and I don't like it and I hear every other judge does it, I get to sue them?"
 
Singer: "I believe it does."
 
Judge Leavitt: "I think that's the most absurd argument I've ever heard."
 
The judge dismissed the complaint. So, now it is over? No, of course, not. Singer tells the Sun he must confer with his client before deciding whether to appeal to the Nevada Supreme Court. I wonder how many billable hours that appeal would add? Anyone, think any other court in the United States will have any other opinion about a story covered by the First Amendment with no known factual errors in it? 

Vegas Billionaire: China offers citizens "the good life"

March 2, 2007 |  7:44 am
The owner of the Venetian, and the richest man in Las Vegas, Sheldon Adelson, doesn't see any problem with the way China treats its citizens. Despite the lack of human rights, stories of slave labor, horrible prison conditions, limits on children and no freedom of speech or press, AP reports that Adelson "liked the way the Chinese run their country." Adelson seems surprised, in fact, that anyone could see things otherwise, telling AP in a story picked up by the China Daily: "People seem to be living the good life in China. Look at the incredible progress China has made. How can anyone say they are doing the wrong thing?" Adelson goes on to say, according to the article, that those who don't like the way China treats human rights should simply not go there. He, of course, offers no advice to Chinese citizens who can't leave China and are stuck with this version of "the good life."
 
I am sure it is just a coincidence, but Adelson's company, like many Vegas casino companies, has opened a highly profitable casino in Macau (licensed by the Chinese government) with another soon to open. So, maybe, Adelson has been too busy making money working with the Chinese Government to pay a visit to Amnesty International's website to read recent features like "The Human Cost of China's Economic Miracle" and "China's Growing Underclass"

Sheldon Adelson Fights for No. 1 Spot

September 28, 2006 | 11:17 am

Sheldonadelson_j4pl17nc Sheldon Adelson must be a Rolling Stone's fan. He still can't get no satisfaction.

It seems being the third richest man in the United States has not sated Adelson's ambition or appetites. Oliver Staley interviewed the 73-year-old Adelson for Bloomberg at The Venetian on Tuesday about his desire to be the richest person in the country:

"I've already figured out when I am going to be No. 2 and No. 1."

No 2. is Warren Buffett and No. 1, of course, is Bill Gates. Adelson does not say if there are others running in this race. Buffett and especially his partner in charity, Gates, seem to be more focused right now on giving their money away; that sure makes it easier for Adelson to reach the top of the list.

Oh, in the interview, Adelson too mentions vague charitable plans to fight unspecified diseases at some future point. "I see this as my humanitarian legacy. We're prepared to pay billions."

How quirky that Adelson says "pay" billions instead of "give" billions; kind of makes it sound like a humanitarian legacy is something hanging in a store window with a price tag on it. Other little quirks Adelson offers in the interview are his similes for the discussion of his Macau casino operation.

"In my entrepreneurial language, it's a no-brainer. It's like bringing a blanket to someone on an ice floe, or bringing water to someone in the desert.''

These are Adelson's examples of entrepreneurship and not charity? Anyway, that is his view of what his Venetian Macau gambling operation will bring to tourists from Korea and Japan.

Of course, in my view, in charity, motivation is less important than action, the actual giving of money. In that regard, the only thing missing from Adelson's announced plan are those pesky details about when he will give these billions that will go to humanity to fight unnamed diseases and in what way he will give it. Charity is often done in private, yes, but understand if you are the third-wealthiest person in the country, people get really curious.

(Photo: Kim Cheung / AP)


The Richest Person in Las Vegas

September 22, 2006 | 11:33 am

Forbes list of the 400 richest Americans includes many names familiar to locals like Kirk Kerkorian, Bill Boyd and Steve Wynn. But it is Wynn's less-than-friendly competitor Sheldon Adelson (who controls the Venetian) who easily answers the question: who is the richest person in Las Vegas? Adelson appears just after Bill Gates and Warren Buffett on the list, and at No. 3, Adelson is the only local in the top 10. Wynn, for example, is not even close at No. 107.

Despite all his success here (dating back to the Comdex convention he founded in the '80s and sold at a premium in the '90s) Adelson, a City College of New York dropout, continues to see himself as a barbarian at Las Vegas' gate. Adelson tells Forbes, "I loved being the outsider. I didn't care what those guys said." That means, among other things, the Venetian is the only non-union property on the Strip.

Interestingly, Adelson's fortune has increased enormously not so much because of his faith in Vegas, but because of his early investment in Macau, according to Forbes. Even the magazine is blown away by Adelson's riches:

"He’s been getting rich faster than, as far as we can tell, anyone in history. Over the past two years Adelson has made $23.6 million a day — just under $1 million a hour. At that pace he’ll eclipse Bill Gates as the richest man in the country sometime in 2012."


Elton John is Vegas' Richest Celeb

January 26, 2006 |  6:51 am

Eltonjohnredpiano_ii5703kn_2 Up on Forbes's web site is a ranking of the "Celebrity 100" calculating the earnings of the creative, athletic, beautiful and famous. After an absence from this list, the bitch is back, as Caesars headliner Elton John is the only Vegas local in the top ten (sitting pretty at #9) below Madonna but above Tom Cruise.

John's estimated pay last year: $44 Million. That may seem like all your dreams come true, but  $44 million is really just change between the couch cushions if you are a billionaire and Nevada has four of those, according to the Forbes list of the 400 richest Americans. Three will come as no surprise to locals. Number 235 is William Samuel Boyd whose Boyd Gaming last year swallowed Coast Casinos. Number 164 is Steve Wynn whose monstrously large vision is fairly credited with creating contemporary Las Vegas. And, at number 15, Wynn's rival Sheldon Adelson, the son of a cab driver, who owns the Venetian. The final Nevada billionaire may be less familiar to locals as he has managed to keep a remarkably low profile considering how good this town is at flushing out the ultra rich to come play with us. Pierre M Omidyar is number 18 (and, at 38, decades younger than every other billionaire here), and is the founder of E-Bay. Omidyar and I both live in Henderson; so, I'll keep a look out for him at the grocery store.



Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Comments


Categories


Recent Posts
Movable Buffet: Final entry |  November 4, 2009, 1:05 pm »
Photos from Fangoria: Trinity of Terrors |  November 1, 2009, 8:45 am »
Oops, I am a tourist (and it's expensive) |  October 31, 2009, 10:00 am »
Fright Dome: Huge haunted houses at Circus Circus |  October 30, 2009, 11:47 am »

Archives