By: Roger Landry (TLB)
Updated July 24, 2015
Federal Courts and the Law they dispense within the Sovereign States of America constitutes a felonious enterprise at best, and choreographed tyranny upon We The People at worst.
Who/what is the harbinger of Law within these Sovereign States of America?
Who/what defines the Law in Said jurisdictions?
Do US federal courts even have jurisdiction within these Sovereign States of America?
Not in accordance with the Act of 1871 they don’t …
When the system of courts we depend on to maintain fairness and justice are operating outside the confines of the Constitution and defined jurisdiction, can We The People have any faith that said courts or their dispensed justice is valid … or merely the agent of those who would gain from such actions.
This video is spot on and a serious wake up call …
When those who would dispense (supposed) justice are operating outside the law, and are aware of this fact, We The People are by default subject to a calculated program of tyranny beyond comprehension and treason becomes the practiced norm!
Please read the information presented below, and follow the provided links in order to fully understand what is said. What is presented here is a serious trip down the rabbit hole.
************
Landmark Income Tax Case: Supreme Court No. 14-1305
Source: May 21, 2015 supremecourtcase
Relying on the provisions of the Constitution as ultimate proof, the petition presents incontrovertible evidence that no contemporary federal court has jurisdiction anywhere within the exterior limits of any of the 50 freely associated compact states of the Union.
This means that federal law is enforceable only in the District of Columbia and the Territories—and every United States District Judge in every United States District Court throughout the Union is usurping exercise of jurisdiction in extra-constitutional geographic area and culpable for treason to the Constitution:
“We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution. . . .” Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264, 6 Wheat. 265, 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821).
THERE IS NO ONE ON EARTH WHOSE LIFE IS NOT AFFECTED BY THIS SITUATION.
************
1 – Supreme Court No. 14-1305, Petition for Writ of Certiorari, filed April 29, 2015
2 – ‘Petition,’ ‘writ,’ and ‘certiorari’ defined
3 – Proof of Service on Solicitor General – April 29, 2015
4 – Solicitor General waives right to file response – May 12, 2015
6 – Supreme Court Docket – May 19, 2015
8 – Ad runs in Houston Chronicle May 29 – June 3
****************