Showing posts with label globalist stunts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label globalist stunts. Show all posts

Templating a Color Revolution

UPDATE: The below mentioned "Prachatai" website, a self-proclaimed NGO working in opposition to the Thai government on behalf of the "red shirt" color revolution has been revealed to receive partial funding from the notorious globalist funding arm the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). NED includes a myriad of globalists on the Council on Foreign Relations, Rand, and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, including "neo-cons" Vin Weber and Francis Fukuyama (also a RAND trustee) as board members.

By Tony Cartalucci


Introduction


My first exposure to globalist engineered color revolutions began in Thailand during the spring of 2009. Since then, it has taken me nearly 2 years to unravel, decipher, and expose the mechanics of a staged revolution, an opportunity afforded to me only through the desperate gambit twice thus far failing and dragging on. As instability spreads across the Middle East and threatens to spread beyond in an unprecedented and simultaneous conflagration of the world's remaining old-world regimes, we do not have 2 years to unravel and expose the inner workings of each.

However, the premise being that a central globalist agenda drives these uprisings and uses the same or similar organizations to bring them about, using the color revolution in Thailand as a template, we can quickly analyze and expose each revolution as it unfolds and possibly balk the globalist agenda that hinges on their desired and orchestrated regime changes.

The Rabble-Rousers

It is essential to first examine who is behind the protesters, what their connections are, and what their demands are. A movement unable to enumerate their grievances and who instead insist on rhetoric like "democratization," "social justice," and "elections" should immediately raise suspicions. Double your suspicions if it turns out a globalist backed opposition political party is leading the protesters. It then becomes obvious that the goal is not "democratization" or "elections" in and of themselves, but merely the installation of a globalist favored party into power.

In Thailand the "red shirt" protesters are unable to articulate their grievances beyond rhetorical "double standards" and alleged stolen elections. The fact that a political party, Peua Thai Party, leads the protests on the stage to supplement their attempts to regain power in Parliament point to a more self-serving agenda.

Concrete demands would be "improved education," "better infrastructure," "lower taxes," "a less intrusive government," and so on. Political activity in the US carried out by alternative media activism usually revolves around specific, enumerated grievances and specific redresses, not necessarily "regime change." A movement without "a program," myopically obsessed with "regime change" smacks of geopolitical meddling.

Further examination of Thailand's situation, reveals that the Peua Thai Party leading the "red shirts" on stage is in turn led by deposed Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Thaksin was literally standing in front of the Council on Foreign Relations in New York City on the eve the Thai military ousted his government from power in a bloodless coup in 2006. Thaksin had been consolidating power, dismantling checks and balances, and systematically attempting to "liberalize" Thailand's economy on behalf of globalist foreign investors. Before taking office in 2001, Thaksin had been serving as an adviser for the notorious globalist equity firm, the Carlyle Group.

His ouster from power was coupled by a protectionist posture taken by the Thai establishment, perhaps wise to what was unfolding. The globalist response was to begin working on a color revolution to permanently overthrow the Thai establishment and reinstall Thaksin as head of a socialist welfare state. Thus, when a "revolutionary" leader has direct links to and support from globalist institutions, it serves as yet more evidence of geopolitical meddling.

No example is as clear as the current unrest in Egypt, and the self-proclaimed leader of the protesters, globalist stooge Mohamed ElBaradei of the International Crisis Group. With ElBaradei's year long efforts to build up his "National Front for Change" and the Muslim Brotherhood's support, we see yet another group of protesters calling not for concrete demands, but myopically obsessed on regime change.

Summary: Examine the opposition; are they articulating concrete, articulated grievances and demands or are they myopically obsessed with "regime change" and rhetoric? Establish their leadership and their support, and thus their motive. If their leader is an overt globalist, geopolitical meddling is afoot.

The Lobbyists and Policy Wonks

In Egypt, it has already been well documented that the Council on Foreign Relations, Brookings Institute, and the International Crisis Group had been building support and devising strategies to back their man ElBaradei. Their work was dutifully repeated throughout the corporate owned media that make up the corporate memberships of these think-tanks.

In Thailand, this took the form of globalist lobbying for Thaksin by International Crisis Group member Kenneth Adelman via the Eldelman Public Relations Agency and current lobbying efforts provided by Chatham House major corporate member Amsterdam & Peroff.

Concurrently, globalist mouthpieces like the Economist conducted a concerted smear campaign against the Thai establishment along with heaping praise upon Thaksin and his "accomplishments." News services like the Huffington Post afforded Robert Amsterdam of Amsterdam & Peroff, his own page to pass off his paid lobbyist work as opinion, commentary or perhaps even news.

Summary: The globalist think-tanks, for color revolutions and the globalist agenda in general, openly lay out their designs within the pages of their websites, meticulously documented and released for public consumption months in advance. What is laid out on their pages today, become tomorrow's media talking points, and next week's policy being rubber stamped by a congress or parliament. Skeptics of the "New World Order" insist that such a plot cannot be kept secret. They are correct. It is not a secret, it is hidden in plain view. Watch the think-tanks for brazen intentions and gleeful celebration as their plans come to fruition.

Non-Government Organizations: Beware of the "Civil Society"

While the role of NGO's in Egypt's unrest remains to be uncovered, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace's Middle East Center is unable to write a single piece on the unrest without mentioning "civil society" organizations.

Using Thailand as a template, we can see how "civil society" and indeed universities and their networks are being used to generate consensus and reinforce the compromised integrity a paid lobbyist like Robert Amsterdam lends his otherwise discredited client.

A visit to Robert Amsterdam's website makes it incredibly easy. Listed on the far right margin are several links that lead off to university websites, political activist groups, and faux-news sites that attempt to lend credibility to Amsterdam's unsavory and disingenuous body of work. They include paid-blogger Bangkok Pundit, Australian National University's College of Asia & the Pacific's "New Mandala," and Robert Amsterdam disinformation clearing house, "Thai Political Prisoners." Each in turn links to more NGO's and demagogic bloggers until you literally end up on the color revolution's official website. Prachatai, also listed on Amsterdam's blog, reveals the inner workings and role of NGO's in facilitating the propaganda color revolutions run on in their "About Prachatai."

Their stated objectives are as follows:
  1. To provide the Thai public with access to reliable news and information relevant to developing and strengthening the democratic functions of Thai civil society.
  2. To focus news coverage on the problems, concerns, activities and accomplishments of local communities and civil society movements and organisations.
  3. To strive for freedom and independence of Thai news media.
  4. To promote active public participation in Thai news media.

It is no surprise then to look at their "Events" calender and see it blotted with globalist ASEAN events coupled with "Red Shirt" exhibitions. It is also no surprise they link to openly George Soros "Open Society Insitutue" funded outfits like "openDemocracy."


Summary: These layers of "credibility" that wrap the crass, generally non-English delivered propaganda used by the color revolution on the ground, attempt to foist upon the unsuspecting public a false image of the movement and its motivations. It serves as insulation from obvious demagogues pandering to vulnerably undereducated or desperate people in the streets. That is stems from the same globalist think-tanks, and NGO's built upon identical formats points directly to globalist geopolitical meddling. NGO's are the globalists' helping hands inside target nations and are key to the spread of globalization.

Identifying these layers, be it in Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Jordan, or Thailand as these color revolutions unfold gives us undeniable evidence that the "grassroots" uprisings we see are in fact engineered from the top down by NGO's receiving their marching orders and agenda from the top and disseminating them on a grassroots level.

The Corporate-Owned Media

As discussed already, the mainstream media participates with globalist lobbying firms and think-tanks in building up or rehabilitating their chosen puppets. ElBaradei was getting the treatment as early as February 2010, and Thaksin has been the gracious recipient of the media's help refurbishing his image since his ouster in 2006.

However, when the NGO's and rabble-rousers start bringing people into the street, the media begins its other role of controlling the narrative. The protesters will always be "peaceful" the government always "heavy-handed" and the truth will always be a day late and a dollar short to ensure carefully prepared propaganda dominates the crucial initial opinions of the public. The media's goal is to build momentum for the protesters on the ground and the international support or "solidarity" to feed that momentum. The gamble is in hoping the momentum lasts long enough to achieve the globalists goals before the truth is ultimately revealed.

Just like the demagogues pandering to the crowd on the ground, the media is high on rhetoric and absent of enumerated, detailed analysis involving grievances and demands. During an engineered globalist color revolution, the media will also myopically focus on "regime change" beyond all other things. This could not be any clearer than in Egypt where headlines were dominated with calls for Mubarak to step down.

During the Thai protests in 2009 and again in 2010, BBC, CNN, and AlJazeera dominated international coverage with similar portrayals of gallant freedom fighters struggling for "democracy" and "free elections" against a heavy handed dictatorship. They focused mainly on classic class-warfare rhetoric and of course regime change.

The most cunning ploy executed during this stage of a "color revolution" is focusing on the protesters themselves. In Thailand, the people in the street are generally honest, decent, hard working people. Many would literally give you the shirt off their back. They honestly believe what they've been told and the mainstream media capitalizes on this very real sincerity. The media is preying on the ignorance of the international audience concerning the leadership's role in selling or igniting the protesters' anger. Grievances that could have been constructively tackled through real grassroots activism becomes rhetorical self-serving feedstock for violence, confrontation, chaos, destabilization and regime change.

We must remember who the corporate owned media works for and who they are openly affiliated with. They populate the corporate memberships of multiple globalist think tanks, the very think tanks fomenting the unfolding unrest and presenting their "puppets" as the solution. The Chatham House alone claims the BBC, the Economist, Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, ABC News, the Guardian, Telegraph Media Group, Times Newspapers, and the Daily Mail, all as corporate members and major corporate members.

Summary: Keeping careful track of the rhetoric coming from Chatham House, the CFR, Brookings Institute, RAND, and the other think-tanks along with the wording and talking points expressed by media organizations affiliated with them can reveal an unmistakable almost verbatim agenda.

As the chaos unfolds the media will attempt to control the narrative using misleading statements, propaganda, deceiving footage, and even outright lies. It is also important to remember that many protesters sincerely believe in their cause and may have legitimate concerns which the demagogues then manipulate for their own self-serving agenda. The media will fully capitalize on the protesters' sincerity to appeal to viewers emotionally.

Conclusion

British author, David Icke gave an exceptionally cogent interview on the Alex Jones Show recently where he made two crucial points. He first expressed the importance of we as a people getting "street wise" to what is going on around us. He also mentioned that knowing what their plans are, with our non-compliance, the globalist system is unable to carry out their agenda.



Part 1 of 5 of author David Icke's interview on the Alex Jones Show,
February 1, 2011. Click for Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, and Part 5.


That is the crux of a real awakening. It will take place in our gardens as we relearn how to feed ourselves, in our farmers markets where we relearn the importance of community and honest economics, it will take place in our garages and workshops where we utilize the amazing technology available to us today to become once again producers, tradesmen, and artisans. It will take place at our local sheriff's office, where we learn to organize and protect our communities.

And as we build this culture and system of true revolution and freedom, perhaps the dark armies of the establishment will march against us. Then it may be necessary to defend ourselves, but not as mobs in the street destroying our own city led by demagogues, but as freemen on the field of battle defending ourselves against an overt enemy.

Understanding the mechanics of the "color revolution" and heading them off proactively by exposing their nefarious intentions and their deceptive methods, we may help blunt them when they are put into effect. By balking the globalists here and now, we save ourselves from having to face them down the road, emboldened and empowered by their continued success made possible by our inability to understand their own game, let alone beat them at it.

Globalist Stunts: Somali Piracy

Part three in an ongoing series exposing globalist stunts foisted upon humanity at the cost of our lives, our livelihood, our past and our future. Click here for previous "Globalist Stunts."

By Tony Cartalucci


According to CNN a South Korean fishing vessel was hijacked early October, 2010, by Somali pirates. It was supposedly off the coast of Lamu, Kenya, a city lining the Somali-Kenyan border. This isn't the first foreign fishing vessel hijacked by Somali pirates. This year alone, Thai and Taiwanese fishing vessels were seized as well. Over the last decade the captured crews of fishing vessels caught by Somali pirates off their coast could double as a "mock UN" assembly.

International fishing fleets sail from around the world to
plunder Somalia's lawless shores.

And while the mainstream corporate media sensationalizes the freighters being hijacked, ships being victimized simply for 'passing by,' mentions of captured fishing vessels are glazed over, explanations as to why vessels are caught half-way around the world from their home ports are absent, and the concept of "illegal fishing" is buried deep within articles. Certainly it would be difficult to explain why a South Korean vessel is fishing over 6,600 miles away from its own shores.

Indeed, the very genesis of Somali piracy was illegal fishing off their shores. According to "War is Boring," foreign fishing fleets representing a multi-billion dollar global industry have been muscling Somali fishermen out of their own waters since 1991. But what does "War Is Boring" know? They are just "citizen journalists" after all, and besides, CNN and Fox News say the Somali pirates are terrorists, even in league with Al Qeada.

The Globalist's Reality

Glenn Beck of Fox News provides us with the pinnacle of globalist propaganda regarding "Somali piracy."



Glenn Beck manages to insult Thomas Jefferson, the French, the United States Marine Corps, Islam, history, and our intelligence all within the span of a nine minute clip.

He characterizes the pirates and their piratical economic operation in the Mediterranean Sea as "Islamic extremists" who harassed our ships because they despised everything that we stood for - instead of just making money like the countless non-Muslim pirates before them had since the beginning of naval history. He goes on to retrospectively rewrite the history of the Marine Corps which at the time of the Barbary Wars was already celebrating its 26th anniversary, and in reality, received its "baptism of fire" during the Revolutionary War, not in Tripoli as Beck suggests. And all the while Beck links the modern Somali pirates to Al Qeada and Islamic extremism, shamelessly without a shred of evidence to bolster his claim - ignoring evidence that suggests otherwise.

To one degree or another, all mainstream media outlets rehash this narrative. CNN's article comes the closest to the truth by stating, "Pirates have often justified the capture of fishing vessels as punishment for what they view as illegal fishing off its shores." Of course this is written with as much ambiguity as possible to allow your conditioning to discard it as "enemy propaganda."

The Reality

Conceding to those who would rather believe only "officials" and shrug off reports like those from "War Is Boring," a rare spot of honesty can be found if you know where to look.

After 3 Thai fishing vessels were seized earlier this year, the Thai Navy deployed 2 ships with over 300 sailors, marines, and Thai Navy SEALS on-board. According to the Bangkok Post, Rear Admiral Chaiyos commanding the anti-piracy effort said "the Somali people had previously tried to protect their marine resources from foreign exploitation by demanding fees from fishing trawlers and cargo ships that might dump toxic waste. They later turned to piracy and hijacked the ships for ransom."

Despite this observation, Rear Admiral Chaiyos is sending 2 navy ships to Somalia's coast to confront them in an unprecedented deployment to protect "Thai interests" overseas. And despite the overt hypocrisy, Rear Admiral Chaiyos' assessment gives us insight into the true nature of "Somali piracy."

The Somalis have something everyone wants, and little or no means to protect it. They have no voice or influence in the "international community" and so the media can easily recast them as anything their nefarious imaginations want. This has opened the door to over a decade of illegal fishing, waste dumping, and recently, the invitation of the degenerate murderers for hire at Blackwater to find yet another way to waste tax payer's money and/or raise shipping costs.

Even though British and Icelandic naval forces threatened confrontation over fishing rights off their own shores on several occasions during the "Cod Wars," and the fact that say an, Iranian fishing fleet 40 miles off the coast of California would never be tolerated, the Somalis in their limited way defending themselves from wall-to-wall exploitation are branded terrorists with the full brunt of military force brought against them. They haven't blinked.

Meanwhile, the issue of "piracy" is yet another conflict in a long parade of manufactured and manipulated crises to promote globalization and the undermining of national sovereignty for the sake of global governance. That the "pirates" are Muslim is an added bonus for the globalists who seek any tree, rock or bedpost to hide their imagined bogymen behind.

Surely there is money involved for the Somalis as well as defending their waters from exploitation, and perhaps also they were hoping the high profile ships they took, and headlines like "Pirates seize South Korean fishing boat off Kenya" would beg people to wonder just why a South Korean fishing boat is "off Kenya" in the first place and who the real pirates actually are.

Globalist Stunts: Global Climate Change

Part two in a series exposing globalist stunts foisted upon humanity at the cost of our lives, our livelihood, our past and our future. For Part 1, Globalist Stunts: Islamophobia, click here.

By Tony Cartalucci


The story of "global warming" starts 65 million years ago, during the Cretaceous period. According to National Geographic "Two New Dinosaurs Discovered in Antarctica," "Antarctica has sat at much the same latitude for the last hundred million years. But during the Cretaceous it enjoyed a warmer, lusher climate, similar to that of the U.S. Pacific Northwest today. (The Cretaceous period started 144 million years ago and ended 65 million years ago.)"

During this period, what is now North America featured a massive inland sea covering much of the Midwest.

Mesozoic Inland Sea of North America - 65 million B.C.
Global warming and rising sea levels occurred naturally, long before the first humans ever existed. An honest and thorough study of natural history reveals that wild, linear fluctuations are the only 'norms' that exist in terms of climatology. Consider the ever changing geological face of the earth. Pangaea, the mega-continent that existed 250 million years ago, surely affected global climate and drove its change as it shifted and separated into today's seven continents.

Geology - shifting continents, pushing islands up from beneath the sea while swallowing others, not only drove climatology, but biology as well. Flora and fauna populations shift, expand and contract as geology shapes the ever changing face of the earth. At no two points in natural history does the earth look the same, geologically, biologically, climatologically, nor will such a phenomenon ever be possible. It is a constant linear process, not a cycle. Cycles are superficial and temporary, existing for relatively minuscule periods of time.

Has this fact, evident to school children looking at pictures of prehistoric America complete with inland seas, long extinct animals and plant life, eluded our top scientific minds? Obviously not.

Global warming is in fact a scam perpetrated by globalists to control every aspect of human industry, population, consumption and demographics, as declared in the United Nation's Agenda 21 report and conclusions drawn at the globalist Club of Rome forum. After decades of uncontested propagandizing, the globalist agenda began to slow under the scrutiny of skeptics able to propose their objections en-mass via the Internet.

Under increasing pressure, exposing inconsistencies and bold faced lies, globalists themselves have literally conceded that their "irrefutable research" on all fronts is "flawed," (read: lies).

Times Online: "UN climate chief admits Mistake on Himalayan glaciers warning"

Times Online: "UN climate change expert: there could be more errors in report"

Mail Online: "Climategate U-turn as Scientist at Centre of Row Admits: There has been no global warming since 1995."

Telegraph: "UN admits flaw in report on meat and climate change"

Obviously the irrefutable scientific consensus Al Gore proposed is as contrived as the globalist "War on Terror" threat. And just like the fraudulent "War on Terror," "global climate change" has reaped globalist corporate combines a windfall of profits.

Remember the "Carbon Clock" put up in New York City's Times Square? It wasn't genuine conservationists behind this public stunt, but the shifty banksters over at Deutsche Bank. According to Deutsche Bank's own website, "Deutsche Bank has been a leading participant in the international carbon credit market since its inception."

Money is to be made on the back of this hoax, and so the globalist controlled media is going to keep the fear mongering going as long as possible/profitable. Carbon trading is merely the first in a long series of brazen domineering financial scams working in tandem with the "War on Terror" driven police state, and big-pharma driven "pandemic" vaccine scams. The next step is literally taxing CO2 emissions.

Since the contrived monetization of "carbon" like all financial markets, depends on a certain level of stability, and the science behind carbon emissions, by the UN's own admission is far from settled, society is being shoehorned into these markets where key players refuse to change the rules once agreed upon and fraudulent money starts flowing. Does this sound like a solution or a swindle?

The fact that the climate has forever been in a perpetual state of change and the fact that it is now public knowledge that the "science" behind "global climate change" is fraudulent, doesn't matter to the globalists. They will simply insist, as White House Science Adviser John Holdren does here, that any change of weather constitutes justification for their criminal intentions.



Criminal scams like carbon trading and carbon taxes don't just represent unprecedented corruption on a global scale. They threaten human progress altogether.

Cars do pollute our air. Poison is being dumped into our water. Genetically modified organisms are corrupting natural flora and fauna worldwide. Resources could be more efficiently used, manufacturing processes improved, and new forms of energy and transportation pursued. Manufacturing and agriculture could be decentralized/localized to allow people to be more directly involved in the mechanisms of society and not only improve efficiency, but speed up the progress at which efficiency is achieved. This requires improved education, innovation, and mountains of regulations protecting destructive corporate monopolies to be removed. Strangely, none of these solutions are part of the globalists' agenda.

By exacting a tax on human activity, the globalists tighten control over populations worldwide, narrowing their ability to sustain themselves and increase their dependence on their global institutions. It would then be up to us to trust these handful of global elitists, who have written ad nauseum about their desire to reduce our numbers and subjugate us with a global planetary regime. Judging by the behavior of prime suspects like Deutsche Bank, who already have looted and robbed within their own burgeoning carbon trading scam, its obvious such trust would be misplaced - and much to the detriment of humanity.



Globalist Stunts: Islamophobia


Elites use movies and "documentaries" past and present to stoke war and atrocities.


It started with speeches by President George Bush like this one he delivered at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland in 2005. In it, he states that terrorists "would then use Iraq as a base from which to launch attacks against America and overthrow moderate governments in the Middle East and try to establish a totalitarian Islamic empire that reaches from Indonesia to Spain."

Never mind using the consequences of the invasion as justification FOR the invasion; the "clash of civilizations" was born. The target audience was the average American and European, profoundly ignorant, religious zealots in their own right, and true believers that bearded men in turbans outwitted America's trillion dollar defense network on 9/11 and has continued to confound the world's most powerful military for now nearly a decade.

Able to overlook billions in war profits for the Council on Foreign Relations' various corporate members, like DynCorp and KBR and the fact that the war in Afghanistan is growing the world's largest narco-terrorist state, complete with US troops guarding opium fields and the CIA funding drug kingpins running the country, this demographic is made to believe Islam itself is the root of all problems.

George Bush, of course, doesn't ever officially declare this. He leaves this job to the real leadership, the globalist think tanks and their satellite organizations.

Council on Foreign Relations tentacle PNAC (Project for a New American Century), was already fleshing out the "War" part of the "War on Terror" long before 9/11 took place in their "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report in 2000. In it, the only missing ingredient for their full-spectrum domination of the planet was a catalyzing event, a "new Pearl Harbor."

Of course on 9/11 they got their "new Pearl Harbor." The next step, as any war propagandist ever to live since the beginning of humanity knows, was to dehumanize the supposed enemy. The enemy was decidedly "Islam."

"All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach." -Adolf Hitler

Not much has changed since Hitler and his henchmen duped an entire nation into a suicidal war that cost millions their lives and decades of painful recovery. Watching the 2006 war propaganda film "Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West" featuring British police informants, Council on Foreign Relations PNAC signatory "Islamophobia" ring leader Daniel Pipes, and Steven Emerson of "The Investigative Project on Terrorism," we are reminded by its cartoonish nature that ghoulish men still strictly adhere to Hitler's doctrine of duping the masses with rudimentary fear mongering . David Horowitz, of the "Freedom Center" toured America screening the propaganda film, while the "Clarion Fund" mass-mailed it to millions of Americans ahead of the 2008 presidential election.

A quick look at Daniel Pipes' or Steven Emerson's websites will show shameless and relentless reinforcement of the U.S. government's official narrative surrounding 9/11; that it was perpetrated by "radical Islam" and that "radical Islam" is the greatest threat the West now faces. Steven Emerson's "Investigative Project on Terrorism" recently sent one of their salesmen to Bill O'Reilly's show on CFR News Corporation's Fox News, trying to link "Truthers" with radical Islam.



Perhaps the most insulting aspect of this clip was the omitted fact that Faisal Abdul Rauf is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, like Rupert Murdoch and his News Corporation, while his activities are being openly funded by the Carnegie Corporation and various Rockefeller funding arms, all chaired by CFR members. In fact, O'Reilly features video of Rauf speaking in front of the CFR.

Other permanent fixtures of the globalist's "Islamophobia" stunt are Robert Spencer of "Jihad Watch," a David Horowitz Freedom Center project, and Pamela Geller of "Atlas Shrugs." A quick look at the sensational, cartoonish headlines, trying to blame everything from stubbed toes to dry mouth on Islam, we are reminded of Adolf Hitler's "comprehension of the least intelligent" tenant of propaganda.

Robert Spencer divides his time between commentating on Fox News, speaking in front of the globalist Heritage Foundation, and writing book, after book cherry picking versus from the Qu'ran to demonize a religion of over a billion adherents. One book he wrote, co-authored with the above mentioned Pamella Geller, titled "The Post American Presidency: The Obama Administration's War on America," received a forward written in it by notorious war monger, PNAC signatory, and Council on Foreign Relations member, John Bolton.

John Bolton doesn't just settle for writing forwards for opportunistic propagandists like Pam Geller and Robert Spencer, he also gives them exclusive interviews.




That John Bolton and Daniel Pipes of the Council on Foreign Relations, and participants in the various pre-9/11 pro-war PNAC publications are constantly turning up in propaganda films like "Obsession," and behind war propaganda clearing houses like "Jihad Watch" and "Atlas Shrugs" engenders serious suspicion due to an equally serious conflict of interest.

Understand that these men are direct beneficiaries, perhaps the only beneficiaries of the endless war that has resulted from 9/11 and the threat of their manufactured "radical Islam." It is in their best interest to keep the fear, the hatred and the resulting "clash of civilizations" going on as long as possible/profitable.

Victims of Pipes, Spencer, Bolton, Geller, and Horowtiz's cartoonish war propaganda need to remember it is the Department of Homeland Security dismantling the Bill of Rights, not Al Qaeda. It is the bankers and globalists flooding America with immigrants, preventing Americans from defending their borders and enacting free trade collapsing America's economy. The Council on Foreign Relations wrote "Building a North American Community," not bearded men, wearing turbans and hiding in caves. And if anyone comes to the realization that 9/11 is indeed an inside job, then the game these modern day propagandists are playing becomes all the more transparent, and people listening to them - their anger ever more misdirected.

These men, like Hitler, appealing to the most ignorant in society, plan on leading the nations of the world into yet another suicidal war, from which only they will benefit from. Remember, the dividers, the globalists, they are the enemy.

In closing, here is a link to an interview, part of David Horowitz' "Freedom Center" activities featuring David Horowitz, CFR Daniel Pipes, and CFR John Bolton during a Q&A session. These globalist creatures, their demeanor, their making fun of violence they have stoked but are safely removed from as they giggle, speaks for itself.