Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Expert points to strong evidence of Raising the Dead: Bin Laden presence in Yemen

Expert points to strong evidence of Bin Laden presence in Yemen
Al Qaida expert tells Gulf News he has no doubts that wanted Al Qaida leader Osama Bin Laden either visited Yemen or is actually based there.

Dubai: "Yemen has become the base for Al Qaida organisation in the Arabian peninsula" according to Abdul Bari Atwan, the editor in chief of the London-based newspaper Al Quds Al Arabi and an expert on Al Qaida being one of the few journalists to have spent time with Osama Bin Laden.


"I have no doubts that Osama either visited Yemen or is actually based there," Atwan told Gulf News in an interview.


"When I met him in Tora Bora [in November 1996] I asked him, ‘One of these days you will be kicked out of Afghanistan like you were from Sudan. Have you considered an alternative?' His answer was Yemen because ‘its mountains are like Tora Bora's and the country will embrace me and will be warm towards me'."

 

For more National Security Industrial Complex/Job Security BS, read here>>


But now on to our regularly scheduled program of Reality


Related

CIA Admits Making Fake Osama bin Laden Videos - Wanted to Create Fake Saddam Porn Video






Osama bin Laden: A Dead Nemesis Perpetuated by the US Government


by WhatReallyHappened.com


Osama bin Laden is dead. The news first came from sources in Afghanistan and Pakistan almost six months ago: the fugitive died in December [2001] and was buried in the mountains of southeast Afghanistan. Pakistan's president, Pervez Musharraf, echoed the information. The remnants of Osama's gang, however, have mostly stayed silent, either to keep Osama's ghost alive or because they have no means of communication.

When is a Leak "Hacking", Hacking a "Leak" and What is "Espionage?": F-35 Stealth Fighter Cover-Up


F-35 Joint Strike Fighter worthless?
“WIKI” STYLE ESPIONAGE LANDS $300 BILLION DOLLAR SUPER-PLANE PLANS

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
“Another spy disaster like Pollard, shoved under the rug too long due to pressure from the powerful Israeli lobby.”
On April 21, 2009, the Department of Defense announced the theft of 1.5 terabytes of data on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the platform meant give the United States and her allies air superiority for the next 40 years.  In a flash, all that was gone, $300 billion dollars of funding down the drain, every system, defense, offense, stealth, everything needed to build one or shoot it down, all gone.  Day one, China was accused but it wasn’t China, it wasn’t Iran, it wasn’t Pakistan.  The theft left a clear signature, one identical to the data Wikileaks has been receiving, sources inside the Pentagon repeating the actions of Israeli-Soviet spy, Jonathan Pollard.  As vital as the F-35 is to America’s defense, Pollard’s triumph on behalf of Soviet Russia and Israel dwarfs the current espionage coup.
Since the 2009 announcement, there has been nothing but silence.
When the theft was announced, Pentagon “damage control” went into action immediately branding the disaster as “unimportant” while scrambling to look for any possible way to “put the toothpaste back into the tube.”  What Secretary Gates came up with was a simple denial and to pretend it never happened.  With the continual efforts by the Israeli government to secure the release of master spy Jonathan Pollard, a “witch hunt” for another Israeli spy would endanger America’s hopes of winning a settlement between Israel and the Palestinians.
There was no real question, this was another Israeli operation, their “signature” was all over it.
“AN UNPRECEDENTED DISASTER”
What did America lose?  15 years of research and development?  That doesn’t come close.  Key components of the F-35, from stealth materials, flight and weapons systems, to tens of thousands of man-hours of systems programming are now “out there,” available to any potential rival, military or commercial.  At best, it could be considered a $300 billion dollar bank robbery, by American standards, nothing new in today’s financial world.

Rallies Have Always Been Used to Manipulate the Masses

From MediaMonarchy | kenny's sideshow: I finally saw the 1988 movie "They Live" today and realized what Peter Chamberlin is saying with his blog title 'There Are No Sunglasses'. I also saw a little of the Stewart and Colbert sanity/fear rally and you don't need the sunglasses to see through it.

The lefty counterpoint to the righty Glenn Beck hijacked Tea Party types. The lefties may be a little more fun but no less propagandizing. It's breaking us down into two groups that oppose each other as if that's all there is.

But most of us don't actually fit into this false duplicity. We're the ones who don't like Stewart and Obama, Beck and Palin. Using conventional terms we as individuals are a mix of conservative, liberal, moderate, radical or what ever you want to call it. Sort of 'mongrels' that don't fit what the media wants us to be.

A real rally for America would be anti-war, anti-imperialism and most definitely anti-criminal government and anti-wall street/banker syndicate. Basically it would be looking for the truth wherever it leads us. We haven't seen much of that in these controlled for TV gatherings.

Rallies have always been used to manipulate the masses. The crowd cheers "hooray for us" and goes home satiated. A lot of good people want to be involved, a lot of good people fall for the deceptions.


---oOo---


Here's How We Handled Ourselves and Message at the Stewart/Colbert Rally


9/11 - We Didn't Do It vs I Did Do It

We dressed as renditioned prisoners in the standard fall gitmo orange and Afghan women in Burkas, all with signs stating, "We Didn't Do It" and one Fed/Operative dressed appropriately with a sign stating, "I Did Do It - National Security Industrial Complex." We also paraded around the Mall event with our 9/11 Elephant, "Trudy," with the banner draped over her back reading, "9/11 Truth - The Elephant in the Room."

Overwhelmingly, the response was very positive as we posed for thousands of photos alongside one of the Smithsonian museums [side note: for whatever it is worth,  was accosted by one of the Smithsonian guards on the sidewalk who had seen one-too-many Night at the Museum franchises, keeping the public sidewalk a "no-walk" zone for some reason even though I had just walked up that same sidewalk moments prior, that the DC police just acquiesced to in that incident - the guard reminded me a lot of the TV junk yard magnate, Fred Sanford, with his over posturing and chest ramming].  We only had a few angry shills, yet lots of positive support amazingly enough right here within the District of Criminals.


We handed out copies of our brochure, "Nine Years of War Based on a Lie" available as a PDF below as well as copies of our latest edition of our newspaper, the Rock Creek Free Press, available as a subscription.


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...