The Movable Buffet

Dispatches from Las Vegas
by Richard Abowitz

Category: UFC

UFC vs. Movable Buffet continues ...

May 19, 2009 | 12:29 pm
The UFC 100 is coming up this summer. And once again the organization that owns UFC will not credential the Buffet.  I do not qualify under its credential policy for media access to their event. In the past, I have been offered a contract called, in my opinion, misleadingly a credential application that allows the UFC to have vast control over how they are covered by the Buffet and for how long I am allowed to cover them. Since I refuse to sign, UFC will not provide credentials to me. But this policy is not consistent. Doug Elfman of the Review-Journal, who told me he also would not sign such a credential application (but did not write about the issue publicly), was granted media tickets. I requested those once and was turned down for them as well. In fact, this time I was even turned down for UFC 100 to be among fans in the overflow room. UFC has explained to me that many of the sportswriters who cover their fights are happy to sign the UFC lawyer reviewed (?) credential application,  But those are sports people who do not pay attention to the connection between sports and Vegas and betting.
 
What I find so disturbing about UFC's attempt to control access of legitimate Vegas press is just that: A few years ago some of the resorts started taking bets on the outcome of these UFC fights. It would seem for that reason alone that the insular UFC world should have an obligation to allow for legitimate public scrutiny of fighters and practices at their events by local media in Vegas. Please, don't get me wrong. There is no reason to think that anything dishonest is going on with the only sporting event I know of that uses an entertainment reality show for its minor league. Nevada is good about regulating what betting is allowed here, and so I am sure UFC is carefully monitored by gaming authorities and the governing athletic bodies. Still, nothing beats a free press.

In the end, I find it more fascinating to wonder why UFC won't credential me than the fact that they don't do so. It is important to note that no amount of smoke equals a fire, but that doesn't mean it isn't smart to look around to see if anything is burning.

Ultimate Fighting Championship vs. Movable Buffet

May 27, 2008 | 11:23 am

Tito One local journalist who covered Saturday's Ultimate Fighting Championship card at MGM's Grand Garden Arena wrote me an e-mail, offering this impression:  "UFC attempts to be more controlling than other sports. UFC sounds like it's trying to hem in media."

We were discussing his experience as well as the credential application that UFC demanded that I sign to be approved to cover the fight. The application specified everything from the trivial, forbidding my wearing certain clothes, to the ridiculous, controlling where and when I was allowed to write about the event forever more. In explaining this bizarre credential application that most would call not an application but a contract, UFC events manager Diann Brizzolara wrote me: "We have the right to protect our brand and how coverage taken from our events is disseminated." Actually, UFC does not have that right to control "how coverage taken...is disseminated" at all. This rather unique privilege in fact is what the credential application is trying to give them a back door claim to having. Brizzolara continued, "Other sports leagues, such as the NFL, have similar regulations printed on the back of their press passes." Two points: Similar isn't identical, and regulations on the back of a press pass are a wish list because they do not require my signature of agreement. Oh and the obvious, the UFC is no NFL.

Interestingly, in another e-mail, Brizzolara also wrote to me defensively that the UFC credential application was "actually reviewed by our COO (who also has a law degree)."  Huh?  Who is the COO's client: UFC or media?

Credential applications are supposed to be basic as they are designed to confirm only the legitimacy and assignment of media to an event. The standard application answers two questions: is this writer a legitimate journalist and does the writer have an assignment? Since it is an application and not a contract, it is therefore revealing that UFC felt the need to have this routine document examined by a COO with a law degree.

By the way, the writer I was exchanging e-mails with who covered this weekend's fight was not asked to sign any credential application. He was not even told that the application existed. Like me, he would never sign such a form. Could it be that UFC has a problem with the Buffet? Not according to an MGM spokesperson: "He [the other writer] had tickets to the event and no credential." Of course, that offer of review tickets without a credential was never made to me.

But why would UFC have any problems with the Buffet? Certainly this was not the case two years ago, the last time I covered a UFC fight. At that time, there was no discussion of a credential application at all.

Of course, since then I have attempted to question famously touchy UFC head Dana White about his issues with fighter Tito Ortiz and Jenna Jameson, pictured. That request for an interview with White was at first rebuffed and then ignored. Now, when it comes to me, a credential application with all sorts of stipulations is required for a press pass. I wonder what they are so worried about?

Here is one possibility: if credentialed, I would have been there this weekend to view the after-fight press conference fight. According to Robin Leach's blog, that press conference turned into such a fiasco with such vitriol and chaos that the police were called and "UFC officials immediately ended the press conference." Eventually order was restored and the press conference resumed.

So, was the problem caused by two emotionally high-strung fighters who could not settle it in the ring? No. Once again the situation was apparently a conflict between White and Ortiz and Jameson. Apparently, White wanted Ortiz at the press conference about as much as he wanted me there.

Of course, next time, I can always just buy a ticket and go blog about the UFC event. But that might not be necessary. UFC's moment may be passing anyway. Ortiz, the league's biggest star, now is done with UFC, and the league is facing increased competition.

On his blog, Leach also reports about speculation on the future of Ortiz and for White's UFC: "Will Tito join a rival Mixed Martial Arts league or retire and how will White take on his more bitter rivals in the XC Extreme Sports league that starts its CBS TV network coverage next Saturday night from Newark, New Jersey. If a ratings success I am reliably told three further fights would be broadcast live from Vegas."

And, of course, network fights on CBS are likely to get many more viewers than pay-for-view and cable fights. That would begin to make UFC obsolete even as it approaches mainstream status. When I first wrote about a UFC fight in 2006 that league was bringing unprecedented attention to mixed martial arts. But maybe now it is time for the next big sensation. I wonder if EliteXC requires select press to sign a credential application?

UPDATE: An MGM spokesperson writes: "I can clarify the incident about the post-fight press conference -- there was NO incident at all -- the officers were simply there to monitor the situation in the event anything got out of control. Everything was fine and so you know they attend every event we have whether it's boxing, UFC or concerts."

(Photo by Sarah Gerke)





Advertisement

About the Bloggers

Recent Comments


Categories


Recent Posts
Movable Buffet: Final entry |  November 4, 2009, 1:05 pm »
Photos from Fangoria: Trinity of Terrors |  November 1, 2009, 8:45 am »
Oops, I am a tourist (and it's expensive) |  October 31, 2009, 10:00 am »
Fright Dome: Huge haunted houses at Circus Circus |  October 30, 2009, 11:47 am »

Archives