State schools are slammed for charging parents £2-a-day 'sandwich tax' for children who bring in their own packed lunch

  • 'Sandwich tax’ supposedly goes towards cleaning and supervision in dining halls
  • School leaders said it was sign of the ‘hard financial times’ their institutions face 
  • Department for Education called it ‘unacceptable’ and urged people to complain

A growing number of state schools are charging pupils to eat their own packed lunch in the canteen, teachers warn (file photo)

A growing number of state schools are charging pupils to eat their own packed lunch in the canteen, teachers warn (file photo)

A growing number of state schools are charging pupils to eat their own packed lunch in the canteen, teachers warn.

The so-called ‘sandwich tax’ costs parents up to £2 a day – which supposedly goes towards cleaning and supervision in dining halls.

School leaders said it was a sign of the ‘hard financial times’ their institutions face. 

But yesterday the Department for Education slammed the practice as ‘unacceptable’ and urged families to complain to the schools involved.

The NASUWT teaching union quizzed families about the hidden costs of state education.

Twenty-six out of 2,211 (1.18 per cent) parents who answered a question about school food said their child had to pay to bring in a lunch box this year – with around half charged between £1.50 and £2 a day. 

This was up from 14 (0.95 per cent) who said there were fees when 1,472 parents responded to a similar survey last year.

Speaking ahead of the union’s annual conference in Manchester this weekend, Dr Patrick Roach, deputy general secretary of the NASUWT, said: ‘For many parents who are, in the words of the Prime Minister, just about managing, their children may not qualify for a free school lunch.

‘Parents are saying “I can’t afford the price of a school lunch, I’ll send my child in with sandwiches”, only to find they’re paying between £1 and £2 a day just for right of the child to sit in the cafeteria. Quite honestly, that defies common sense and reasonableness from our point of view.’

Dr Roach said the Education Act 2011 ‘opened the door’ to this practice by enabling schools to charge for ‘optional extras’. He said: ‘It’s outrageous that the Government has allowed schools to be able to charge for this.

‘When you have 1 or 2 per cent of schools that are choosing to apply such practice as a sandwich tax, that’s too many.

‘We allow that to take root, and suddenly it becomes the norm and every school across the system is doing this on the pretext that it helps schools to make ends meet.’

The so-called ‘sandwich tax’ costs parents up to £2 a day – which supposedly goes towards cleaning and supervision in dining halls

The so-called ‘sandwich tax’ costs parents up to £2 a day – which supposedly goes towards cleaning and supervision in dining halls

Margaret Morrissey, from family pressure group, Parents Outloud, said: ‘This is outrageous. It’s a sandwich tax on parents.

‘You pay taxes to the Government for your child’s school indirectly, you pay council tax to the local authority. It is absolutely incredible that we’ve reached the stage in schools where if you want to take in something to eat you’ve got to pay for it.’

In total, 3,934 parents were questioned by the NASUWT about the overall costs of state schooling. Almost one in five (18 per cent) have been asked to make a regular financial contribution to their child’s school via direct debit or standing order.

A fifth of these said they paid between £51 and £100 annually. Some 6 per cent paid £400 or more a year. Around one in eight said they were expected to make regular donations by cash or cheque, with 6 per cent paying over £100 annually using this method.

Over half (51 per cent) said the school had asked for money to ‘enhance resources’, while 23 per cent said demands were due to budget constraints.

Malcolm Trobe, interim general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: ‘Schools are obliged to provide for sandwich pupils the perfect place for them to eat and water to drink. We would not expect schools to be charging in any way to provide this for pupils with lunch boxes.’

He added: ‘All of these things about charging for anything are just a symptom of the hard financial times that schools are finding themselves in – but this is not something we expect to see.’

A Department for Education spokesman said yesterday: ‘It is unacceptable for schools to charge pupils to eat their own packed lunches in canteens. Parents should raise any concerns about this directly with the school.’

UNION MEMBERS REFUSE TO TEACH UNRULY PUPILS

Teachers are resorting to industrial action to keep violent and disruptive children out of the classroom.

Some are refusing to teach out-of-control pupils who have brought knives into school or threatened to set staff on fire.

Often, the children – some as young as eight – have been allowed to stay in lessons despite concerns about the risk they pose to teachers and classmates.

Figures from the NASUWT teaching union show the number of ‘refusal to teach’ ballots has more than doubled from three in 2015 to eight in 2016. The industrial action involves the pupil being barred from attending classes taught by the union’s members. 

There were ‘many more cases’ where a ballot was threatened, but the school took ‘appropriate action’ before it went ahead.

Members of the National Union of Teachers also requested two ‘refusal to teach’ ballots last year, but none in 2015.

Among incidents triggering votes in 2016 was a Year Four (age eight or nine) boy in Essex who brought two pocket knives into school and threatened to use them on another child. 

Teachers at a secondary school in Belfast also took ‘refusal to teach’ action after a pupil made death threats against two members of staff. In Lancashire, a ballot was called at a ‘failing’ secondary school where staff were ‘exposed to violent behaviour’ and pupils were ‘out of control’.

In many cases, the action eventually led to the child being moved to another school. Dr Patrick Roach, deputy general secretary of NASUWT, said: ‘We only ballot when there’s been a failure of schools to deal with those problems. It appears to be intensifying.’

In a survey of 4,908 NASUWT members, half said there was a ‘widespread behaviour problem’ in their own school.

Malcolm Trobe, of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: ‘If a pupil has to be excluded, [headteachers] will exclude the pupil.’

The comments below have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

We are no longer accepting comments on this article.