UN Supporters Write Paper Calling for Depopulation


Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
April 16, 2012




The United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) has  published a assortment of “key messages” titled “Environment and Development Challenges: The Imperative to Act” written by eugenicist Paul Ehrlich, climate change alarmist James Lovelock and NASA’s own James Hansen.

This paper will be presented at the UN Earth Summit (Rio+20) 2012 as a call for the global implementation of depopulation policies. The authors decry their rights are being infringed upon for addressing what they call the “population issue”.

The paper states:

“The population issue should be urgently addressed by education and empowerment of women, including in the work-force and in rights, ownership and inheritance; health care of children and the elderly; and making modern contraception accessible to all.”

They want “funding (for worldwide fertility control) decreased by 30% between 1995 and 2008, not least as a result of legislative pressure from the religious right in the USA and elsewhere”, the authors call for “education and planning needed to foster and achieve a sustainable human population and lifestyles.”

To achieve a “sustainable human population” the authors call for “. . . globally, we must find better means to agree and implement measures to achieve collective goals.”

They also want to indoctrinate our children by rear-mongering. “In the face of an absolutely unprecedented emergency, society has no choice but to take dramatic action to avert a collapse of civilization. Either we will change our ways and build an entirely new kind of global society, or they will be changed for us.”

These spokesmen, under the support of the UN, wish to coerce the global populations into acquiescing to their vision of a global society. These three men have shown themselves to be terrorists who use the guise of environmentalism to ultimately put in place their one world government.

James Lovelock proposed reducing the world’s population to 1 billion in 2009. Lovelock also stated in 2010that average people are too stupid to stop man-made climate change themselves; and therefore need governments to help them stop themselves.

Paul Ehrilch has been quoted on record demanding that the world’s population be reduced dramatically. In the proposals within Ecoscience, that Ehrilch co-authored with John P. Holdren, Obama’s Science Czar, stated that:

“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.”

Ehrilch and Holdren say that global society will not survive without a decisive and massive depopulation of humans worldwide.

“… Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international super-agency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist.”

It is obviously unacceptable to have these types in places of influential power. And for their usage of environmentalism is a total tainting of the movement. Of course there should be recycling and reuse of our already made resources. There are ways in which to have technology without destroying our planet.

This is not about saving the planet. This is about the global Elite changing the social meme to support the unilateral death of billions of innocent people. It is imperative to see this illusion for what it is.

We can have a sustainable planet without murdering billions of people to achieve it.



Comments are closed.