John Kampfner: Wikileaks shows up our media for their docility at the feet of authority

Mr Assange is an unconventional figure, a man who lives in the shadows and enjoys doing so

You should never shout "fire" in a crowded theatre. Once you have accepted this old adage, you accept that there are limits to free expression. The important word in the first sentence is not "fire", but "crowded". A crowded theatre would lead to a stampede. Where there is a real and identifiable danger, restraint should be shown. Context is everything in the free-speech debate; risk to life is an undeniable caveat. Most other caveats are, however, mere ruses by the powerful to prevent information from reaching the public domain.

It is within these parameters that the furore over Wikileaks and its exposures should be seen. The latest document dump is larger than the Iraq files and potentially more embarrassing, with its State Department assessments of governments and statesmen – from Hamid Karzai to Silvio Berlusconi to Nicolas Sarkozy. Diplomats have launched a frantic round of damage limitation. Oh to have been a fly on the wall during the excruciating conversation between the US ambassador and Downing Street. The Americans are entitled to put their side of the story, to seek to assuage any inconvenience caused.

The founder of Wikileaks, Julian Assange, believes the Americans are going much further than that, carrying out a concerted campaign to undermine and discredit him. I have no information on the cases that have led two Swedish women to press charges of rape and sexual harassment against him. Only those involved do. Mr Assange's legal representatives in the UK suspect that the Swedish authorities are playing the Americans' game, cutting corners in terms of correct legal procedures. So highly charged is the environment that it is extremely difficult to separate information from disinformation.

Mr Assange is an unconventional figure, a man who lives in the shadows and enjoys doing so. He is difficult to deal with and holds himself in high regard. When he contacted me through an intermediary two months ago, suggesting that Index on Censorship host him in a London event, I was happy to accept but made clear that I did not want to give him an open forum. I would engage him in debate with a detractor.



He accepted; then he disappeared for five days, not answering phone calls or emails. When he finally surfaced, he stipulated no cameras or photographers, and that we should sneak him in through the back door. I argued that this would not look great for a free-expression organisation. In the end we compromised, and the television crews were allowed in halfway through what turned out to be a fascinating debate with the columnist David Aaronovitch. The sell-out crowd did not give Mr Assange an easy ride. But there was a virtually unanimous presumption towards free speech, something that is woefully lacking in so much of British public life.

This must surely be the starting point. In the US, with its First Amendment, restrictions are seen as an exception to the rule. In the UK, free speech is regarded as a negotiable commodity. An interest group's right to be offended is seen as just as important as the right to air an opinion. A government's right to secrecy is seen as more important than the public's right to know.

The mainstream media in the UK are serial offenders. Newspapers that have no compunction about invasions of privacy or about shrill comment devote precious little time or energy to challenging authority through rigorous investigative journalism. Most political "scoops" are merely stories planted by politicians on pliant lobby hacks. Editors and senior journalists are habitually invited into MI5 and MI6 for briefings. These are affable occasions, often over lunch. There is no harm in that. What tends to happen, however, is that journalists are tickled pink by the attention. They love being invited to the "D-notice" committee to discuss how they can all behave "responsibly". It makes them feel important. Many suspend their critical faculties as a result.

Far from being "feral beasts", to use Tony Blair's phrase, the British media are overly respectful of authority. Newspapers and broadcasters tend to be suspicious of those who do not play the game, people like Mr Assange who are awkward outsiders. Some editors are quite happy to help the authorities in their denunciations of him, partly out of revenge for not being in his inner circle.

All governments have a legitimate right to protect national security. This should be a specific, and closely scrutinised, area of policy. Most of our secrecy rules are designed merely to protect politicians and officials from embarrassment. Documents are habitually over-classified for this purpose. The previous government made desperate attempts to stop legal evidence of its collusion in torture from reaching the public. Ministers argued, speciously, that this was to protect the "special intelligence relationship" with Washington. It will be intriguing to see how much information is allowed to be published when Sir Peter Gibson begins his official inquiry. Precedent suggests little grounds for optimism.

As with all free speech, as with Wikileaks, context is key. It is vital to know when governments collude in torture or other illegal acts. It is important to know when they say one thing in private (about a particular world leader) and do quite another in public. It is perturbing to know that aid agencies may have been used by the military, particularly in Afghanistan, to help Nato forces to "win hearts and minds".

These questions, and more, are vital for the democratic debate. The answers inevitably cause embarrassment. That too is essential for a healthy civil society. Good journalists and editors should be capable of separating the awkward from the damaging. Information that could endanger life, either in the short term or as part of a longer-term operation, should remain secret.

Once this latest flurry is over, prepare for the backlash. Mr Assange's industrial-scale leaking may lead to legislation in a number of countries that makes whistle-blowing harder than it already is. Perhaps the most curious aspect of the Wikileaks revelations is not that they have happened, but it took someone as mercurial as Mr Assange to be the conduit. Rather than throwing stones, newspapers should be asking themselves why they did not have the wherewithal to hold truth to power.

John Kampfner is the chief executive of Index on Censorship

Independent Comment
blog comments powered by Disqus
Career Services

Day In a Page

Robert Fisk: Western agreement 'could leave Syria in Assad's hands for two more years'

Robert Fisk

Western agreement 'could leave Syria in Assad's hands for two more years'
The Top Gun technology targeting the world

Made in Britain Part five: Defence industry

The Top Gun technology targeting the world
'Tampon King's' revolution will be sanitised

India's tampon revolution will be sanitised

No one believed he could do it – but one school drop-out has changed women's lives in India
Overnight revolution: A new breed of luxury hotel is shaking up the hospitality industry

Overnight revolution: New breed of luxury hotel

They deliver the things we need, the way we need them, says Mark Jones.
Going for gold on Box Hill: Simon Calder gets a sneak preview of the Olympic Road Race route

Going for gold on Box Hill

Simon Calder gets a sneak preview of the Olympic Road Race route
Canada: Join the stampede to Calgary

Canada: Join the stampede to Calgary

It has been 100 years since the annual rodeo extravaganza began in Alberta's largest city
Why it's cheaper to park a light aircraft at the airport than a car

Why it's cheaper to park a light aircraft at the airport than a car

If you thought it was expensive to leave your car in Britain as you jet off on holiday, you were right
Bernie's dream of grand prix in London is heading for the pits

Bernie's dream of grand prix in London is heading for the pits

The Formula One boss has revealed his vision for a race around the West End – but he's got a fight on his hands with the city's taxi drivers
Hollywood: Aliens vs Presidents

Hollywood: Aliens vs Presidents

US voters reckon that when it comes to protecting their country from UFOs and martians, Obama is their man. But how does he compare to his on-screen counterparts?
The science of salt: How to bring out the hidden flavours in your dishes

In season: The science of salt

Knowing how to season properly separates the top chefs from the kitchen amateurs.
Pecking order: How to get a better breed of bird

How to get a better breed of bird

The rich taste of properly reared chicken is a revelation to those of us used to mass-produced meat.
Spice up your life: Thomasina Miers reveals how to tackle tacos - and more - at home

Thomasina Miers: How to tackle tacos

Miers brought authentic Mexican food to the masses with Wahaca
The 10 Best summer rosés

The 10 Best summer rosés

From the sun-drenched vineyards of Provence to the slopes of Surrey, the pink drink is better than ever...
James Lawton: Spanish can always have faith in miracle saves of 'Saint Iker'

James Lawton

Spanish can always have faith in miracle saves of 'Saint Iker'
Nick Bollettieri's Wimbledon Files: Odds stacked against her but Watson belongs on centre stage

Nick Bollettieri's Wimbledon Files

Odds stacked against her but Watson belongs on centre stage