AFLC Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Review Appellate Court Decision Upholding Federal “Hate Crimes” Law

On October 31, the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, asking the Court to review an appellate court decision which held that several Michigan pastors and a family values advocate lacked standing to challenge the constitutionality of the federal “Hate Crimes” law, which criminalizes so-called “bias” crimes motivated by a person’s “actual or perceived” “sexual orientation” or “gender identity.”  Violators of the Act are subject to ten years in prison.  

In February 2010, Gary Glenn, president of the American Family Association of Michigan, and Michigan-based pastors Levon Yuille, Rene Ouellette, and James Combs filed a federal lawsuit against U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, challenging the Act’s constitutionality.  As Christian leaders with a duty to teach God’s Word on moral issues, such as homosexuality, Glenn and pastors Yuille, Ouellette, and Combs have “willfully” and actively engaged in expressive conduct regarding the morality of homosexuality—conduct that could subject them to investigation and prosecution under the Hate Crimes Act, which does not limit its prohibitions to physical acts of violence.

In September 2010, a federal district court judge in Michigan granted the Attorney General’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit on standing and ripeness grounds, thus avoiding a decision on the merits of the constitutional challenge.  AFLC Co-Founder and Senior Counsel Robert Muise appealed that ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, where he argued the case before a three-judge panel in January 2012.  In August 2012, the Sixth Circuit ruled that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the law and dismissed the case.

Muise commented: “There is no doubt that this federal criminal statute violates the First Amendment on its face.  Thus, the Act chills the exercise of free speech, specifically the free speech of our clients, who speak out against homosexuality.  This chilling effect is sufficient to confer standing to challenge the Act as a matter of law.”

David Yerushalmi, Co-Founder and Senior Counsel of AFLC, commented: “Criminalizing religious opposition to homosexuality while elevating those who engage in homosexual acts to a protected class under federal law is a clear violation of the Constitution and a frightening abuse of federal power.”

In support of this legal challenge, Congressman Steve King (R-IA), wrote a letter stating, “I want to commend you for your courage to challenge the constitutionality of the Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009.  As a Member of the House Committee on the Judiciary, I worked hard to stop this legislation in Committee and on the floor of the House of Representatives. . . .  Like you, I believe this ‘Hate Crimes’ Act is unconstitutional and marks an unprecedented move to regulate and criminalize thoughts.”

Search for:
Become a proud member and supporter of AFLC
Click Here
Sign up for Alerts
Follow AFLC
Contribute Now
Latest from the Blog
AFLC Month in Review: ...
Elections Have Conse ...
AFLC Asks Federal Court ...
AFLC Free Speech Victory: ...
AFLC Month in Review: ...
Efforts to Impose Sharia ...
"Wellspring of Manufactured ...
Muslim in New York Responds ...
Swing State Poll Indicates ...
Featured Media

AFLC Senior Counsel Robert Muise's speech at the Metro Detroit Stand Up for Religious Freedom rally in Dearborn, Michigan on October 20, 2012 

AFLC in the News
Potential 10-year terms for 'bias' challenged by pastors
Pastors, Biblical Principles Silenced in Michigan
Politics, religion tangled up in lawsuit
Stand Up Rally calls to defy government mandate
The silencing of supporters of traditional marriage
Terms of Use and Disclaimer
Developed by VIE Corp.