• Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or My Tools.

First, do no harm: Confronting the myths of psychiatric drugs

  1. Phil Barker
    1. University of Dundee, UK
  2. Poppy Buchanan-Barker
    1. Clan Unity International, UK
  1. Phil Barker, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK Email: phil.j.barker{at}btinternet.com

Abstract

The enduring psychiatric myth is that particular personal, interpersonal and social problems in living are manifestations of ‘mental illness’ or ‘mental disease’, which can only be addressed by ‘treatment’ with psychiatric drugs. Psychiatric drugs are used only to control ‘patient’ behaviour and do not ‘treat’ any specific pathology in the sense understood by physical medicine. Evidence that people, diagnosed with ‘serious’ forms of ‘mental illness’ can ‘recover’, without psychiatric drugs, has been marginalized by drug-focused research, much of this funded by the pharmaceutical industry. The pervasive myth of psychiatric drugs dominates much of contemporary ‘mental health’ policy and practice and raises discrete ethical issues for nurses who claim to be focused on promoting or enabling the ‘mental health’ of the people in their care.

Article Notes

  • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Conflict of interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

| Table of Contents

This Article

  1. Nurs Ethics vol. 19 no. 4 451-463
    All Versions of this Article:
    1. current version image indicatorVersion of Record - Jun 29, 2012
    2. OnlineFirst Version of Record - Apr 11, 2012
    What's this?
  1. References

Share