Democrats panic over Clinton email scandal: Hillary campaign issues 4,000-word explanation of why she's innocent after it emerges her private server held secret CIA intelligence and satellite info

  • Intelligence community's inspector general tells Congress two emails on Hillary's private server were later classified 'TOP SECRET//SI/TK//NOFORN'
  • His letter spells out that the information came from keyhole satellite data and signal intercepts in 2006 and 2008
  • Intelligence originally was from the CIA and the Pentagon's National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
  • Clinton camp posted a 4,000-word treatise insisting she did nothing wrong
  • Democrats inside the presidential campaign world's bubble are panicking as their front-runner faces multiple investigations and the possibility of criminal prosecution 
  • As Clinton splits hairs over when the top-secret information was classified, Republicans on Capitol Hill complain her spin 'doesn't pass the smell test'

At least two classified messages on Hillary Clinton's home-brew email server contained top-secret intelligence including signal intercepts and information from keyhole satellite conducted by the CIA and the Pentagon's satellite-spying National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.

U.S. Intelligence Community Inspector General Charles McCullough reported to Congress on Wednesday that the sensitive information dated from 2006 and 2008, and was 'classified up to "TO.PSECRET//SI/TK//NOFORN".'

The last three designations refer to 'Special Intelligence,' 'Talent Keyhole' – a kind of satellite – and a prohibition on any non-Americans seeing the information. 

SCROLL DOWN TO READ THE LETTER 

TROUBLE IN CHAPPAQUA: Hillary Clinton faces new questions and new levels of outrage as messages on her private email server were found to contain top-secret signal intercepts and information from spy satellites

TROUBLE IN CHAPPAQUA: Hillary Clinton faces new questions and new levels of outrage as messages on her private email server were found to contain top-secret signal intercepts and information from spy satellites

National Intelligence Community Inspector General Charles McCullough told members of Congress in writing that two of Clinton's emails were so sensitive that it would have been illegal to show them to any foreigner

National Intelligence Community Inspector General Charles McCullough told members of Congress in writing that two of Clinton's emails were so sensitive that it would have been illegal to show them to any foreigner

EYE IN THE SKY: The classification acronym 'TK' stands for 'Talent Keyhole,' a kind of taskable satellite that delivers high-resolution imagery like this from 200 miles or more above the earth

EYE IN THE SKY: The classification acronym 'TK' stands for 'Talent Keyhole,' a kind of taskable satellite that delivers high-resolution imagery like this from 200 miles or more above the earth

The new revelation led the Clinton camp to post and distribute a 4,000-word treatise on Wednesday defending the former secretary of state as her White House ambitions drift dangerously close to the rocks. 

Part of that document is a stern denial that she handled classified information on her private email account – a claim that is at odds with McCullough's report.

'Clinton only used her account for unclassified email,' that claim reads in part. 'No information in Clinton's emails was marked classified at the time she sent or received them.'

The campaign is leaning heavily on a technicality, insisting that if emails 'did not contain any classified markings and/or dissemination controls' when Clinton saw them, she's not responsible for securing the information even though they 'should have been classified at the time they were sent.' 

That explanation isn't sitting well on Capitol Hill.

'So we're supposed to think the secretary of state, and a former senator in this case, thought signal-intercepts and descriptions of satellite intelligence were okay things to send around the ordinary Internet as long as no one had marked them classified?' a senior Republican Senate aide asked DailyMail.com on Thursday.

'That just doesn't pass the smell test. Either Secretary Clinton was derelict and thought she was above national security rules, or she was just aloof and careless. Either way she has lots of explaining to do.'

A veteran GOP campaign aide working for a middle-tier presdiential candidate added: 'She's toast. It's just a matter of how burned she's going to be before she pops up.'

TIMELINE: THE CLINTON EMAIL SAGA 

Hillary Clinton's email troubles began when her private address was exposed by a Romanian hacker. Now the resulting scandal threatens to torpedo her presidential ambitions.

2008 – Hillary Clinton acquires a personal email server for her use in running for president, and has it installed in her Chappaqua, New York home

January 13, 2009 – Internet records show that the domain 'clintonemail.com' was created

January 21, 2009 – Clinton is confirmed by the U.S. Senate as President Obama's secretary of state

February 1, 2013 – Clinton leaves the State Department

March 20, 2013 – Clinton's private email address, hdr22@clintonemail.com, is made public when a Romanian hacker named 'Guccifer' (whose real name is Marcel Lazăr Lehel) hacks into longtime Clinton adviser Sidney Blumenthal's AOL email account and leaks images of his inbox – including emails from Clinton

June 2013 – Hillary's team shifts control of the email domain to an outside IT contractor in Denver called Platte River Networks, and sends the original server hardware to a data center facility in New Jersey, where it is erased

August 11, 2014 – Following a congressional subpoena and more than a year of delays, the State Department hands over a small number of Clinton's private emails, 10 in all, to a House committee investigating the 2012 terror attack on a State Department compound in Benghazi, Libya – including some emails from the hdr22@clintonemail.com address

November 2014 – The Benghazi committee asks the State Department for a larger batch of Clinton's emails and receives about 300 that relate to the Libya saga, amounting to 850 printed pages

December 5, 2014 – Clinton's aides say that in response to a request from the State Department, they have handed over about 55,000 pages of her work-related emails, comprising 30,490 messages

February 13, 2015 – The State Department sends the Benghazi committee another 850 pages of Clinton's emails, including some from two different accounts on the private 'clintonemail.com' server

February 27, 2015 – State Department staffers tell Benghazi committee aides that Clinton had used her private address exclusively during her tenure at the agency, and that they don't have any of her emails other than those she provided voluntarily

March 4, 2015 – The Associated Press reports that it has traced Clinton's private email address back to a private server at her Chappaqua, New York home, and that the server was registered under a fake name

March 10, 2015 – In a contentious press conference following a speech at the United Nations, Clinton admits that she deleted more than 30,000 emails that she says were personal in nature, and says she turned over everything work-related to the State Department, while insisting that 'I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email; there is no classified material'

March 11, 2015 – The Associated Press sues the State Department to force the release of Clinton's emails and other documents that the agency has failed to turn over following a Freedom Of Information Act request

April 12, 2015 – Clinton launches her second presidential campaign with an online video and begins two months of low-key campaigning marked by a lack of interaction with reporters

May 22, 2015 – The first 300 of Clinton's emails are made public by the State Department, revealing a close relationship with Blumenthal in the weeks following the Benghazi terror attack; one of them has been retroactively classified by the FBI as 'secret' but Clinton insists it was 'handled appropriately'

May 27, 2015 – A federal judge orders the State Department to begin releasing all of Clinton's emails in installments every 30 days, setting monthly targets for the agency so the work is completed by January 29, 2016

July 23, 2015 – Charles McCullough, the inspector general for the U.S. intelligence community tells members of Congress in a letter that a random sampling of 40 Clinton emails turned up four that contained material classified as secret

July 24, 2015 – Andrea Williams, spokeswoman for the McCulloush, says that the emails 'were classified when they were sent and are classified now.'

July 25, 2015 – During a campaign appearance in Iowa, Clinton modifies her position and tells reporters in Iowa that 'I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classifiedat the time it was sent and received' 

July 31, 2015 – The second State Department release of Clinton's emails, more than 1,300 in all, includes 41 that were marked 'classified' before they were made public

August 4, 2015 – Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill says in a statement that the candidate 'did not send nor receive any emails that were marked classified at the time'

August 11, 2015 – McCullough revises his statement to Congress, saying that two of the four emails in question should have been classified 'top secret' – but were not marked that way – and contained information from signal intercepts and keyhole satellite data; he adds that the other two emails are still being evaluated

August 11, 2015 – The FBI takes possession of Clinton's server hardware and three thumb drives in her lawyer's possession, which are said to contain copies of everything she turned over to the State Department

'SMELL TEST': Clinton will have to answer tough questions in the coming days about how she secured information that might have risked national security

'SMELL TEST': Clinton will have to answer tough questions in the coming days about how she secured information that might have risked national security

It's not just Republicans who are stunned by this week's revelations.  

The increased attention on Clinton and her now-infamous email server has also brought Democratic Party insiders out of the woodwork to hammer her campaign's defensive and reactive handling of what has become known as 'servergate.'

'I'm not sure they completely understand the credibility they are losing, by the second,' a Democratic strategist told The Hill on Thursday. 'At some point this goes from being something you can rationalize away to something that becomes political cancer. And we are getting pretty close to the cancer stage, because this is starting to get ridiculous.'

And rumblings are starting to surface inside Vice President Joe Biden's inner circle that Hillary's sudden weakness could open the door for him to run for president. 

A government official told DailyMail.com on Wednesday that the Obama White House may be clearing a path for Vice President Joe Biden to enter the presidential race by instigating a deep-dive investigation into Clinton's emails.

'The timing is the thing,' the official said on condition of anonymity. 'The DOJ could have jumped in at any time, but it's happening only after the vice president has signaled that he'd rather be the nominee instead of the former secretary.'

'I don't believe in coincidences,' he added.

Biden, according to The Wall Street Journal, is huddling with advisers on an island off the South Carolina coast this week, assessing his chances of winning the Democratic nomination. 

The Justice Department's sudden move to seize Clinton's email server and digital copies of her emails held by her lawyer has shifted her campaign from offense to defense, as stories about her college tuition initiative dried up and questions about her secretive email arrangement at the State Department intensified.

The campaign's lengthy defense of the former secretary came in conjunction with an email blast from Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri, which a New Hampshire Democratic campaign consultant told DailyMail.com 'smells of desperation.'

Clinton's team knows 'how close to the edge Hillary is right now,' the political operative said. 'And it's a sign of weakness that the campaign is getting this defensive.'

Even Democratic insiders who don't believe the front-running candidate did anything wrong are beginning to voice frustration at how the scandal is being managed from insice Clintonworld.

THE AGENCY: The CIA's headquarters campus in Langley, Virginia (shown) is likely buzzing over the former secretary of state's apparent casual management of sensitive information

THE AGENCY: The CIA's headquarters campus in Langley, Virginia (shown) is likely buzzing over the former secretary of state's apparent casual management of sensitive information

'This is a classic example of the cover-up being ten times worse than the so-called crime – though in this case there wasn't a crime,' a progressive strategist told The Hill.

'The culture of secrecy that has surrounded the Clintons – understandably in some cases – has now yielded a situation where she did something that wasn't necessary and looks nefarious.'

That secrecy, added New York-based Democratic strategist Hank Sheinkopf, is adding to public feelings that Hillary is hiding something.

'It's hard to imagine Americans in the heartland wondering about whether Hillary Clinton gave up an email server or not,' he said. 'But [it adds to] this constant battering she's taking, which is that people don't trust her. It increases the feeling that something is not being told to them.'

Palmieri's email was framed as a warning to Clinton's supporters that then 'might hear some news over the next few days about Hillary Clinton's emails.'

The Clinton aide stressed that there would be 'a lot of misinformation' surrounding the story, adding that 'Hillary has remained absolutely committed to cooperating' and that 'this kind of nonsense comes with the territory of running for president.' 

THE CLINTON DEFENSE 

Hillary's campaign issued a 4,000-word defense of her on Wednesday, including two separate claims that she never used her private email account to handle classified information. The complete sections are reproduced here, including bolded text in the original:

------------------------

'Clinton said she did not use her email to send or receive classified information, but the State Department and two Inspectors General said some of these emails do contain classified information. Was her statement inaccurate?

'Clinton only used her account for unclassified email. No information in Clinton's emails was marked classified at the time she sent or received them.

'When information is reviewed for public release, it is common for information previously unclassified to be upgraded to classified if the State Department or another agency believes its public release could cause potential harm to national security, law enforcement or diplomatic relations.

'After reviewing a sampling of the 55,000 pages of emails, the Inspectors General have proffered that a small number of emails, which did not contain any classified markings and/or dissemination controls, should have been classified at the time they were sent. The State Department has said it disagrees with this assessment.

'Clinton hopes the State Department and the agencies involved in the review process will sort out as quickly as possible which of the 55,000 pages of emails are appropriate to share with the public.

'How did Clinton receive and consume classified information?

'The Secretary's office was located in a secure area. Classified information was viewed in hard copy by Clinton while in the office. While on travel, the State Department had rigorous protocols for her and traveling staff to receive and transmit information of all types.

'A separate, closed email system was used by the State Department for the purpose of handling classified communications, which was designed to prevent such information from being transmitted anywhere other than within that system.'

 

The comments below have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

By posting your comment you agree to our house rules.

Who is this week's top commenter? Find out now