User talk:JoeHebda

Tip of the day... Help test the MediaWiki software The MediaWiki software that runs Wikipedia is under constant development. Do you want to see the latest, greatest features? Then head over to test.wikipedia.org, where the development branch is tested. But be careful. That wiki runs in debugging mode, so even the smallest problem in the code might cause it to spew out error messages. Take a look at the list of features under development in the MediaWiki roadmap. MediaWiki already is one of the most feature-rich wiki engines; see the MediaWiki feature list. MediaWiki and its dependencies are open source, so if you are the inquisitive type, please take a look at the code and help improve it. Prior tip – Next tip Read more: test.wikipedia.org   Become a Wikipedia tipster – Tips library, by subject To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd CP}}

User_talk:JoeHebda/to do

Service awards

	This editor is an Experienced Editor and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

JoeHebda (talk) 23:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Commons picture of the day

You can also display the Commons Picture of the Day, which is different from the featured picture displayed on the main page, with {{POTD commons}}. Which shows this:

View of the Acropolis from the Philopappos Hill in Athens, Greece

Talk page helps

Wikipedia:List of discussion templates

Thoughtboxes

This positive thoughtbox was found on Lord Voldemort's userpage:

What happens when a Wikipedian dies? He or she just doesn't show up to edit anymore. Does anybody notice? Does anybody really even care? To all those Wikipedians who may have died and been forgotten here, Thank you for your contributions and Rest in Peace.

What happens when a Wikipedian dies? He or she just doesn't show up to edit anymore. Does anybody notice? Does anybody really even care? To all those Wikipedians who may have died and been forgotten here, Thank you for your contributions and Rest in Peace.

Plain message box

This is a plain ivory message box. JoeHebda (talk) 01:52, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Test Wikitable

* Welcome! Thank you for your recent edits for Wikipedia Tip of the day and for joining the Tip of the day. Thank you for your contributions.

Plain time banner

Welcome!

Hello, JoeHebda, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting started
• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -RFD (talk) 09:52, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

JoeHebda, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi JoeHebda! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Overlinking

It is helpful to provide Wikilinks to articles about subjects which may be unfamiliar to the reader, but it clutters an article when there are too many links to common words. You have overlinked in Sensationalism. Please do not add links to so many common and well-understood terms. Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking before you add more links in articles. Also, please preview your changes and make sure that the new link actually goes to a relevant article, and not to a disambiguation page as some of your links do. Thanks. Edison (talk) 17:46, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

I see that in adding links to St. Lawrence Seminary High School you also overlinked in some cases. though some of the links were quite appropriate and helpful. Do you really think the reader needs to be steered to United States, for instance? Edison (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Seems to be somewhat of a gray area...So any words that are 'common & well-understood' should be skipped? Thanks for the advice. Just started on wikipedia this spring & now that I'm retired, can do more from time to time.

For St. Lawrence Seminary High School a good portion of the students are not from US, so I thought United States would be helpful, especially for any parents, relatives, friends that may be reading this page from foreign countries. Again, I can do additional un-linking as you suggest.

Just got back from doing a few errands & see that Sensationalism page is corrected. I will now red line on my notepapers all the links removed. A great way for me to learn. Thanks. JoeHebda (talk) 15:48, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Found this page about overlinking and found it to be valuable. User:Tony1/Build_your_linking_skills JoeHebda (talk) 02:44, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

One-Time SuggestBot Trial

Add this into a new section to activate. {{User:SuggestBot/suggest}}

Catholic-Hierarchy.org

Howdy, I just wanted to introduce myself. I added a response to your comment on the talk page. Whether or not my website should be used as a source for Wiki is not a question I can answer - that is for this community to decide. But I would be happy to answer any questions about the website. --Dcheney (talk) 04:45, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Catholic Church in the United States

Navigational templates must contain the article in which they are placed. The American church is just too low level an article in which to place The Catholicism template. And "by country" is way too indirect to be considered "inclusion." That template looks more like a portal anyway. Kind of high level. WP:EXISTING kind of makes that clearer. There has been much discussion about this in the past but this is the outcome. Student7 (talk) 18:40, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I understand, so as I make my next pass through articles that I've updated, will remove cath.template. JoeHebda (talk) 14:08, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Diocese links?

I noticed you're adding Diocese links to a number of pages. I'm afraid I don't see how they're appropriate per Wikipedia's external linking policy. If the only relationship of a link to a page is tangential or of a parent-child hierarchy -- in which case the link would not serve to provide a general resource for more information about the subject of the article -- it's typically not appropriate. The one I first noticed was Bishop Hendricken High School, which already links to the Wikipedia article Roman Catholic Diocese of Providence, which is where the link would, of course be appropriate and where a reader would be looking for more information about that topic. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks User:Rhododendrites for letting me know. That is a woops for me. Today I'll go back and correct those articles. Regards, JoeHebda (talk) 10:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Not a great big deal, of course (it's not like you're spamming some personal business of yours), and I didn't look closely at what articles you added it to so some may be perfectly appropriate. Anyway, thanks. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

After a little more digging, wondering if these would be better Ext. links? People looking at these school articles could be teachers and parents as well as students.

• National Association of Catholic School Teachers
• National Association of Private Catholic and Independent Schools
• National Federation of Catholic Youth Ministry - USA

Sorry if above are not indented--don't know how to do that. JoeHebda (talk) 15:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Well, the question isn't what might be useful, because tons of things might be useful to a reader who might be searching for a given reason, coming from a certain background, etc. Because they're subject to abuse, link to places Wikipedia can't monitor and has no responsibility for, etc. external link use is purposefully limited to things like official websites and general resources for the subject (general as in providing a resource relating directly to the subject such that anyone reading could gain additional information about the subject by clicking).

...Wikilinks, however, are not so tightly controlled -- and in fact it's pretty rare that something is unwikilinked. That's how we link people to information on other subjects they may find useful. So we link to teacher, education, Catholic education]], Roman Catholic Diocese of Providence, etc. If one of those organizations has a Wikipedia article and a school is a member, it would make sense to add, for example, "Such and such high school is part of the National Association of Catholic School Teachers". It would then be that article which would have the external link to the organization's website, which would then be appropriate as anyone looking at that article could learn more about the subject by clicking it.

I don't know if I'm explaining that well, so I'd recommend taking a look through WP:EL. PS: to indent a bulletpoint, you can just add the colons before the asterisk. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:10, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Catholic Bishop link help

Thanks for your edits on all the Catholic Bishop articles, Joe! I have tried to create one for every bishop I find who does not have one, but they all need fleshing out. Good work! Dhpage (talk) 00:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Glad to hear from another editor. Nice to know that we're not alone! At Historical list of the Catholic bishops of the United States is a huge list starting with number 1, John Carroll forward to present day. I have updated a few to improve where I can. Lately I am adding Navbox for a Diocese or Archdiocese article without one. After adding the Navbox template, I go back and add that Navbox to each article in that diocese, and do some updates to bishop/archbishop articles along the way. Some of those 'stub' articles really do need improvements... Regards, JoeHebda (talk) 13:29, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Adding the reply @Dhpage: JoeHebda (talk) 15:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Move request

The move instruction

{{db-move|Template:ArchbishopsofNY|This Redirect no longer needed as 'redirect-to' page ( Template:Archbishops of New York ) has been replaced by a Navbox template ( Template:Ordinaries of the Archdiocese of New York ) }}

which you inserted into page Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests at 14:38 on 27 February 2015‎, should have been inserted into page X, where you wanted to move Template:ArchbishopsofNY to X. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:30, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry @Anthony Appleyard: that I goofed up. I thought the db-move had a delete option. What I really need to have done is

Step 1, Delete this no longer needed Redirect Template:ArchbishopsofNY

Step 2, Delete this replaced Navbox Template:Archbishops of New York

Above Navbox was replaced with new Navbox Template:Ordinaries of the Archdiocese of New York

I'm somewhat new (since March, 2014) to Wikipedia and still have more to learn. If you could help me out that would be great, or point me to the correct process for me to try. Thanks, JoeHebda (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

• • Done I deleted Template:ArchbishopsofNY and Template:Archbishops of New York. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you @Anthony Appleyard: as this was beyond what I would know how to do. :-) Regards, JoeHebda (talk) 23:11, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Succession headers in prelate articles

Hello JoeHebda, thanks for adding information to many prelate and church-related articles. Just a quick note though, the last section header of an article should be "External links" or a reference header (or any previous header, if no ELs are listed). Following succession information, navboxes, categories, stub warnings, etc. at the bottom of the article generally don't have a separate header (they should have a descriptive title inside of them). See MOS:LAYOUT for some information about the background for this structure. Not a big issue, but I just wanted to explain my reverts of those header additions. Regards. GermanJoe (talk) 10:06, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

For example, see articles about royals Henry IV of France and popes Pius X for succession box usage without headers. Afaik the vast majority of articles with succession info follows this layout. GermanJoe (talk) 10:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks @GermanJoe: for taking the time to let me know. Going forward, I will not add the Episcopal succession section title anymore. Since I am about one-half way through US Ecclesiastical provinces (currently working New York), I will cleanup previous additions on my next pass through. And BTW, I did stumble upon these 2 articles (on topic) that are helpful and thought to share these.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject_Succession_Box_Standardization#Project_scope_and_goals
• Wikipedia:WikiProject_Succession_Box_Standardization/Templates

Regards, JoeHebda (talk) 13:15, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the links, interesting info. I don't know all layout guidelines myself (there are simply too many of them), but if you have questions about such "technical" aspects, please feel free to ping me anytime. GermanJoe (talk) 13:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taylor County, Wisconsin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wisconsin Central Railroad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Food Preferences in Older Adults/Seniors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scientific study (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

SuggestBot - April 18, 2015

For one time request(s): Wikipedia:Teahouse/Suggestions. Click on Get suggestions and follow the instructions. The SuggestBot may take 2 to 6 hours to process the request. A new section Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot is added at bottom of this talk page.

After updating the suggested articles, the new SuggestBot section can be removed, or renamed if you wish. JoeHebda (talk) 18:06, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Diocese of La Crosse

Hello,

"I see that on the image licensing it states, Minimal use (WP:NFCC#3) Only used for the Diocese Wiki page. It needs Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license or similiar; so that it can be added to the Navbox Template: Roman Catholic Diocese of La Crosse and thereby appear on all of the Diocese-related article pages"

OK, How do I do that? I have a few more to update.

Thanks Roberto221 (talk) 20:18, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I do not know how. So far, I have only uploaded 3 or 4 pictures to Commons that I took with my own camera. I do know there are a lot of hoops to jump through to get the proper license.

A clue might also be found on the History page of another Diocese that already has a COA uploaded. The history will give the name of the uploading editor, who could then be contacted.

Another possible source might be at Wikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology where there is a Discussion page, and a list of Participants.

From time to time, I have gotten good answers on other topics at Wikipedia:Teahouse.

Good luck. JoeHebda (talk) 22:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Coat of Arms

Over the weekend I added more coat of arms but I didn't use the naming conventions. The product I used doesn't let me save them in .svg so if you can convert them, that would be of great help. They are:

• File:COA - La Crosse, WI.jpg
• File:COA - Jefferson City, MO.jpg
• File:COA - Santa Rose, CA.jpg
• File:COA - Salt Lake City, UT.jpg
• File:COA - Yakima, WA.jpg
• File:COA - Sioux Falls, SD.jpg
• File:COA - Reno, NV.jpg
• File:COA - Oakland, CA.jpg
• File:COA - Spokane, WA.jpg
• File:COA - Lake Charles, LA.jpg
• File:COA - Bridgeport, CT.jpg
• File:Coat of Arms - Springfield-Cape Girardeau, MO.jpg
• File:COA - Fajardo-Humacao, PR.jpg
• File:COA - Arecibo, PR.jpg
• File:COA - Wichita, KS.jpg
• File:Diocese of Ogdensburg CoA.jpg
• File:Diocese of Amarillo coat of arms.jpg

The Santa Rose .jpg should read Santa Rosa, I attended St. Rose when I was a child, it stuck in my brain. Thanks.. Roberto221 (talk) 00:04, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Greetings Roberto221, I took the liberty of adding * for the file list above.

I do not know if there is any way to convert from .jpg file to .svg (vector graphics) file. On one of the discussions at WP Heraldry, another editor mentioned using Inkscape software to draw the Coat-Of-Arms files that end with .svg.

At [this Archive] there is an editor that has this knowledge and might be able to look at the above files. At this page, Search for Offer for vectorization section title.

It might be easier to just to delete these above files, rename them locally on your pc, then re-upload with the .jpg file extension. As I mentioned earlier, I have seen a few COA that do end with .jpg so it would seem that either file type will work.

Cheers JoeHebda (talk) 00:44, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

What does it mean to be an "editor" of Wikipedia?

Please explain to me what it means to be an editor, and how do they get together to make decisions? Are editors paid by Wikipedia? Are logged-in contributors called "editors" or what's the difference? With regard to the article I contributed on History of the Catholic Church in Belize, I can see why the editors may want the title to correspond more directly with their categories, but I don't see why they need to add the term "Roman" within an article since it had occurred only once in the article (in a reference to the Roman authorities). I explain on the talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Catholicism/Terminology why this is a sensitive issue in the Catholic church. By inserting the word "Roman" within the article the editors are injecting themselves into the discussion within the church and biasing the article in favor of those who don't want change (by slowing down the process toward renewal). Must Wikipedia carry on this way?jzsj 22:47, 15 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jzsj (talk • contribs)

Greetings Jzsj, All of us who are helping to improve Wikipedia are contributors and considered to be editors - as far as I know there is no title of editor. More info at Wikipedia:Introduction at the How you can contribute section.

Recently, I've been updating at Wikipedia:Tips and think these two tips might be responses for the Roman discussion.

*Be neutral, like Wikipedia

*Be neutral when editing Wikipedia

Lastly, it is helpful when discussing on talk pages To sign a message, type ~~~~

Hope this helps explain more about Wikipedia. Regards, JoeHebda (talk) 23:37, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your forthright answer. You seem to leave the question open why the first line of the article must say "Roman" if there is no ambiguity about "Catholic" in Belize today, and we are not calling ourselves catholic (universal) with a small "c". As to the designation "unsigned" that keep appearing after my comments, I do use the 4 tildas and it still keeps appearing!jzsj 23:56, 15 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jzsj (talk • contribs)

Ctrl-Z

Thank you for showing me that in the Teahouse. SovalValtos (talk) 20:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Catholic bishops in Nazi Germany - B-checklists

Hello JoeHebda, I have set the class for this article to C for now, but merely for technical reasons: projects with B-class checklists should have all B-criteria set to "yes", before the class parameter can be updated to B - that's why the template didn't display the B-class correctly. If you feel the article is ready for B-class, please check all criteria and update all criteria parameters and the class accordingly (I am not knowledgeable about that specific topic or I would have done it myself). A summary what is needed for B-class in WP:Germany can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Germany/Assessment#Quality_scale (it's very similar to most other projects). If you have additional questions, just let me know. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 13:54, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

History of Roman Catholicism in Belize

Thank you for your edits with one exception: I don't understand the logic of removing the heading "Historical periods" as a section heading for the historical periods (2,3,4 now) which it describes. Please explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jzsj (talk • contribs) 11:03, 1 July 2015‎

See Talk:History_of_Roman_Catholicism_in_Belize#Updates_for_article_Sections for the details. I thought it better to explain there. Regards, JoeHebda (talk) 13:03, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Mid-volume transaction output

I nominated this article for deletion. If you care, please comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mid-volume transaction output. Kendall-K1 (talk) 03:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

List of popes

Hi, sorry to disturb you. There have benn scores of edits by User:艾德一世 to the above article. In my opinion, many of them are incorrect/unnecessary (OR maybe not, I'm no expert of this subject). Is there any chance you could take a look at them & check? Many thanks Denisarona (talk) 12:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Urgent request

In 12 hours, the Signpost is published for this week and is short on articles. I am hoping to throw together and article on tip of the day. Since you participate in the project, I would appreciate if you could answer these questions about the project as soon as you could.

1. What is the goal of the project?

1. Some might say that the tip of the day isnt contributing to the encyclopedia. What would you say in response?

1. What are some recent issues or updates with the project?

1. How can editors get involved, please list the various ways.

Thanks, if you see this after the deadline for the signpost, dont fret. Tortle (talk) 07:33, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Greetings Tortle, one of my fav slogans is: It something is worth doing, do it right so IMO since Signpost is weekly, there is always next week. For the questions above, this talk page Wikipedia talk:Tip of the day should provide answers. With this UTC clock on Wikipedia, I'm not sure about the 12 hours with time diff. etc. Regards, JoeHebda (talk) 14:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Well as you know, Im involved in the project and know whats going on but it is a requirement of the article that I interview a user from the project so it would be much appreciated if you would do that but kf you are too busy, its ok. Thanks Tortle (talk) 14:40, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Tortle, sorry I've only glanced at Signpost a couple of times & did not know of their requirements. Right now I'm half way thru monthly MS security updates (on my laptop) & have to break away right now. (On a slow 1Mb DSL line.) Will look into providing answers above. Just to let you know I just don't do well with deadlines. In ancient days, people lined up for execution were known as the dead line! JoeHebda (talk) 14:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Its all good, domt worry about it now though because the deadline is coming up fast. Maybe in a week or two, ill interview you. Im gonns take a look at that yellow lightbulb .Thanks, Tortle (talk) 18:16, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Interview responses

Hi Tortle, below are my answers to the above questions. Note that for the numbered list to work, the lines must be kept together without a blank line in between, for example.

1. Line number one
2. Line number two
3. Line number three

• What is the goal of the project?

Provide informative and instructional help for Wikipedia contributors in a single tip, idea or shortcut format.

• Some might say that the tip of the day isnt contributing to the encyclopedia. What would you say in response?

While we have no survey results or benchmarks to indicate direct linkage between TOTD views and resulting Wikipedia improvements, we can check the page information for some hard numbers.

We see that both the TOTD page and the Tips (by subject) page are being viewed on a daily basis.

Wikipedia:Tip_of_the_day has been viewed 4103 times in the last 30 days.

Wikipedia:Tip_of_the_day has been viewed 23330 times in the last 90 days.

Wikipedia:Tips (library) has been viewed 5522 times in the last 30 days.

Wikipedia:Tips (library) has been viewed 26036 times in the last 90 days.

A second consideration is the lack of controversy or negative feedback on these TOTD talk pages.

• What are some recent issues or updates with the project?

A new tip was added for The Wikipedia Adventure! (Tip schedule queue date: April 24).

Added cross wikilinks between the TOTD page and Tips library page.

In the Tips library, over 40 unsorted Tips were placed into subject categories.

• How can editors get involved, please list the various ways.

On the Tips schedule queue of 366 days there are not 366 unique individual tips, so new tips to be added to the schedule queue as well as removal of duplicate tips.

To keep the Tip library in step with the scheduling queue, additional editors may help by reviewing the Tip library and performing cleanup.

broken link in userbox

Hi Joe, I noticed that your font userbox links to Calibri(typeface), which is a red link. Perhaps change it to link to Calibri? Paul2520 (talk) 04:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Paul2520, I updated :-) JoeHebda (talk) 13:58, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

JoeHebda, October 2, 2015, your editing suggestions are on the way

Manual restore of removed section: Originally posted: 11:04, 2 October 2015, and reconstructed from History.

MANUAL RESTORE - SECOND TIME - Why is SuggestBot removing this section?""

Removed links this time JoeHebda (talk) 10:51, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

User:SuggestBot|SuggestBot is making a list of articles that you might like to edit. You will receive these suggestions soon. In the meantime, you might be interested in checking out the following WikiProjects. If you're interested in a project, feel free to add yourself to the member list and introduce yourself on the project talk page!

• "WikiProject_Catholicism" (WP:"WikiProject_Catholicism"|project page, [WT:"WikiProject_Catholicism"|talk page)
• "WikiProject_Vatican_City" (WP:"WikiProject_Vatican_City"|project page, WT:"WikiProject_Vatican_City"|talk page)
• "WikiProject_Biography" (WP:"WikiProject_Biography"|project page, WT:"WikiProject_Biography"|talk page)

User:SuggestBot/th-suggest|no_match|no_match|no_match

Request submitted 11:03, 2 October 2015‎. Now wondering if SubbestBot is down? JoeHebda (talk) 15:47, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

(October 3, 2015) Request

Add this into a new section to activate. {{User:SuggestBot/suggest}}

Tips Project

Your work on the tips project looks good. Maybe like every day there should be like one tip for beginners, one tip for frequent editors, and like one tip for experts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackhat999 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Articles (October 8, 2015) you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
10	1.0	Brothers of Christian Instruction of St. Gabriel (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	Add sources
82	2.0	Relations between the Catholic Church and the state (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Add sources
486	3.0	Christian theology (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	Add sources
2,761	2.0	Pope Paul VI (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	Add sources
1,589	3.0	Ferdinand Marcos (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	Add sources
160	2.0	Grace in Christianity (talk)	2.0	2.0	0.0	2.0	2.0	Add sources
20	3.0	Catholic Church in the 20th century (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	Cleanup
476	1.0	Salutation (talk)	2.0	2.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	Cleanup
150	3.0	Women in Christianity (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	Cleanup
32	2.0	Missionaries of the Precious Blood (talk)	0.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Expand
75	2.0	Declaration of nullity (talk)	0.0	2.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	Expand
74	1.0	AIDS-defining clinical condition (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	Expand
36	2.0	Rosary and scapular (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	Unencyclopaedic
35	1.0	Religious of the Virgin Mary (talk)	0.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Unencyclopaedic
275	2.0	Catholic social teaching (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	Unencyclopaedic
63	3.0	Women in Church history (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	Merge
57	2.0	Hidden Christians of Japan (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Merge
26	1.0	Impediment of Crime (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	Merge
28	1.0	Hugues Felicité Robert de Lamennais (talk)	0.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Wikify
13	1.0	Absolution of the dead (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	Wikify
2	1.0	Apostolic school (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	Wikify
4	1.0	Peter Fehlner (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	Orphan
1	1.0	Holy Rosary College, Enugu (talk)	0.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	0.0	Orphan
3	1.0	Santo Niño Church (Midsayap) (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	Orphan
7	1.0	Algonquin and Lakeshore Catholic District School Board (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	Stub
18	1.0	Daughters of Jesus (Spain) (talk)	0.0	0.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Stub
19	1.0	Society of the Helpers of the Holy Souls (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	Stub
1	1.0	Atanasio Amisse Canira (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	Stub
18	1.0	Daughters of Mary of the Immaculate Conception (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	Stub
6	1.0	Joseph Melcher (talk)	0.0	0.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:44, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Congrats...

		The Tip of the Day Barnstar
		is hereby awarded to JoeHebda for taking up the reins at this department and its corresponding library. Thank you for all the new tips! The Transhumanist 21:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

An icon for Tips library?

Which of these might be the best to use?

• 
• 
• 
• 

JoeHebda (talk) 17:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Added Welcome!

Similar to Welcome on TOTD page. JoeHebda (talk) 19:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Notre Dame Invite

Hey! I noticed you are a Notre Dame alumnus, hence I wanted to invite you to join our project. Also, I know you're already an active member of the project, but I just wanted to tell you that I'm currently in the effort to re-boot the project and make it more productive than ever.

Hello, JoeHebda! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Notre Dame, an outreach effort which aims to support development of Notre Dame related articles in Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants, check out our To Do list, and join the discussion on our talk page. Thanks!!!

Posted by Eccekevin on 01:28, 9 November 2015‎ Eccekevin. This would be a Woops! as I am NOT a ND alumnus. In the 1980's I did attend a conference there however & many fond memories. And friends who are alumni. JoeHebda (talk) 18:47, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

November 10, 2015 - Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
47	1.0	Apostolic vicariate (talk)	0.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Add sources
5	1.0	Roman Catholic Diocese of Langres (talk)	0.0	2.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	Add sources
271	3.0	James (brother of Jesus) (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	Add sources
339	1.0	K. Kamaraj (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Add sources
258	1.0	Nave (talk)	0.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	0.0	Add sources
163	1.0	Christian cross variants (talk)	0.0	0.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Add sources
458	2.0	Enoch (ancestor of Noah) (talk)	0.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Cleanup
21	3.0	James Stephens (Fenian) (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	2.0	Cleanup
21	1.0	Bon Secours Sisters (talk)	0.0	2.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	Cleanup
12	1.0	Port-Royal-des-Champs Abbey (talk)	0.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	0.0	Expand
33	1.0	Cîteaux Abbey (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	Expand
238	2.0	Jansenism (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Expand
63	3.0	Bloke (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.0	Unencyclopaedic
313	2.0	Christian mysticism (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	Unencyclopaedic
350	2.0	Rule of Saint Benedict (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Unencyclopaedic
2,075	3.0	Ralph Waldo Emerson (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	Merge
843	2.0	Inquisition (talk)	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Merge
28	2.0	Catholic Church in Israel (talk)	0.0	2.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	Merge
67	2.0	Pope Benedict XII (talk)	0.0	0.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Wikify
4	1.0	Bedford Abbey (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	Wikify
48	1.0	San Carlo al Corso (talk)	0.0	0.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Wikify
2	1.0	Pilgrimage centres near Ernakulam city (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	Orphan
1	1.0	Jacques-Charles de Brisacier (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	Orphan
2	1.0	Bernard Jarre (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	Orphan
1	1.0	Tuam Golf Club (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	Stub
2	1.0	Seán Canney (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	Stub
60	1.0	Domrémy-la-Pucelle (talk)	0.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	Stub
11	1.0	Grand Séminaire de Montréal (talk)	0.0	0.0	2.0	0.0	0.0	Stub
15	2.0	Padua Cathedral (talk)	0.0	2.0	2.0	0.0	0.0	Stub
1	1.0	Isaac Arnauld (talk)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:23, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

articles on the enclos paroissial of Brittany

I note your edits of my various articles on the enclos paroissial of Brittany and rather than keep clicking "thank you" I thought a general thank you was appropriate. Your efforts are much appreciated and the articles are improved. Hope you enjoyed them.Weglinde (talk) 18:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

I BOTFIGHTER I got your message on the talk page of teahouse I have visited shevgaon I can help you in that matter just I nedd some time till I collect more information on it. Thanks for asking. BOTFIGHTER (talk) 15:57, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

Your efforts have made it possible for the Tip of the day to return to its high help profile. Therefore...

		The Tip of the Day Barnstar
		is hereby awarded (for the second time) to JoeHebda, for revitalizing the TOTD department and its tip library, and increasing the quality of the tip collection to be worthy of display upon Wikipedia's main help page once again. Congratulations. Sincerely, The Transhumanist 22:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Catholicism templates

Hi! Thank you for the reminder! :)

I often don't complete the assessment since I hadn't really familiarized myself with the exact criteria and differences in regards to both importance and quality ranking. I was mainly focusing on just adding articles to their respective projects. WhisperToMe (talk) 18:43, 26 December 2015 (UTC)