top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]parsimonious_instead 36 points37 points ago

Harry Harrison's Stainless Steel Rat series. A bit lightweight, but full of fun and satire. Pure enjoyment.

[–]greengirlsyndrome 6 points7 points ago

I'll second this. Absolutely magical read :)

[–]dkdeathknight 2 points3 points ago

As a person who got hooked on Science Fiction because of this author, I agree. I started with the Deathworld series, but Stainless Steel Rat is an easier read.

[–]the-jesuve 2 points3 points ago

Cheers for this. My favorite series that deserves to be picked up for TV development.

[–]scourgeobohem 133 points134 points ago

The Foundation series was my first venture into the genre and it was amazing. I might also recommend Sherman Alexie's Flight, very very cool.

[–]RSquaredBreach Zone, Myke Cole 42 points43 points ago

Or his (Asimov's) Robot series, which is extremely readable and mostly short stories.

[–]scourgeobohem 10 points11 points ago

I was so surprised by how readable it was as well and blown away by his ability to get his arms around such a massive world and keep his eye on the ball over such huge swaths of history.

[–]Morlaak 10 points11 points ago

I agree. His short stories are like an Introduction to Asimov. If you like them, you know you're going to like his novels too.

[–]hatu 25 points26 points ago

My first foray into sci-fi was 1984, but really what got me hooked was Asimov and PKD of course. The scale of the ideas in Foundation is really what made me fall in love with scifi (I used to think it was stupid).

[–]Flatliner0452 16 points17 points ago

I'd say PKD is probably a much more accessible author than any of the people on the list.

[–]TheJunkyard 8 points9 points ago

I'm not sure. He had an astonishing amount of crazy and cool ideas (as witness the number of film adaptations made of his work) and he had a unique style all of his own. On the other hand, his work was a bit variable, some books were way better than others, and a lot of his work might be a bit "out there" for some non sci-fi readers.

If we're cherry-picking a good Dick novel to recommend to our hypothetical new reader, I could go along with that, but I certainly wouldn't make a blanket recommendation for a noob to just go pick up one of his books.

[–]InfanticideAquifer 9 points10 points ago

Yeah, but if you start them on Foundation you run the risk of everything else you give them being a let-down ;) .

[–]Gosh-Darnit 16 points17 points ago

Asimov is a little dense for a scifi entry point.

[–]Auspants 21 points22 points ago

You can't really list anything Asimov as "entry level", not unless your first time scifi reader comes from a science background... anyone else isn't likely to get very far in before they get bored/annoyed with Asimov's writing style.

Might be easier to start a beginner off with either Clarke or Heinlein's short stories.

[–]masklinn 22 points23 points ago

You can't really list anything Asimov as "entry level"

The Robots series are very easy reads.

[–]TFH05 4 points5 points ago

Exception being Caves of steel, first of the robot stories (first novel about R. Daneel Olivaw). Gave up on Foundation myself.

[–]yngwinC.J. Cherryh: Downbelow Station 2 points3 points ago

I disagree. Actually, Asimov was my entry into science fiction, with his robot stories and Foundation trilogy. I didn't find him boring at all, even tho I was 12 at the time.

[–]WhatIsPoop 1 point2 points ago

I always tell people The Foundation is basically a bunch of stories of nerds triumphing over all other adversity.

[–]ConansBeard 23 points24 points ago

The Stars My Destination. It's short too, like <250 pages.

[–]alfredbester 8 points9 points ago

This is obviously the best answer.

[–]Auspants 106 points107 points ago

ITT: people who don't understand "entry level".

To fit that name a book needs to be enjoyable and accessible FROM THE BEGINNING!

You want to give them something like one of the many short collections put together by Gardner Dozois, give them accessible stories that aren't too long and are written in a variety of styles. Failing that I'd suggest something like Reach for Tomorrow (Clarke) or The Green Hills of Earth (Heinlein).

TGHOE will be particularly engaging for a new reader, vastly differing stories all set in the same universe so the reader adjusts easily.

[–]shiplesp 33 points34 points ago

I interpreted entry level to be for those inexperienced with science fiction, and/or for those who may even be resistant to it. Plenty of readers have preconceived notions about what science fiction is like, and to break those conceptions down, we may need to sneak some vegetables into the mashed potatoes.

[–]Surf_Science 7 points8 points ago

Plenty of readers have preconceived notions about what science fiction is like, and to break those conceptions down, we may need to sneak some vegetables into the mashed potatoes.

Well there is also the issue that some readers (and I'm including myself) may not enjoy some of the epic sort of self-indulgent fantasy that can be found in the genre, so, recommending something with quality that translates across genre may be good. I think the inclusion of, for example. Never Let Me Go, was a good idea.

[–]Loonytic 2 points3 points ago

I thought entry level meant someone with 2-3 years of experience and expertise in the field.

owait.

[–]The_Year_of_Glad 6 points7 points ago

You want to give them something like one of the many short collections put together by Gardner Dozois, give them accessible stories that aren't too long and are written in a variety of styles. Failing that I'd suggest something like Reach for Tomorrow (Clarke) or The Green Hills of Earth (Heinlein).

Yep. Short stories get to the hook more quickly, and a collection with works by a bunch of authors is more likely to have a good style match for a new reader's personal tastes.

One of the first science fiction books I ever read was an anthology called Adventures in Time and Space. It's old enough that there's been a lot of good stuff written since it was published, and I think it's currently out of print (though there are a ton of used copies on the secondary market), but my guess is that it'd still be a reasonably effective gateway drug for the genre.

[–]Ashilikia 47 points48 points ago

For people who want a quick list of books to read from this article:

Patrick Nielsen Hayden recommends

Ken Liu recommends

Maureen McHugh recommends

Daniel Abraham recommends:

Scott Westerfeld recommends

E. Lily Yu recommends

Diana Gill recommends so many books

Seanan McGuire recommends

John Scalzi recommends

Lou Anders recommends

Saladin Ahmed recommends

Paolo Bacigalupi recommends

N.K. Jemisin recommends

This was compiled by hand. Please let me know if there are any errors or bad links.

[–]vortik 67 points68 points ago

Most books by John Scalzi -- Old Man's War and Redshirts, to name two. Scalzi's books are fast, easy to read, and are like action movies in a book.

In short, they are a lot of fun and very approachable. A number of his publications have been nominated for or have received a Hugo award, and given that Hugo awards tend to be "popularity measures", they're pretty good indicators of general readability.

[–]DerpZillaTheMindKill 13 points14 points ago

Agent to the Stars -- It is easy reading and has to do with a LA Talent agent.

[–]accpi 3 points4 points ago

+1 to this one. It's funny, pretty fast moving and a good ride.

[–]Hedgehogs4MeScience Fiction 3 points4 points ago

Non-obvious one I'd like to bring to the table as well: David Brin, especially his long non-series stuff like Earth. It reads like, well, a book, but also brings some scifi stuff to the table that can be used for getting into harder stuff later. Same sort of deal as Scalzi, but usually less silly.

[–]Rude_Etude 15 points16 points ago

Stanislaw Lem's stuff is good.

[–]el_horsto 5 points6 points ago

Came to suggest that, Solaris in particular. I think you can enjoy it for the psychological aspects, even if you're not into science fiction, so I would consider it a good start. (if you can get through the sometimes lengthy descriptions of the wave formations etc)

[–]Rude_Etude 1 point2 points ago

No, Solaris is really dense, I didn't enjoy reading it much. Lem's short stories, his Pirx the Pilot series, are great stuff.

[–]sumbeech 13 points14 points ago

I'm going to go with John Scalzi's "Old Man's War" It's a fun book to read and it's a great take on books like "The Forever War" and "Starship Troopers" which you can direct the reader to after he finishes it.

[–]wake_their_ashes 46 points47 points ago

The Forever War, it's a classic.

[–]trillreaper 8 points9 points ago

I've read it and enjoyed it but I don't know how accessible it would be for a non sci-fi reader versus other offerings. The beginning being standard military fiction with some modifications is a big draw but I would venture that it gets a little strange later on for your average reader.

[–]Brendan_Fraser 2 points3 points ago

Pretty much pre-Halo.

[–]wake_their_ashes 2 points3 points ago

It inspired a lot of sci-fi properties, which in turn inspired things like Halo. Heinlein's Starship troopers being a bigger influence I think, although the two works are very similar thematically.

I always liked how he worked time dilation into the narrative, this book was the introduction to that subject for me and I felt it did a good job of explaining it and made it work in superb fashion.

[–]reddit_isnt_cool 14 points15 points ago

I usually start people on Asimov short stories. They are quick and easy to digest and are some of the most pure sci-fi I can think of that delivers my favorite aspect of science fiction-the ability to translate moral and social issues into futuristic reflections-in an accessible form.

Think of how much attention "The Last Question" gets on this site. Everyone I've sent that too has loved it. And when I hand them an anthology they can't put it down.

[–]just_a_question_bro 66 points67 points ago

Neuromancer by William Gibson would be a good introduction for people who like fast paced thrillers.

Dune by Frank Herbert would be a good introduction for people who like history, think LOTR/ASOIF.

Foundation by Isaac Asimov would be a good introduction for people who like traditional plot development and don't mind Deus Ex Machina.

Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card would be a good introduction for anyone who still favors young adult novels and coming of age stories.

Brave New World by Aldous Huxley would be a good introduction for anyone who enjoys prophetic, dystopian social critiques.

Out of the Silent Planet although dated would make a pretty good introduction for anyone that likes C.S. Lewis or enjoys novels with heavy spiritual or religious undertones.

Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy would make a great introduction to the genre for anyone looking for an easy, fun, humorous, and entertaining read.


I could recommend more, but I'm sure those will do.

[–]BR0STRADAMUSTennis Player 33 points34 points ago

[–]CowboyNinjaD 6 points7 points ago

I feel like Hitchhikers Guide is better for people with at least some familiarity of the sci-fi genre, because it plays with and pokes fun at existing sci-fi tropes.

It's sort of like Galaxy Quest, which stands alone well enough but is much better if you're familiar with Star Trek and sci-fi fandom.

[–]skysinsaneThe Riddlemaster of Hed 19 points20 points ago

The hitchhikers guide would be a good sci-fi novel even if there was no humor. As it was, it became one of my favorite books ever.

[–]This_is_a_revolution 6 points7 points ago

As someone who doesn't tend to read sci-fi, the humor is what drew me to THGTTG. The story is what kept me. I now recommend it to anyone I know despite their preferences in fiction.

[–]fumf 14 points15 points ago

Great list! I'd throw on snowcrash by Neal Stephenson, 2001 by Clarke, and stranger in a strange land by Heinlein.

[–]troglodyte 23 points24 points ago

I would never recommend Neuromancer to a non-literary, non-sci-fi person. The book is amazing but it's definitely odd prose.

I always tell people to start with Snow Crash instead of Neuromancer, for that reason. Snow Crash is funny, smart, and a bit more straightforward than Neuromancer.

[–]njm1314 7 points8 points ago

I don't think Dune is the best for entry level. A lot of people have trouble getting into it unless they are familiar with the genre. I've had a few people quit the book because they thought it was too hard only to come back to it years later.

Hitchhickers on the other hand is a fantastic entry level book.

[–]MarsdreamerJules Verne 22 points23 points ago

I got my step dad into sic-fi by having him read Levaithan Wakes. He'd never read a sic-fi in his life, isn't a big fan of the genre and typically reads outdoor survival novels.

Within a month he'd read the entire series and couldn't stop texting me about.

Perhaps now he's ready for Foundation..

[–]atapestryofobscenity 13 points14 points ago

(sic)-fi

[–]BadassSasquatch 6 points7 points ago

Reading leviathan now. It is quite good. I'm about half way through and still have no clue who/what leviathan is.

[–]MarsdreamerJules Verne 1 point2 points ago

Prepare yourself for a wild ride :)

The sequels are also quite good.

[–]itfeelsfeynman 1 point2 points ago

I got my SO ready for Foundation with The Gods Themselves

[–]Durzo_BlintThe Emperor's Blades 1 point2 points ago

Book 4 is coming out soon. There's also 2 short stories that Corey wrote.

[–][deleted] ago

[deleted]

    [–]NotYourAssistant 9 points10 points ago

    Great book, one of my "Top 10", but it's a bit over the top as an intro to sci fi for a lot of people.

    [–]cphuntington97 3 points4 points ago

    The style is like an action movie. It's short and fast paced... a great intro, imho!

    [–]EagleOfMay 26 points27 points ago

    I would recommend a A Canticle for Leibowitz .

    Out of all the science fiction I've read it is this story arc that I remember with the most detail. The "Pope's Children" still give me shivers.

    Just learned something from scanning the wikipedia entry: The author was inspired by his participation in the Allied bombing of the monastery at Monte Cassino during World War II.

    [–]amcdon 11 points12 points ago

    Although it's objectively a good book and I'm glad I read it, I honestly can't think of a more boring book. I definitely wouldn't recommend this as someone's first SF novel.

    [–]thesecretbarn 2 points3 points ago

    It's not supposed to be someone's first novel ever, just someone's first science fiction novel.

    I loved A Canticle for Leibowitz, and couldn't put it down. What made it so great was the characters and their interactions with the environment; anyone who loves good writing and good characters can love it. No sci fi knowledge requried.

    [–]wake_their_ashes 1 point2 points ago

    I love this book, I found it when searching for more books similar to The Forever War, which I noted in another post in here. This was the first post-apocalyptic sci-fi book I really got into. Just randomly stumbled across the name in an Amazon review of something else and did a cursory search. So glad I did.

    "Sic transit mundus..."

    Chills. By far one of my all time favorites, I consider it a classic.

    [–]PenIsBroken 17 points18 points ago

    Iain M Banks - Culture series. I am only just getting into them and I have really enjoyed them so far. They are highly regarded by a lot of people I know.

    [–]topbanter_lad 5 points6 points ago

    Yeah, and I think "Player of Games" is the best book to start on. Even though "Consider Phlebas" is first in the series, it's probably better for a sci-fi novice to read a story with events revolving around a clear (and human) central character, rather than a sprawling space-epic.

    Banks was also a very accomplished "mainstream" writer, and it shows in his characterisation and plotting.

    [–]Aterius 4 points5 points ago

    I thrice agree with this. Surface Detail is also excellent.

    [–]HoliestGuacamole 10 points11 points ago

    Graphic Novels are great for short entry level reads

    • Transhuman Genetic engineering and human augmentation

    A mockumentary about the future, where genetically engineered humans are created by rival companies in an attempt to corner the market under the guise of bettering the world.

    This is the saga of Yorick Brown—the only human survivor of a planet-wide plague that instantly kills every mammal possessing a Y chromosome

    The year is 2054, and life has been reduced to a data feed. The fusing of virtual reality and cybernetics has ushered in the era of the surrogate, a new technology that lets users interact with the world without ever leaving their homes. It's a perfect world, and it's up to Detectives Harvey Greer and Pete Ford of the Metro Police Department to keep it that way. But to do so they'll need to stop a techno-terrorist bent on returning society to a time when people lived their lives instead of merely experiencing them.

    • The Windup Girl, and Brave New World/1984?, would work in the current political and social atmosphere as well.

    • The Illustrated Man, and Asimov short story collections would also be tops for people that read for the human elements (and don't mind a bit of sci fi tossed in)

    • Armor for sci fi (future wars/military angle)

    [–]ItsJustaMetaphor 14 points15 points ago

    Fahrenheit 451 and Childhood's End were two that convinced me I love Sci-Fi.

    [–]GordonFreemonster 6 points7 points ago

    Ray Bradbury's a genius with words. I'm in the middle of reading the Illustrated Man and the short stories in it are awesome. Easy to read too.

    [–]MentisinDeum 44 points45 points ago

    Slaughterhous-Five by Vonnegut. Maybe Cat's Cradle first. It's easy reading to build up to a more intense subject like in S5

    [–]khafra 29 points30 points ago

    Vonnegut is a good gateway drug to SF for fans of Serious Literature; which raises a good point--"entry level science fiction" depends on where they're entering from. For a neuroscientist or neurosurgeon, I'd recommend Blindsight by Peter Watts. For a physicist, Schild's Ladder by Greg Egan. For an economist, Accelerando by Charlie Stross.

    [–]AnalysisSitus 2 points3 points ago

    While I haven't yet read Schild's Ladder, I think a physicist might also love The Clockwork Rocket by the same. It's more or less an exploration of a universe in which there is no special timelike dimension; they're all spacelike. (Being no physicist I will freely admit to mangling this.)

    [–]AndrewVanWyngarden 2 points3 points ago

    Greg Egan

    I love him. Diaspora is the best.

    [–]hoodbro__skillson 8 points9 points ago

    I came here to make the same suggestion. Vonnegut is sci-fi for people who wouldn't be caught dead reading sci-fi. It's the trojan horse of the genre.

    [–]just_a_question_bro 5 points6 points ago

    Schlachthof-fünf is awesome.

    [–]MandaloreThePleasant 8 points9 points ago

    Heir to the Empire. Everyone likes it.

    [–]wake_their_ashes 5 points6 points ago

    The lit nerd in me isn't sure about starting someone on sci-fi with this trilogy, the star wars nerd in me agrees 1000%. Zahn's books and Stackpole/Alison's X-Wing series are so fantastic it hurts. I harbor an impossible dream of someone adapting these into a clone wars style TV series, but only if it stays 100% true to the excellent source material. I freaking love the Thrawn trilogy.

    It bites that a lot of the EU is getting retconned but rumor is that they are keeping Mara Jade as a character in the new films.

    [–]2muchparty 9 points10 points ago

    Time Machine is an excellent choice. It's pretty intense plus it's so short you can even read it in one day.

    [–]MikeOrtiz 155 points156 points ago

    I'll go with Ender's Game. Added to that is it just had a movie made, making the conversion even easier.

    [–]harlothangar 37 points38 points ago

    I don't know if I'd have gotten the movie if I hadn't read the book. It was rushed and didn't really bring across any of the points the book made. It's a sign of bad movie making when the protagonist needs to have a monologue at the end describing the entire undertone of the movie.

    [–]thoseareyourshrooms 68 points69 points ago

    I prefer Bender's Game.

    [–]Smelly_Penis_HaHaHa 25 points26 points ago

    Well shit my britches. I only just now made that connection.

    [–]masterwolfe 6 points7 points ago

    I know! I felt silly a couple of years ago when I was rewatching all the of movies. Had quite the "OHHhhh" moment.

    [–]Shardwing[🍰] 7 points8 points ago

    Bender's Game was more fantasy than SF.

    [–]SirQuincealot 7 points8 points ago

    the fact that the lead is a robot kinda contradicts your statement, and really only a third of the movie is in the fantasy realm, the opening and closing of the film both take place in the normal sci fi continuity

    [–]redscream 11 points12 points ago

    For some reason, and it may very well be unreasonable, I can't shake the feeling that Ender's Game should belong to the "young adult" genre.

    For some reason I just can't justify placing it alongside the Foundation series or other works I consider good SciFi like The Forever War or even lighter fare such as The Long Earth.

    I think I'm probably wrong, if that matters.

    [–]Sarex 15 points16 points ago

    The movie butchered the book, but other then that, yeah a great book to start with.

    [–]Neromous 23 points24 points ago

    I've heard a lot of bad things about the movie but I thought they did a good job. The only complaint I have is that it was rushed like crazy. It was pretty comical when the lake scene only lasted 5 minutes.

    Why did you think it was butchered?

    [–]Stiffo90 38 points39 points ago

    The romantic undertones between Petra and Ender (wtf?), no character development, no explanation between scenes, removing key scenes, not explaining key concepts (thirds, the monitor, the armies, the scene with Alai etc), disregarding the sub plot with his family, not explaining Enders actions and thoughts (which is, what, half the book?) giving up the final major plottwist to the audience ahead of time and finally infrequent and badly placed quotes from the book that breaks immersion.

    The only way to understand what happens in the movie is to have read the book. And seeing it after having read the book will make you regret it.

    [–]Neromous 6 points7 points ago

    Well alright, I agree with all of that.

    not explaining Enders actions and thoughts.

    I feel like this is usually hard to adapt from a book but you're absolutely correct. That is a huge part of the book.

    [–]lunarlander 5 points6 points ago

    The Hunger Games had this exact same problem and its honestly not that difficult. A lot of movies have a narrorator. Fight Club for example did it spot on and that movie would be mediocre without it. Although he is a young kid and that definitely might be an issue.

    [–]k12kato 3 points4 points ago

    I agree that its difficult but I think the bigger problem was that their adaptation changed Ender's character completely. IMO he come across as an arrogant and sadistic prick. In the book's I felt sorry for him every time he hurt someone, like he had no other options.

    [–]Stiffo90 6 points7 points ago

    Only good way to do it would be to have Ender narrate in a style similar to Sherlock in Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows, but then we'd be complaining about how annoying he sounds instead.

    [–]Trick9 9 points10 points ago

    Could always get Fred Savage...

    [–]JunkMonkee 1 point2 points ago

    Ehhh, wasn't the best adaptation but looking at it solely as a movie it wasn't too bad. My family watched it without having any knowledge of the books and all seemed to enjoy it (my dad actually saw it a second time when my brother was in town cause he liked it so much). It's not impossible to decipher without reading the books although that would have helped out immensely.

    I agree about losing key scenes and not fleshing stuff out but I also understand that in some big corporate way they're mostly concerned with starting a franchise in a genre that tends to have some terrible bombs at the box office, so trying to minimize costs and not instantly commit to a multiple picture deal is just business. The books are well liked by genre fans but haven't had that reach like a LoTR or Harry Potter to demand more investment and time from the studio.

    [–]Sarex 1 point2 points ago

    The whole point of the book was ruined, his internal conflict about the aliens, not to mention the butchering of the ending.

    [–]MyMindWanders 3 points4 points ago

    Question: I like reading books before watching the movie just to see the director's interpretation of the literature. I read Ender's Game, but have yet to read Ender's Shadow. Should I bother reading Ender's Shadow before seeing the movie?

    [–]betterthanwork 8 points9 points ago

    Eh, not really. They said it was going to be based on both of those stories, but Bean is a pretty minimal character, and it doesn't touch on any of the things that are exclusive to Bean in Ender's Shadow.

    [–]Sarex 5 points6 points ago

    The movie will spoil nothing about any of the other books.

    [–]gooniette 1 point2 points ago

    /u/betterthanwork is right, but I do recommend reading Ender's Shadow, just because it's a great book. Better than Ender's Game in a lot of ways. I mean, my husband and I named our dog Bean, so I'm completely unbiased here.

    [–]shobb592 1 point2 points ago

    You don't need to read Enders Shadow before the movie as the character of Bean is inconsequential in the film. However, I would recommend skipping the movie entirely and going straight to Enders Shadow because it's almost better than Enders Game. Then read Speaker for the Dead and Xenocide because they're both pretty good. Anything after that just depends on how much fun you're having with the series. I personally got bored with it after those books.

    [–]Thedanjer 3 points4 points ago

    Why do people like it? I read it recently when the movie came out because I'd heard good things, but I just really hated all of it. I honestly don't think I've ever actively hated a book so much... I forced myself to finish it because that's what I do, but it was seriously painful. Reading page after page of a kid complaining about how hard it is to be literally the greatest person who has ever existed. I understand it's science fiction, but you're still supposed to be able to relate to characters on a basic human level, and I didn't find that at all in the book

    [–]Pretty_Little_Shit 4 points5 points ago

    When did you read it? Those who loved it generally first read it as a kid, and it appealed to those who were often the outcasts of the middle school society. Most who read it as an adult hate it.

    [–]Thedanjer 2 points3 points ago

    I'm 24, and I read it when the movie came out because I feel like most children's classics can still be enjoyable. For example, I still love the harry potter books. Even though they're based in fantasy, they still deal with relatable themes. But if you're talking about a mature person trying to get into science fiction, I don't see ender's game as a good start. But I can see what you're saying

    [–]Mrs_Queequeg 2 points3 points ago

    Typically, people read it as kids, and they continue to like it for the nostalgia value. It's a very kid-power book that appeals to younger audiences.

    I agree, it's one of the more terrible books I've read, but I read it as an adult.

    [–]Thedanjer 3 points4 points ago

    I agree, I can see how a little kid would like it. Just not sure how it would be a good "entry level science fiction book to convert your friends" if your friends are older than 11

    [–]half-assed-haiku 5 points6 points ago

    I love this series
    But card is a homophobe
    So ill pirate it.

    [–]Wilmore 5 points6 points ago

    Not sure if you're being downvoted for the sentiment or the half-assed haiku, but I'm with you on the sentiment.

    It was nice to see Daniel Abraham say the same thing in this article (though not in a haiku:)

    Here's the thing about Ender's Game. It is a deeply felt, beautifully imagined story that has spoken to a couple generations of people who found real compassion and acceptance and even the beginnings of love in this amazing, gorgeous, tragic adventure. It shows what's best about science fiction, but only if you only read the text. Card himself has gone so septic, it's poisoned the novel. So Ender's Game — but borrow it from a library or get it from a used bookstore — and don't google Orson Scott Card once you're done.

    [–]notjustaprettybeard 7 points8 points ago

    Out of the Silent Planet - C. S. Lewis. Most people don't even know he wrote sci-fi but are predisposed to love him from the Narnia books. Not to mention, it's beautifully written, has an engaging plot, and who wouldn't want to read about J. R. R. Tolkien bumbling around Mars with seal aliens?

    [–]Elbie79 5 points6 points ago

    My journey into SF started with "Hyperion" and "The Fall of Hyperion" by Dan Simmons. They're not 'hard' science fiction, but essentially adventure books set in the far future. There's a little time travel, politics and religion involved, but not too much to get boring.

    Also recommended: "Endymion" and "The Rise of Endymion", essentially part of the same series but also quite enjoyable on their own.

    [–]ChiggyVonRichtofen 6 points7 points ago

    Hyperion is a great book but I would never recommend it to somebody who had never read another sci-fi book before.

    [–]lostlittlebear 9 points10 points ago

    For people interested in/who have served in the military, I'd actually recommend Starship Troopers. It's not too over-the-top science-fictiony, and uses what sci-fi elements it has to make deep commentaries on a lot of real world issues. And also it's written pretty phenomenally

    [–]unc15 5 points6 points ago

    Dune. The greatest science fiction novel ever, but with political, mystical, and fantastical elements that make it a more general novel easily understandable for the uninitiated.

    [–]MaxChaplin 5 points6 points ago

    Either people just post sci-fi books they like, or the term "entry level" has no meaning.

    I'm curious - which novel would you describe as not entry level sci-fi? From my experience, sci-fi in general is easier to get into than "literary fiction", but maybe that's just me.

    [–]OutragedLiberal 5 points6 points ago

    Bujold's Vorkosigan books. Possibly Brin's Startide Rising and The Uplift War

    [–]TheeBeeDeeGee 6 points7 points ago

    The forever war , I thought it was fucking awesome.

    [–]elegantjihad 5 points6 points ago

    As amazing as Isaac Asimov is, I'd also recommend him for people trying to get into the genre. Just because he is one of the best, doesn't mean he is any harder to read or get into. Foundation is definitely an investment of time and brain, but there's a good standalone that he did with Robert Silverberg called Nightfall. One of my favorite sci-fi stories. Easy to read, and based on a short story of his.

    I generally think the best sci-fi plots are in short stories. Selected Short Stories of Philip K Dick is probably my #1 pick for anthologies.

    [–]fumf 4 points5 points ago

    I tried getting my friend into the foundation series. He couldn't handle it, so I gave him a collection of Asimov short stories, which he absolutely loves. I think short stories are definitely the best for beginners.

    [–]Necroclysm 2 points3 points ago

    Nemesis is a fairly easy read as well and deals more with politics(as usual with Asimov).

    I do think short stories are excellent for getting people into the genre. There is an amazing collection of short stories that Asimov put together/edited that I usually recommend to people who think they don't like science fiction. They usually ask for longer stories afterwards, but they are now hooked.

    100 Great Science Fiction Short Short Stories

    [–]fumf 2 points3 points ago

    iRobot is a good one. It's essentially short stories with a wrapper.

    [–]NairForceOne 1 point2 points ago

    Agreed. Asimov and Clarke are my go to intro guys, specifically in the realm of short stories. Short stories are interesting, get the point across and lay a lot of the groundwork people might need before jumping into a full book, which can sometimes get a little dry.

    [–]YAISEDDIT 4 points5 points ago

    I think Tom Holt is a good entry into the genre, as is Douglas Adams if you're into that kind of thing. Those books are much easier to digest and were a good segway for me into the genre and Arthur C. Clark.

    [–]urection 2 points3 points ago

    Spin? iirc that had a lot of relativity, stellar evolution, terraforming etc in it

    not ideal for entry level imo, the Arthur C. Clarke stuff (2001, Rama, Childhood's End etc.) are much better choices

    [–]YeaDudeImOnReddit 4 points5 points ago

    Ubiq by Philip K Dick

    [–]bic_flicker 3 points4 points ago

    My first sci-fi book was Ringworld by Larry Niven. Awesome story, great descriptions of scale, and it is a three book series if you like the first one (they are all worth it). Niven actually has some other easy and interesting reads too, like The Integral Trees.

    [–]ninjaface 3 points4 points ago

    Entry level people.... Not your favorite obscure sci fi tome

    [–]the_cocksman 2 points3 points ago

    Heinlein -- Have Spacesuit, Will Travel.

    [–]JustinCayce 2 points3 points ago

    Little Fuzzy by H. Beam Piper

    [–]vectorhead 32 points33 points ago

    I would argue that sci-fi readers need to be convinced to read non-sci-fi (or... more all-round) literature more than vice versa.

    [–]DaTacoThe Foundation/Ender's Game 16 points17 points ago

    Um, okay. I'm interested, why would you argue that?

    [–]Asteroidea 1 point2 points ago

    If they are completely entrenched, have them start with titles by Iain M Banks (his sci-fi works), then read his other works (just Iain Banks).

    Afterwards (or if they are not entirely entrenched), have them read the Book of the New Sun series (first book is Shadow of the Torturer) by Gene Wolfe.

    [–]SynysterSaintIt 8 points9 points ago

    I was thrilled to see Little Brother on the list. Then I come in here, and no one is talking about it. It's the best book no one I know has read without my recommendation first.

    [–]marywait 3 points4 points ago

    Anything by Sherry Tepper, Ursula LeGuin, Nicola Griffith, Pamela Sargent, Octavia Butler and Connie Willis. I started to read the SciFi classics in the 60s and it's so weird that the future they painted is already mostly the past.

    [–]MassivelyMini 3 points4 points ago

    Hugh Howey's Molly Fyde series. I'm not really a huge fan of Science Fiction, but these books were amazing!

    [–]ddddddjim 2 points3 points ago

    Have you read his Wool/Shift/Dust series yet? Also amazing. Not to mention his latest, Sand.

    [–]MassivelyMini 1 point2 points ago

    I loved Wool, and I haven't started Sand yet. But Molly Fyde.... She's my hero! Shes one of those characters that you want to be friends with.

    [–]Luis707 3 points4 points ago

    I would like to add "Pastwatch: The Redemption of Christopher Columbus." I love history and my friend knew I would love this book. Author: Orson Scott Card.

    [–]Zach_Attakk 3 points4 points ago

    The first sci-fi that got me was the Freedom series by Anne McCaffrey. Then I discovered Hitchhiker's Guide. ..

    [–]Slidin_stop 3 points4 points ago

    Well I'm getting into this late, but I have some recommendations. In first or second grade the teacher read us A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L'Engle. That started me on my lifelong love affair with SF. Of course times have changed, we have computers now and that has dated many of my favorites. Some of the dated stuff I liked was the Lensman series by Edward Elmer Smith, also known as E.E. "Doc" Smith I read him in Jr. High. I really liked most things by Andre Norton such as Moon of Three Rings or The Beast Master or Star Man's Son as well.

    Keith Laumer is known for the Bolo and Retief stories which I enjoyed immensely. Roger Joseph Zelazny for his Amber series and I liked Eye of Cat. David Brin The Postman and Startide Rising. There really is an SF genre that correlates to just about every non-science fiction genre from mysteries to politics to war. Google is your friend, just type in say Science Fiction mystery stories and you'll get some good hits. Since everyone's taste is different one has to try a bit of everything to find out what they like. There are a lot of free ebooks out there of stuff that is out of copyright and I recommend using the local library to try stuff, because if you don't like a book you haven't spent any money on it.

    [–]thejurysout 3 points4 points ago

    The Forever War by Joe Haldeman is simply amazing. It's a fast read and at the end your like, "did all that happen in such a short novel?" It's thought provoking, action packed and one of the most engrossing reads. Scientifically rather accurate too. And I just picked up Hyperion by Dan Simmons. Feel like I'm gonna love this one.

    [–]OiyVeyGoyim 3 points4 points ago

    "Roadside Picnic"

    By Arkady and Boris Strugatsky

    There was a movie based off this book called "Stalker" as well as three video games based off the book and the movie called "S.T.A.L.K.E.R."

    I highly recommend this book because it is one of the best examples of cold war communist sensor era science fiction produced.

    It is very easy to get into with characters that people can relate to. Average Joe's.

    [–]turtle513 2 points3 points ago

    Most of Orson Scott Card's books and short stories are awesome, he may be a racist homophobic but damn he writes some amazing sci-fi. So I usually just pretend that I never found out that he is a complete asshole and continue reading on happily.

    [–]psychobillyqueen 4 points5 points ago

    Ray Bradbury got me into science fiction. The Martian Chronicles would be great for someone just getting into it.

    [–]Theothercan 10 points11 points ago

    I'm a novel novice, and I highly recommend Ready Player One by Ernest Cline. It was a fantastic and worthwhile read that kept me interested.

    [–]bzj 6 points7 points ago

    I thought it was all right, but a lot of it felt forced to me, like "If I throw enough pop-culture-geek references in here, some of them are bound to stick."

    [–]omgitsakitty 1 point2 points ago

    It was ridiculous towards the end when there were nearly more references than actual content.

    [–]MassivelyMini 1 point2 points ago

    I totally felt like I was in a different world reading this book! Which is what you want. I recommend this book frequently.

    [–]iamtacosPicture Books 7 points8 points ago

    The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Heinlein. I am somewhat surprised this one was missing. The tech isn't so much the focus as much as the politics and sociology of such a separated culture. Plus it had Mycroft in it, who had to be one of the greatest supporting characters of all time!

    [–]ForeverAclone95 5 points6 points ago

    Heinlein's best. If only it hadn't started my insufferable libertarian phase.

    [–]PintoTheBurninator 2 points3 points ago

    Anything by C.S. Friedman. I would start someone off with This Alien Shore as it is non-threatening story but is very entertaining and has an engaging plot with plenty of futuristic sci-fi.

    Also, anything from the Revelation Space series by Alastair Reynolds for the same reason. In that case I might start with Chasm City - Sky Houseman is a great character and the rest of the series is superb.

    [–]britishfuntcase 2 points3 points ago

    No lucky Starr series by Asimov? i am disappoint.

    [–]regisuu 2 points3 points ago

    I had just read my first sci-fi book and it was Nexus... Awesome lecture, light to read and it has more of science than fiction so it was perfect for such IT guy like me. Earlier I had read only fantasy books, but now I look for sci-fi.

    [–]thomasmagnum 1 point2 points ago

    Loved Nexus. Try "Lexicon" now, you'll love it

    [–]nicepin 2 points3 points ago

    Would anyone recommend a subset of these books (or books not included) that were written with an emphasis on technologies that are coming online in our lifetimes?

    It's not so much that I'm specifically looking for "hard" sci-fi, I just want to read about how some of the cool stuff I hear about in /r/technology and /r/futurology might theoretically hit its stride.

    [–]thomasmagnum 1 point2 points ago

    Nexus

    [–]Shine_On_Your_Chevy 2 points3 points ago

    Neither Stanislaw Lem's Solaris nor Evgeny Zamyatin's We are on this list?

    [–]RatherDa3hing 2 points3 points ago

    Old Man's War is extremely approachable.

    [–]nathwhal 2 points3 points ago

    "I, Robot" is classic SciFi, but with a very approachable theme, and a short-story collection format that seems low investment, so less intimidating. I've used it to break in several "scifi noobs" to good effect.

    "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" is a great follow-on, another classic (by a different author) with a very relatable/memorable cast of characters and a bit more "scifi-ey" setting. Always a hit.

    After this I either dub the adventurer a lost case or write down a list of authors/novels based on the things they liked about the books, and turn them loose.

    [–]ddddddjim 2 points3 points ago

    Anything by Hugh Howey. My Favorite of his is the Wool/Shift/Dust series of books.

    [–]Porcelet_Sauvage 2 points3 points ago

    I showed a friend Profession by Asimov and he enjoyed it. As he barely reads, let alone scifi, i was pleasantly surprised by his reaction. There aren't too many scifi elements in it that people getting into the genre won't have seen in a film or real life which i think makes it good for a scifi beginner. It's short too which helps.

    [–]sakebomb69Bloom County Babylon 2 points3 points ago

    Depends on how old you and your "friends" are.

    [–]NotHosaniMubarak 2 points3 points ago

    Stranger in a Strange Land is one of my favorite books.

    But it's not led me to read more sci fi so maybe not.

    [–]Batch_5 2 points3 points ago

    William Gibson - Neuromancer.

    [–]Addicted2Qtips 2 points3 points ago

    I was about to say that cyberpunk is probably the right ticket for entry level reads, because the style incorporates a lot of other genres, and are stylized and very "visual." Neuromancer is great but gets pretty heavy; I'd probably recommend "Snow Crash" as a first read.

    [–]muffledvoice 2 points3 points ago

    "50 Short Science Fiction Tales," by Isaac Asimov, Groff Conklin, et al.

    Short stories are a great way to get people interested in science fiction.

    [–]drunkenwanderer 2 points3 points ago

    The Tom Swift Series really need to be pushed. It's how I got into a lot of different topics, like spaceships, aviation, etc.

    Also, it's pretty easy reading too, for kids/adults alike.

    Also, it's not TOO Sci-Fi, it's like a 'sciency' Hardy Boys...almost.

    [–]XboxOne1 2 points3 points ago

    I was surprised to see Ted Chiang's book on here. I don't read a lot of fiction, but I read that and I loved it.

    [–]mertzj 2 points3 points ago

    War of the Worlds did it did it for me.

    [–]oceanicairlinesHorror 2 points3 points ago

    The Forever War is one that I suggest to a lot of people. To me its a good one because its still so relate-able with today's world without being to "far out there" with strange ships and different worlds and whatnot that can turn people off. I also suggest Rendezvous with Rama as a neat first contact novel.

    [–]hulivar 2 points3 points ago

    the foundation series is too wordy though for newbies.

    A good PKD novel would do it for sure. The Star Force series by BV Larson is amazing. John Scalzi's Old Man's War series was pretty damn good. Greg Bears Forge of God and Anvil of the Stars was one of my all time favorites for sure. An Alistair Reynolds novel would work...a stand alone novel though and one of the older ones not the Blue Remembered Earth series. Dune was awesome for sure.

    Any of these would be a good choice imo. If you want something full proof do BV Larson first Star Force novel. He's the hottest new sci-fi author on the scene atm.

    If you're going to do an Asimov book I promise you I know where to start.

    Eternity is the book he should read. It's rather short and about time travel, it's awesome. Also the robot detective novels are not too complex at all and very good, the name escapes me though atm. K I looked it up lol, the first novel is called Caves of Steel. There are 3 novels in the series, Naked Sun, and Robots of Dawn.

    So ya my top 3 would be, BV Larson Starforce, End of Eternity by Isaac Asimov, and Forge of God and Anvil of the stars by Greg Bear, you should read those back to back they are both not too long at all.

    GL

    [–]smartache 2 points3 points ago

    For the younger (or young at heart) crowd, The Giver by Lois Lowry or A Wrinkle in Time by Madeline L'Engle.

    [–]sm00thtr00per 2 points3 points ago

    I just came back from my university's library with a copy of Childhood's End in hand. What a great post to find today.

    [–]MeHereProtectYerAnus 2 points3 points ago

    Camouflage, Joe Haldeman.

    [–]Scrnickell 2 points3 points ago

    I would go with the Takeshi Kovacs novels by Richard K. Morgan. Pretty good stuff.

    [–]voodootrucker43 2 points3 points ago

    anything by vonnegut

    [–]FriendoftheDork 2 points3 points ago

    Entry level science fiction? I know people will hate me for this but: The Hunger games trilogy. Probably the most popular, and certainly "entry-level."

    The hard part is convincing the readers that the series is actually Psi-fi and that they should expand to the classics.

    [–]moseby75 2 points3 points ago

    Entry level Sci Fi: Enders Game, Starship Troopers, Old Mans War, Fallen Dragon. Peter F Hamilton writes very good stuff and are not to tough to follow, however I do not think he has a single book less then 500 pages

    Superb Sci Fi: Richard K Morgan Kovac series Altered Carbon, Fallen Angels, I forget the other.

    Dune, if you enjoyed Dune give Lord of Light by Roger Zelazny a try (as mentioned earlier)

    Hamilton again for the Commonwealth and Void series all are very good but can run on a bit.

    Dan Simmons: Hyperion is what I feel to be the singularly best piece of Sci Fi written. The sequels are also good but it is like comparing Dune to its sequels.

    I might also suggest David Brin's Sun Diver series (6 books and again can be drawn out at points).

    [–]billinsomerville 5 points6 points ago

    Kazuo Ishiguro's Never let me go.

    [–]abermarm 1 point2 points ago

    Any Hugo Awards compendiums. It can be a bit of a mixed bag, but the stories are out of this world (see what I did there?) and a newbie should find at least a few that will capture their imagination and have them wanting more.

    [–]epz 1 point2 points ago

    THE LIEGE KILLER by Christopher Hinz and OLD MANS WAR by John Scalzi

    These 2 books blew me away...

    [–]ItsMathematics 1 point2 points ago

    The Long Run by Daniel Keys Moran is still my favorite book that nobody has heard of.

    [–][deleted] ago

    [deleted]

      [–]fumf 1 point2 points ago

      Best of short stories by Isaac Asimov. Make sure 'the last question' and 'the last answer' are two of the stories in it.

      [–]lolly_lolly_lolly 1 point2 points ago

      I'm surprised no one (here) mentioned Heinlein. Despite his 1950's misogyny and style, "Stranger in a Strange Land" and "Friday" are, I think, very approachable. I've loaned "Stranger..." to several people and not gotten it back (a sure sign of a good book.)

      [–]ffas3 1 point2 points ago

      Salvage and Destroy by Edward Llewellyn All of his books have great character development, compelling story-lines, and characters one can identify with.

      [–]ShotFromGunsThe Hungry Caterpillar 1 point2 points ago

      Am I the only person who doesn't understand all the love for Old Man's War? I got it as part of a Humble Bundle, and I couldn't make it through more than a couple of chapters. The writing felt completely amateur, with cartoonishly two-dimensional characters.

      [–]Lillipout 1 point2 points ago

      Anthologies. I would hand a new sci-fi reader one of those old "Year's Best Sci-Fi" compilations. The commitment is much less than a novel or series, and they'll have an opportunity to read selections in different styles and genres to find the one they like.

      [–]Enderlobster 1 point2 points ago

      Dan Simmonds. wrote the hyperion trilogy. I used to like the ender books but now these are my favorite. First book is a little slow but the later books are so good. Not exactly entry level though. He also has the llium and olympos books so good.

      [–]shiplesp 1 point2 points ago

      Two possibly unlikely suggestions for readers who consider SciFi as something completely inaccessible - The Children of Men by P.D. James, and John Updike's In the Beauty of the Lilies (takes place in a future time when nanotechnology has gotten out of control). The reputations of these two writers may lure some reluctant readers to the genre.

      [–]MelloFox 1 point2 points ago

      Well, just added 6 books to my wish list.

      As for my recommendations, I'd recommend 2001 : A Space Odyssey and A Scanner Darkly - two books I just finished that were interesting, fun reads.

      [–]veulGod Delusion 1 point2 points ago

      I am surprised one of the guys put Babel-17 on the list. It was originally released in a twin book (flip it over and its a second book, I think Empire Star), I am still trying to find a legit copy in the used books stores and library sales I go to.

      [–][deleted] 1 point2 points ago

      While we have som sci-fi duders in here I'd like to ask if I could get some advice. If I were looking for a sci-fi equivolent of A Song of Ice and Fire (Game of Thrones) but in the sci-fi genre; what should I read? Something more realistic and gritty if you know what I mean.

      [–]b4ldur 1 point2 points ago

      I love the Honor Harrington series by David Weber. Granted i read a lot of C.S. Forester when i was akid so that might have influenced me in that regard.

      [–]didierdoddsy 1 point2 points ago

      Can't remember what my own initial foray into sci-fi was, but for good introduction I always recommend Walter Tevis' "Mockingbird". Apart from being and easy and entertaining read, it actually has a quite an uplifting ending which is pretty unusual in the genre!

      [–]cosmicmoss 1 point2 points ago

      I'm surprised what I consider the best entry scifi book is not on the list. End of Eternity by Asimov is short, but captures a lot of the essence of Asimov's writing, and a good part of what scifi is. To be honest it's probably my favorite work by him.

      [–]wolfkin 1 point2 points ago

      I hear Feed was good but sequels are not

      I have Little Brother from the Humble Bundle.. i should read it.

      I see this is mostly a list grounded in the recent years. but for my money I like "The Caves of Steel"

      [–]JackTRex 1 point2 points ago

      All things Isaac Asimov.

      [–]DrBoffo 1 point2 points ago

      If you want to sneak the genre in - Simon Ings' "Wolves". For the non-reader, Frank Herbert's "The God Makers". For the horny teenage boy or depressed 30-something man, William Gibson's "Neuromancer". For the Star Trek casual you want to tip over, Peter David's "Q Squared". For kids, the Hal Spacejock series.

      [–]NotYourAssistant 1 point2 points ago

      I'm really surprised that, other than an off-hand mention of her in the article, no one is mentioning Margaret Atwood's Madd Adam series - Oryx & Crake, in particular, is a fantastic read, and a great entry into Sci Fi. My wife and I often share interest in books, but there are some areas we've never really crossed over - I don't read some of her favorite authors as they're too oriented to women, and she doesn't read Sci Fi. She read Oryx & Crake because she reads everything Atwood writes, and got me to read it. Since then, she's been much more open to reading some of the Sci Fi I've got in my book shelf.

      To me, "entry level" is a book that will get someone interested enough in the genre to not only read it once, but seek out more and this one definitely does the trick.

      [–]langknowforrealz 1 point2 points ago

      End of Eternity by Isaac Asimov was really good and an easy read for me. It read like a drama on TV.