The Liberty Beacon

The Liberty Beacon

» Posts tagged 'GMO'



By: Roger Landry (TLB)

Why are there so many mindless Sheeple in America today? To this question I have a very clear and defined answer, What results do you expect when you …

Start them out in life by injecting their tiny bodies with multiple vaccines containing neurotoxic heavy metals at levels known to be extremely harmful if not deadly, with a known side effect of ‘Brain Damage’.

Feed them processed foods containing neurotoxic, excitotoxic and carcinogenic substances such as MSG, high fructose corn syrup, preservatives, coloring and flavoring such as aspartame.

Raise them on genetically engineered (GE), or genetically modified (GM) food, linked to cancer, sterility, kidney disease, etc…

Spray their food with known carcinogenic and neurotoxic chemicals whose origins where deadly nerve gases (Glyphosate & Agent Orange).

Teach them through their most formative years in pathetic Common Core laden institutions designed to fail from the start by their bloated bureaucratic top down mentality.

Force them to bath, cook, and consume water purposefully contaminated with neurotoxic fluoride (rat poison).

Force them to spend a lifetime breathing air saturated with toxic metals such as Aluminum and Barium, a result of atmospheric spraying (chemtrails) that our own government wont even admit is taking place.

Put them on psychotropic or psychiatric mind altering drugs at the drop of a hat (including millions of children) that facilitate thoughts of aggression and suicide.

And what do all of these have in common … Our government and health agencies (EPA, FDA, CDC, USDA), mandated with the health and well-being of all Americans, supporting and in some cases mandating all of the above.

Sponsors of our own demise

Now top it off by deliberately numbing what ever intellect survives this massive assault with a constant bombardment of pathetic drivel called entertainment, provided and programmed by the bought and paid for Lame Stream Media, and saturated with the message relax, stay calm, trust us, don’t get upset because all is as it should be.

The Sad truth 1

What you inevitably end up with, is what you intended to create in the first place … sick, mindless, apathetic, complacent, dependent SHEEPLE!

The following has been a lesson in Sheeple 101, No test will follow, they couldn’t pass it anyway … !!!



By: Steven M. Druker, J.D.
Executive Director of the Alliance for Bio-Integrity

1) Although most Americans (including those who serve in government) are unaware of it, genetically engineered foods are on the market only because the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has covered up the warnings of its own scientists, misrepresented the facts, and violated explicit mandates of U.S. law. The following points provide the details and describe the solution.

2) The Food Additive Amendment of the U.S. Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act institutes a precautionary approach and requires that new additives to food must be demonstrated safe before they are marketed. (21 U.S.C. Sec. 321)

3) An official Senate report described the intent of the amendment as follows: “While Congress did not want to unnecessarily stifle technological advances, it nevertheless intended that additives created through new technologies be proven safe before they go to market. (S. Rep. 2422, 1958 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5301- 2 (emphasis added)).

4) Although the FDA admits that the various genetic materials implanted in bioengineered organisms are within the amendment’s purview, it claims they are exempt from testing because they are generally recognized as safe (GRAS).

5) However, the FDA’s regulations state that substances added to food that were not in use prior to 1958 cannot qualify as GRAS unless they meet two requirements. Not only must they be acknowledged as safe by an overwhelming consensus of experts, but this consensus must be based on “scientific procedures? – which ordinarily entails studies published in peer-reviewed journals. (21 CFR Sec. 170.30 (a-b) )

6) FDA regulations further stipulate that these scientific procedures must provide a demonstration of safety and that GRAS substances “…require the same quantity and quality of scientific evidence as is required to obtain approval of the substance as a food additive.? (21 CFR Sec. 170.30(b)) Thus, it’s clear that the GRAS exemption is not supposed to reduce the degree of testing but rather to relieve a producer from performing new tests for substances already known to be safe on the basis of previous ones.

7) Genetically engineered (GE) foods fail both requirements. There is substantial dispute among experts about their safety; and none has been confirmed safe through adequate testing. As the FDA was developing its policy on GE foods during 1991- 92, there was not even consensus of safety among its own experts. The predominant opinion was (a) that these new foods entail unique risks, especially the potential for unintended harmful side effects that are difficult to detect and (b) that none can be considered safe unless it has passed rigorous tests capable of screening for such effects. These scientists expressed their concerns in numerous memos to superiors – memos that only came to light in 1998 when the Alliance for Bio-Integrity initiated a lawsuit that forced the FDA to divulge its files.

8) For example, microbiologist Dr. Louis Pribyl stated: “There is a profound difference between the types of unexpected effects from traditional breeding and genetic engineering ….? He added that several aspects of gene- splicing “. . . may be more hazardous . . .? (#4 in the set of photocopies of FDA memos at …

Numbers after subsequent quotes from FDA scientists refer to the number in this set.) Similarly, Dr. E.J. Matthews of the FDA’s Toxicology Group warned that “. . . genetically modified plants could … contain unexpected high concentrations of plant toxicants…,? and he cautioned that some of these toxicants could be unexpected and could “…be uniquely different chemicals that are usually expressed in unrelated plants.? (2) Citing the potential for such unintended dangers, the Director of FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) called for bioengineered products to be demonstrated safe prior to marketing. He stated: “…  CVM believes that animal feeds derived from genetically modified plants present unique animal and food safety concerns.? (10) (emphasis added) He explained that residues of unexpected substances could make meat and milk products harmful to humans.

9) In light of these unique risks, agency scientists advised that GE foods should undergo special testing, including toxicological tests. (e.g. 6, 10)

10) The pervasiveness of the concerns within the scientific staff is attested by a memo from an FDA official who protested the agency was “… trying to fit a square peg into a round hole . . . [by] trying to force an ultimate conclusion that there is no difference between foods modified by genetic engineering and foods modified by traditional breeding practices.? She declared: “The processes of genetic engineering and traditional breeding are different, and according to the technical experts in the agency, they lead to different risks.? (1)

11) Moreover, FDA officials knew there was not a consensus about the safety of GE foods among scientists outside the agency either. For instance, FDA’s Biotechnology Coordinator acknowledged in a letter to a Canadian health official that there was no such consensus in the scientific community at large. He also admitted, “I think the question of the potential for some substances to cause allergenic reactions is particularly difficult to predict.? (8)

12) This lack of consensus in itself disqualifies GE foods from GRAS status. But even if consensus did exist, no GE food would qualify as GRAS because none has satisfactorily passed the level of testing that the law requires – and that the FDA experts stated is necessary. The agency’s files demonstrate that as of 1992, there was virtually no evidence to support safety, with one official’s memo to the Biotechnology Coordinator querying: ? … are we asking the scientific experts to generate the basis for this policy statement in the absence of any data??(1). And the evidentiary base is still deficient because the FDA does not require any testing; and the tests relied on by the EU, Canada, and others do not adequately screen for the unexpected side effects about which the FDA scientists warned. The inadequacy of current testing has been pointed out by numerous experts, including the Royal Society of Canada and the Public Health Association of Australia.

13) Despite the ample evidence indicating a lack of consensus about safety, as well as the lack of requisite evidence to confirm it, the FDA’s decision-makers (who acknowledge they’ve been operating under a policy “to foster? the U.S. biotechnology industry) declared it is legitimate to presume that all GE foods are GRAS – and can therefore be marketed without any testing. In doing so, they professed themselves “not aware of any information? showing that GE foods differ from others “in any meaningful way,? despite the extensive input from their scientists pointing out the significant differences and their serious implications. (Statement of Policy: Foods Derived From New Plant Varieties, May 29, 1992, Federal Register vol. 57, No. 104 at 22991.)

14) Although many people have been led to believe that the U.S. district court in Alliance for Bio-Integrity v. Shalala determined that GE foods are on the market legally, its decision actually highlights the extent to which their presence is contrary to the law.

15) In her written opinion, the judge stated: “Plaintiffs have produced several documents showing significant disagreements among scientific experts.? 116 F.Supp.2d 166 (D.D.C. 2000) at 177. However, she ruled that the crucial issue was not whether GE foods were in fact GRAS at the time of the lawsuit (or were actually GRAS when the FDA issued its policy statement on GE foods in May 1992) but whether FDA administrators had acted arbitrarily in 1992 in presuming that they were GRAS. Therefore, because she held that the case hinged on this narrow procedural issue of  whether there had been adequate rational basis for the FDA’s.Presumption, she said that any evidence showing lack of expert consensus at the time of the lawsuit was irrelevant since it was not within the administrators’ purview when they formed their policy in 1992.

16) As for the evidence that had been within the FDA’s own files in 1992, she ruled that the administrators were free to disregard the opinions of subordinates when setting policy. (p.178) This conclusion seems odd, since the written opinions of the agency’s scientists represented far more than mere policy preferences. They constituted solid evidence that a significant number of experts did not recognize GE foods as safe. Further, the judge did not mention the fact that the FDA’s biotechnology coordinator had admitted there was not a consensus within the scientific community, even though plaintiffs’ briefs had repeatedly cited the relevant document.

17) Moreover, the judge also disregarded the fact (repeatedly pointed out to her) that the FDA’s files demonstrated there was insufficient technical evidence about safety to support a presumption that GE foods are GRAS. Although her opinion initially acknowledged that such technical evidence is legally required, she never returned to the issue – a highly irregular outcome.

18) Thus, the judge did not determine that GE foods are (or ever were) truly GRAS. Nor did she determine that any has been demonstrated safe. She merely held that given the evidence before them in 1992, FDA officials had not acted arbitrarily in presuming that the foods were GRAS. Further, she emphasized that their presumption is, as a matter of law, “rebuttable.? (p.172)

19) Regardless of whether one agrees that FDA administrators had reasonable basis in 1992 to presume that GE foods are GRAS, it’s obvious this presumption has been decisively rebutted, both by the ever-growing dispute among experts and the ongoing lack of adequate testing.

20) Consequently, the marketing of GE foods in the U.S. is illegal because none of them is GRAS and none has undergone formal food additive approval. To rectify this situation, the FDA needs to acknowledge the truth, admit that GE foods are not GRAS, and remove them from market. And it must not allow any such product to be re-introduced until it has been confirmed safe through the testing required by law. To do so, the agency does not have to reverse any official determinations, because it has never formally determined that any GE food is GRAS or that any has been demonstrated safe. It merely has to acknowledge that its rebuttable presumption has been solidly rebutted. Otherwise, it will remain in violation of the law – and will continue to deprive Americans of the safeguards that Congress has explicitly mandated.

The following paragraphs more fully document the extent of the FDA’s malfeasance.

A. Addressing the extensive death and disability caused by a GE food

In 1989, the Japanese manufacturer Showa Denko K.K. began marketing a food supplement of the amino acid L-tryptophan that was produced with genetically engineered bacteria. As part of the process, several genes to substantially increase the output of tryptophan were spliced into the bacterial DNA. Within a few months of entering the U.S. market, the bioengineered supplement caused an epidemic of an unusual malady (called EMS) that resulted in the deaths of dozens of people and the permanent disability of at least 1,500 others.

For many preceding years, other manufacturers had marketed food grade L-tryptophan supplements produced from bacteria without use of gene-splicing. Epidemiological evidence from the Center for Disease Control does not link any tryptophan from these other manufacturers with outbreaks of EMS. (Kilbourne, E. Journal of Rheumatology Supplement, vol. 46, Oct. 1996) Further, Showa Denko’s bioengineered tryptophan was found to contain numerous contaminants, at least two of which were novel and had not been seen in any of those conventionally produced batches. It is still not known which contaminant (or combination of them) caused the epidemic.

Although there is no conclusive proof that EMS resulted from genetic engineering, the link has not been ruled out; and many experts think it’s likely that whatever toxin caused the disease was an unexpected side effect of the gene-splicing procedure.

In private, FDA officials confirm that the bioengineering process might have caused the EMS. On September 27, 1991, Dr. James Maryanski, Coordinator of FDA’s Biotechnology Working Group, was questioned by staff of the GAO. According to his record of the meeting: “I said that we have no new information, that we do not yet know the cause of EMS nor can we rule out the engineering of the organism.? Emphasis added. (FDA Administrative Record at 22,923) When I questioned him in private eight years later, Dr.  Maryanski again admitted that bioengineering cannot be ruled out. (Personal conversation, Washington, D.C. November 30, 1999)

FDA’s Public Response: On July 18, 1991, Dr. Douglas L. Archer, Deputy Director of FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), testified before the House of Representatives Subcommittee on Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations about the L-Tryptophan tragedy. He said the incident confirmed the FDA’s warnings about the hazards of many health food supplements and that the deaths and injuries “demonstrate the dangers inherent in the various health fraud schemes that are being perpetrated on segments of the American Public.? Dr. Archer’s prepared remarks never indicated that the toxic batches of L-Tryptophan had been produced through genetic engineering, nor did he once raise the possibility it was this process rather than any presumed problems with L-Tryptophan supplements in general that was the cause of the illnesses.

The FDA and other agencies of the federal executive branch continue to cloud the fact that the fatal L-Tryptophan was derived through bioengineering and persist in the false claim that no GE food has even been associated with a human health problem.

B. Addressing the tests on the “Flavr Savr? tomato

The first GE whole food that the FDA reviewed was Calgene’s “Flavr Savr? tomato. Although the FDA did not require testing, Calgene voluntarily subjected the tomato to animal feeding studies and asked the agency to review the data. FDA scientists noted a pattern of stomach lesions that raised a safety issue. Further, seven of the rats fed one variety of the GE tomato died within two weeks. Commenting on the data, Dr. Robert J. Scheuplein, director of the FDA’s Office of Special Research Skills, wrote: “… the data fall short of ‘a demonstration of safety’ or of a ‘demonstration of reasonable certainty of no harm’ which is the standard we typically apply to food additives. To do that we would need, in my opinion, a study that resolves the safety question raised by the current data.?(15) Dr. Carl B. Johnson of the Additives Evaluation Branch concurred that “… unresolved questions still remain.? (16)

It is noteworthy that FDA officials had instructed their experts to apply a lower safety standard in evaluating the tomato than the standard used for new food additives. (Scheuplein memo, p.4) In  doing so, they violated the FDA’s own regulations, which (as earlier noted) mandate that even foods claimed to be GRAS “…require the same quantity and quality of scientific evidence as is required to obtain approval of the substance as a food additive.? (21 CFR Sec. 170.30(b)) FDA Response: The agency claimed that all relevant safety issues had been satisfactorily resolved and said that because the Flavr Savr had performed so well, it would be unnecessary for any subsequent bio-engineered food to be subjected to the same standard of testing. To date, there is no reliable evidence showing that any has satisfied the standard the Flavr Savr failed to meet.

C. Addressing the use of antibiotic resistant marker genes

Because most cells subjected to gene implantation techniques fail to incorporate the foreign gene, a large number must be used, and a marker must be attached to the foreign gene in order to identify the cells that have taken it up. The manufacturers decided that genes coding for resistance to anti-biotic chemicals would be the most economical markers. They especially desired to use a gene that confers resistance to kanamycin, a broad-spectrum antibiotic with a significant medical use. On September 30, 1992, FDA’s Biotechnology Coordinator requested the Division of Anti-Infective Drug Products to evaluate the proposed use of the kanamycin resistance marker gene. (11) On December 3, 1992, the Division’s experts submitted their written opinion. To emphasize their concern, they capitalized all the letters in the key sentence of their conclusion:


Emphasis in original (12) In sending the document to another FDA official, the Division’s director included a cover letter titled, “The tomatoes that will eat Akron.? (The first commercial use of the marker was planned for the Flavr Savr tomato.) He said: “You really need to read this consult. The Division comes down fairly squarely gainst the kan gene marker in the genetically engineered tomatoes. I know this could have serious ramifications.? (12)

On March 30, 1993 the Division’s Supervisory Microbiologist sent a follow-up memo to the Biotechnology Coordinator in which he strongly criticized the proposed use of the marker. He noted that although other markers are available, industry prefers the anti-biotic resistant ones because they are more economical. He stated that to make the choice on this basis was wrong, considering the risks involved: “In my opinion, the benefit to be gained by the use of the kanamycin resistance marker in transgenic plants is out weighed by the risk imposed in using this marker and aiding its dissemination nation wide. If we allow this proposal, we will be adding a tremendous quantitative load of genetic material to the environment which will probably assure dissemination of kanamycin resistance.? (13)

FDA Response: The agency approved the use of the kanamycin resistance gene not only in tomatoes but in other vegetables as well. Consequently, for many years, most GE foods contained anti-biotic resistance genes. Because most experts have come to agree that it’s more prudent to employ different markers, changes have slowly been made to correct a situation the FDA scientists tried to prevent from happening in the first place.

D. What the FDA says in public

In addition to the false statements noted in the previous sections, the agency has continued to misrepresent the facts. For example, on February 28, 2000, Dr. James Maryanski, the agency’s primary spokesperson on GE foods at that time, responded to revelations in the British press about the memos in the FDA files while addressing the OECD Conference on GE Food Safety in Edinburgh, Scotland. He stated that the staff scientists had merely been “asking questions? about the various issues involved in bioengineered food. But as their own memos clearly indicate, they were making declarative statements, many of them quite emphatic, about the unique potential of bioengineering to induce unintended and unpredictable negative side effects. Further, on May 3, 2000, the FDA Commissioner declared: “FDA’s scientific review continues to show that all bio-engineered foods sold here in the United States today are as safe as their non-bio-engineered counterparts.? Yet the year before, the FDA acknowledged it does not perform substantial reviews of GE foods, stating: “FDA has not found it necessary to conduct comprehensive scientific reviews of foods derived from bio-engineered plants … consistent with its 1992 policy.? (Reported in The Lancet, May 29, 1999) Moreover, as previously pointed out, the most extensive test it did review (on the Flavr Savr tomato) raised a safety issue that, according to its own experts, was never resolved.

E. The FDA has an agenda to promote the U.S. biotech industry

The FDA’s acknowledged policy “to foster? the U.S. biotechnology industry is part of a broader executive policy that was initiated by the Reagan/Bush administration – and has continued through each successive administration, including Clinton/Gore and Obama/Biden. Further, when in 1991 the FDA created a new position of Deputy Commissioner for Policy to supervise the formulation of its policy on GE foods, it appointed Michael Taylor, a Washington, D.C. lawyer who had been representing Monsanto and other members of the biotech industry on food regulatory issues. During Mr. Taylor’s tenure as Deputy Commissioner, references to the potential unintended negative effects of bioengineering were progressively deleted from drafts of the policy statement (over the protests of agency scientists), and the final statement was issued claiming (a) that GE foods are no riskier than others and (b) that the agency has no information to the contrary. (Subsequently, Mr. Taylor was hired by Monsanto as Vice-President for Public Policy.) Moreover, when Vice-President Dan Quayle introduced the FDA’s policy statement in 1992, he referred to it as “regulatory relief? for the industry.


StevenDrukerSteven M. Druker is a public interest attorney who founded the Alliance for Bio-Integrity, a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting technologies that foster human and environmental health and addressing the problems of those that do not. Read more on Steven HERE


TLB highly recommends you Alliance for Bio-Integrity for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article HERE


By: Roger Landry (TLB)

Updated 07/09/2015

(Applicable video series at base of commentary)

We as Americans, and for this matter to a large extent, all of humanity, are under fire. We are being poisoned from every direction. There is no place to run or hide. There is no escape. So it is time to stand fast and confront our violators. The only viable solution is to stand up and in a loud enough voice (via massive numbers) push back against what I can only describe as the most heinous agenda ever perpetrated against mankind. What we are seeing today makes the holocaust, Stalin’s purge in Russia and even Mao’s purge in China look insignificant in comparison. So what am I talking about … What could possibly be this significant to all of humanity.

The global population with special emphasis on the good old USA, is being consistently poisoned via the following mechanisms …

Fluoride – GMOs – Pharmaceutical Drugs – Vaccines – Geo-engineering – Bio Toxins – Environmental Toxins – Radiation – Electromagnetic Bombardment etc…

And these are just the main players.

Via these mechanisms we are being poisoned by the air we breath, the food we eat, the water we drink, the medications we take, the vaccines we receive and the toys/devices we play with (cellphones, computer wifi, smart meters, etc…). Each and every one of these mechanisms in their own right are a severe (KNOWN) detriment to our health, but especially to the health of our vulnerable children with developing brains, blood to brain barriers and immune systems.

But the sheer magnitude of this scenario shows in the fact that they are “All Taking Place Simultaneously!”

There is solid scientific proof that when the human body is exposed to multiple toxins simultaneously, the cumulative affect is not necessarily additive, but in a vast majority of cases, magnitudes more harmful.

But why do I place special emphasis on Americans?

The good old USA is the most Fluoridated, GMOed, Drugged, Vaccinated, Geo-engineered (chemtrails) and Electromagnetically bombarded society on this planet. So being the most exposed to all of these components of destruction, we make the perfect lab rats to observe for any negative impacts or reactions. So lets take a trip down this rabbit hole …

Americans today suffer the highest levels of cognitive dysfunction (Alzheimer, Dementia, Autism, ADHD, ADD etc…), the highest level of autoimmune disorders, the highest incidences of deadly food allergies, one of the highest levels of diabetes, the fastest rising level of occurrences of cancer in both our youth and elderly (one out of three baby boomers have cancer), the fastest rising level of infertility, one of the highest levels of infant mortality (soon to be number one), one of the highest levels of spontaneous abortion or stillbirth … etc… in the industrialized world, and for most of those mentioned above, we are the gold medal winners on the entire planet!

Now how many times has our government made this type of information available to you, all in one place, with the issues and possible catalysts all mentioned in the same text? The answer is a resounding NEVER. The burning question is WHY when all above is true, and most of this information can be seen, in isolated sources, in published information from said government.

The time-line for this massive transformation of America is about three generations with the USA being among the healthiest nations on this planet in the 1950’s. Those days are now gone forever, and as a result of all mentioned above (all being birthed or matured over the last three generations), our slide to catastrophic health as a nation is all but guaranteed.

But even now this scenario is getting much worse (accelerating) as our once world-renowned healthcare system (via Obamacare) is being intentionally Dismantled and Destroyed right before our eyes, leaving us little, or severely limited, recourse in our inevitable illnesses.

Yet our government constantly claims not to understand the root cause of this massive decline in Americas health, and doesn’t even officially recognize its existence. Sure we are given reasons for some of the symptoms, but their solutions always seem to benefit the massive (Government Controlling) corporate entities (Pharmaceutical, Biotech and Chemical industries), without any real long term solutions for us. Treating the symptoms is profitable … Curing the Disease is not …

The biggest issue we face here is the convergence of all these components over the same time frame, all sponsored by or promoted by this very government … Can you say GENOCIDE or intentional POPULATION REDUCTION? Now before you push back on my last comment, are you truly convinced that this government with its unlimited funds and resources, is ignorant of these facts or component convergence? REALLY ???

One of the clearly stated goals of Agenda 21 is the reduction of the global population, and through the mechanisms mentioned in this article, that can be accomplished with relative ease, and without massive population culling wars … providing people like you and me don’t wake up in mass and push back hard. To those who would rule humanity eliminating (Culling) a sizable portion of this planets population to a more controllable number (the key reason for all this) is not a weight on their conscience, and America has no special immunity from tyranny. Actually quite the opposite, as those who would play God believe America must be culled or neutered first and brought to its knees in order to keep us, with our cowboy attitudes and freedom loving spirit, from inspiring an uprising and leading the charge against them globally.

If you believe the above to be a false statement then please explain why we as Americans suffer the most exposure and fallout from all of the mechanisms discussed here … in a huge fashion and all simultaneously. Also consider that this government, elected to serve and protect, does nothing to eradicate these blights, and everything to accommodate them … Or is this just all a mistake … One big coincidence, because …

Coincidence 01

So are you a fool ???

Now for all who would state that this is merely a conspiracy theory … You are partially correct because it IS a conspiracy, but there is a massive amount of scientific proof and documented actions to more than alleviate any chances of this being a theory. All one need do is look deep enough. But in a severely sickened and dumbed down society that may be asking … just a little too much.

Below I offer a select video covering each of the mechanisms of health destruction mentioned above, below that are selected TLB Special (recorded) discussions/articles with the experts, and attached at the bottom of this article is a virtual library of links for further research. Take the time to find out more … or go back to sleep, a sleep that is sure to be FATAL !!!




GMOs & Biotoxins


Environmental Toxins


Prescription Drugs






Electromagnetic bombardment



When all is finally said and done, make no mistake, it will be up to us to make a difference and put a stop to this insanity! Because if anything, this article blatantly proves at best … THIS GOVERNMENT DOES NOT GIVE A DAMN … and at worst is COMPLICIT !!!


Please don’t take just my word for anything above! Take some time and listen to and read what the experts have to say …

Related TLB Special (recorded) Articles/Radio Shows:

TLB Special, CMSRI Funding Vaccine Research, Providing the Truth: A Discussion With Claire Dwoskin, The Founder

TLB Special, Our Toxic Environment & The Declining Health of America: A Discussion With Microbiologist & EPA Whistleblower, Dr. David Lewis

Geo-engineering Humanity’s Demise: A TLB Special With Dane Wigington of GeoEngineering Watch


Sources, References and additional information:


Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) 101

Doctors Warn Avoid Genetically modified Food

GMO’s: The Rising Infertility Rate, It’s No Accident

Genocide: Bio Engineering Disease, Vaccines – In Lies We trust

The Great GMO Experiment: An Exercise In Lethality

From Aspartame to Aminosweet: Same Evil, Pretty natural Wrapper

Prescription Drugs

Psychiatric Drugs: The Legal Massacre of Untold Innocents

Thousands of Toddlers On ADHD Drugs, Tip of the Iceberg

Why the FDA Should Be Charged With Murder

Shocker: Comparing Deaths from Medical Drugs, Vitamins and All US Wars

7 Drugs Whose Dangerous Risks Emerged Only After Big Pharma Made Its Money

Dazed &-Confused: Drugs In Drinking Water

5 Ways to End the Drugging Of America

Geo-engineering (chemtrails)

Climate Engineering: Media Deception and Hard Facts

Chemtrails: There Is No Debate, So Why Respond Like There Is One

Chemtrails: Cancer In the Air

Chemtrails Not Just for Weather Modification Anymore: Vaccines On The Wind

Chemtrails: An Integral Part Of the Great Starvation

Chemtrails: Covert and Ongoing Crimes Against Humanity

Geo_Engineering Is Destroying the Ozone Layer

Dimming the Sun


Fluoride: Evil Beyond Conscience

Fluoride: Dining On Industrial Waste

If Sodium Fluoride Ia a Chemical Weapon (WMD) … Is the US Government Guilty Of Chemical Attacks On We The People?

Dentists Blame Bottled Water For Low Fluoride Levels

Fluoride: Follow the Money

The Phosphate Fertilizer Industry: An Environmental Overview, Fluoride Is Poison

EMF Pollution

The widely unreported dangers of electromagnetic pollution

Are the Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation A Factor for Your Health?

Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Health Dangers

Electromagnetic Frequency Dangers – Experts Speak Out

EMF Health Dangers – Who is at Risk?




By: Roger Landry (TLB)

We who are in the know constantly rail against Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s). We are awake and aware, through our constant search for knowledge on this subject. We are also painfully aware that the science has no long term credibility. More research and studies are published daily proving the extreme and detrimental health affects these organisms have on humanity with the long term ramifications still unrealized, yet their proliferation continues and accelerates.

References and realted articles:

GMO Scandal – The Long-Term Effects of Genetically Modified Food on Humans

What is not so well know to the general public is the catastrophic influence these organisms have on our global biosphere. This is the mechanism that allows life to flourish on this planet and it is in grave danger of radical if not fatal modification. Genetically modified plants are now common across the globe in the guise of trees or crops modified to resist insects, pesticides and other invasive influences.


But once planted how do you stop the spread of this organism outside its realm (an issue Monsanto profits from)? Once released into the biosphere how do you prevent the same mechanism that was designed to kill root worms from killing another species of insect, one with a vital role in the maintenance of said biosphere? Through cross pollination alone it is impossible to prevent this eventuality. Scientist from across the planet are now sounding the alarm concerning the infiltration of GMO’s into the wild, with some saying we are quickly approaching the point of no return were the damage will be irreversible.

References and related articles:

The Evil of Monsanto and GMOs Explained: Bad Technology, Endless Greed and the Destruction of Humanity

But now the third part of this triad of evil is rearing its ugly head in the guise of Genetically modified Humanity. This is not a new concept and this research is underway in thousands of laboratories across the planet.


Producing human, animal hybrids is legal in the United Kingdom and parallel research has been taking place in America for well over a generation funded in most part by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Soldiers that can see in the dark, run for miles without tiring or go for day without food and water.

And why stop there, what about parents who wish their child to have certain traits, say enhanced intelligence or added physical prowess. Again we run into the same issues of long term study. Are these GM humans susceptible to diseases or maladies not suffered by us mere mortals, if we interbreed will these genes be passed on to the rest of humanity, will this fatally contaminate the future gene pool leading to an extinction event? None of these questions have been answered by those who surge forward with this dangerous and irresponsible technology.

The debate over the Genetic Engineering of the humans species has been a heated debate since scientists initially wrote about the future, not as it will be, but as it could be … or should be. The Human race thrives in a large portion due to its ample diversity. We as humans generally find this attractive and liberating that we are each unique in our personage, with very few to none containing the same balance of intellect, appeal or physical prowess, which exemplifies that uniqueness.

Never before in the history of mankind have we released so many dangerous mechanisms, untried and untested on humanity and the world. None of this is fantasy or hype and the research showing the facts is readily available in vast quantities for those who wish to pursue it. Those who would perpetrate this madness do so at the possible (and by some scientists the guaranteed) peril of all humanity, but this does not hinder them.

References and related articles:

800 Scientists Demand Global GMO “Experiment? End

Related TLB RANT radio show:

Attached below you will find a great video containing more information of the third leg of this evil GMO triad …

See original video here:


By Colin Todhunter

When rich companies with politically-connected lobbyists and seats on public bodies bend policies for their own ends, we are in serious trouble. It is then that public institutions become hijacked and our choices, freedoms and rights are destroyed. Corporate interests have too often used their dubious ‘science’, lobbyists, political connections and presence within the heart of governments to subvert institutions set up to supposedly protect the public interest for their own commercial benefit. Once their power has been established, anyone who questions them or who stands in their way can expect a very bumpy ride.

The revolving door between the private sector and government bodies has been well established. In the US, many senior figures from the Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) industry, especially Monsanto, have moved with ease to take up positions with the Food and Drug Administration and Environmental  Protection Agency and within the government. Writer and researcher William F Engdahl writes about a similar influence in Europe, noting the links between the GMO sector within the European Food Safety Authority. He states that over half of the scientists involved in the GMO panel which positively reviewed the Monsanto’s study for GMO maize in 2009, leading to its EU-wide authorization, had links with the biotech industry.

“Monsanto should not have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech food. Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDA’s job? – Phil Angell, Monsanto’s director of corporate communications. “Playing God in the Garden? New York Times Magazine,October 25, 1998.

Phil Angell’s statement begs the question: then who should vouchsafe for it, especially when the public bodies have been severely comprised? Monsanto has all angles covered.

When corporate interests are able to gain access to such positions of power, little wonder they have some heavy-duty tools at their disposal to try to fend off criticism by all means necessary.

A well-worn tactic of the pro-GMO lobby is to slur and attack figures that have challenged the ‘science’ and claims of the industry. With threats of lawsuits and UK government pressure, some years ago top research scientist Dr Arpad Pusztai was effectively silenced over his research concerning the dangers of GM food. A campaign was set in motion to destroy his reputation. Professor Seralini and his team’s research was also met with intense industry pressure, with Monsanto effectively targeting the heart of science to secure its commercial interests. There are numerous examples of scientists being targeted like this. A WikiLeaks cable highlighted how GMOs were being forced into European nations by the US ambassador to France who plotted with other US officials to create a ‘retaliatory target list’ of anyone who tried to regulate GMOs. That clearly indicates the power of the industry.

What the GMO sector fails to grasp is that the onus is on it to prove that its products are safe. And it has patently failed to do this. No independent testing was done before Bush senior allowed GMOs onto the US market. The onus should not be on others to prove they are safe (or unsafe) after they are on the market, especially as public attorney Steven Druker‘s book ‘Altered Genes, Twisted Truth’ shows that GMOs are on the US market due to fraudulent practices and the bypassing of scientific evidence pointing to potential health hazards.

We therefore have the right to ask whether we should trust studies carried out by the sector itself that claims GM crops are safe? Let us turn to Tiruvadi Jagadisan for an answer.

He worked with Monsanto for nearly two decades, including eight years as the managing director of India operations. A few years ago, he stated that Monsanto “used to fake scientific data? submitted to government regulatory agencies to get commercial approvals for its products in India. The former Monsanto boss said government regulatory agencies with which the company used to deal with in the 1980s simply depended on data supplied by the company while giving approvals to herbicides. As reported in India Today, he is on record as saying that India’s Central Insecticide Board simply accepted foreign data supplied by Monsanto and did not even have a test tube to validate the data which at times was faked.

Now that scientists such as Professor Seralini are in a sense playing catch-up by testing previously independently untested GMOs, he is attacked. However, the attacks on Seralini and his study have been found to be based on little more than unscientific polemics and industry pressure. In fact, in new study, Seralini highlights the serious flaws of industry-backed studies that were apparently slanted to distort results. It remains to be seen whether he and his team are in for another bout of smears and attacks.

But this is symptomatic of the industry: it says a product is safe, therefore it is – regardless that science is being used as little more than an ideological smokescreen. We are expected to take its claims at face value. The revolving door between top figures at Monsanto and positions at the FDA makes it difficult to see where the line between lobbying and regulation is actually drawn. People are rightly suspicious of the links between the FDA and GMO industry in the US and the links between it and the regulatory body within the EU.

GM represents the so-called “Green Revolution’s? second coming. Agriculture has changed more over the last two generations than it did in the previous 12,000 years. Environmentalist Vandana Shiva (right) notes that, after 1945, chemical manufacturers who had been involved in the weapons industry turned their attention to applying their chemical know-how to farming. As a result ‘dwarf seeds’ were purposively created to specifically respond to their chemicals. Agriculture became transformed into a chemical-dependent industry that has destroyed much biodiversity. What we are left with is crop monocultures, which negatively impact food security and nutrition. In effect, modern agriculture is part of the paradigm of control based on mass standardization and a dependency on corporate products.

The implications have been vast. Chemical-industrial agriculture has proved extremely lucrative for the oil and chemicals industry, courtesy of oil-rich Rockefeller interests which were instrumental in pushing for the green revolution throughout the world, and has served to maintain and promote Western hegemony, not least via ‘structural adjustment’ and the consequent uprooting of traditional farming practices in favour of single-crop export-oriented policies, dam building to cater for what became a highly water intensive industry, loans and indebtedness, boosting demand for the US dollar, etc.

Agriculture has been a major tool of US foreign policy since 1945 and has helped to secure its global hegemony. One must look no further than current events in Ukraine, where the strings attached to financial loans are resulting in the opening up of (GM) agriculture to Monsanto. From Africa to India and across Asia, the hijack of indigenous agriculture and food production by big corporations is a major political issue as farmers struggle for their rights to remain on the land, retain ownership of seeds, grow healthy food and protect their livelihoods.

Apart from tying poorer countries into an unequal system of global trade and reinforcing global inequalities, the corporate hijacking of food and agriculture has had many other implications, not least where health is concerned.

Dr Meryl Hammond, founder of the Campaign for Alternatives to Pesticides, told a Canadian parliament committee in 2009 that a raft of studies published in prestigious peer-reviewed journals point to strong associations between chemical pesticides and a vast range of serious life-threatening health consequences. Shiv Chopra, a top food advisor to the Canadian government, has documented how all kinds of food products that were known to be dangerous were passed by the regulatory authority and put on the market there due to the power of the food industry.

Severe anemia, permanent brain damage, Alzheimer’s, dementia, neurological disorders, reproductive problems, diminished intelligence, impaired immune system, behavioural disorders, cancers, hyperactivity and learning disability are just some of the diseases that numerous studies have linked to our food.

Of course, just like cigarettes and the tobacco industry before, trying to ‘prove’ the glaringly obvious link will take decades as deceit is passed off as ‘science’ or becomes institutionalized due to the hijacking of government bodies by the corporations involved in food production.

But anyone who questions the need for GMOs in the first place and the risks they bring and devastating impacts they have is painted as clueless and indulging in scare mongering and falsehoods, while standing in the way of human progress. But can we expect much better from an industry that has a record of smearing and attempting to ruin people who criticize it? Are those of us who question the political links of big agritech and the nature of its products ready to take lessons on ethics and high-minded notions of ‘human progress’ from anyone involved with it?

This is an industry that has contaminated crops and bullied farmers with lawsuits in North America, an industry whose companies have been charged with and most often found guilty of contaminating the environment and seriously damaging health with PCBs and dioxins, an industry complicit in concealing the deadly impact of GM corn on animals, an industry where bribery seems to be second nature (Monsanto in Indonesia), an industry associated with human rights violations in Brazil and an industry that will not label its foods in the US.

A great myth forwarded by the pro-GMO lobby is that governments are freely choosing to adopt GMOs. Any brief analysis of the politics of GM highlights that this is nonsense. Various pressures are applied and agritech companies have captured policy bodies and have a strategic hold over the WTO and trade deals like the TTIP.

For instance, take the 2005 US-India nuclear deal (allowing India to develop its nuclear sector despite it not being a signatory of the Non-Proliferation Treaty and allegedly pushed through with a cash for votes tactic in the Indian parliament). It was linked to the Knowledge Initiative on Agriculture, which was aimed at widening access to India’s agricultural and retail sectors. This initiative was drawn up with the full and direct participation of representatives from various companies, including Monsanto, Cargill and Walmart.

When the most powerful country comes knocking at your door seeking to gain access to your markets, there’s good chance that once its corporate-tipped jackboot is in, you won’t be able to get it out.

And it seems you can’t. So far, Bt cotton has been the only GM crop allowed in India, but the open field trials of many GM crops are now taking place around the country despite an overwhelming consensus of official reports warning against this. The work of numerous public bodies and research institutes is now compromised as a result of Monsanto’s strategic influence within India (see this and this).

If global victory cannot be achieved by the GMO biotech sector via the hijack of public bodies and trade deals or intimidation, then the politics of another form of contamination may eventually suffice:

“The hope of the industry is that over time the market is so flooded [with GMOs] that there’s nothing you can do about it. You just sort of surrender? – Don Westfall, biotech industry consultant and vice-president of Promar International, in the Toronto Star, January 9 2001.

Open field planting is but one way of achieving what Westfall states. Of course, there are numerous other ways too (see this).

As powerful agribusiness concerns seek to ‘consolidate the entire food chain’ with their seed monopolies, patents and GMOs, it is clear that it’s not just the health of the nation (any nation) that is at stake but the global control of food and by implication nations.

“What you are seeing is not just a consolidation of seed companies, it’s really a consolidation of the entire food chain? – Robert Fraley, co-president of Monsanto’s agricultural sector 1996, in the Farm Journal. Quoted in: Flint J. (1998) Agricultural industry giants moving towards genetic monopolism. Telepolis, Heise.


See featured article here

TLB recommends you visit Global Research for more great articles and pertinent information.

Monsanto deception

By: Roger Landry (TLB)

We are very aware of the ultimate dangers inherent in GMOs and their associated bio-toxins, just as we are becoming more aware of the inherent dangers associated with weather modification or Geo-engineering.

We also know Monsanto (along with the rest of the biotech cabal) via the courts, congress, trade agreements and patents is facilitating a takeover of the global food supply. But what about their ties to Geo-engineering?

Why is Monsanto developing and patenting seeds that can grow and thrive in soil afflicted by Geo-engineering?

YES Monsanto DOES own patents that appear to mitigate the effects of Geo-engineering, that can be applied to a whole host of fruits, trees, grains and veggies. A quick patent search brings up 3,981 hits for Monsanto and Stress Tolerance. Mendel Biotechnology is partners with Monsanto in several of these patents. This is taken from one of the joint patents:

The claimed invention, in the field of functional genomics and the characterization of plant genes for the improvement of plants, was made by or on behalf of Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. and Monsanto Corporation as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement in effect on or before the date the claimed invention was made.

Here is a patent titled “Stress tolerant plants and methods thereof,? that is owned by Monsanto, and seems to address all forms of abiotic stress that weather manipulation and chemtrails can cause:

Read more here: Monsanto Patents and Chemtrails

What better way to grab absolute control of said food supply, than to have a patent on the only seeds that can and will grow in this afflicted soil?

So when see that, and ask WHY Monsanto purchased a Climate Company, or how deeply are they involved in artificial weather modification … the answers should be obvious and connecting the dots a slam dunk.

Please read on …


Monsanto Has Purchased “Climate Corporation? For Nearly A Billion Dollars, Why?

By TLB Contributor: Dane Wigington

Monsanto purchased “The Climate Corporation? in 2013, why? Because those who are connected to the climate engineering insanity (and the decimation it is causing) need to control the flow of information in order to better capitalize from the ever increasing engineered disasters.

Controlling the message makes for better manipulation of the farmers struggling from the geoengineered destruction. The post below was sent to me from activist Melody Meachum, my gratitude to her for this. It is a summary of statements made by Monsanto and the Climate Corporation just prior to the purchase being completed, the message is sickening for those that know the truth of the matter. Monsanto and Climate Corporation state how much they will be able to help the agriculture communities when in reality their goals have long since been clear to any who investigate, to capitalize off the engineered decimation being carried out on our planet.

DaneSFMonsantoI spoke in front of “The Climate Corporation? headquarters in San Francisco at the request of the “March Against Monsanto? group. At this event I made clear the connection between Monsanto, The Climate Corporation, and climate engineering (the photo was taken at this event).  Below is a short comment from Melody Meachum followed by the carefully crafted public propaganda message from the Monsanto/Climate Corporation merger group.


The Monsanto/Climate Corporation Machine Of Deception

So now Monsanto brings us not only GMO, but weather control!

This was taken from the Michigan Farm News website, but the Farm Bureau organization nationally and within states are huge advertisers/sellers of Crop Insurance.

Seems that everything on this planet has boiled down to money. Period!

Continue reading here


TLB recommends you visit GeoEngineering Watch for more pertinent articles and information.



By: Roger Landry (TLB)

80-90% of everything you buy to feed your family or loved ones is genetically modified (GMO)  or genetically engineered (GE) in one fashion or another making them almost impossible to avoid … unless you know what to look for. Scientists from across the planet have been heralding their dangers to the human physiology and the biosphere for well over a decade, to no avail.

But the bio-toxins approved for use on these frankenfoods being Glyphosate, or the main active ingredient in Agent Orange, 2,4-D, and now Enlist Duo (a combination of both ), present an even more “clear and present danger” of an increased magnitude over the foods they are designed to protect. These frankentoxins are linked to the promotion of sterility, cancer, kidney disease and a myriad of other maladies, the list being too lengthy to mention here. These are three of the most evil Genetically Engineered Bio-toxins ever developed, and peer reviewed studies and historical data prove this out with more information to this effect being published almost daily.

The problem is you are not made aware of what is and is not genetically modified, or sprayed with genetically engineered bio-toxins in the form of toxic herbicides or pesticides, because labeling is not required by our government (and if they have their way, it never will be).

There are thousands of highly respected scientists and researchers globally screaming at the top of their lungs “STOP GMO’s & these Biotoxins? for the sake of humanity and the biosphere. The great GMO experiment is a colossal failure by any scientific peer reviewed research … unless you consider the actual intention was and is to cull the herd. None of this is a guess, it is a peer reviewed fact that anyone can research from readily available information.

Please click on the above active links (blue text) for additional information and watch the attached video …


GMO Food — It’s Worse Than We Thought

Russell Blaylock M.D

Editor’s Note: This video blows the lid off the GMO controversy and exposes little-known dangers. Plus, you’ll see exactly how to avoid GMOs in their many hidden forms, in grocery stores and in restaurants.

Newsmax editor: Travis Davis, health publisher at Newsmax, previewed Dr. Blaylock’s presentation for our readers and reports: “GMOs enter your body through thousands of packaged and canned food products, through fresh produce, and through the meat, chicken, and fish you eat. The expert help Dr. Blaylock offers in this video reveals everything you need to know to avoid GMOs at the grocery store as well as restaurants.”

Since the introduction of GMO foods, many cancers and other diseases have skyrocketed in humans. Can this really be a coincidence? Please use the information available in this online educational presentation, Cracking the GMO Code to help protect your own health — and the health of your family.

Renowned former neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D., left conventional medicine after decades of practice to concentrate on nutrition and disease prevention. He is the author of several health books and medical editor of The Blaylock Wellness Report.


See original video here:


It looks the same—the bread, pies, sodas, even corn on the cob. So much of what we eat every day looks just like it did 20 years ago. But something profoundly different has happened without our knowledge or consent. And according to leading doctors, what we don’t know is already hurting us big time.

What are GMOs?

GMO stands for “Genetically Modified Organism?. Sometimes the initials “GM? are used, which stands for “Genetically Modified?.

Genetic engineering is very different from normal breeding because it involves taking genes from a completely different species and inserting them into the DNA of another species of plant or even of an animal.


For the first time in history, bacteria, plants and animals can all be mixed up together. For example, right now the DNA of bacteria is put into food plants.

The two primary reasons why plants are genetically engineered are to allow them to:

  • Drink poison, or
  • Produce poison

The poison drinkers are inserted with genes from bacteria that allow them to survive otherwise deadly doses of herbicides. The main poison is GMOs is glyphosate, the poison that is in Roundup. Biotech companies sell the seed and herbicide as a package deal, and farmers can then use hundreds of millions of pounds more herbicide than would normally be possible without the plants dying.

The poison producers are called Bt crops. Inserted genes from the a bacteria produce a pesticide (poison) in every cell of the plant. What kills insects, kills us. This is a pesticide which is INSIDE the plant. You cannot wash it off!

More than 70% of the foods on supermarket shelves contain GM foods. Get a magnifying glass and read the list of ingredients. Unless the following words are organic, do not eat it.

  • Corn

  • Soy

  • Canola (Rapeseed. This is toxic and should not be eaten in any case)

  • Cotton seed (This is toxic and should not be eaten in any case)

  • Sugar (beet sugar is GMO. Cane sugar so far is okay)

  • Hawaiian papaya

  • Zucchini & crook neck squash

Other countries have or import GMO rice and potato.

But it gets worse. Since we now have genetically modified alfalfa, and alfalfa, corn and soy are fed to animals, unless it’s organic, you must not eat:

  • Dairy

  • Meat

  • Eggs

  • Farm-raised fish or seafood

Glyphosate has even been found in the bodies of dairy cows in Denmark, because Europe imports GMO feed! So you know it has to be in the milk.

This is why we no longer eat out anywhere. Since no restaurant uses organic, gmo-free food, or gives you a full list of ingredients, you are bound to be eating poison in virtually every restaurant, fastfood joint and school canteen.

Organic food is meant to be free of GMOs.  But we are starting to find out that even this is not a guarantee.  It’s way too easy to sneak in.  There have been so far at least two instances discovered where GMOs were found in so-called ‘organic’ food.  In each case, this discovery was not made by organizations that should protect you, like the FDA.  They were made by independent bodies.  Baby food is one.  Which is really scary.  The only food a baby should have is breastmilk and, when ready for solids, homemade baby food (cook it, strain it, freeze in icecube trays) and reverse osmosis water.

Kashi ‘organic’ cereal is another.  The Cornucopia Institute found that Kashi has high levels of GMOs in it’sorganic’ cereal.  You may be less surprised at this once you realize that Kashi is not owned by nature-lovers, but by Kellogg’s.

Animals Fed GMO Corn for Two Years Grow MASSIVE TUMORS

In the first long-term study of GMOs, rats fed a lifelong diet of one of genetically modified corn grew tumors and had multiple organ damage, of the liver and kidneys.

Corn is meant to be nutritious. It is not meant to do this –


ANIMALS FED GMOs Have Sterile Grandchildren

When Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) were first created, some people knew they were very bad.  But no one really knew just how bad they are.  We know that now.  Basically, not only are they killing people, because they are so highly toxic, they are also doing something VERY DIFFERENT TO NORMAL FOOD, that in the longer term they will wipe out the human race if not eradicated completely.  Because animals fed GMOs do not have great grand children.  NO other toxic food does that!  This is proof that we are dealing with something completely different.  And evil.  Here is some evidence of this:

Concerning the experiment carried out jointly by the National Association for Gene Security and the Institute of Ecological and Evolutional Problems, Dr. Alexei Surov had this to say.

“We selected several groups of hamsters, kept them in pairs in cells and gave them ordinary food as always,? says Alexei Surov.

“We did not add anything for one group but the other was fed with soya that contained no GM components, while the third group with some content of Genetically Modified Organisms and the fourth one with increased amount of GMO.  We monitored their behavior and how they gain weight and when they give birth to their cubs.  Originally, everything went smoothly.  However, we noticed quite a serious effect when we selected new pairs from their cubs and continued to feed them as before.  These pairs’ growth rate was slower and they reached their sexual maturity more slowly.  When we got some of their cubs we formed the new pairs of the third generation.  We failed to get cubs from these pairs, which were fed with GM foodstuffs.  It was proved that these pairs lost their ability to give birth to their cubs,? Dr. Alexei Surov said.

Another surprise was discovered by scientists in hamsters of the third generation. Hair grew in the mouth of the animals that took part in the experiment.

GMOs remain inside of us

The only published human feeding study revealed one of the most dangerous problems from GM foods.  The gene inserted into GM soy transfers into the DNA of bacteria living inside our intestines and continues to function.  This means that long after we stop eating GMOs, we may still have potentially harmful GM proteins produced continuously inside of us.

Put more plainly, eating a corn chip produced from Bt corn might transform our intestinal bacteria into living pesticide factories, possibly for the rest of our lives.

Please, get this information to all your family and friends!

By the way, I muscle tested to find out if there was any product that could undo the damage to the intestinal bacteria that GMOs do. I have no way of knowing if this is correct or not, but I got that monolaurin (from coconut) may help. It’s been reported to help to heal Lyme’s disease.

GMOS destroy Organs

If GMOs did nothing, then organs of animals fed GMOs should look exactly the same as normal. But they look radically different, as you can see from this photo:


If you that still does not convince you that it is deadly serious that you become obsessive about getting GMOs out of your diet, here’s another pic that proves that GMOs seriously alter the whole body. This photo is a comparison of rat testicles:


People are dying at very early ages, and you know from seeing these pictures of totally changed organs, that GMOs are a major, if not THE major cause, behind it. You won’t hear about this in the media, because the power of Monsanto goes nearly everywhere. The following are just a few examples that I have collected:

My 40 year old female cousin died of breast cancer tonight…

Her parents raised her on a healthy diet, totally healthy. They took supplements, had a garden, went to church, didn’t drink or smoke EVER…and then one day she finds a lump.

She decided to treat it using natural methods like Vitamin C treatments, oxygenation, hydrogen peroxide, changing the body to alkaline, all under the supervision of natural healers and doctors…but she was also getting chemo treatments.

She ate an organic diet and cleansed weekly to flush the poison from her body and kept her immune system boosted to fight off infection. She was totally informed about modern day, alternative, cancer treatments and what she was doing to beat it.

A week and a half ago she was admitted into the hospital with severe pain from fluid gathering around her heart and lungs(the tumor area). Doctors drained her chest and tested the fluid and found it to be full of cancer cells, all of the sudden it spread, it had taken over.

A week and a half ago she was a beautiful, youthful 40 year old woman and today she is dead.

She looked 80 years old when I say her earlier today at the hospital. From 40 to 80 in a week and a half….What the —- is going on around here people?!

(Note: All you have to do is look again at the pictures of the tumors on the rats, and change to the organs from GMOs, and you will know).

On another post I read about a lady who walked into her boyfriend’s house, and found him dead in the middle of the living room. He was only 40 years old.

A lady I talked with in the line at the post office said that 5 people, all close to her and most of them under 50, had all died in the last month.

Another poster said that 6 people close to them, none of them particularly old, had all died within several months of each other.

Something is causing this. Vaccines are part of the cause, but GMOs are obviously deadly. The lamestream media will not tell you that GMOs are killing people. I urge you to totally get GMOs and all other toxins out of your life.

GMOs need to be banned totally, not just labelled. They kill. And the pollen from GMO plants goes everywhere, and is infecting non-GMO plants.

The dangers of GMOs is just one of the 55 chapters in the book that I spent 2 years writing- You’re not Fat, You’re Toxic – to help you save you and your family. If you don’t want to buy it, I encourage you to ask the library to obtain a copy:


TLB recommends you visit for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article HERE


By: Roger Landry (TLB)

How many of us so involved in the GMO or Bio-toxin push-back know the industrial or political history of GMOs, or the birth, usage and proliferation of chemical or genetically engineered (GE) herbicides and pesticides? What was the motivation behind these mechanisms?

Let me make one shocking point to get the ball rolling …

Are you aware that pesticides evolved from the defense industry. The first modern synthetic chemical pesticides were derived from “NERVE GASES? developed by the Germans in World War II. These were designed to perpetrate massive destruction on the human physiology, up to and including death (the intended result). The pesticides used on our food were produced by making simple changes in the molecules in the original deadly formula, so that instead of having their greatest toxicity for human beings they could have their greatest toxicity for insects … or so we were told …

Who in their right mind would ever believe that any and all toxicity to human physiology (their paramount function) was gone from these chemicals. Not having their “greatest toxicity” to humans seems to imply a residual toxicity. Is it a coincidence that the steady decline of health in America and the steady rise of maladies such as cancer coincides with the birth of this pesticide industry?

Are you even aware of the most vulnerable areas of your body to absorption of these toxic chemicals …

pesticides 2

So how safe are modern GMOs, Pesticides and Herbicides? Not what we are told by government regulatory agencies, proven over and over again to hold the interests of the pharmaceutical, chemical and biotech industries that own them, above the health of the public they are mandated to protect, but by what we see historically and via peer reviewed independent science.

What follows is a partial transcript from the video presented below stating the propaganda rich story-line being presented to the population, at the time, to justify the introduction and massive proliferation of these mechanisms:


In the harvest of 1999, 60% of Canada’s canola crop, 90% of Argentina’s soybean crop, 50% of the US’ soybean crop, and 33% of the US’ corn crop was genetically engineered. Industrial agriculture is damaging the basis for future production. We’ve got soil erosion, soil compaction, salinisation, water logging, destruction of beneficial biodiversity, loss of natural enemies of pest… and all that is occurring in an alarming rate.

Three things needed to come together to make the Green Revolution work. One was the development of specific high yield and often dwarf varieties of wheat, rice and corn that were derived by special outcrossing and hybridization techniques that Norman Borlaug perfected, working in Mexico and South-Western United States. Secondly there was a tremendous investment of funds from the Rockefeller foundation and the World Bank to assist poor countries to develop broader food base based on these resources. And third, there was tremendous availability, input and requirement for pesticides, fertilizers and irrigation which combined reinforced the value to a merchant commerce of supporting this type of agriculture.

The Ford and Rockefeller foundations in the ’50s were concerned that if the issue of hunger in the third world wasn’t addressed, than poor people in those countries would be ripe for communist subversion. The Green Revolution, which is really the introduction of chemical agriculture under forced circumstances, in India acted as an antidote to social change and reinforced the patterns of inequality. The smaller peasants lost their land because they couldn’t afford to keep up with the credit payments linked to the Green Revolution, the usage of water skyrocketed which left huge land regions basically desertified, the agricultural diversity has been wiped out, and yes the production of rice and wheat has increased but that was not an absolute increase in food.

Faced with a choice of crop failures and resulting worldwide starvation, the use of pesticide and herbicides seems inevitable.

To get the whole story please watch this video …

See original video here


Attached is a re-post of an outstanding video and audio discussion released by TLB earlier this year we feel highly pertinent to this discussion:


GMO’s The End Game – Profits Before Health (TLB Recorded Discussion & Video)

By: Roger Landry (TLB)

The following is an excerpt from the article “Now This, My Fellow Lab Rats … Is Connecting The Dots Of Tyranny !!!? By: TLB

85-90% of everything you buy to feed your family or loved ones is genetically modified (GMO), and known to promote sterility, cancer, kidney disease and a myriad of other maladies, the list being too lengthy to mention here.

But even our non-GMO food is saturated with Glyphosate, or the main active ingredient in Agent Orange (yes I said that), two of the most evil Genetically Engineered Bio-toxins ever developed and also known to cause all of the above mentioned maladies and many more including massive birth defects.

The problem is you are not made aware of what is and is not genetically modified, or sprayed with genetically engineered bio-toxins in the form of toxic herbicides or pesticides, because labeling is not required by our government (and if they have their way never will be).

There are thousands of highly respected scientists and researchers globally screaming at the top of their lungs “STOP GMO’s” for the sake of humanity and the biosphere. The great GMO experiment is a colossal failure by any scientific peer reviewed research … unless you consider the actual intention was and is to cull the herd. None of this is a guess, it is a peer reviewed fact that anyone can research from readily available information.


TLB Specials is proud to present a great discussion with Rose Stevens:

Rose Stevens is a concerned citizen and the Manitoba Coordinator for the GE Foods and Health Tour that is going across Canada educating Canadians on the dangers of GMO’s.

Please click on the TLB Radio Logo to listen to this recorded discussion.

TLB radio


Rose was intramental is the production of the following video and we highly recomment you take the time to watch this highly informative and well made 17 minute production …

GMO’s The End Game – Profits Before Health


By: Marco Torres

Ever wonder when it was that we all started submitting to the terms of life as we are subjected to on a daily basis? When did we start accepting the poisoning of our water supply with fluoride and other toxins? When did we start saying it’s ok to pollute our food, the planet and ourselves? When did we start giving away our freedom of choice and giving it to the government? When and why did this happen to humanity and how could we let it happen?

There are many theories, but definitive answers are difficult to find. If you look back at history, such instances of absolute illogical behavior are rampant. The common theme appears to be that the masses are always in agreement to this behavior and they simply let it ride. It seems that mass mind control programs have been in operation and affecting people for tens of thousands and perhaps hundreds of thousands of years. Our present day reality is a reflection of the culmination of this mass mind control and what we have come to accept as normal. It’s psychotic to sane observers but completely normal to others.

Take healers as an example. They were historically stoned to death for their ability to drive away a variety of illnesses from countless people. Then there was the slaying of medicine men and women who had the ancient herbal knowledge to heal and cure hundreds of diseases.

What about the raping, killing and torture of entire communities and cities, peaceful and otherwise that did not fit into the grand scheme of plans for conquering rulers as their quest for occupied territories expanded? Sound familiar? That’s because it has happened for tens of thousands of years while the world watched and let it happen, just as we do in present day.

What about wars or the utter lies put forth to convince the masses that we must kill millions of people to achieve a specific peace initiative as dictated to us by our government officials? That we must invade countries under the guise of peace keeping, when in actuality the motives are far more sinister. When did the assassination of human beings become a right of passage, where these values and belief systems based on violence became such an important and accepted part of our culture?

When was the first time a consensus was reached by religious groups that deemed it was a sin for boys to masturbate? What was the discourse of the people who examined this approach and then accepted it? Can you imagine? A sin for young teenage boys raging with testosterone to act on one of the most natural and primal functions of their bodies as they passed into puberty marking their entrance into manhood. Any man knows that it is an impossible request, yet these same men created these mindsets. Unfathomable!!

Circumcision is one that still baffles many. When was it that men (and women) decided it was ok to actually start cutting the skin of babies’ and young boys’ penises in an attempt to curb masturbation? Again, why was there always such an interest in curbing masturbation and why resort to such barbaric rituals in an effort to reduce this natural instinct in boys? Why does it still continue today when there is absolutely no accepted and established scientific evidence for any benefits?

Laws which undermine a man or woman’s sovereignty are another surging topic of debate. At what point did government start demanding (and have the people accepting) that land owners are required to pay taxes on the property they own, live and subsist on? Or require people to submit half of their income to the government? When did this become acceptable without dispute, and without massive civil disobedience?

When did the first license plate law come into effect that required citizens of a state to pay for the “right” to drive their vehicle? No validation sticker, no vehicle privileges they say. And the people accepted this? We need validation from the government to drive?? Why would people ever even rationalize and then accept such a decision made by governments?

What about seatbelts? Sure, they save lives, but should that not be the choice of those who wear them? When was the first time that a populace accepted a law that allowed a peace officer to take away our freedom of choice to wear or not wear a seatbelt, and demand a fine for their masters if we opposed the enacted law? Seatbelt laws are especially ridiculous since not wearing one would typically only harm or kill the person that made that choice and nobody else. Seatbelt laws are a clear demonstration of why the police only have two objectives in our society, to enforce laws and generate revenue for governments.

When was the first time that farmers started saying “yes” to pesticides, fungicides and herbicides to control crops? When did the first farmer or group of farmers say “it’s ok to poison our crops” for the betterment of production and the expense of health? One might also ask when and why the first farmer decided it was ok to plant genetically modified seeds, in essence toying with nature at her expense and our own, without any regard to the consequences?

On what wisdom did any regulatory agency, run by some well-intentioned scientists, ever deem it appropriate that the way to keep people safe from foods was to pasteurize, homogenize, irradiate and destroy all the nutritional content of food and beverage? Find salmonella, or bacteria? No worries, let’s fry the entire food supply so that it never happens again. What? On what planet is this logical and why do we continue to allow these regulations?

At what point did conventional medical wisdom accept junk science which fabricated conclusions that things like chemotherapy, radiation, mammograms, CAT scans, vaccines and pharmaceuticals in general were things that would benefit the health of people? And how was the entire medical profession in mass agreement as these harmful medical interventions were implemented? How did they manage to convince millions of well educated professionals that this was the way to advance human health? Why was sheer ignorance the hallmark of medical practice throughout history?

How did the acceptance of putting chemicals into our water supply, whether it be chlorine, fluoride or other artificial chemicals not found in naturally occurring water, become widely accepted across the world without massive opposition? In fact, protecting the public from hazardous chemicals seems to be completing lacking in our society. We have more chemicals today than we ever have in the history of our civilization, and we know it’s killing us, yet we keep adding more toxins every year without any objection from those in regulatory positions.

At what point did we start criminalizing and imprisoning populations for possessing plants in nature, especially those which have had and do have powerful medicinal properties. In what sane world would we declare that marijuana, one of the most powerful medicinal plants in the world has no accepted medical use? How did we ever come to accept that a person who grows marijuana plants is more of criminal and should receive a longer mandatory sentence than a child rapist?

The list of insanities could go on forever. Obviously, the when and how all of these things happened are part of historical record, but we never really question why, and when we do question it, the answers never make sense. The ends never justify the means.

When we look at history we realize that only through the exact science of incrementalism has all of the above been possible. This relies on many small changes enacted over time in order to create a larger broad based change. World powers have embraced this systematized knowledge and applied it to the gradual deterioration of human health for one purpose – control.

We need less followers and more leaders to reverse this trend. We are stronger than this and we are certainly a species that has enduring qualities. We need to effectuate change not through political processes but through ourselves.

So my two questions are: How long will it take before we reverse the insanity, flip the coin, turn the page and stand up for who we are, what we are and embrace our true ownership of this planet, nature and ourselves as universal sovereign beings? Isn’t it time?

Marco Torres is a research specialist, writer and consumer advocate for healthy lifestyles. He holds degrees in Public Health and Environmental Science and is a professional speaker on topics such as disease prevention, environmental toxins and health policy.


TLB recommends you visit Prevent Disease for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article here


  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 795 other subscribers