Cam Newton sued for $270k after allegedly trashing the Beverly Hills mansion he was renting from Stacey Kiebler's husband

  • Cam Newton is being sued for $270,324.47 after he allegedly trashed a home he was renting in Beverly Hills earlier this year
  • The home was rented to him by a luxury real estate company managed by Jared Pobre, the husband of Stacey Kiebler
  • Newton is alleged to have had multiple parties at the home and destroyed a $32,000 while also causing water damage
  • The football star, who made $53.1million last year, was in Los Angeles at the time filming his Nickelodeon show All In With Cam Newton
  • He has yet to respond to the lawsuit 

By Chris Spargo For Dailymail.com

Published: 15:30 EST, 4 October 2016 | Updated: 15:30 EST, 4 October 2016

Cam Newton is being sued by the husband of husband of Stacey Kiebler for damages caused to a home the football star rented earlier this year while working in Los Angeles.

Jared Pobre claims in court papers obtained by TMZ that Newton agreed he would have no parties while staying at the home, which was rented to him by a company managed by Pobre. 

It was revealed during his stay however that Newton 'had been throwing multiple parties and leaving cigarette ashes all over the house' according to the court filing, and once he moved out extensive work and repairs had to be done to the property.

Pobre is now asking Newton to fork over $270,324.47 to cover the costs of the damage.

Scroll down for video

Pay up: Cam Newton (above last November) is being sued for $270,324.47 after he allegedly trashed a home he was renting in Beverly Hills earlier this year

Pay up: Cam Newton (above last November) is being sued for $270,324.47 after he allegedly trashed a home he was renting in Beverly Hills earlier this year

Angry landlord: The home was rented to him by a luxury real estate company managed by Jared Pobre, the husband of Stacey Kiebler (coupel above in 2015)

Angry landlord: The home was rented to him by a luxury real estate company managed by Jared Pobre, the husband of Stacey Kiebler (coupel above in 2015)

The damage done to the house by Newton according to the lawsuit included breaking a refrigerator, causing water damage and ruining a $32,000 rug.

The total damage done came out to $90,324.47 according to the lawsuit, which states that Pobre previously tried to collect this amount from newton. 

Pobre claims he was also unable to rent the home while he made repairs on the property, which caused his company to lose out on $180,000 in rental fees.

That is why he is asking Newton to hand over $270,000 in addition to paying the legal fees for the case. 

The football player rented the $11million home for $123,000 shortly after he and the Carolina Panthers were defeated by Peyton Manning and the Denver Broncos in the Super Bowl last year. 

Newton was in Los Angeles to work on his Nickelodeon show, All In With Cam Newton.

Great view: Newton is alleged to have had multiple parties at the home and destroyed a $32,000 while also causing water damage (the rental property's backyard and pool above)

Great view: Newton is alleged to have had multiple parties at the home and destroyed a $32,000 while also causing water damage (the rental property's backyard and pool above)

City of dreams: The football star, who made $53.1million last year, was in Los Angeles at the time filming his Nickelodeon show All In With Cam Newton

City of dreams: The football star, who made $53.1million last year, was in Los Angeles at the time filming his Nickelodeon show All In With Cam Newton

Newton has yet to respond to the lawsuit, but the money should not be an issue for the elite athlete who won the league's MVP honors last year.

Forbes recently reported that Newton made $53.1million last year in salary and endorsements after signing a five-year contract deal worth just over $103million. 

Pobre's lawyer Richard K. Howell meanwhile told ESPN that the lawsuit was a last resort, adding: 'We’re expecting Cam Newton to be held accountable for actions for damages he caused.'

Comments (62)

Share what you think

 View all

The comments below have not been moderated.

 View all

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Add your comment

By posting your comment you agree to our house rules.

Who is this week's top commenter? Find out now