Comey's wall of silence! FBI director angers lawmakers by dodging questions during closed-door briefing about whether he is investigating Trump's links to Russia 

  • James Comey was criticized after reopening investigation on Hillary Clinton 
  • The FBI director refused to comment on investigation of Trump-Russia Friday
  • After being grilled, Comey said he could not disclose private information
  • US Justice Department inspector general is investigating Comey's actions  

James Comey is receiving a lot of flak from House Democrats after the FBI director refused to confirm whether or not the bureau is investigating links between President-elect Donald Trump and Russia.

In a closed-door briefing on Friday, the law enforcement officer said he would 'never comment' on a potential FBI investigation.

The Justice Department's Inspector General Michael Horowitz announced on Thursday an investigation will be carried out to look at whether Comey followed policy and if he improperly disclosed nonpublic information regarding the Clinton campaign. 

The FBI director refused to comment on investigation of Trump and Russia after a contentious session on Friday (Pictured: Comey at a Senate hearing on Tuesday) 

Critics said Comey's decision to stay tight-lipped was hypocritical referring to the time he broke protocol during a press conference where he explained why he wouldn't charge Hillary Clinton for the email scandal.

US intelligence official James Clapper released a report last week saying the agency had found ties between the Putin and Trump and found evidence that the Russian government staged cyber attacks on the US to influence the election.

Democratic congressman Jerrold Nadler asked Comey if he thought there had been a double standard with the two situations, the Associated Press reported.

'Do you believe that standard has been met with reference to the possible investigation of the Trump campaign's possible connections to the Russian government? And if not, why not?', Nadler asked.

Comey replied the cases were not the same and refused to comment.  

US intelligence officials released a report last week saying the agency had found ties between the Putin and Trump and found evidence that the Russian government staged cyber attacks on the US to influence the election

Eleven days before the election, the FBI director reopened the case against Clinton, which caused contention among democratic leaders and Comey.

The timing of his announcement led Democrats to believe it influenced  Hillary Clinton's loss in the presidential race.

Comey initially looked into Clinton's email scandal in July and cleared her after finding her use of the email server 'reckless' but not illegal. 

He opened the investigation once again just days before the 2016 election in November citing newfound emails. 

Days later, Comey said he found no incriminating evidence against the Democratic presidential candidate.  

Following her shocking defeat, Clinton called Comey's letter to Congress which 'groundless, baseless, proven to be, stopped our momentum,' the New York Times reported

After the hearing, California Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi told reporters the issue was of 'high interest' and the 'American people are owed the truth.' 

While Republican Steve King said he was impressed by the way the FBI director handled the contentious briefing, The Wall Street Journal said in an editorial that Comey should resign from his position.  

What the IG said he is reviewing 

- Allegations that Department or FBI policies or procedures were not followed in connection with, or in actions leading up to or related to, the FBI Director’s public announcement on July 5, 2016, and the Director’s letters to Congress on October 28 and November 6, 2016, and that certain underlying investigative decisions were based on improper considerations

• Allegations that the FBI Deputy Director should have been refused from participating in certain investigative matters

• Allegations that the Department’s Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs improperly disclosed non-public information to the Clinton campaign and/or should have been refused from participating in certain matters; 

• Allegations that Department and FBI employees improperly disclosed non-public information; and 

• Allegations that decisions regarding the timing of the FBI’s release of certain Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) documents on October 30 and November 1, 2016, and the use of a Twitter account to publicize same, were influenced by improper considerations. 

 

The comments below have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

By posting your comment you agree to our house rules.

Who is this week's top commenter? Find out now