Does anyone really believe that managers bully their owners?

|

Bruce Buck, chairman of Chelsea, says that he never feels sorry for sacked managers, probably because he negotiates their pay-offs.

He has a point but so did Harry Redknapp when he pronounced himself very comfortable with the money Tony Fernandes has been spending on survival at Queens Park Rangers.

Redknapp said, as a manager, he presumed his chairmen had competence, financially. 'They're not silly men, they're successful businessmen,' he said. 'I'll leave it to them - it's their business.'

Calling the shots: As boss of Air Asia, Tony Fernandes is no patsy

Calling the shots: As boss of Air Asia, Tony Fernandes is no patsy

He's right, of course. The idea that owners are ploughing through their life savings, the unwitting dupes of managers and agents, ignores the fact that these are some of the richest men in the world, operating in brutally hard-nosed global markets, and can look after themselves.

To presume they are bullied into saying yes to every managerial demand is preposterous.

Yet as the new financial year approaches, and accounts are published, football club owners have been cut quite a length of slack.

'McLeish era cost Villa £6m,' read one headline. 'Dalglish cost £10m to sack,' read another.

This makes it seem as if the manager alone incurs the debt, not the misjudged appointment.

It is as if Aston Villa owner Randy Lerner did not make the decision to appoint Alex McLeish in the first place, or John Henry had no option but to dismiss Kenny Dalglish, having pursued his vision for all of 15 months.

Villa's accounts contain an exceptional charge of £5.9m, covering both McLeish's arrival and his rapid departure.

There was a compensation payment of £2.5m to Birmingham City, and the rest made up by termination settlements.

Sacking Dalglish cost Liverpool £9.6m. Wages rose to £131m annually, too, and no doubt Dalglish's signings account for a slice of that.

Yet both men were employees. Nothing more. They did not hypnotise nor blackmail their owners.

So it wasn't the McLeish era that cost Villa an exceptional £5.9m. It was the Lerner era. His man, his call, his mistake. He pays for it, dearly.

But just as Buck ruthlessly washes his hands of managers the moment Roman Abramovich writes a cheque, we should not ignore that the senior decision-maker at any modern football club is no longer the man in the tracksuit.

This is the era of the owner-manager. The men at the top have never wanted more say in the running of their clubs. The time when managers were left to buy and sell is gone.

These days, owners have favoured agents and advisers and present managers with players almost as gifts.

Open secret: Tottenham manager Andre Villas-Boas (left) wanted Joao Moutinho at White Hart Lane
Tottenham target: Joao Moutinho

Open secret: Tottenham manager Andre Villas-Boas (left) wanted Joao Moutinho (right) at White Hart Lane

Join the debate with Martin...

Martin Samuel tackles your comments online every Thursday. Leave your opinions at www.dailymail.co.uk/sport

It is no secret that Andre Villas-Boas was very keen to bring Joao Moutinho to Tottenham Hotspur this summer. He got Clint Dempsey and a goalkeeper, Hugo Lloris, instead.

It has worked rather well but this is no more the Villas-Boas era at Tottenham than it was his era at Chelsea. He gets some of what he wants, some of what his boss wants, and he stitches it together as best he can.

If Tottenham's accounts later become a point of weakness, or he fails and is paid off, the buck stops in the boardroom.

French fancy: Harry Redknapp (left) went to France in to persuade Loic Remy (right) to come to Loftus Road
French fancy: Harry Redknapp (left) went to France in to persuade Loic Remy (right) to come to Loftus Road

French fancy: Harry Redknapp (left) went to France to persuade Loic Remy (right) to join Queens Park Rangers

'We work with the team and on the pitch,' Redknapp added. 'We are not involved in players' wages. We are not involved in that side of the business.'

Of course, the reality is a little more complex. Redknapp still travelled to France to watch Loic Remy, to meet him and try to convince him to come to QPR.

Yet it was Fernandes who dragged the deal over the line and Fernandes who made sure his club outbid Newcastle United for the player.

So Fernandes should know what his club can afford. He owns an airline. None of his planes run out of fuel halfway, so why should QPR?

 

Why's Sam still kept waiting?

Something does not add up in Sam Allardyce's contract position at West Ham United.

The club say they are happy to wait until Premier League survival is guaranteed before opening talks on a new deal; Allardyce says he is content with this arrangement, too.

Yet his contract expires at the end of this season. No club would let a valued player get even close to becoming a free agent.

Contract delay: Sam Allardyce says he's content to wait

Contract delay: Sam Allardyce says he's content to wait

As it stands, if any rival fancied employing Allardyce, he could simply be bought out of the remainder of his agreement and start next week.

Why would West Ham entertain such vulnerability? It is almost as if they are secretly hoping Allardyce will be taken off their hands.

 
Loan star: Romelu Lukaku has proved a shrewd loan signing by West Brom

Loan star: Romelu Lukaku has proved a shrewd loan signing by West Brom

West Bromwich Albion were ordinary against Chelsea last week without striker Romelu Lukaku, who had scored three goals in two games prior to the fixture, and scored again in the win over Swansea City on Saturday.

How fortunate that Lukaku's parent club Chelsea could ensure West Brom were strong against every other team in the Premier League, but not them. Another triumph for the loan system.

 
Absolute confidence: Sir Alex Ferguson

Absolute confidence: Sir Alex Ferguson

It is a lot easier to win the Champions League when you don't have to go through the hardship of playing the matches.

Sir Alex Ferguson's assertion that his team have been denied progress by referees three times, and would have won the trophy on two of those occasions 'without a doubt', should therefore be taken with a pinch of salt.

Porto were helped by an incorrectly disallowed goal against Manchester United and an unusually weak opponent, Monaco, in the 2004 final, but they had to come through two rounds between those ties and kept three clean sheets in those games.

Ferguson's absolute confidence that his team would have beaten Inter Milan in 2010, had Rafael not been sent off during elimination by Bayern Munich, also seems a little misplaced.

Inter knocked out Barcelona in the semi-final, deservedly, having been the better team at home, winning 3-1, before holding out with 10 men for 62 minutes at the Nou Camp.

This being the sort of resilience real, as opposed to imagined, European champions display.

 

Eastern promise lost in January sales

No team from eastern Europe have ever made the final of the modern Champions League.

There were only four appearances in the old European Cup. Steaua Bucharest and Red Star Belgrade won it in 1986 and 1991, Partizan Belgrade and Steaua Bucharest didn't in 1966 and 1989.

No Russian or Ukrainian team have reached the final, although Spartak Moscow could undoubtedly have triumphed in 1995-96.

This was the last year there was no English representation in the quarter-finals, mainly because Blackburn Rovers were the sole Premier League qualifiers and performed horribly. Spartak, who won Blackburn's group with a 100 per cent record, were a dream to watch.

They had two brilliant ball-playing centre halves in Viktor Onopko and Yuri Nikiforov, outstanding wide players, Ilia Tsymbalar and Dmitri Alenichev, and a good striker in Sergei Yuran.

Top striker: Sergei Yuran (left) helped make Spartak a dream to watch

Top striker: Sergei Yuran (left) helped make Spartak a dream to watch

Moved on: Willian's sale did not help Shakhtar

Moved on: Willian's sale did not help Shakhtar

By the time the competition reconvened after its mid-winter hiatus, however, the Russians were a changed team. Onopko and Yuran had been sold. They lost 4-2 on aggregate to Nantes of France.

Many who saw Shakhtar Donetsk against Chelsea in this season's group stage had similarly high hopes of the Ukrainians.

They won at home and lost away, but were a far superior team over two legs. Much would depend on whether they kept their players in the January transfer window.

The sale of the impressive forward Willian to Anzhi Makhachkala, for a fee in the region of £30m, gave the answer to that.

This week Shakhtar were eliminated by Borussia Dortmund 5-2 on aggregate.

Dortmund are a good side, but once again an east European contender has been sold short.

With so much new money in the region, this should be changing. Yet Donetsk are the embodiment of the modern financial powerhouse club.

In a tournament crying out for more variety, the limit of their ambitions was a real shame.

 

Andre Villas-Boas did not actually condone or advocate Gareth Bale's dive against Inter Milan on Thursday, but he has not stopped such travesties occurring.

As any poor behaviour that is not eradicated is tacitly encouraged, he shares responsibility here. Maybe he will realise his error when Bale, and perhaps his Tottenham Hotspur team-mates, are denied several blatant penalties by suspicious referees.

Bale's diving is not ignored. It is widely discussed, widely debated, everyone is aware of it and, unless he changes, it will return to haunt them all.

 

And while we're at it...

It would be easy to interpret the five-point deduction London Welsh received last week for illegally fielding scrum-half Tyson Keats as the Rugby Football Union's revenge.

London Welsh challenged the RFU legally in the summer to win promotion to the Premiership, having initially been denied a place for wishing to use Oxford United's Kassam Stadium as their home.

Misleading: Ex-London Welsh team manager Mike Scott

Misleading: Ex-London Welsh team manager Mike Scott

No doubt some will presume that the spiteful RFU have used this misdemeanour to get even. Except playing Keats in 10 matches was no mere oversight.

It involved extensive deception from rugby manager Mike Scott, who falsified documents and misled everybody, including his employers and the player.

Scott has received a life ban so severe that he could not coach an Under 11 team. London Welsh think his culpability exonerates them. It doesn't.

Scott may have acted alone, the club may have been fully co-operative, indeed pro-active, in the RFU investigation, but his activities were still to London Welsh's gain.

A point per game has been the standard deduction in previous instances, and Keats featured in nine league games illegally, including the four London Welsh have won this season, against Exeter Chiefs, Sale Sharks, Bath and London Irish.

Nine points would have been an equally justifiable deduction, or 16, considering each of those victories involving Keats were worth four points.

Instead, the RFU settled on an arbitrary figure that took into account the club's misfortune in trusting Scott.

It leaves the Exiles fighting relegation, but not relegated. This was no vendetta. Indeed, it could have been far worse.

 

Blame it on Rio

The Maracana Stadium in Rio de Janeiro is a mess with England's friendly fixture against Brazil on June 2 looming.

There is no grass on the playing area, no roof over parts of the arena and thousands of seats are missing. Business as usual then.

When the Club World Cup visited Brazil in 2000 it was a similar story.

Rebuilding project: The Maracana Stadium work is putting the Confederations Cup in jeopardy

Rebuilding project: The Maracana Stadium work is putting the Confederations Cup in jeopardy

Just two days before Manchester United's first game, the Maracana looked like a building site.

Somehow, the hosts got it ready in time.

Now the summer schedule, including the Confederations Cup, appears in jeopardy.

FIFA are making disapproving noises but would not dare remove this World Cup dry run from Brazil, let alone the main event in 2014.

They will just have to live with last-minute chaos and make the best of it. As will we all.

 

It was explained to me last week that the reason the proposed Arsenal takeover went public before being placed before Stan Kroenke and his fellow shareholders is that the club are not for sale.

Roman Abramovich and Sheik Mansour could do their work privately, because Chelsea and Manchester City were available, and they did not have to win over or place pressure on the selling parties.

The model for this Arsenal move, apparently, is the Fenway Sports Group takeover of Liverpool.

Tom Hicks and George Gillett had to be helped out of the door. They did not want to sell, so Fenway leaked their interest, creating a groundswell of public support that ultimately proved unstoppable.

Yet this tactic has more than the odd flaw. Surely the public agitation begins when the private negotiations have reached stalemate.

Not the ideal model: Former Liverpool owners George Gillett (left) and Tom Hicks

Not the ideal model: Former Liverpool owners George Gillett (left) and Tom Hicks

If the offer to Kroenke is so generous - there is talk of a £400m profit - why not try that method first and, if unsuccessful, then attempt to enlist disaffected supporters and capture popular opinion?

This starting point seems destined to antagonise, which will make the existing owners more stubborn in their resistance.

Whether Arsenal supporters will be convinced by the nod to Fenway is also debatable.

They would hardly consider Liverpool's fortunes an upgrade on their own.


 

The comments below have been moderated in advance.

Can hardly expect someone to pump tens of millions to nearly a billion into a project and not impose conditions or influence. Hopefully you get a good balance of investment and heeding advice from the right people.

Click to rate     Rating   (0)

Two points I'd like to dispute here Martin. Firstly, as a Liverpool fan, I'd like to point out that I'm happy with our current trajectory under Fenway. Considering we were on the brink of bankruptcy I'd say we are in a much better position now. Our debt is down from what it was under Hicks and Gillet and our squad is being invested in at a fairly good level. Enough to convince Luis Suarez that we are moving in the right direction (as he said on Sky). If Arsenal improved as much as we have, rather than going backwards each year, I'm sure their fans would be happy. Secondly, the loan system. It isn't perfect, but I would suggest it is the best of a bad set of options. The fact you are talking about Lukaku, who barely got a kick for Chelsea last season, shows just what an impact it has had on him and how well he has developed his potential. We want the best players, and this helps them to develop their talent. I'm interested to know what you would suggest as an alternative?

Click to rate     Rating   1

I feel sorry for Chelsea when Bruce n Ron Gourlay are still behind... They should not give RA blind advices..

Click to rate     Rating   (0)

West Ham have a task on their hands to fill a 60,000 capacity stadium, that task is made greater if they attempt to entertain fans with the brand of football that Allardyce employs. The contractual situation will suit Allardyce as well, as he will be an easy target for a perspective club. He'll personally feel that the likes of Everton will be looking at him, and that will be an upgrade for him, as he has a massive opinion of himself. He may find that his talents will be sought by a Championship team that is looking to get promoted and stay up, which is his level I feel. West Ham would do well in my opinion, to employ a new manager once Premier league survival is assured, rather than spend millions of pounds on Allardyce's shopping list, which will no doubt include a couple of 6'4 central midfielders and a defenders who have no inclination of passing out from the back .

Click to rate     Rating   (0)

Sometimes owners see their clubs as hobbies or vanity projects and get a little too carried away with themselves, spending money they know they shouldn't and disregarding the business principles they've lived by their professional lives. FFP seeks to ensure that each club is run in a accordance to these strict set of 'rules' which ensures everyone is playing by the same set of universally accepted business practices and never again will these reckless owners be allowed to spend the money they have earned themselves in the way they wish. Wheres the fun in that? I'm a Wednesday fan and realistically the only chance we've got of ever competing at the top level again is to hope a rich guy with a big ego pitches up and takes leave of his senses, disregarding those sensible business principles and chucking a bit of money at us.

Click to rate     Rating   2

The money men call all of the shots nowadays!

Click to rate     Rating   (0)

2nd point: I agree about Bale's diving and it has already come back to haunt us. I believe I am correct in saying we are the only Premier League club not to be awarded a penalty this season. Gardner's clear foul in the penalty area on Bale at the Stadium of Light was ignored and Bale was promptly booked. Bale needs to stop because I can see us being denied a stonewall penalty in one of the many important games coming up and I will not blame the referee (ok I will for a little while) but I will also blame Bale, the senior pros at the club who should speak to him and the management at the club for not pulling him up on this. As well as costing us freekicks and penalties, it is irritating for us Spurs fans and even worse, embarrassing...! If my eight-year-old son, who regularly attends games with me, starts feigning injury when playing I'll know who to blame. Bale is a great player but needs to stop the theatrics.

Click to rate     Rating   11

"It is no secret that Andre Villas-Boas was very keen to bring Joao Moutinho to Tottenham Hotspur this summer. He got Clint Dempsey and a goalkeeper, Hugo Lloris, instead." True, but Spurs did have a bid accepted for Moutinho. The deal collapsed because of third party ownership...

Click to rate     Rating   6

Yeah the era of owners with no qualifications in football & lack of experience playing with clubs as though they are a kid playing a football manager game on a computer. None of them no what they are doing & Abramovich has still not learnt that you have to buy for the future rather than just buy a super squad & believe it can just keep winning trophies then blame the manager for you own bad decisions.

Click to rate     Rating   (0)

It's too black and white the way Samuel puts it. The answer probably is yes there are managers that do this. Take Fernandes as an example, he obviously is a smart guy to have made the money he has but from the outside he comes across as a guy who also wants to be popular and a recognisable 'celebrity'. His love of Twitter backs this opinion. There are people out there who have a lot of money but not the celebrity that goes with it and becoming a Football chairman enables their profile to become that much greater. What percentage of the population had heard of Tony Fernandes before he became a Football chairman? A very small one. Unfortunately in the world of Football they are then vulnerable to the 'chancer' type manager who plays the media well and openly states he needs this and that in order for the team to go forward. If the money man doesn't go with it, it is abuse he receives from the stands rather than the things he craves the most, popularity and hero status.

Click to rate     Rating   1

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

You have 1000 characters left.
Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.
For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.
Terms