Bin Laden death photos will NOT be released as U.S. court rules they must stay classified

By Daily Mail Reporter

|


A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that the U.S. government had properly classified top secret more than 50 images of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden taken after his death and that the government did not need to release them.

The unanimous ruling by three judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected a request for the images by a conservative nonprofit watchdog group.

Judicial Watch sued for photographs and video from the May 2011 raid in which U.S. special forces killed bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan, after more than a decade of searching.

Osama bin Laden
Soldiers keep guard around a compound within which al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden was killed in Abbottabad on May 3, 2011

Under wraps: A federal appeals court has ruled that the U.S. government did not need to release top-secret photographs of Osama bin Laden taken after he was killed at his compound (right) in Pakistan in May 2011

The organization's lawsuit relied on the Freedom of Information Act, a 1966 law that guarantees public access to some government documents.

In an unsigned opinion, the appeals court accepted an assertion from President Barack Obama's administration that the images are so potent that releasing them could cause riots that would put Americans abroad at risk.

'It is undisputed that the government is withholding the images not to shield wrongdoing or avoid embarrassment, but rather to prevent the killing of Americans and violence against American interests,' the opinion said.

The court ruled that the risk of violence justifies the decision to classify the images top secret, and that the CIA may withhold the images under an exception to the Freedom of Information Act for documents that are classified.

Tense: President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and members of the national security team receive an update on the mission that killed bin Laden

Tense: President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and members of the national security team receive an update on the mission that killed bin Laden

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement that the ruling 'would allow terrorists to dictate our laws.'

Fitton said his lawyers are considering what to do next. The group could ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case.

A spokeswoman for the Justice Department, which represents the Obama administration in court, had no immediate comment.

The images show a dead bin Laden at his compound in Pakistan, the transportation of his body to a U.S. ship and his burial at sea, the government has said.

Some of the photographs were taken so the CIA could conduct facial recognition analysis to confirm the body's identity, according to court papers.

The case is Judicial Watch Inc v. U.S. Department of Defense and CIA, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, No. 12-5137.

The comments below have not been moderated.

Is anyone really surprised by this ruling? I'm not.......never expwctwd anything else.

Click to rate     Rating   (0)

What would expect from a "annointed" judge?

Click to rate     Rating   2

He was just a puppet, didn't really exist so this is no surprise.

Click to rate     Rating   1

Why must they stay classified? I don't understand that.

Click to rate     Rating   2

Because they never killed him, DUH!!

Click to rate     Rating   1

These conspiracies make me lol

Click to rate     Rating   1

Because there aren't any...

Click to rate     Rating   (0)

Because they don't exist as he died in 2001...this story is really tiresome now

Click to rate     Rating   1

Yeah, they don't want people pulling apart the fake photos, like they did the faked moon landing!

Click to rate     Rating   1

" They already admitted that the picture of them all round the table (as seen above) was staged. - John, Durham, " Really ? Your source ?

Click to rate     Rating   5

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

You have 1000 characters left.
Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.
For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.
Terms