Can Computers Think?
The History and Status of the Debate
- Map 4 of 7
Can Chinese Rooms Think?
Click on issue areas on map or in list below to go to next level.
humans, unlike computers, have intrinsic intentionality?
Is biological naturalism valid?
Can computers cross the syntaxsemantics barrier?
Can learning computers cross the syntaxsemantics barrier?
Can brain simulators think?
Can robots think?
Can a combination robot/brain simulator think?
Can the Chinese Room, considered as a total system, think?
Do Chinese Rooms instantiate programs?
Can an internalized Chinese Room think?
Can translations occur between the internalized Chinese Room and the internalizing English speaker?
Can computers have the right causal powers?
Is strong AI a valid category?
Other Chinese Room arguments
Back to top level of all maps
Maps | General information
| Details and features
| Specifications |
Issue areas | Press
Methodology | Background paper | The cartographic metaphor | Criteria | How the maps work
For Instructors and Students | Importance of Turing debate | For instructors | For students | Author (Protagonist) index | FAQS
Commentary and Reviews | Commentary and reviews | Errata and corrections
Action Items | Buy the set of maps | How you can participate in this debate
Examples | View the maps. | Map 1 | Map 2 | Map 3 | Map 4 | Map 5 | Map 6 | Map 7 |
MacroVU home page | Send us a message | Project Director's Home Page