Have humans killed off ice ages? Experts warn our effect on the planet could mean the natural cycle doesn't happen for a 'very, very long time'

  • Experts look at factors that vary the orbit: eccentricity, obliquity and precession
  • The combined effects of these produce a 21,000-year ice age cycle   
  • But expert says small increases in greenhouse gases delayed the next ice age
  • It's possible we put off the next ice age for at least half a million years

Over the last two and a half million years the Earth has undergone more than 50 major ice ages, each having a profound effect on our planet's climate. 

But what causes them and how do we predict when the next big ice age will hit?

About 40 years ago, scientists realised that ice ages were driven by changes in the Earth's orbit. 

But, as I recently argued in Nature, it's not that simple. 

Scroll down for videos 

During the last ice age, only 21,000 years ago, there was nearly continuous ice across North America from the Pacific to the Atlantic Ocean. Scientists are still trying to understand how wobbles interact with the climate system,to push the planet in to or out of an ice age

DID WE KILL THE ICE AGES? 

The last ice age was nearly 21,000 years ago.

In December 1976, a team of researchers published a study showing that climate records contained the same cycles as the three parameters that vary the Earth's orbit: eccentricity, obliquity and precession.

The combined effects of these two components and the eccentricity produce an approximately 21,000-year cycle. 

Experts discovered that greenhouse gases had an important role in controlling climate.

In particular atmospheric carbon dioxide had to be low enough for the planet to start cooling before it could tip into an ice age.

The small increases in greenhouse gases due to the expansion of agriculture have delayed the next ice age.

Researchers believe if we continue emitting greenhouse gases at the same rate, we might have put off the next ice age for at least half a million years.

Scientists are still trying to understand how such wobbles interact with the climate system, particularly greenhouse gases, to push the planet in to or out of an ice age.

During the last ice age, only 21,000 years ago, there was nearly continuous ice across North America from the Pacific to the Atlantic Ocean. 

At its deepest over the Hudson Bay, it was over two miles thick and reached as far south as what would now be New York and Cincinnati. 

In Europe, there were two major ice sheets: the British ice sheet which reached as far south as what would now be Norfolk, and the Scandinavian ice sheet that extended all the way from Norway to the Ural mountains in Russia.

In the Southern Hemisphere there were significant ice sheets on Patagonia, South Africa, southern Australia and New Zealand. 

So much water was locked up in these ice sheets that the global sea level dropped by over 125 metres – around ten metres lower than the height of the London Eye. 

In comparison if all the ice on Antarctica and Greenland melted today it would only raise sea level by 70 metres.

So what caused these great ice ages? 

In 1941, Milutin Milankovitch suggested that wobbles in the Earth's orbit changed the distribution of solar energy on the planet's surface, driving the ice age cycles. 

He believed that the amount of incoming solar radiation (insolation) just south of the Arctic Circle, at a latitude of 65°N, was essential. 

Climate records contained the same cycles as the three parameters that vary the Earth's orbit: eccentricity, obliquity and precession. The combined effects of these two components and the eccentricity produce an approximately 21,000-year cycle

Here, insolation can vary by as much as 25%. 

When there was less insolation during the summer months, the average temperature would be slightly lower and some of the ice in this region could survive and build up – eventually producing an ice sheet.

But it wasn't until 30 years later that three scientists used long-term climate records from analysing marine sediments to put this to the test. 

EXPERTS SAYS ICE AGES HAPPEN IN 100,000 YEAR INTERVALS

 An analysis has revealed evidence of an abundance of CO2 stored deep in the ocean during the 100,000 year intervals, suggesting extra carbon dioxide was sequestered during these periods, lowering the temperature on Earth.

Researchers from Cardiff University now say the oceans could be to blame for 100,000 year ice age intervals.

While Earth once experienced ice ages at 40,000 year intervals, this changed about a million years ago in what's known as the Mid-Pleistocene Transition.

Now, it happens every 100,000 years.

Researchers say this could be the result of the oceans 'inhaling' larger amounts of carbon dioxide during these times.

Doing this removes CO2 from the atmosphere and lowers the temperatures on Earth. 

Jim Hays used fossil assemblages to estimate past sea surface temperatures. 

Nick Shackleton calculated changes in past global ice volume by measuring oxygen isotopes (atoms with different numbers of neutrons in the nuclues) in calcium carbon fossil in marine sediments. 

John Imbrie used time-series analysis to statistically compare the timing and cycles in the sea surface temperature and global ice volume records with patterns of the Earth's orbit.

In December 1976 they published a landmark climate paper in Science, showing that climate records contained the same cycles as the three parameters that vary the Earth's orbit: eccentricity, obliquity and precession (shown in Figure 1).

Eccentricity describes the shape of the Earth's orbit around the sun, varying from nearly a circle to an ellipse with a period of about 96,000 years. 

Obliquity is the tilt of the Earth's axis of rotation with respect to the plane of its orbit, which changes with a period of about 41,000 years. 

Increases in greenhouse gases due to the expansion of agriculture that started 8,000 years ago have in fact delayed the next ice age.  Pictured is a satellite map by the NOAA in 2011 that shows the extent of the snow blanketing

Precession refers to the fact that both Earth's rotational axis and orbital path precess (rotate) over time – the combined effects of these two components and the eccentricity produce an approximately 21,000-year cycle.

The researchers also found that these parameters have different effects at different places on our globe. 

Obliquity has a strong influence at high latitudes, whereas precession has a notable impact on tropical seasons. 

For example precession has been linked to the rise and fall of the African rift valley lakes and so may have even influenced the evolution of our ancestors. 

Evidence for such 'orbital forcing' of climate has now been found as far back as 1.4 billion years ago.

EXPERTS SAY SUN WILL 'GO TO SLEEP' IN 2030 

A recent study claims to have cracked predicting solar cycles - and says that between 2020 and 2030 solar cycles will cancel each other out.

This, they say, will lead to a phenomenon known as the 'Maunder minimum' - which has previously been known as a mini ice age when it hit between 1646 and 1715, even causing London's River Thames to freeze over.

The new model of the Sun's solar cycle is producing unprecedentedly accurate predictions of irregularities within the Sun's 11-year heartbeat.

It draws on dynamo effects in two layers of the Sun, one close to the surface and one deep within its convection zone.

Predictions from the model suggest that solar activity will fall by 60 per cent during the 2030s to conditions last seen during the 'mini ice age' that began in 1645, according to the results presented by Prof Valentina Zharkova at the National Astronomy Meeting in Llandudno.

The model predicts that the pair of waves become increasingly offset during Cycle 25, which peaks in 2022.

During Cycle 26, which covers the decade from 2030-2040, the two waves will become exactly out of synch and this will cause a significant reduction in solar activity. 

However, the scientists realised that there were limitations and challenges of their research – many of which remain today. 

In particular, they recognised that variations in the Earth's orbit did not cause the ice age cycles per se – they rather paced them. 

A certain orbit of the Earth can be associated with many different climates. 

The one we have today is in fact similar to the one we had during the most intense part of the last ice age.

Small changes in insolation driven by changes in the Earth's orbit can push the planet into or out of an ice age through the planet's 'climate feedback' mechanisms. 

For example when summer solar radiation in reduced it allows some ice to remain after the winter. 

HUMAN CARBON EMISSIONS COULD PUT OFF ICE AGE

Cambridge university scientists say that a new Ice Age is due to start within 1,500 years.

But due to human carbon emissions, the lethal 'big freeze' could be put off.

Levels of CO2 in the atmosphere could actually insulate against a catastrophic ice age which would see glaciers advance over Europe and North America.

The scientists admit that we would be 'better off' in a warmer world - but caution that this is 'missing the point'.

In a paper published in Nature Geoscience, Cambridge University paleoclimatologist Luke Skinner says that even if carbon emissions stopped today, levels would remain elevated for at least 1,000 years, and stored heat could prevent the next Ice Age from happening.

Instead, things would cool down, but not quite so severely.

Thanks to elevated levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the earth would not experience 'glaciation' - periods of severe cold where glaciers advance.

The current level of carbon dioxide is 390 parts per million. Scientists believe that level would need to drop to 240 parts per million to allow glaciation to take place.

This white ice reflects more sunlight, which cools the area further and allows more ice to build up, which reflects even more sunlight and so forth. 

Therefore, the researchers' next step was to understand the relative importance of ice sheet, ocean and atmospheric feedbacks. 

They discovered that greenhouse gases had an important role in controlling climate. 

In particular atmospheric carbon dioxide had to be low enough for the planet to start cooling before it could tip into an ice age.

So how can all this help us understand future climate? 

If we continue emitting greenhouse gases at the same rate, we might have put off the next ice age for at least half a million years. If we have merely delayed the next ice age, we will still be in the Quaternary Period – the last 2.58m years defined by the ice age cycles

One idea is that small increases in greenhouse gases due to the expansion of agriculture that started 8,000 years ago have in fact delayed the next ice age. 

What's more, if we continue emitting greenhouse gases at the same rate, we might have put off the next ice age for at least half a million years.

If we have merely delayed the next ice age, we will still be in the Quaternary Period – the last 2.58m years defined by the ice age cycles. 

But if we have stopped the ice ages, humans will have caused a much greater change and so have entered the Anthropocene period as some argue. 

If I had to put money on it, I'd say the Earth has experienced its last ice age for a very, very long time.

Mark Maslin, Professor of Palaeoclimatology, UCL

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

 

 

The comments below have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

By posting your comment you agree to our house rules.

Who is this week's top commenter? Find out now