The hour has come for a new Britannia
Today the Mail rejoices that a crude attempt to scupper a scheme to replace the Royal Yacht Britannia has spectacularly backfired.
Opponents hoped to undermine it by leaking a letter from the Education Secretary, in which he appeared to demand public money for the vessel.
But it now emerges that in fact Michael Gove was throwing his weight behind the imaginative scheme for a privately funded flagship, put forward by a consortium of marine industry heavyweights and backed by the Mail.
Majestic: The Mail supports the plan to replace the former Royal Yacht Britannia (pictured) with a new national flagship
And far from sinking this hugely popular project, for which this paper has been campaigning since October, the bungled leak has rallied massive new support for it – including an endorsement from the Prime Minister, who describes it as ‘a truly inspiring initiative’.
More from Daily Mail Comment...
- DAILY MAIL COMMENT: At last, GPs will have to earn their keep 14/01/17
- DAILY MAIL COMMENT: It's not a hate crime to talk about migration 13/01/17
- DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Patients betrayed by their part-time GPs 12/01/17
- DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Brexit shambles and a party that's lost its way 11/01/17
- DAILY MAIL COMMENT: After 300 years, the freedom of Britain's Press is in peril. YOU can save it 09/01/17
- DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Mandarins' greed and an insult to taxpayers 06/01/17
- DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Utter madness of exporting the dole 03/01/17
- DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Mass migration - has the penny dropped? 02/01/17
- DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Use aid NOT tax rises to cover cost of care 29/12/16
- VIEW FULL ARCHIVE
It is also understood to have the backing of senior members of the Royal Family, including the Prince of Wales and the Princess Royal.
Under the plans, drawn up to mark the Queen’s six decades on the throne, Her Majesty would be presented with an elegant flagship, to be financed by private donations and run by a charitable trust.
Apart from serving as a floating trade mission (the last Britannia helped secure deals worth billions for Britain), the zero-carbon vessel would be used for scientific and educational purposes. Truly, this would be a Britannia for the modern age.
In his letter, Mr Gove points out that an occasion as rare as a Diamond Jubilee should have a longer-lasting legacy than the transient celebrations of previous, lesser anniversaries.
Bravo: Michael Gove is throwing his weight behind the imaginative scheme for a privately funded flagship
He argues, too, that an event of such national importance should not be overshadowed by the Olympic Games, but should form an integral part of ‘this great year for our country’.
Yes, the scheme for a new Britannia may be romantic. But the Mail believes there could be no more fitting way for this seafaring nation to mark its gratitude and respect for the woman who has been our greatest ambassador for 60 years.
Mr Gove’s Lib Dem and Labour critics, who seized on his misrepresented letter to make cheap political points, owe him an apology.
They should now join him and the Mail in backing a scheme whose hour has surely come.
Stay out of it, George
Again and again, the Coalition has assured British taxpayers that it won’t pile any more of our money into bailing out the euro.
So why does George Osborne now say he may ask Parliament to approve an increase in our contributions to the International Monetary Fund, beyond the £40billion already agreed?
Listen: The Chancellor doesn't seem to be hearing the British people on the issue of increasing our contribution to the IMF
He knows as well as anyone that the French-led IMF will misuse any extra money to try to prop up the failed political project of the eurozone, by bailing out reckless German and French banks that have lent to basket-case nations such as Greece.
It is simply not Britain’s business to throw our good money after their bad.
Our deceitful banks
In a study that heaps further shame on the banking industry, consumer watchdog Which? reports that overdraft charges are so complicated that the great majority of customers find them impossible to understand or compare.
Isn’t the disgraceful truth that this is entirely deliberate – and that by making charges incomprehensible, the banks hope to extort the maximum from those who exceed their borrowing limits?
It’s too much to hope ministers can cure bankers of their greed. But the minimum they should demand of them is clarity.