Prince of Brunei loses £13.5m lawsuit against British husband and wife legal team

  • Case offered glimpse into lavish lifestyle of scion from one of world's richest families

Two British lawyers have won a multimillion-dollar tussle with Brunei's Prince Jefri Bolkiah.

The five-week trial provided a glimpse into the playboy prince's jet-set lifestyle as a member of one of the world's richest royal families.

Faith Zaman Derbyshire, 34, and her husband Thomas Derbyshire, 43, could now walk away with more than £13million after the verdict by a New York court.

In essence the protracted case centered on various claims and counter-claims between a lawyer and his client.

The difference being that this particular client is a fantastically rich prince who is locked in a spectacular royal family feud.

Judge's ruling: Prince Jefri lost his legal battle against London barrister Thomas Derbyshire, 43, and his wife Faith Zaman, 34, and was ordered to pay them £13million by a New York court

Jefri is the youngest brother of Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah, the supreme ruler of oil-rich Brunei. The tiny country is on the island of Borneo in South-East Asia.

The prince is known for living lavishly. He once kept a stable of more than 600 properties and 2,000 cars, according to court documents. 

A 2001 auction of some of his possessions featured gold-plated hot tubs and gilded toilet-paper holders.

He also has a set of sexually explicit, life-size, custom-made statues. Their existence emerged in the run-up to the trial, but a judge barred any mention of them in court.

During the hearings, which ended yesterday, the prince said the Derbyshires abused his trust to steal from him in various schemes.

They, in turn, said he underpaid them and had given his permission for everything they did.

The flamboyant prince of Brunei has had to endure the embarrassment of having his former fiancée - the model of four of his by now famous life-size erotic statues - giving evidence in a court case.

The prince had to endure the embarrassment of having his former fiancée - the model of four of his by now famous life-size erotic statues (pictured) - giving evidence in court

Jefri had hired them partly to help him fight efforts by his sultan brother's government to get him to surrender some of his assets after he was accused of embezzlement.

After the hearing, Mrs Derbyshire hugged her lawyers and even jurors outside the courtroom.

'For us, yes, this is huge vindication by real people,' she said. 'We're not the sort of people like Jefri.'

Jurors awarded Thomas Derbyshire, 43, more than £6.4million in one piece of the case.

The jury also found for Faith Derbyshire, 34, on another issue worth £7million.

'Prince Jefri decimated our reputations and our characters,' said Mr Derbyshire, who said the allegations had destroyed his established London legal practice.

The jury did side with Jefri on just one of the myriad allegations in the civil case: that one of Faith Derbyshire's brothers had improperly charged expenses to one of the prince's corporate credit cards. Jurors awarded the prince £34,000.

The polo-playing prince is known for his spending. In the 1990s he bought the carpet seen here, made from solid gold threads and 25,000 precious stones

However the prince's legal team have vowed to challenge the findings.

The prince, who is in his 50s, wasn't in court for the verdict, though he had been a steady presence and testified during the trial.

Officials at one of his properties, the New York Palace Hotel - where the Derbyshires were accused of helping themselves to a generous management deal and benefits - expressed disappointment at the verdict.

'We continue to believe that based on the facts presented, the hotel has been a victim of a crude fraud scheme, and we are confident that the verdict will be overturned on appeal,' the hotel and its ownership company said in a statement.

The Derbyshires, however, portrayed themselves as collateral damage - 'roadkill', Faith Derbyshire said - in the rocky legal life of an imperious prince.

Jefri's family includes four wives, 17 children and 18 adopted wards, according to Brunei media, and a recent book by an American writer chronicled her experience years ago as a member of a coterie of roughly 40 women competing for his attention at nightly parties.

But Jefri has spent much of the past decade vying to hang onto various assets after being accused of embezzling nearly £10billion from Brunei's state coffers while serving as its finance minister.

Jefri denied wrongdoing but agreed in 2000 to repay Brunei's investment arm.

But the dispute dragged on for years as his brother's government pressed him to turn over such promised assets as the New York Palace and the Hotel Bel Air in Los Angeles.

He hired the Derbyshires in 2004 to help, giving them expansive power in his legal and business affairs.

'Prince Jefri gave Zaman and Derbyshire total control, and the evidence shows he was taken advantage of,' one of the prince's lawyers, Geoffrey S. Stewart, told jurors in a closing argument.

'The (Derbyshires) betrayed Prince Jefri at a time when he needed them most.'

The prince's camp accused the Derbyshires of profiteering from him.

This included siphoning off more than £3.2million of his proceeds from selling a Las Vegas ranch to buy themselves property in Manhattan Beach, California; awarding themselves a £320-a-month lease on an apartment worth far more at the New York Palace; and charging beauty treatments and other personal luxuries to Jefri's corporate credit cards.

The Derbyshires said the disputed transactions were the prince's way of paying them, reimbursements for money they advanced to pay his business expenses or purchases he asked them to make - sometimes for such items as designer watches for his family.

The prince fired the two in 2006 and later sued them.

The Derbyshires now live in California with their two small children.

The comments below have been moderated in advance.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

We are no longer accepting comments on this article.

Who is this week's top commenter? Find out now