Don’t rain on my parade! Cliff Richard is all smiles as he poses in the rain during trip to Croatia after announcing he will sue the BBC and police over house raid
- Sir Cliff Richard is to sue over live coverage of police raid at his home
- Despite the impending legal battle he looking happy and relaxed while on holiday in Dubrovnik
- Sir Cliff, 75, was never arrested or charged over sex abuse allegations
Sir Cliff Richard was all smiles as he posed for photographers in Dubrovnik - Croatia's most popular tourist destination.
Sir Cliff, who is thought to be on holiday in the country, said his life was 'effectively turned upside down' as he confirmed he was suing the BBC and South Yorkshire Police over live coverage of a police raid at his home.
Holding an umbrella and looking happy and relaxed despite the wet weather, Sir Cliff was happy to smile for snappers while touring Dubrovnik's old town, shortly after announcing his plans to sue.
The 75-year-old singer looked to be in good spirits on holiday, and neither the miserable weather nor the impending legal battle appeared to be dampening his mood.
Following a tip-off, the BBC filmed detectives raiding Sir Cliff's home in August 2014 and identified him as an alleged sex abuser.
Scroll down for video
The miserable weather was no issue for Sir Cliff Richard as he appeared to be in good spirits
The entertainer was spotted shortly after announcing in a statement that he was planning to take legal action against the BBC and South Yorkshire Police
Sir Cliff, 75, was the subject of a long-running South Yorkshire Police investigation which centred on accusations made by four men and dating between 1958 and 1983
The entertainer confirmed in a statement he has instructed his lawyers to make formal legal complaints to determine whether or not the actions of the broadcaster and police was 'justified and proportionate'.
Officers investigating allegations of historic sex offences were filmed searching Sir Cliff's apartment in Berkshire in August 2014, leading to him being publicly named as part of the probe. The 75-year-old was never arrested or charged.
A spokesman for Sir Cliff today said: 'We can confirm that Sir Cliff today issued legal proceedings at the High Court against both SYP and the BBC. It would not be appropriate to comment further.'
The 75-year-old singer was never arrested or charged over the sex abuse allegations
Sir Cliff was spotted out-and-about in the old town of Dubrovnik, Croatia's most popular tourist destination
A BBC spokesman said: 'While we haven't received any notification of action, we've said previously we are very sorry that Sir Cliff has suffered distress but we have a duty to report on matters of public interest and we stand by our journalism.'
He was the subject of a long-running South Yorkshire Police investigation which centred on accusations made by four men and dating between 1958 and 1983.
The Crown Prosecution Service dismissed the case on grounds of insufficient evidence in June and both the BBC and South Yorkshire Police have apologised to the star.
Sir Cliff Richard (pictured) is to sue the BBC and South Yorkshire Police over the live coverage of a raid on his home in 2014 by detectives investigating alleged sex offences
The BBC filmed a raid on Sir Cliff's home, pictured, in Sunningdale, Berkshire, after a 'tip-off' from officers
Following the announcement, Sir Cliff said: 'As I have said previously, I'm innocent, so I'm obviously pleased with today's CPS decision and the speed with which they reached it.
'I hope that it brings this matter to a close.'
Sir Cliff has called for police to follow guidelines in not naming suspects before they were charged save for 'exceptional circumstances'.
He said: 'I chose not to comment during the active investigation for obvious reasons, but having suffered the experience that I have, I firmly believe that privacy should be respected and that police guidelines are there to be followed.
'That means that, save in exceptional circumstances, people should never be named unless and until they are charged.
Sir Cliff, centre, DJ Paul Gambaccini, left, and MP Nigel Evans, right, who have all been subject to sex abuse allegations, will lobby the House of Lords to change the law over anonymity for those accused of such crimes
The complex in Berkshire was sold for around £3million earlier this year according to estate agents Charters after it was put on the market in 2015
'As everybody has accepted there were no such 'exceptional circumstances' in my case.'
According to the Daily Mail, the claim is worth £1 million and reflects damage he suffered personally and commercially as a result of the episode.
It is understood Sir Cliff developed a cough which affected his touring schedule, an album release had to be delayed, sales of his popular calendars were affected and his winery business suffered.
Sir Cliff said the issue of whether the actions were justified or not was 'important not only for me personally but much more widely'.
He added: 'My life was effectively turned upside down and my reputation, worldwide, was unnecessarily damaged. I would not want the same to happen to others whether in the public eye or not.'
'Whilst the police of course need to properly investigate allegations made to them, it is clear to me that questions need to be answered by both the police and the BBC about their initial handling of my matter, which has rightly been condemned from so many quarters, including the Home Affairs Select Committee, the broader press, and, even the police themselves.'
Sir Cliff has launched a legal bid to determine whether the coverage, pictured, was 'justified or proportionate'
The BBC, whose relationship with Sir Cliff stretches back decades, declined to comment.
It previously said it was 'very sorry' for causing the singer distress.
As previously reported, the veteran pop star is demanding a change in the law that would give anonymity to anyone suspected of rape or sexual assault unless they were facing trial.
He hopes it will end the 'witch hunts' against high-profile figures who have had their reputations tarnished by unfounded accusations without ever being charged with any offence.
Sir Cliff has met with former Commons deputy speaker and Ribble Valley MP Nigel Evans to discuss his proposed changes.
Sir Cliff, pictured, is to lobby the House of Lords to support proposed reforms to stop the identities of anyone accused of a sexual offence being published until they are charged
In 2014 a jury unanimously found Mr Evans not guilty of nine sexual allegations, including one of rape, following a five-week trial at Preston Crown Court.
The former Deputy Speaker said: 'We are all scarred by the experiences we have been through and we all came through it.
At a meeting in a House of Lords committee room on October 17, Sir Cliff will be joined by DJ Paul Gambaccini, who endured '12 months of hell' on bail for sex abuse allegations for which he was never charged.
Also present will be the widow of Leon Brittan, the former Home Secretary who died before being told police had dismissed historical abuse allegations against him.
They will urge politicians to back changes being proposed by Lord Paddick, a former Scotland Yard chief who is now a Lib Dem peer.
His reform would mean nothing could be published or broadcast in England and Wales to identify anyone accused of a sexual offence 'up until that person is charged with the offence, except where a judge is satisfied it is in the public interest'.
Some say the move could hamper police investigations because further victims sometimes come forward when arrests are publicised, as happened in the cases of Rolf Harris and Stuart Hall.
In a statement released on June 21 the BBC said it 'applied normal editorial judgments' to covering the story, but added: 'The BBC is very sorry that Sir Cliff Richard, who has worked as a musician and performer for so many years with the organisation, has suffered distress.
'The BBC's responsibility is to report fully stories that are in the public interest. Police investigations into prominent figures in public life are, of course, squarely in the public interest, which is why they have been reported by all news organisations in this country.
'Once the South Yorkshire Police had confirmed the investigation and Sir Cliff Richard's identity and informed the BBC of the timing and details of the search of his property, it would neither have been editorially responsible nor in the public interest to choose not to report fully the investigation into Sir Cliff Richard because of his public profile.
'The BBC, at every stage, reported Sir Cliff's full denial of the allegations.
'The BBC, therefore, stands by the decision to report the investigation undertaken by the South Yorkshire Police and the search of his property.'
Prosecutors reviewed the case against the veteran singer after the main accuser appealed for the evidence to be reconsidered.
The veteran singer, pictured, claimed his accuser got 'everything wrong'
The man – whose claim was found to be riddled with inaccuracies – sparked the original police investigation in April 2014.
He told officers that as a young boy he was sexually assaulted by Sir Cliff in 1983 at a rally in a Sheffield stadium for the US evangelist Billy Graham.
The complainant, who has not been named, requested that the Crown Prosecution Service should review its decision not to bring charges. A second alleged victim later came forward to request the same.
Sir Cliff revealed in the Mail after the initial CPS decision in June that the man's account was full of errors.
He said: 'The accuser got everything wrong. He got the year wrong. That rally wasn't until 1985. It [the attack] was supposed to have happened in a room that hadn't even been built then.'
The singer said South Yorkshire Police should have 'dumped that there and then' in 2014.
Instead detectives continued to appeal for witnesses, even though several officers who had been part of the security on the night in question came forward offering to speak up for the star.
'They were ignored,' said Sir Cliff.
'They phoned the lawyers independently and said they would like to make a statement saying they were there, on guard, and they didn't think it was possible.'
The allegations prompted eight other accusers to come forward. Four of these, who alleged abuse dating between 1958 and 1983, had their cases considered by prosecutors.
But senior CPS lawyers took just a few weeks to reject the evidence collected by detectives over 22 months, raising concerns about the handling of the investigation.
Most watched News videos
- CCTV captures final tragic moments of Mirna Salihin's life
- Mother shaves daughters hair after she 'bullies cancer girl'
- GRAPHIC CONTENT: 'Ghost' rises from body after fatal crash
- Bulls head butt each other then die instantly from brutal blow
- Shocking moment girl gets viciously beaten after starting fight
- Mother releases devastating footage of son's final moments
- Lorry smashes into car leaving driver with severe injuries
- Is this the creepy moment the corpse of a girl OPENS her eyes?
- 'Big fat gypsy wedding' in Romania goes on for FOUR days
- Groom ALREADY tired of marriage life just after 15 minutes
- 'Pascal's a G!' Kim Kardashian speaks well of her bodyguard
- GoPro captures the moment a croc swims amongst swimmers
The comments below have been moderated in advance.
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.
We are no longer accepting comments on this article.