Our climate models are WRONG: Global warming has slowed - and recent changes are down to ‘natural variability’, says study
- Duke University study looked at 1,000 years of temperature records
- It compared it to the most severe emissions scenarios by the IPCC
- Found that natural variability can slow or speed the rate of warming
- These 'climate wiggles' were not properly accounted for in IPCC report
Global warming hasn't happened as fast as expected, according to a new study based on 1,000 years of temperature records.
The research claims that natural variability in surface temperatures over the course of a decade can account for increases and dips in warming rates.
But it adds that these so-called 'climate wiggles' could also, in the future, cause our planet to warm up much faster than anticipated.
Scroll down for video
The study compared its results to the most severe emissions scenarios outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Projected temperature change from 2081-2100 by the IPCC are pictured here. The latest study, however, says this climate model may be wrong
The study compared its results to the most severe emissions scenarios outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
'Based on our analysis, a middle-of-the-road warming scenario is more likely, at least for now,' said Patrick Brown, a doctoral student in climatology at Duke University. 'But this could change.'
The Duke-led study says that variability is caused by interactions between the ocean and atmosphere, and other natural factors.
They claim these 'wiggles' can slow or speed the rate of warming from decade to decade, and exaggerate or offset the effects of increases in greenhouse gas concentrations.
If not properly explained and accounted for, they may skew the reliability of climate models and lead to over-interpretation of short-term temperature trends.
Summary of projected changes in crop yields in a previous IPCC report. Because 'climate wiggles' were not accounted for, the Duke University researchers say the report may have been an over-interpretation of short-term temperature trends
The research, uses observed data, rather than the more commonly used climate models, to estimate decade-to-decade variability.
'At any given time, we could start warming at a faster rate if greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere increase without any offsetting changes in aerosol concentrations or natural variability,' said Wenhong Li, assistant professor of climate at Duke, who conducted the study with Brown.
The team examined whether climate models, such as those used by the IPCC, accurately account for natural chaotic variability that can occur in the rate of global warming.
To test these, created a new statistical model based on reconstructed empirical records of surface temperatures over the last 1,000 years.
'By comparing our model against theirs, we found that climate models largely get the 'big picture' right but seem to underestimate the magnitude of natural decade-to-decade climate wiggles,' Brown said.
'Our model shows these wiggles can be big enough that they could have accounted for a reasonable portion of the accelerated warming we experienced from 1975 to 2000, as well as the reduced rate in warming that occurred from 2002 to 2013.'
'Statistically, it's pretty unlikely that an 11-year hiatus in warming, like the one we saw at the start of this century, would occur if the underlying human-caused warming was progressing at a rate as fast as the most severe IPCC projections,' Brown said.
'Hiatus periods of 11 years or longer are more likely to occur under a middle-of-the-road scenario.'
Under the IPCC's middle-of-the-road scenario, there was a 70 per cent likelihood that at least one hiatus lasting 11 years or longer would occur between 1993 and 2050, Brown said.
'That matches up well with what we're seeing.'
There's no guarantee, however, that this rate of warming will remain steady in coming years, Li stressed.
'Our analysis clearly shows that we shouldn't expect the observed rates of warming to be constant. They can and do change.'
The IPCC has previously warmed that global warming is impacting 'all continents and across the oceans'. This map details some of the predicted affects of climate change in different continents. However the latest study claims that the worst-case scenario is unlikely to take place
- Russian army's rocket launch test goes terribly wrong
- Nurse yelps with joy as previously paralysed girl stands up
- Touching moment 102-year-old Alice Barker sees herself on...
- 'Not heroes, just tourists': Swedish cops stop subway...
- Kim Richards leaves hotel after explosive Dr Phil interview
- Pimple porn: Dermatologist becomes viral YouTube star
- Dramatic moment Alondra Luna Nunez is torn away from family
- How does my story end?: Bruce Jenner ponders the future
- Amy Schumer flashes her surfing scar on Letterman
- The moment comedienne Amy Schumer falls in front of Kimye
- Can you spot the ghost at Disneyland on CCTV? (related)
- Vampire girl spreads terror through victims veins in online...
- Child star of Everybody Loves Raymond commits suicide at 19:...
- Bride and ghoul: Ghostly figure photo bombs wedding...
- Treat a lady like a wh**e, and a wh**e like a lady': David...
- A hug from the executioner... then two gay men are stoned to...
- The female SS Auschwitz guard who trained Alsatian to bite...
- The horrifying moment 14-year-old girl was torn away from...
- Trial hears how Boston victim Martin Richard, 8, suffered...
- Is this the worst son in the world? Grinning teen uses...
- Terror in the air as passengers start to pass-out on...
- Four Swedish cops on vacation in New York answer the call of...
- Great, five more mouths to feed! Cow in India gives birth to...
- Five nursing students killed in fiery Georgia interstate...