DOW JONES, A NEWS CORP COMPANY
Sections
Aim higher, reach further.
Get the Wall Street Journal $12 for 12 weeks. Subscribe Now

Crowdfunding Sites Like GoFundMe and YouCaring Raise Money—and Concerns

Sites come under fire for not having enough controls to protect users

‘We were crushed,’ said Todd King Sr., after a neighbor refused to turn over a portion of the $2,700 she had raised on behalf of his family after the death of his son Tyree. ENLARGE
‘We were crushed,’ said Todd King Sr., after a neighbor refused to turn over a portion of the $2,700 she had raised on behalf of his family after the death of his son Tyree. Photo: Andrew Spear for The Wall Street Journal

After Todd King Sr.’s 13-year-old son Tyree was killed by a drunken driver last summer, friends, neighbors and strangers rallied to the family’s side, donating several thousand dollars for funeral expenses through a crowdfunding website.

Then Mr. King, who lives in Springfield, Ohio, discovered that a neighbor had kept more than $1,000 of the $2,700 she had raised on the family’s behalf through YouCaring.com. She refused to turn over the remaining funds, so Mr. King filed a report with the county sheriff and ended up in court.

“We were crushed,” said Mr. King. “Whoever has guardianship over the child should be the one that cashes the check.”

Crowdfunding websites, such as YouCaring.com and GoFundMe.com, are for-profit businesses that make it easy for people to raise money for a variety of causes, such as funeral expenses and medical bills. The sites are gaining in popularity, raising $1.9 billion last year through campaigns, with giving expected to grow at a 25% annual clip for the next several years, according to Blackbaud Inc., a technology provider for nonprofits.

But the sites have come under fire for not having enough controls to protect users. “There is no accountability after the fact,” said Ethan Mollick, an assistant professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School who studies crowdfunding.

The platforms earn money from fees paid by donors or campaign organizers. For example, GoFundMe, the largest peer-to-peer fundraising site by revenue, levies a 5% platform fee, plus a processing fee of 2.9% plus 30 cents per donation in the U.S. and Canada. On a campaign that raises $110,000 from 760 donors, GoFundMe would collect a platform fee of $5,500; an additional $3,418 would go to WePay, the payment processor.

Some competitors don’t charge a platform fee, but automatically indicate a recommended contribution to cover platform costs when a donation is made.

Executives at GoFundMe, YouCaring and their competitors say the number of fraudulent campaigns is actually low and note that they can’t vet every campaign. GoFundMe says each month it adds 100,000 new campaigns to its site. The campaigns have helped raise $2 billion, including more than $1 billion in the last nine months. YouCaring said it hosted 170,000 campaigns last year that raised $140 million.

“A new campaign is started every 18 seconds on GoFundMe,” said GoFundMe Chief Executive Rob Solomon. “While we are careful to screen as much as humanly possible, there is virtually no way to proactively screen each and every one when they are created.”

To verify the campaigns they host, the sites employ basic fraud screens that use behavioral, financial and social information to identify fraud. The sites also rely on users to help maintain the integrity of the fundraising efforts.

GoFundMe advises users to “only contribute payments to GoFundMe users they personally know and trust.” YouCaring terms of service note it “cannot and does not represent or warrant the truthfulness of any Fundraiser.”

The issue we are grappling with is whether there is a law out there that governs this type of transaction and do we have jurisdiction.

—Janet Kleinfelter, president of the National Association of State Charity Officials

As more complaints land at local and federal law-enforcement agencies, some officials see the need for better laws aimed at online giving to help manage the problem.

Most states have laws that govern the formation and operation of nonprofits and many also regulate charitable solicitations by, for instance, barring fraudulent or deceptive campaigns. But it’s not clear whether those laws cover the online platforms and those using them to raise money.

“The issue we are grappling with is whether there is a law out there that governs this type of transaction and do we have jurisdiction,” Janet Kleinfelter, president of the National Association of State Charity Officials.

Clark County prosecutor D. Andrew Wilson, who brought a case against Mr. King’s neighbor, is urging Ohio officials to specifically address online charitable fraud as part of an update of the state’s criminal code.

YouCaring spokesman Leonard Lee said the five-year-old company is in the process of strengthening and improving its system to ensure that campaign organizers have the beneficiary’s permission, a site requirement. He said the industry could face new regulations if it doesn’t adopt its own set of standards and guidelines.

Mr. King’s neighbor pleaded guilty last year to one count of telecommunications fraud and was sentenced to 60 days in jail and two years of probation. The neighbor has since made full restitution, said her attorney, Stacey Pavlatos.

‘We were crushed,’ said Todd King, after a neighbor refused to turn over a portion of the funds she had raised on his family’s behalf through YouCaring. A photo of Tyree King as a baby. ENLARGE
‘We were crushed,’ said Todd King, after a neighbor refused to turn over a portion of the funds she had raised on his family’s behalf through YouCaring. A photo of Tyree King as a baby. Photo: Andrew Spear for The Wall Street Journal

GoFundMe’s Mr. Solomon said “the best defense we have against bad actors or any impropriety is our community of users.” The company says that if a campaign displays “suspicious or untrustworthy behavior,” it immediately suspends withdrawals.

Though most appeals on these charitable crowdfunding sites bring in less than $5,000, some prove far more successful. GoFundMe’s largest campaign to date raised more than $2 million for the family of a four-year-old with a terminal disease.

And the industry is attracting new players, talent and funding. Last summer, Accel Partners and Technology Crossover Ventures led a group of investors in purchasing a majority stake in GoFundMe, a deal that valued the nearly six-year-old company at roughly $600 million.

While the sites can provide a platform for con artists to bilk others by misrepresenting an illness, campaigns raising money on behalf of someone else can create a complex web of problems where the avenues for resolution are murky.

In December, Priscilla Williams’s 28-year-old husband died in a car wreck with his mother and a friend near their home outside Fort Worth, Texas.

Ms. Williams discovered there was a campaign set up for the victims’ families, but she didn’t know the person who set it up, so she asked GoFundMe to have the campaign shut down. The site refused “because nothing fraudulent had occurred,” according to a complaint filed by Ms. Williams with the Fort Worth Police Department.

Even after being notified, GoFundMe continued to release funds to the organizer, according to emails reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. The campaign raised $1,061.

GoFundMe said it has been working to resolve the situation. A Fort Worth Police Department spokesman declined to comment because the case is still open.

Efforts to reach the campaign organizer were unsuccessful.

Sheila Robertson, whose son also died in the same wreck, reached out to the organizer, and she said she was able to get a portion of the funds raised in the GoFundMe campaign, or $530, from the family of the campaign organizer in exchange for agreeing not to bring legal action or mention the organizer’s name on social media.

The episode “made a tragic event that was already hard even worse,” she said.

Write to Ruth Simon at ruth.simon@wsj.com

6 comments
howard sherman
howard sherman subscriber

Running the world's #1 PR firm and social media agency for crowdfunding campaigns - http://www.crowdfundbuzz.com - we've seen it all.


I'm not trying to jade the readership but I am trying to educate the ill-informed.  There are legitimate fundraising efforts that are noble and honest just as there are crowdfunding efforts that are total shams.


The recent GoFundMe campaigns for the two separate assault cases of our veterans who were beaten to a pulp in Washington DC who just wanted help to pay their sky-high medical bills ring true.


The takeaway? The vetting process must be done by the public.  Before people open their wallets and take out their credit cards they need to do their own research on the crowdfunding campaign.  Do the facts check out? Is the story verifiable? 


Most people do some homework before pledging a donation to a charity. That same level of diligence - if not even more research - should be conducted before backing a needs-based crowdfunding campaign. 

Richard Lawson
Richard Lawson subscriber

If you have a legitimate need due to an unexpected tragedy, illness, or other disaster, you can have funds sent directly to a bank, church or other non-profit entity that agrees to receive the funds.  And with a church or non-profit, the donors may receive a tax deduction.  The very concept of asking for money for undocumented needs through a website scares me and I would never agree to being serviced by any of them.

TED CHILDERS
TED CHILDERS subscriber

Oh and as an added benefit any funds raised but not disbursed will escheat to the state of residence of the intended recipient.  Both state and federal governments can get a cut this way.

TED CHILDERS
TED CHILDERS subscriber

This is an area just begging for Federal Legislation to protect the ignorant, poor, and disrespected classes from fraud.


Might I suggest that the donations be placed in a federally supervised escrow account and released only when a government approved receipt for the expense to be covered is presented.


NO TAX is necessary, simply a 20% processing charge to support and pay for the bureaucracy to run the program, well maybe 25% if the donations average under $200 each.

EDWARD YANG
EDWARD YANG subscriber

Pathetic to see people go shamelessly begging.  Like the move to EBT cards from food stamps, these sites and the digital economy removed some of the embarrassment of being beggars, but not the stains on their contemptible souls.

Show More Archives
Advertisement

Popular on WSJ

Editors’ Picks