Rail firm freezes 43% of its fares for 2014 including more than half of its journeys from London
- Government-run East Coast said freeze was 'commercial decision'
- 64% of booked in advance journey fares will also be frozen
- Government took over running of line between London and North East and Edinburgh after National Express decided it cost too much to run
By Ray Massey
|
A rail firm has become the first to announce a freeze on 43 per cent of its fares for 2014 - including more than half of journeys to and from London.
But Government-run East Coast, which runs to the North East and Edinburgh, said regulated fares, which include season tickets, will rise by 3.1 per cent.
A spokesman said: ‘Fares on 43 per cent of all journeys will be frozen next month, with fares on tickets booked in advance frozen for 64 per cent of all journeys.’
Government-run East Coast, which runs between London and North East and Edinburgh, has become the first to announce a freeze on 43 per cent of its fares for 20134
This is in sharp contrast to the oft-quoted ‘real terms freeze’ in which fares go up only by the rate of inflation - which still means ticket prices rise.
The company said there would be some increase below or up
to the rate of inflation on 51 per cent of fares. And 6 per cent of
tickets would see an above inflation rise, it said.
The line was taken over by the Department for Transport in 2009 after franchise holder National Express decided it cost too much to run.
East Coast managing director Karen Boswell said: ‘We’re freezing fares to encourage more people to travel with us. This will help us to continue to grow our business, and to give back even more to the taxpayer.
‘This is a straightforward commercial decision which is very good
news for our customers and businesses across our route. It will also
help East Coast to sustain our strong advantage in a highly-competitive
travel market.
'When you take into account the rate of
inflation, [the] announcement represents a genuine real terms cut in
our overall fares.
The company said it was a 'commercial decision' and hoped it would attract more passengers (file picture)
'We believe this will attract more people to our trains, and help to maximise revenue. It will also help businesses and hard-working people by holding down the cost of travel for many.‘
East Coast operates services from London up the east side of England to Scotland, with about 60 per cent of services starting or finishing at London’s King’s Cross station.
Overall average rise for all East Coast fares from January 2 will be 1.21 per cent.
Unregulated fares - which include off-peak fares and advanced-purchased tickets for leisure travellers - will go up by an average of 0.83 per cent.
Regulated fares, including season tickets, will rise by 3.1 per cent next year after an announcement by George Osborne
But regulated fares, which include season tickets, are rising by the recently-agreed 3.1 per cent average which is in line with the July 2013 RPI inflation rate on which the January 2014 national rises are based.
This follows the announcement in Chancellor George Osborne’s recent Autumn statement that January 2014’s rail fare rise for regulated fares - which include season tickets - would be capped and limited to the retail or RPI rate of inflation rather than ‘RPI plus 1per cent’.
The rises will now be based solely on the inflation-rate rate in July 2013, which means that the average rise in January 2014 will be 3.1 per cent rather than the expected 4.1 per cent.
However, train operators still have flexibility to increase fares by a further 2 percentage points to 5.1 per cent, - provided other fares fall to compensate and keep the overall average at 3.1 per cent.
Mr Osborne said his decision would benefit more than 250,000 annual season ticket holders who will, on average in 2014, save £25.
Passenger Focus executive Mike Hewitson said: ‘Hard-pressed passengers will welcome East Coast’s decision to freeze nearly half of all its fares, including more than half of those to or from London.’
And TSSA transport union leader Manuel Cortes said other rail companies who have made ‘massive profits down the years from ripping off passengers’ should follow suit.
He added: ‘We would like to see all fares frozen because they have more than doubled since privatisation 20 years ago.’
- VIDEO: Lion sent FLYING through the air before turning on...
- GRAPHIC CONTENT: Moment dead Sperm Whale EXPLODES
- Dog has trouble coping with the stairs in the Tiny House
- How to stop people's loud cell phone conversations
- Officer slams handcuffed man's head into wall
- 'Let's get the f*** out of here': News anchor ready to go
- Didn't believe it? WATCH man fry fish WITH HANDS in 200C oil
- Blanket speaks for first time since Michael Jackson's death
- Great catch! Airport security guard saves falling baby
- Paul Walker's family look for burial plots
- Family makes hysterical video in lieu of Christmas card
- WATCH: Canadian Elvis boy wonder (with a very deep voice)
- The tiny home built from scratch for $11,000 by architect,...
- Boston bombing victim who suffered devastating burns...
- High school football player kills himself after 'getting in...
- EXCLUSIVE - Sins of the 'affluenza' boy's parents:...
- Hell on wheels: The state with America's worst drivers...
- What's happened to Sheena Easton? Singer, 54, looks fragile...
- China's hot mum photo contest where you can’t tell...
- Female students banned from speaking at Islam seminar and...
- Paul Walker's final farewell: Beloved actor's family and...
- 'No evidence' that Princess Diana was killed by the SAS,...
- Did someone order deep fried fish fingers? Chef draws crowds...
- Pink Floyd star Roger Waters causes outrage as he compares...
Ben Russell-Gough, London, United Kingdom, 1 hour ago
They wouldn't do that if their costs meant this would not be commercially viable. That suggests that costs are such that the train companies can get away without such high fare increases this year. Other firms, here is your chance to prove that you're NOT profiteers.