A tax on bravery: Undercover police officers get billed for their chase cars as they are taxed as company vehicles

  • Undercover officers will have to pay bills of up to £5,000 for their cars 
  • The officers require high-powered unmarked cars for dealing with gangsters
  • The National Police Chief's Council said the tax could damage national security
  • Senior officers with unmarked cars have a loophole to avoid the tax 

By Mark Nicol for The Mail on Sunday

Published: 17:50 EST, 30 September 2017 | Updated: 19:50 EST, 30 September 2017

Hundreds of undercover police officers have been hit by a 'shameful' tax on the unmarked vehicles they use to track and chase terrorists and gangsters.

The elite officers have received bills of up to £5,000 after Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) ruled the high-powered cars and motorbikes they drive in their dangerous roles should be taxed as company cars.

Critics have branded the move 'ridiculous', while both the Police Federation – representing rank and file officers – and the National Police Chiefs' Council, say the tax could damage national security.

Undercover police officers face being taxed on their high-powered unmarked cars 

Undercover police officers face being taxed on their high-powered unmarked cars 

Undercover operatives often take their vehicles home so they can respond faster to emergency call-outs. 

To date, they have been taxed only on their personal mileage outside working hours, but now HMRC is demanding a levy based on the vehicles' retail value and CO2 emissions – the same as executives' company cars.

Officers told The Mail on Sunday that they cannot afford to pay the additional taxes, and that the move will compromise public safety. 

Their treatment is in contrast to that of police chiefs, who have previously fitted blue lights to their executive cars to reduce their tax bills.

Last night, an officer from the Metropolitan Police's Specialist Crime and Operations branch, who used his vehicle to respond to the IS attack on London Bridge in June, said: 'I'm on a £40,000 salary. So there's no way I can pay £5,000 in company vehicle tax to HMRC. 

'It's shameful that it's being imposed on us because it will seriously impact on policing. 

'I can react faster to an incident, such as London Bridge, because I've got an undercover police vehicle on my driveway, rather than having to drive my own car or get public transport to a depot where these vehicles would otherwise be kept.

Some officers fear they will have to pay benefit in kind tax if they bring the cars home 

Some officers fear they will have to pay benefit in kind tax if they bring the cars home 

'But because I effectively commute in this police vehicle to and from shifts and emergency call-outs, I am liable to be taxed on this vehicle by HMRC. The new way it is being calculated has killed me.'

And Christopher Chope, a Conservative MP on the Parliamentary Home Affairs Committee, added: 'This is a ridiculous situation with the HMRC clearly acting at odds with the Government's agenda to improve security. 

'It is completely unreasonable for individual police officers to be saddled with this additional tax burden on vehicles, which are an essential part of their very dangerous jobs.'

The HMRC told The Mail on Sunday yesterday that the new arrangement will see officers liable to tax bills based on 20 per cent of their vehicle's market value, the number of days the vehicle is available for their private use and an environmental levy. 

The police officer's salary is also a factor. HMRC issued the new directive in April this year but officers have only just been informed of the change.

Police Federation general secretary Andy Fittes said: 'These tax changes could adversely affect the ability of these officers to carry out their vital role in keeping the public safe. No officer should be penalised for doing his or her job.'

An HMRC spokesman said: 'No police officer or emergency workers will incur tax when they just use the vehicle for work.

'Tax can only be payable on the vehicle when it's made available for private reasons.'

Comments 711

Share what you think

  View all

The comments below have not been moderated.

  View all

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

We are no longer accepting comments on this article.