The Autumn Statement: As boost for banks slashes their interest rates, Isa savers plead to be allowed to hold more in cash

By Richard Dyson, Financial Mail On Sunday and Jeff Prestridge, Financial Mail On Sunday

|

Savers are petitioning George Osborne to use next week’s Autumn Statement to reverse some of the ‘catastrophic’ measures that have ‘obliterated’ their income since the onset of the financial crisis.

One controversial measure is the Chancellor’s Funding for Lending initiative announced last July to stimulate the economy, but which Financial Mail calculates is costing cash Isa savers £557million a year in lost interest.

Top of savers’ wish list is for Osborne to end Isa rules that discriminate against savers who want to keep their money on deposit rather than invest in riskier shares or funds. Current rules allow shares investors to tax-proof up to £11,280 a year in an Isa. But more cautious savers wanting to protect only cash are limited to £5,640.

'Let people decide': Part-time lecturer Professor Robert Fletcher is one of millions of savers to suffer

'Let people decide': Part-time lecturer Professor Robert Fletcher is one of millions of savers to suffer

Financial Mail has spearheaded the campaign for the two allowances to be equalised, with growing support from leading figures in the savings industry, such as Paul Ellis of Ecology Building Society and politicians such as Alun Cairns, Conservative MP for Vale of Glamorgan.

Ellis says: It doesn’t make sense that savers can’t convert their shares to cash if they need to reduce their risk. Why penalise people who want to take a more cautious approach?

‘A simpler, fairer Isa regime would encourage more people to save for the future. We want everyone to have the information they need to make the right decisions about their money. Isn’t it time for everyone to put fairness at the heart of finance?’

 

The need to act in savers’ defence has become even more urgent in recent weeks as banks and other savings providers have cut rates across a range of accounts.

Experts say these cuts are a direct response to the funding for lending scheme in which billions of pounds of Government-backed money has become available for banks and building societies to advance to home buyers as mortgages. The move was aimed to aid borrowers and kick-start the flagging housing market.

The jury is out on whether it is achieving that effect, but what no one doubts is the consequences the measure is having on savers. Because banks don’t need to raise money from depositors, they no longer offer competitive rates.

Data provider Moneyfacts says £10,000 in an average easy-access account earns 11 per cent less interest today than in August, when the scheme began. The average one-year fixed bond pays 18 per cent less on £10,000 and the average cash Isa with the maximum £5,640 invested – taking into account fixed and variable accounts – pays 12 per cent less.

The Office for National Statistics says a total of £196billion is currently saved in cash Isas. Using this figure, Financial Mail calculates that the annual loss of cash Isa interest due to Osborne’s lending scheme is £557million a year.

Even more disturbing for savers is the fact the Government has made so much money available that lenders will not have to return to depositors in search of funds for three to four years.

Simon Rose, spokesman for lobby group Save our Savers, says: ‘Osborne regards prudent savers as a cash cow to be milked repeatedly. He appears not to care if he undermines the entire saving ethos of this country.

‘His policies have consistently rewarded irresponsibility on the part of borrowers while penalising prudence on the part of savers.’

Nearly 11,000 savers have joined Financial Mail’s campaign and signed our online petition. Hundreds of others have written direct to voice their support, encouraged by organisations such as Saga, all of whose customers are aged over 50. Older people have been hit hardest by falling rates.

Robert Fletcher, a retired professor and an authority on colour-blindness for which he has designed a range of tests and equipment, is one of millions of savers to suffer. ‘The royalties I earn from the devices I designed and the books I have written are not prolific,’ he says.

‘Like other people I rely on income from savings. The value of the tax break provided by an Isa has grown substantially because overall rates have sunk so low. If the Government wishes to offer Isas, I do not understand why it cannot allow members of the public to decide what they want to put inside their Isa – be it cash or shares.’

Aged 87, Robert still works as a consultant and occasional lecturer, but a lower income means he is able to give less to charities and other causes. Campaigner Simon Rose thinks the Government’s low prioritising of savers’ needs will have far-reaching economic consequences.

He warns: ‘There will be children out there who will look at their parents, struggling to get by on income from their savings, and who will say to themselves, ‘‘I won’t bother to save. I won’t make the same mistake as my parents.’’ ’

You can read the views of other supporters at the Save our Savers campaign page and if you would like to comment you can email jeff.prestridge@mailonsunday.co.uk

ALUN CAIRNS MP: WHY I'M OPTIMISTIC THIS ISA CHANGE MAY BE ON THE WAY

Alun Cairns The Conservative MP for Vale of Glamorgan

We are encouraged to save almost from birth. This mantra certainly resonates with the current Government. We are asked to prepare ourselves for unforeseen circumstances, rather than assume the State or others will bail us out.

Saving should be simple, straightforward and efficient. Do Isas have to be so bureaucratically complicated?  Hopefully, such complications are about to change in the Autumn Statement, if the Parliamentary Answer I received recently is any indication. 

It can’t be right that we are allowed to save up to £11,280 a year into stocks and shares within the Isa umbrella, but only half that amount can be in cash. Common sense suggests if you are motivated to invest in stocks and shares you are more likely to be the type of person who saves in the first place. 

Sajid Javid, Financial Secretary to the Treasury, responded to my question by stating that the complexity had arisen from decisions taken by the previous  Government and that any changes to the cash Isa limit would be announced in the Autumn Statement. I could be reading  too much into this but the answer makes me optimistic.

As well as the need to simplify limits, I hope the Chancellor will in time reduce the bureaucracy. There is a need to cut the transfer time to swap Isa providers. It takes about 15 days to switch, when this could be done within 48 hours. Making Isas more portable would encourage competition.

The original purpose of the  Isa was to encourage those who don’t save to do so regularly.  I can recall the last Government saying it wanted people to be able to add cash to their Isa  as they paid for groceries at  the checkout. However,  the complicated structure  was never going to allow that  to happen. 

Professional financial advice is about to get more expensive based on regulatory demands for advisers to become better qualified. By simplifying Isas, this Government has the opportunity to make cash savings simple, straightforward and efficient in all our interests.

 

The comments below have not been moderated.

If the government increase the amount you are allowed to put into a cash isa each year it will dilute the amount of money available to be paid out in interest. This will reduce the already low interest rates we are receiving.

Click to rate     Rating   (0)

If an individual had put the maximum into the original Tessas, Peps and now Isa's, since they started 20 years ago, some in cash, some in stock market investments, they are worth at least £150,000 by now, double that for a couple. If they chose not to take a slight risk and get involved with stock market Isa's, then that is their loss, and was their choice.

Click to rate     Rating   1

Just biding my time until the BoE crashes the Pound at which point I'll sell some of my gold to by that McMansion down the road. Those holding cash savings are going to be DESTROYED. The Government will do anything rather than have a hose price correction and have the banks face up to their bad bets.

Click to rate     Rating   1

Surely what needs addressing is the poor rates everyone pays in Isas. In most cases it is better to have a normal account and pay tax on the interest. Isas only seem to benefit the providers of them not the investors

Click to rate     Rating   14

Madness, why do people want to keep saving in cash offering lower interest than inflation. RPI is 3.2% inflation and for pensioners is even higher as they don't buy TVs and music which drag RPI down. Inflation for pensioner is between 7 & 9 % Cautious investor need education not larger cash ISAs. The banks can looking forward to more deposits on with low rates to improve their financial security if this goes through.

Click to rate     Rating   5

I don't get people's aversion of stocks and shares isas really. A few hours reading a week and some basic knowledge and you can set up a not too risky portfolio that can easily make 10% plus. The younger and more risk taking you are the more you can make, plenty of time to wait out any lows.

Click to rate     Rating   8

This government like most others in the last thirty years can't help but interefere with the day to day running of ordinary people's lives. It is easier to do that, than to crackdown on the rich, those who fiddle their expenses ( like MPs) and the dis-honest. ISAs and Pensions are the two things that they can mess around with and get away with it.

Click to rate     Rating   26

As long as a citizen has sufficient income from other inflation linked pension schemes for their needs - so as not to be eligible for benefits from the state, there should be unlimited access to their own pension savings via drawdown : Anything else is premeditated theft by the government in anticipation of collecting 55% of their pension savings after their death. Younger people, be warned, trying to make provisions for an independent old age just leads to the government taking advantage of your prudence!

Click to rate     Rating   21

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

You have 1000 characters left.
Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.
For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.
Terms