Gawker posts anti-Trump playbook: 200-page DNC document accessed by hackers in data breach paints The Donald as divisive liar - but he says Democrats 'hacked' THEMSELVES to distract from Hillary's issues

  • Document faults Trump for running a campaign based on 'fear-mongering and divisiveness'
  • Mentions four bankruptcies – which GOP rivals also hit on during primaries; has info on golf courses, hotels, land deals, beauty pageants
  • Labels Trump 'misogynist-in-chief' 
  • Trump blasts document saying it's 'all information that has been out there for many years' 
  • 'We believe it was the DNC that did the "hacking" as a way to distract from the many issues facing their deeply flawed candidate and party leader'

A 200-page document that may be the opposition research report reportedly pried from the Democratic National Committee by Russian government-backed hackers surfaced online Wednesday – but didn't add much to the Trump record that wasn't already known. 

And Trump now claims that the DNC hacked itself in order to draw attention away from Hillary Clinton's election-year liabilities. 

According to the table of contents, the document includes examinations of Trump's childhood, upbringing, casinos, golf courses, hotels, land deals, beauty pageants, and debts.

Much of the information is already available in public sources. It's the same kind of material that has been surfacing in press reports as reporters dig through Trump's decades-long pubic profile, while monitoring a raft of controversial public statements the candidate made during his victorious primary campaign.

Donald Trump said much of the information that surfaced online was 'false and/or entirely inaccurate'

Donald Trump said much of the information that surfaced online was 'false and/or entirely inaccurate'

The document surfaced following a report that Russian government hackers had penetrated the Democratic National Committee's network 

The document surfaced following a report that Russian government hackers had penetrated the Democratic National Committee's network 

Researchers dug deep to find 'offensive and extreme' rhetoric on immigration

Researchers dug deep to find 'offensive and extreme' rhetoric on immigration

The Washington Post reported this week that Russian government hackers penetrated the DNC and gained access to Trump's opposition research file, citing committee and technology security sources.

The Russian government has denied being behind the hack. 

Trump blasted the document in a statement provided to DailyMail.com.

'This is all information that's been out there for many years,' said Trump. 'Much of it is false and/or entirely inaccurate. We believe it was the DNC that did the "hacking" as a way to distract from the many issues facing their deeply flawed candidate and party leader. Too bad the DNC doesn't hack crooked Hillary's 33,000 emails.'

The document sifts through Trump's long career and history of interviews. 

'Through both his words and actions, Trump has made clear he thinks women’s primary role is to please men. Trump’s derogatory and degrading comments to and about women, as well as his tumultuous marriages, have been well publicized,' according to the document.

'And as a presidential candidate, Trump has adopted many of the backwards GOP policies that we’ve come to expect from his party.'

The document notes that Trump has invested in China and imported clothes from there, which also came up during the heated primary campaign. His made-in-China ties also came up during the campaign.

One portion jabs Trump for 'sounding like a hypocrite' on trade.

The document digs up memorable Trump quotes form decades worth of interviews, including a 1977 interview where Trump uses the phrase 'piece of ass' to refer to a woman.

'I do remember saying that. I don't remember having used those words,' Trump responded.

There are also sections on lawsuits and Trump University, issues that continue to dog his campaign. 

The DNC has said the hacker gained access to email and chats over the course of a year, but not financial information, although a source who provided the document to Gawker said otherwise.

'DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said no financial documents were compromised. Nonsense! Just look through the Democratic Party lists of donors! They say there were no secret docs! Lies again! Also I have some secret documents from Hillary’s PC she worked with as the Secretary of State.'

Researchers dug up  information from Trump's divorce, including Ivana's since-withdrawn accusation of rape

Researchers dug up information from Trump's divorce, including Ivana's since-withdrawn accusation of rape

A cite called Gucciver 2.0 – a reference to the jailed hacker – provides additional documents that appear to show financial information.

The document appears to show either financial contributions or commitments, with entries such as, 'Steven Spielberg, $1,100,000.00' and 'Jeffrey Katzenberg, $3,000,000.00.'

The DNC said no financial information was compromised, although a document posted online appears to show contributions from former Clinton administration officials

The DNC said no financial information was compromised, although a document posted online appears to show contributions from former Clinton administration officials

Another lists past government officials next to what look like campaign contributions. And example is Bruce Babbitt, Interior Secretary under President Clinton, with $2,000 listed next to his name. 

The document describes Trump's gun policy as 'more guns,' on a day when Trump was meeting with the head of the National Rifle Association.

It notes that Trump has switched his party affiliation, and spoken on both sides of marriage. 

It brings up Trump having called himself 'very liberal' on health care, something that conservative rivals brought up during the campaign.

It quotes Trump telling Barbara Walters in 1990 that he ''absolutely' believes in fidelity, but that if a marriage isn't working it's a 'different ballgame.' 

The comments below have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

By posting your comment you agree to our house rules.

Who is this week's top commenter? Find out now