Nature | News

Kepler clue to supernova puzzle

Two white dwarfs favoured as precursors of type Ia supernovae.

Article tools

X-ray: NASA/CXC/SAO; Infrared: NASA/JPL-Caltech; Optical: MPIA/Calar Alto/O. Krause et al.

This remnant of Tycho’s supernova was created by a type Ia supernova in 1572.

They are cosmic detonations that briefly outshine the light of entire galaxies. And they were a crucial tool in the discovery of dark energy, the force that is accelerating the expansion of the Universe. Yet the process that gives rise to type Ia supernovae has remained mysterious.

Now, light from two of these stellar explosions has been captured in finer temporal detail than ever before, and the data are adding weight to an emerging view: that the explosions result from the merger of two white dwarfs, the burnt-out, Earth-sized remnants of Sun-like stars. The finding erodes a long-standing view that type Ia supernovae arise from a single white dwarf accruing material from an ordinary companion star, either a Sun-like star or an elderly, bloated red giant.

The data have come from an unlikely source: NASA’s Kepler mission, the space telescope that searched for alien planets by staring at some 150,000 stars in nearby reaches of the Milky Way. Distant galaxies also lurk in the telescope’s field of view, and its ability to collect data every 30 minutes, along with its sensitivity to tiny changes in brightness, made it ideal for recording the rise and fall of light emitted during supernovae. 

Robert Olling, an astronomer at the University of Maryland in College Park, was lucky enough to find two type Ia supernovae after a two-year survey of some 400 galaxies in Kepler’s field. He reported them on 8 January at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society near Washington DC. “As a technical tour de force, it’s really cool to use Kepler for more than it was intended,” says Robert Kirshner, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

The exceptional smoothness of the Kepler data is helping researchers to distinguish between the two competing explosion scenarios. Both require that a white dwarf takes on material from a companion object until the pressure ignites a runaway thermonuclear explosion. But in the ordinary companion model, the expanding shell of material from the white dwarf would ram into the normal star, generating extra heat and light that would show up as a bump in the first days of a supernova’s brightening. No such bump exists in Olling’s data.

That essentially rules out all red giant companions, says Olling, because these larger stars would result in a sizeable bump. But the data could still be compatible with smaller, more Sun-like companions, says Daniel Kasen, an astronomer at the University of California, Berkeley, and a collaborator on the survey. Not only would these stars cause a much smaller bump, but the bump could be missed completely depending on the observer’s viewing angle, he says. If the supernova lay between Kepler and the companion star, for example, the associated bump would probably not be seen.

For years, the idea that type Ia supernovae might arise from merging white dwarfs was discounted because the final stages of the merger were thought to occur slowly, over the course of thousands of years. Such a slow accretion of material would be more likely to lead to the formation of a neutron star. Then, from around 2010, simulations began to suggest that the mergers could occur in seconds or minutes, allowing for the sudden pressure change that results in an explosion, says Stan Woosley, a theorist at the University of California, Santa Cruz (see ‘A star’s last rites’).

Craig Wheeler, a supernova theorist at the University of Texas at Austin, says that there are still problems with the merger model. For example, he says, simulations of the mergers often produce highly asymmetric explosions, yet observations so far tend to be more spherical. And spectroscopic observations — which split light into its component wavelengths — have not found as much radiation from ionized iron atoms as merger simulations predict.

Kepler’s exoplanet-hunting days ended in May 2013 after mechanical failures prevented it from pointing precisely enough for that task. But Olling says that the craft could continue to hunt for type Ia supernovae because the bright explosions do not require precise pointing.

It will be crucial to make simultaneous observations from ground-based telescopes, he notes, because Kepler only records brightness and cannot split light into spectra. But to perform such joint observations, Kepler will need to point in the opposite direction; Olling hopes that the Kepler team will agree to this. NASA is expected to announce its plans for the impaired spacecraft this summer.

Journal name:
Nature
Volume:
505,
Pages:
274–275
Date published:
()
DOI:
doi:10.1038/505274a

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

5 comments Subscribe to comments

  1. Avatar for hang gong
    hang gong
    Anyone knows the paper's http link?The author should be Robert Olling? I can not find it. The galaxies mentioned above are in KIC and are point sources?
  2. Avatar for Edward Shaya
    Edward Shaya
    The paper is still in the review process at Nature. It should be out shortly. The galaxies in the project were typically a pixel or two across in Kepler (4"/pixel).
  3. Avatar for hang gong
    hang gong
    oh.. The news is before their paper? I can not believe it. A 'bump' can be distinguished from a SN's host galaxy? Their original motivation is about SNIa? Hope to read the paper soon.
  4. Avatar for Andrew Raybould
    Andrew Raybould
    What implications would this have for the use of 1a supernovae as standard candles in measuring distance, if it is confirmed?
  5. Avatar for James T. Dwyer
    James T. Dwyer
    It would be critical to understand how many (especially distant) type Ia supernova are merger/collision events and how to distinguish them from the previously presumed accretion events. As I understand, only accretion events can be used as a standard candle. As the (smoothly) accreting white dwarf's mass reaches precisely the "Chandrasekhar limit of about 1.38 solar masses (for a non-rotating star)" - it explodes, producing a supernova - "eventually reaching an absolute magnitude of −19.3 (or 5 billion times brighter than the Sun), with little variation." [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova#Normal_Type_Ia] In the merger model two white dwarfs of varying masses merge or collide, producing a supernova of varying absolute magnitude. It seems crucial that these different types of type Ia supernova be readily distinguished so that only consistent accretion type Ia events are used as standard candles. If, for example,many of the supernovae used to conclude that the expansion of the universe is accelerating were actually merger events (wrongly assumed to be accretion events), their varying absolute magnitudes would have produced an invalid result. Surely this possibility is being carefully considered and prior results are being reevaluated - but it's not mentioned in this news report. After all, the conclusion that universal expansion is for some unknown reason is accelerating has enormously impacted cosmology!

Top Story

Quadcopter flock

Video: The first self-organizing flock of drones

Autonomous quadcopters coordinate flight patterns like birds without central control.