Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(2089)
-
▼
April
(158)
- Richard P. Allan & Brian J. Soden, Atmospheric war...
- K. E. Trenberth et al., J. Climate (2011), Atmosph...
- G. Svensson & J. Karlsson, J. Climate (2011), On t...
- F. Giorgi et al., J. Climate (2011), Higher hydroc...
- BREAKING: Anonymous Hits Chamber! by: Releases tho...
- Tas van Ommen: Warmer oceans release CO2 faster th...
- Top climate scientist, Kevin Trenberth, on the mon...
- NOAA's National Weather Service: U.S. Tornadoes --...
- Early Warning Signal for Ecosystem Collapse: Fluct...
- Record Number of Whales, Krill Found in Antarctic ...
- Douglas P. Nowacek et al., PLoS ONE, Super-Aggrega...
- V. Masson-Delmotte et al., Clim. Past (2011), A co...
- Neven: Flushing out the Fjord (Jakobshavn Isbræ)
- Tennessee Valley Authority: “We have never experie...
- Jay Kimball: California's other storm of the centu...
- Andrew Freedman, WaPo: Are La Nina and global warm...
- ExxonMobil Doesn't Speak For ME! Grads protest "Fu...
- Peter H. Gleick, HuffPo: A Cost of Denying Climate...
- Lindzen Illusion #2: Lindzen vs. Hansen -- the Sle...
- John Cook, The Guardian: How climate change denier...
- Immediate Reductions in EIA’s Energy Data and Anal...
- Peter Sinclair, Climate Denial Crock of the Week: ...
- S. Schubert, H. Wang & M. Suarez, J. Climate (2011...
- David Roberts, Grist: Why I’ve avoided commenting ...
- Joseph Romm: Ben Santer elected AGU fellow (well ...
- Jeff Masters: "Tornadoes, floods, and fires contin...
- Richard Muller is a well bad tosser (and a disinge...
- Jeff Masters: Midwest deluge enhanced by near-reco...
- "Recession of Jakobshavn Isbrae continues July 201...
- Siberian seabed methane: first numbers
- “It is High Time to Warn People”: Igor Semiletov a...
- Oakland, Calif., passes Energy and Climate Action ...
- Sam Carana: Runaway Global Warming
- The methane hydrate feedback revisited: "Wakening...
- The Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model (SLAMM)-View...
- The Butterfly's Tale ~ by Celestial Elf
- Longtime Minnesota TV reporter digs into global cl...
- A. Born, K. H. Nisancioglu & B. Risebrobakken, Pal...
- Elinor Breman, Lindsey Gillson & Kathy Willis, The...
- Tim Lambert, Deltoid: Ozone Revisionism [Ted Parso...
- Richard Black, BBC: Ozone hole has dried Australia...
- Chris Mooney: False Balance in Matthew Nisbet’s C...
- Matthew Nisbet -- newly activated Climate Denial M...
- N. T. Kurtz et al., JGR 116 (2011), Observations o...
- Kate Sheppard, Mother Jones: Climategate: What Rea...
- Hansen et al. concludes “the rate of sea level ris...
- Don't Be Fooled: Fossil Fools Fund Latest Climate ...
- George Monbiot: Britain’s Private Militias (Assoc...
- Jason Box: "selective science = pseudo-science" [w...
- Jason Box: Verbatim review of Frauenfeld, Knappenb...
- "Rising Arctic Ocean temperatures cause gas hydrat...
- Fiamma Straneo et al. have found Greenland's fjord...
- Scott Mandia on the recent swarm of tornadoes, flo...
- The Climate Show, No. 11: A trillion tonnes of tro...
- Bill McKibben's Speech at Power Shift 2011
- 5,000 Young Climate Activists Protest at Chamber o...
- James Hansen et al.: Earth's energy imbalance and ...
- Fred Hiatt, WaPo: On climate change, the GOP is lo...
- The Future According to Google Search Results
- Power Shift 2011: Tim DeChristopher on the U.S. Ch...
- Bombshell exclusive: Leading expert withdraws name...
- Chris Mooney, Mother Jones: The Science of Why We ...
- Mark Boslough: [Ten ways that] physics trumps righ...
- Power Shift 2011 Flashmob Shuts Down BP: ‘Don’t Fo...
- Latest U.S. Tornado Statistics (AWIPS ID:STAMTS*)
- trillionthtonne.org
- BBC's Richard Black discusses the European Geoscie...
- Richard Black, BBC: New warning on Arctic sea ice...
- WATCH: Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer Blocks Tea Pa...
- John Cook, Skeptical Science: What was it like the...
- Denis D. Gray, AP: Water wars? Thirsty, energy-sho...
- Senator "Global warming is a hoax" Inhofe "Scared ...
- Richard Muller's Misinformation #2: 'leaked' tree-...
- Groups urge University of Virginia to defend acade...
- NSIDC, Report of April 5, 2011: Ice extent low at ...
- Lee Fang: The Contango Game: How Koch Industries m...
- Skeptical Science: Christy Crock #3: Internal Vari...
- Lee Fang: Georgia-Pacific major polluter of Fox Ri...
- NASA's EO: Mountaintop Mining, West Virginia
- John Bruno, Skeptical Science: More wind, bigger w...
- Monckton Myth #16: Bizarro World Sea Level
- James Hurrell, WaPo: Putting this winter in conte...
- Squid and Octopuses Experience Massive Acoustic Tr...
- Budget battle torpedoes NOAA Climate Service
- Penguins That Shun Ice Still Lose Big from a Warmi...
- Dana Nuccitelli, Skeptical Science: Solar Hockey S...
- Richard J. Behl, PNAS, 108(15), Glacial demise and...
- The oil economy stains the most remote civilizatio...
- More attacks on academic freedom at Michael Mann's...
- Mark Boslough: Gullible denialism (this stuff happ...
- Mark Boslough: Alabama Pi returns!
- Brendan DeMelle: Highway to Fracking Hell: Why Sha...
- Lee Fang: "ChamberLeaks presentation details plans...
- Winter warming in West Antarctica caused by centra...
- SeaMonster: an awesome new blog about the oceans
- Robert Howarth, Climatic Change: Gas from ‘frackin...
- Daniel Bailey & Mauri Pelto: "Zebras? In Greenland...
- Skeptical Science: The e-mail travesty in misquoti...
- Felicity Barringer, NYT: The Rich Are Different: T...
- NSIDC: What is the connection between Arctic sea i...
- The Vital Role of Earth Observations in Understand...
- Miles Grant: Will the GOP shut down the government...
- H. Jay Zwally et al., J. Glaciol., 57 (March 2011)...
- Medieval Climate Anomaly: Recent Research
- Rush to use crops as fuel raises food prices and h...
- Russell Train, former EPA administrator (1973-1977...
- William Shatner worries about global warming, plus...
- Scott Walker's administration gives 27-year-old ch...
- Arctic Ocean freshwater will cause 'unpredictable ...
- JPL: For NASA's Aquarius, Quest for Salt a Global ...
- Icebergs in the Antarctic play important role in c...
- NRDC: Senate, President Obama Must Continue Fight ...
- NYT: Heat damages Colombia coffee, raising prices....
- "Congress on wrong side of history in denying clim...
- The History of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at...
- NYT: Unions Rally, Linking Their Cause to Dr. King...
- 2,000 protesters march on Koch Industries’ DC offi...
- Dr. Kerry Emanuel speaks to congressional committe...
- Tony Carrk: The tentacles of the Kochtopus: What y...
- Making sense of science: Introducing the Google Sc...
- FOX: Google to the rescue! Google picks 21 Google...
- Benjamin Rabe et al., Deep Sea Research Part I: Oc...
- Arctic Ocean hosts weird freshwater pond within th...
- Arthur Max, AP: Massive pool of fresh water in th...
- ESA’s Envisat satellite has measured record low le...
- Wow! Pawlenty goes totally off the rails and calls...
- Brian Angliss: Latest hearing shows GOP is the Mi...
- Greg Sargent, WaPo: Wisconsin recall drive already...
- Don Shelby: When politicians request information:...
- A. V. Reyes & C. A. Cooke, PNAS 108 (2011), Northe...
- David Orr (author of "Down to the Wire") on confro...
- Just in case you were wondering what a Pontifical ...
- Carl Zimmer, NYT: Multitude of Species Face Climat...
- Glenn Hurowitz, Grist: Environmentalists stand up ...
- Climate Myths and other Fairy Tales by John Christ...
- Paul Krugman: The Truth, Still Inconvenient
- Current Northern Hemisphere Temperature (°F) Anoma...
- Upcoming book: "Climate Change Denial" by Haydn Wa...
- Jeff Masters: The global tropical cyclone season o...
- When the situation was manageable it was neglected...
- Joseph Romm: Downplaying or remaining silent about...
- Can biochar help suppress greenhouse gases? New st...
- Lee Fang: Rep. Graves Calls GOP’s Billions In Oil ...
- MIT's Kerry Emanuel's defense of climate science
- NYT Editorial: No to a New Tar Sands Pipeline (no ...
- Climate Central goes completely off the rails and ...
- Here's a different approach: Climate Bollocks
- Climate skeptics lose their cool [Anthony Watts lo...
- The updated scariest graph you will ever see, the ...
- Jeff Masters: Torrential rains of 40+ inches delug...
- Thailand Flooding Impacts Nearly One Million: 50 i...
- Univ. of Wisconsin responds to GOP's Open-Records ...
- Skeptical Science: Crux of a Core, Part 3... Dr. O...
- Michigan’s Debbie Stabenow Falls Asleep, Becomes C...
- Nature Geoscience, Table of Contents, Vol. 4, No. ...
- Extreme weather events becoming more common in the...
- GOP’s only scientists at ‘Scopes’ climate hearing ...
- MIT's Kerry Emanuel’s (a Republican scientist) pow...
-
▼
April
(158)
Monday, April 11, 2011
Winter warming in West Antarctica caused by central tropical Pacific warming by Q. Ding, E.J. Steig, D.V. Battisti & M. Küttel, Nature Geoscience (April 10, 2011)
Saturday, February 12, 2011
Eric Steig: West Antarctica: still warming. The temperature reconstruction of O’Donnell et al. (2010) confirms that West Antarctica is warming — but underestimates the rate
West Antarctica: still warming
More »
Eric Steig: O’Donnellgate. Or…Some thoughts on Personal Responsibility and the Peer Review Process
“Eric recommends that we replace our TTLS results with the ridge regression ones (which required a major rewrite of both the paper and the SI) and then agrees with us that the iRidge results are likely to be better . . . and promptly attempts to turn his own recommendation against us.”
“[in his RealClimate post]…he tries to … misrepresent the Mann article to support his claim [about the iridge routine] when he already knew otherwise. How do I know he knew otherwise? Because I told him so in the review response.”
“The use of the ‘iridge’ procedure makes sense to me, and I suspect it really does give the best results. But O’Donnell et al. do not address the issue with this procedure raised by Mann et al., 2008, which Steig et al. cite as being the reason for using ttls in the regem algorithm. The reason given in Mann et al., is not computational efficiency — as O’Donnell et al state — but rather a bias that results when extrapolating (‘reconstruction’) rather than infilling is done.
I emphasize that I think that a fundamentally reworked version of this manuscript could potentially provide a useful scientific contribution, and many of the points made do indeed have scientific merit. Indeed, the authors have done a very thorough analysis, and are to be congratulated on this.
Eric Steig & Ray Pierrehumbert: The Starship vs. Spaceship Earth (or why Freeman Dyson went emeritus)
New York Times book review
, Dyson juxtaposes Lindzen’s claim that “observations suggest that the sensitivity of the real climate is much less than that found in computer models” with Stefan calling this “simply ludicrous”. Dyson gives the impression that rational arguments from skeptics are met with “open contempt” by the majority. But he fails to mention that Stefan showed in detail why Lindzen’s claim is wrong: Lindzen ignored ocean thermal inertia when comparing observed warming with the equilibrium climate sensitivity. Any physicist should be able to judge that Stefan is right and Lindzen is wrong on this point. He also failed to mention that Stefan used the word “ludicrous” only in a “personal postscript” to a completely sober scientific article, referring to Lindzen’s claims that a vast conspiracy of thousands of climatologists worldwide is misleading the public for personal gain. Dyson’s account of the Lindzen-Rahmstorf exchange neither fairly covers the substance of the argument, nor is it a fair portrayal of its style – Dyson seems to have twisted it as much as he could to score a political point.
Saturday, July 3, 2010
Fastest disinformer retraction: Watts says Goddard’s “Arctic ice increasing by 50000 km2 per year” post is “an example of what not to do when graphing trends”
Fastest disinformer retraction: Watts says Goddard’s “Arctic ice increasing by 50,000 km² per year” post is “an example of what not to do when graphing trends”
Plus science blogosphere roundup: "Fred Pearce is a rubbish journalist" and Eric Stieg on PNAS
by Joseph Romm, Climate Progess, July 3, 2010Ironygate: The king of cherry picking just threw the prince (jester?) of cherry picking under the bus for picking some really, really bad cherries:
Thank you Anthony Watts for leaving this nonsense on your blog and acknowledging it as “an example of what not to do when graphing trends, to illustrate that trends are very often slaves to endpoints” — as opposed to 99% of your other posts, which you continue to embrace even though they are also examples of what not to do, such as these recent absurdities:
“The death spiral continues, with Arctic ice extent and thickness nearly identical to what it was 10 years ago.” (5/31)
“Over the last three years, Arctic Ice has gained significantly in thickness…. Conclusion : Should we expect a nice recovery this summer due to the thicker ice? You bet ya.” (6/2)
“Arctic Basin ice generally looks healthier than 20 years ago.” (6/23)Those laughable conclusions should have been a warning sign to Watts not to keep posting Goddard’s nonsense — except, of course, nonsensical graphing, cherry picking endpoints, and generally making up stuff is what Watts specializes in (see links below).
Since I generally don’t read WattsUpWithThat, except when I am doing a post on Arctic ice and looking for a good LOL, I wouldn’t have actually caught this if I hadn’t been reading the comments at Tamino, one of which notes:
BTW, “the mistake was noted by Steven immediately after publication,” is Watts-speak for “Ian H pointed it out in comment #3 within maybe 15 minutes after the posting.”Tamino has a good post debunking Watts/Goddard on Arctic ice thickness (here).
This CP post originally began as a round up of science blogs, with this opening: The bad news is there’s too much damn stuff to report on or debunk. The good news is there’s a lot of good analysis and debunking in the science blogosphere.
Who knew that the debunking would be by the disinformers themselves!
Here’s more:
- Fred Pearce is a rubbish journalist (The Way Things Break):
If anyone needs evidence that the “reporting” crutch of He Said, She Said is still being employed by stenographers masquerading as journalists, here’s Fred Pearce in New Scientist.
No serious effort is made to inform the reader which of the parties is actually supported by reality. Note the weasel wording and false balance throughout, e.g.: “some of the researchers involved take issue with a suggestion that greenhouse gases are not primarily responsible for global warming”; “Foster’s team concludes… But de Freitas says”; “The vitriol continues”; etc.
It’s a stereotypical example of the “on the one hand, on the other” style that has so distorted the public’s understanding of the issue of anthropogenic climate change.
It’s 2010, FFS. This article should be held up as a model for how reporting should not be done.
Last week, CEI’s Christopher Horner, writing at Pajamas Media claimed that Gabriel Calzada (author of a dodgy study claiming that Spain’s green energy program had cost many jobs) had been mailed a dismantled bomb by a solar energy company. As Ed Darrell observes, the story is preposterous (even without considering the source), but a whole lot of self-styled global warming skeptics uncritically accepted it. And even after the story was completely retracted, folks like Anthony Watts and Andrew Bolt did not make corrections.
- What do climate scientists think? (Real Climate) Gavin Schmidt and Eric Stieg [!] set the record straight on …
More on PNAS soon.
Related posts on Watts:
- Wattergate: Tamino debunks “just plain wrong” Anthony Watts
- Hits charade: WattsUpWithThat hypes itself with dubious webstats, while lowballing other blogs
- Watts not to love: New study finds the poor weather stations tend to have a slight COOL bias, not a warm one
- FoxNews, WattsUpWithThat push falsehood-filled Daily Mail article on global cooling that utterly misquotes, misrepresents work of Mojib Latif and NSIDC
- WattsUpWithThat says it has “nothing to do with the dreaded Climate Change” and “has an unappreciated benefit”!
- Exclusive: New NSIDC director Serreze explains the “death spiral” of Arctic ice, brushes off the “breathtaking ignorance” of blogs like WattsUpWithThat
- Diagnosing a victim of anti-science syndrome (ASS)
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Ted Scambos, Eric Steig, Tom Neumann, IPY, U.S.-Norwegian South Pole Traverse
Photo credit:Lou Albershardt | IPY Traverse Posted: May 6, 2009 Courtesy: Antarctic Sun |
by Peter Rejcek The 12 scientists and support staff who made a slow crawl across a vast, blank stretch of East Antarctica this past austral summer for three months to study how regional climate variability relates to global climate change expected to encounter brutally cold storms and other challenges on the high polar plateau. They didn’t expect to come across other travelers in the relatively unexplored area known as Queen Maud Land. But they did — three times in one day. “We were astonished because we were supposed to be all alone,” said Ted Scambos , a member of the Norwegian-U.S. science team that crossed a large slice of the Antarctic continent using tracked vehicles pulling sleds. “I don’t know where you can go in order to be on the edge of the Earth anymore.” The encounters, all involving people taking part in a commercial race to the South Pole, occurred near a fuel depot in an area where the ice sheet was more than 3,000 meters thick, hiding at least four distinct subglacial bodies of water called the Recovery Lakes. “Fuel depots in Antarctica are kind of the equivalent of watering holes in Africa,” mused Scambos, lead scientist at the Boulder, Colo.-based National Snow and Ice Data Center. “Everybody has to come to the fuel depot, and you see all kinds of people, all kinds of groups, gathered at the fuel depot.” But for most of the roundtrip journey between Norway’s Troll research station on the coast and the U.S. Antarctic Program’s South Pole Station , the scientists and crew were on their own. They took measurements of the snow and ice in areas that virtually no one had visited since the late 1960s, when the United States primarily used tractor trains to conduct deep-field science work. Living and working out of bright red, boxed buildings mounted on sleds, the team collected ice cores at various depths and locations, used radar to map the ice sheet layers and dug snow pits — all in an effort to understand the climate in this area for the last thousand years and how it may be changing today. The project was part of the International Polar Year , a 60-nation effort to better understand the Antarctic and Arctic, which officially ended last month. “It’s really been a blank spot on the map — on both the literal map as well as the metaphoric map of climate change in Antarctica,” said Tom Neumann , leader of the traverse team during the second leg of the two-year project that began in 2007-08 and covered nearly 7,000 kilometers including a few side trips. “[The traverse] should help fill in the picture of how Antarctica overall is changing.” Scientists had believed that Antarctica was largely bucking the global warming trend. While West Antarctica was undoubtedly heating up — particularly the outstretched tip of the Antarctic Peninsula where ice shelves are disappearing at historic rates — studies of the much larger East Antarctic Ice Sheet suggested a cooling trend. Some researchers have suggested the depletion of stratospheric ozone over Antarctica — the ozone hole that appears each austral spring — is affecting atmospheric circulation and westerly winds around the continent, effectively shielding it from global warming. But a paper in the journal Nature earlier this year said warming in West Antarctica is greater than whatever cooling may be occurring on the rest of the ice-covered continent. “Simple explanations don’t capture the complexity of climate,” explained Eric Steig , lead author of the Nature paper and a professor at the University of Washington , in a statement back in January. “The thing you hear all the time is that Antarctica is cooling, and that’s not the case,” added Steig, a collaborator on the IPY traverse project. “If anything it’s the reverse, but it’s more complex than that. Antarctica isn’t warming at the same rate everywhere, and while some areas have been cooling for a long time, the evidence shows the continent as a whole is getting warmer.” Antarctica is roughly the size of the United States and Mexico: Snow in Denver doesn’t mean a blizzard stretches all the way down to Mexico City. “Antarctica is a huge place, and I would be surprised if it was all doing the same thing,” said Neumann, a scientist now with NASA Goddard Space Flight Center . Yet there’s even a hint that East Antarctica — well, at least one spot on that incomplete map — may be warming based on one initial experiment by the traverse team. Scambos deployed strings of highly sensitive “thermometers” called thermistors into two of the deeper ice core holes. The temperature on the ice sheet surface changes with the weather, but the temperature deeper down changes very slowly as the climate changes. Neumann likens it to throwing a frozen turkey into the oven — not the best way to cook a turkey, for sure, but eventually the center starts to thaw and cook based on the long-term outside temperature. “It takes a while for the ice at 90 meters to notice how the surface temperature has changed,” Neumann explained. At that depth, the ice temperature is determined by the average temperature of the last 50 years or so. The instruments will operate for the next several years, allowing the scientists to determine how surface temperature changes through time. “The initial results do say these areas are warming,” Neumann said, stressing that the measurements are in the hundredths of a degree per year and the data still raw. The chemistry will help the team calibrate the radar returns of the ice layers, a key step to nailing the snow accumulation rates in East Antarctica — one part of the equation to whether the ice sheet is overall losing or gaining mass. Loss of mass would indicate a rise in sea level. “The chemistry from the core helps because it tells you the accumulation rate at a point,” Neumann explained. “For example, how deep is the fallout from the 1960s above-ground nuclear testing? That information helps to calibrate the radar layers that intersect the core site. “If a radar layer is shallower, then it has had relatively less accumulation; a deep layer reflects relatively more accumulation. The information form the core lets you quantify the ‘relative’ statements above.” The scientists also took the opportunity to explore the Recovery Lakes, an area of at least four lakes at the head of one of the largest ice streams draining East Antarctica. Ranging in size from 600 to 1,500 square kilometers, at depths well below sea level, the lakes were likely part of a deep marine embayment millions of years ago when the ice sheet was much smaller, according to Scambos. “It was probably dynamic in the past,” he said. “In the distant future, if the Earth gets a great deal warmer, it would be dynamic again. I would prefer to think that we’ll stabilize climate change before we have to worry about this part of Antarctica disintegrating.” There is still a lot of uncertainty about what the Antarctic ice sheets may do in the future because so little of it has been measured, particularly compared to Greenland, according to Neumann. “The physical insight is coming along and the model development is coming along, but I think it’s going to be a quite a while before we really have confidence in the large-scale predictive models of ice sheet change,” he added. More ground-based studies like the traverse would help to continue filling in the blank spots of the climate change map, according to the scientists. “Most of that uncertainty [about Antarctica] can be beaten down with more and more measurements of accumulation rates,” Neumann said. “The traverse system that the Norwegians have put together is fantastic, state-of-the-art. It’s the best in the world right now in terms of supporting a science crew over long distances,” Scambos said. “They essentially have a mobile, 12-person base that provides them relatively easy access to a large area. … [Queen Maud Land is] one of the least-explored areas of Antarctica, and I think that’s going to change, in part, thanks to this traverse system they’ve got.” |
Link to this article:
http://antarcticsun.usap.gov/