The TRUE scale of the Earth: Interactive map shows how the US, India and China could ALL fit inside Africa - and why traditional atlases have got it wrong

  • Computer developers in Detroit, Michigan, created 'The True Size Of' map to highlight the distorted sizes of countries shown on the Mercator projection, which is the map most people are familiar with
  • Interactive tool allows users to drag countries on top of one another to compare their sizes 
  • It shows the US, China and India can fit inside Africa, and Greenland is smaller than India, for example

It’s difficult to show the spherical Earth on a 2D map, with countries becoming distorted in different ways.

Now two computer developers in Detroit, Michigan, have created an interactive map called 'The True Size Of,' which shows how large countries really are compared to one another.

It allows you to search for a country and drag it on top of another one to show how the scale of a country is distorted the closer it gets to the Earth’s poles.

Type in a country below to compare its size to others 

Two computer developers in Detroit, Michigan, have created an interactive map, which shows how large countries really are compared to one another. To use the tool above, enter a country's name in the search box and when it's highlighted, you can drag it around the map

Most of us have grown up using a world map based on the Mercator projection, which was created by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1569.

Used for centuries, including in forms by Google Maps, it includes imaginary lines to cut all meridians as straight lines – making it easy to use – but this distorts the shape and size of countries near the poles.

This means that many people have grown up accepting Africa, for example, is smaller than it is compared to other countries.

On the Mercator projection, Greenland appears to be roughly the same size as Africa, but in reality, 'Greenland is 0.8million square miles and Africa is 11.6 million square miles - nearly 14 and a half times larger,' according to the new map's creators.

Out-of-date: Most of us have grown up using a world map based on the Mercator projection (pictured), which was created by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1569. Used for centuries, including in forms by Google Maps, it includes imaginary lines to cut all meridians as straight lines – making it easy to use – but distorts the shape and size of countries near the poles

Out-of-date: Most of us have grown up using a world map based on the Mercator projection (pictured), which was created by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1569. Used for centuries, including in forms by Google Maps, it includes imaginary lines to cut all meridians as straight lines – making it easy to use – but distorts the shape and size of countries near the poles

In 2010, artist Kai Krause made a map to show that the US, India and the majority of Europe can fit ‘inside’ Africa. The True Size Of map can be used to show which other superpowers are dwarfed by the African continent. For example, a screenshot above shows the US, China and India can comfortably fit inside

In 2010, artist Kai Krause made a map to show that the US, India and the majority of Europe can fit ‘inside’ Africa. The True Size Of map can be used to show which other superpowers are dwarfed by the African continent. For example, a screenshot above shows the US, China and India can comfortably fit inside

Computer developers James Talmage, and Damon Maneice based their interactive map called ‘The True Size’ on his work, to highlight the distortion caused by the Mercator map. A screenshot shows Australia is roughly as large as Western Europe

Computer developers James Talmage, and Damon Maneice based their interactive map called ‘The True Size’ on his work, to highlight the distortion caused by the Mercator map. A screenshot shows Australia is roughly as large as Western Europe

In 2010, artist Kai Krause made a map to show that the US, India and the majority of Europe can fit ‘inside’ Africa, The Washington Post reported.

Computer developers James Talmage, and Damon Maneice based their interactive map called ‘The True Size Of’ on his work, to highlight the distortion caused by the Mercator map.

Users can type in the name of any country, which is then highlighted. It’s then possible to click and drag the outline of a country onto another, to see how they compare.

Twitter user @d_jaishanker used the tool to show how the size of India compares to Europe (above). He noted that Kerala is around the same size as Belgium 

Twitter user @need caffeine, placed the three largest US states - Alaska, California and Texas on top of Africa countries where they don't seem quite as large. Texas is smaller than Tanzania, for example

For example, Greenland appears huge in its natural position near the poles, but once it’s dragged closer to the equator, appears smaller. It is in fact, a comparable size to India.

Equally, Australia is approximately the same size of Europe.

‘We hope teachers will use this in their classrooms as a fun way to help students understand just how big the world is,’ Mr Talmage said.

The map#'s creators hope teachers will use it to give children a fresh perspective on the world, and it is capturing people's imaginations on Twitter.  @ajchavar wrote: 'China and the (continuous) US are much closer in size than I thought,' sharing this screenshot

THE PROBLEM WITH THE MERCATOR PROJECTION: EARTH LOOKS DISTORTED NEAR TO ITS POLES

It is hard to represent our spherical world on flat piece of paper.

Cartographers use something called a ‘projection’ to morph the globe into a 2D map, The True Size Of map creators James Talmage, and Damon Maneice explained.

The most popular of these is the Mercator projection, created by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1569.

It’s probably the most popular overview of the world and has been used for centuries, including in forms by Google Maps.

Every map projection introduces distortion, and each has its own set of problems.

The Mercator map includes imaginary lines to cut all meridians as straight lines – making it easy to use.

But one of the most common criticisms of it is that it exaggerates the size of countries nearer the poles, making the US, Russia and Europe look larger, for example, while downplaying the size of those near the equator - the African Continent.

On the Mercator projection, Greenland appears to be roughly the same size as Africa.

In reality, Greenland is 0.8 million square miles and Africa is 11.6 million square miles - nearly 14 and a half times larger.

‘Even though I have known about this phenomenon for years, I still find it surprising every time I play with the map.

‘It's just shocking to see how small my home state of Michigan gets when I drag it to the equator.’

Users have shared their surprising discoveries on Twitter, with @needcaffeine pointing out that the three largest US states - Alaska, California and Texas look much smaller when placed in Africa, with Texas smaller than Tanzania.

Twitter user @ajchavar wrote: 'China and the (continuous) US are much closer in size than I thought.'

On the Mercator projection, Greenland appears to be roughly the same size as Africa, but in reality, Greenland is 0.8 million square miles and Africa is 11.6 million square miles - nearly 14 and a half times larger. The country is highlighted as it appears on a Mercator map

On the Mercator projection, Greenland appears to be roughly the same size as Africa, but in reality, Greenland is 0.8 million square miles and Africa is 11.6 million square miles - nearly 14 and a half times larger. The country is highlighted as it appears on a Mercator map

Here, a highlighted version of Greenland is dragged on to of India, showing it is smaller than the country, even though it looks significantly larger than the country in a Mercator map view

Here, a highlighted version of Greenland is dragged on to of India, showing it is smaller than the country, even though it looks significantly larger than the country in a Mercator map view

The comments below have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

We are no longer accepting comments on this article.

Who is this week's top commenter? Find out now