Put our needy elderly first! With council tax set to rise £160 to plug the social care black hole, MPs demand foreign aid billions are switched to tackle the crisis

  • MPs say the foreign aid budget should be used to tackle the social care crisis 
  • Their demand came amid warnings the care system is close to 'toppling over' 
  • Chancellor has suggested their would be a review of the foreign aid budget 
  • Ministers are also considering council tax rise of £160 to fund social care  

 The £12billion foreign aid budget should be used to tackle the crisis in social care, MPs said last night (file picture) 

The £12billion foreign aid budget should be used to tackle the crisis in social care, MPs said last night.

Their call to put Britain’s elderly first came amid warnings that the system supporting the vulnerable was close to ‘toppling over’.

And yesterday Chancellor Philip Hammond suggested for the first time there would be a review of the controversial target of spending 0.7 per cent of national income on foreign aid.

Ministers are also considering allowing rises of up to £160 in council tax over the next two years, with much of the money going to fund social care.

But MPs said this would not solve the problem and diverting cash from the foreign aid budget instead could solve the crisis at a stroke. 

Baroness Altmann, a former pensions minister, demanded action as well, saying: ‘The needs of our vulnerable elderly must come first before prioritising the needs of people elsewhere.

‘It is important for us to be a global leader in helping poverty-stricken and Third World countries – but what we mustn’t forget is that we have the equivalent of poverty-stricken and Third World social care here.’

Council bosses say they need an extra £1.3billion to fund the care sector, which faces a rapidly ageing population, wage rises and budget cuts. Tory backbenchers point out this amount is equal to the slice of the £12billion aid budget that Britain sends to Brussels to spend on our behalf.

Shipley MP Philip Davies said: ‘Charity begins at home and we should make sure we are spending enough on social care for our vulnerable older and disabled constituents before we send money abroad – especially when so much of that is wasted.’

Wellingborough MP Peter Bone added: ‘It would seem very sensible to me to use some of the overseas aid money to look after needy people in this country.’

Chancellor Philip Hammond suggested for the first time there would be a review of the controversial target of spending 0.7 per cent of national income on foreign aid. Yesterday, it emerged that Mrs May is preparing to allow town halls to hike council bills by up to £80 next year to help fund the social care system

Thousands of older people are left stuck in hospital beds because town halls cannot provide support in the community. This bed blocking means operations are being delayed for younger people.

Yesterday, it emerged that Mrs May is preparing to allow town halls to hike council bills by up to £80 next year to help fund the social care system. A similar rise could follow the year after under plans to allow councils to bring forward increases in the social care precept.

Mr Hammond made his remarks on the foreign aid target in response to a question from the Tory MP Chris Philp, who asked him to look again at the 0.7 per cent ringfence. Mr Philp pointed out the EU average spending on overseas aid is 0.45 per cent of GDP.

The Chancellor replied that ‘later on in the parliament we will have a spending review’. He said this would cover ‘tax commitments, spending commitments, ringfences and so on’.

Government sources played down the idea that the 0.7 per cent target championed by David Cameron could be scrapped altogether.

Girl bands and the ant man... where your cash goes

The Mail has led the way in chronicling how British taxpayers’ money has been squandered overseas. 

Here are some of the most egregious examples of how YOUR money has been frittered away:

1. £4million to fund Ethiopia’s own Spice Girls. Yegna, a five-strong group, launched a radio show and released a string of videos that aimed to empower women in the African country.

2. £15million on a scheme aimed at reducing the flatulence of Colombian cattle to help combat climate change.

Wannabees: While Ethiopia struggled with the legacy of famine and war, £4million of British aid money went to the African's version of the Spice Girls - giving them a radio show aimed at empowering women 

3. £25million on teaming up meteorologists with Kenyan ‘rainmakers’, who observe the movements of ants to predict the weather.

4. Britain committed £700million to help impoverished children in Pakistan – only for corrupt officials to cream off vast amounts of money by creating thousands of fake teaching jobs then pocketing the salaries.

5. £3million wasted on sending unwanted helicopters to help out with the aftermath of last year’s Nepal earthquake.

6. Last year £3million was given to China – the world’s second largest economy – to increase ‘awareness’ of British football.

Cash cow: £15million spent on reducing the animals’ flatulence in a bid to tackle climate change

Rain cheque: £25million in aid went on using the insects to predict the weather in Kenya

7. A £22.5million programme of aid for China included role-play sessions to encourage young people to think about climate change.

8. Channel 4 News presenter Krishnan Guru-Murthy was paid £15,000 for just a few hours’ work at a summit in Mexico.

9. Britain gives £72million a year to Palestine, more than a third of which goes straight to the Palestinian Authority, which critics say supports terrorists.

10. An aid watchdog found UK money actually fuels corruption in Nigeria – with one scheme increasing the likelihood locals would have to pay backhanders to the police.

WHY IS THE SOCIAL CARE SYSTEM FOR ELDERLY IN MELTDOWN?

By James Slack

How is social care funded?

Councils provide social care. People with assets of more than £23,250 pay full care costs whether it is in a care home or their own home. An ageing population puts pressure on town halls, and the NHS suffers from ‘bed blocking’ if care is not available for someone who is ready to leave hospital.

What has the Government done so far?

In last year’s Autumn Statement, then chancellor George Osborne gave town halls the right to impose a social care precept, initially set at 2 per cent a year, to help cover costs of looking after the elderly. This is in addition to the 2 per cent increase councils can levy each year to fund other services.

How much has it raised?

Some 144 of 152 adult social care authorities implemented the rule, raising £382million this year and adding £22 to the average yearly council tax bills. But town halls say this won’t cover the £612million national living wage bill which has a huge impact on care home costs.

How much do councils want?

Izzi Seccombe, Tory leader of Warwickshire County Council and chairman of the Local Government Association’s community and wellbeing board, said: ‘We need £1.3billion now.’ But this is still barely a tenth of the foreign aid budget – and the exact sum we give Brussels in aid to spend on our behalf. By 2020, there will be a shortfall of £2.6billion.

What are ministers planning to give them?

Under Osborne’s plan, councils could have increased the precept by 6 per cent between now and the end of Parliament – a fixed 2 per cent rise each year to 2019/20. Under new plans, they can increase bills by a maximum of 6 per cent over the next three years – but will be given ‘flexibility’ over how this is done i.e. they could raise the care precept by 3 per cent next year, followed by 3 per cent in 2018/19 and a freeze the following year. The only rule is that, in a single year, the rise cannot be more than 3 per cent.

What will this mean for an average bill?

If a council imposes a 3 per cent rise next year, this would be in addition to the 2 per cent they can hike bills for other services – giving a total rise of 5 per cent. This adds about £76 for the average Band D council tax property currently paying £1,530.

Will it solve the problem?

The King’s Fund think-tank says just increasing the precept ‘is deeply flawed’. The amount raised depends on the existing size of the bill, the value of the properties and the number of residents receiving discounts. Labour claim the poorest areas, where problems are most acute, therefore receive less money. Ministers accept this but say councils which lose out are compensated by the Better Care Fund.

What is the Better Care Fund?

It is a pot of money that councils share with the NHS, which is worth £3.9billion this year and is due to rise by £1.5billion in 2019. It’s targeted at areas which can raise less money from the precept. Many argue the extra funding should be brought forward. Whitehall insiders have suggested an extra £100million could be made available in 2017/18 for social care.

Is it purely a question of money?

Number Ten insist not. Ministers say there’s a 20-fold difference between the best and worst performing areas on delayed discharges, or bed blocking. Half of all delayed discharges took place in just 20 local authority areas (13 per cent of the total). Long term, experts insist the best solution is to merge NHS and social care budgets.

Why wasn’t it addressed in the Autumn Statement?

Philip Hammond yesterday said he’d discussed social care with the PM ahead of the Statement, but it was ‘not true’ she’d vetoed the idea of more cash. The Chancellor said, since then, ministers could not fail to have noticed the ‘cacophony’ of lobbying by councils and health trusts over the issue.

 

 

 

 

No comments have so far been submitted. Why not be the first to send us your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

By posting your comment you agree to our house rules.

Who is this week's top commenter? Find out now