Productivity - Multifactor
< < >-< OECD.Stat
Open all groups and itemsClose all groups and itemsSend link via emailPrintOpen in stand alone windowClose this window
Click to expand Source
Click to collapse Source
Click to expand Contact person/organisation
Click to collapse Contact person/organisation

For further information, please refer to the OECD Productivity database internet page available at: http://www.oecd.org/statistics/productivity

For any questions or comments, please write to productivity.contact@oecd.org.

Statistical / analytical publication:

OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2013: www.oecd.org/industry/oecd-compendium-of-productivity-indicators.htm

Last update: October 2013.  

 

Click to expand Data source(s) used
Click to collapse Data source(s) used
OECD estimates.
Click to expand Data Characteristics
Click to collapse Data Characteristics
Click to expand Unit of measure used
Click to collapse Unit of measure used
Per cent
Click to expand Periodicity
Click to collapse Periodicity
Yearly, series are available from 1985
Click to expand Population & Scope
Click to collapse Population & Scope
Click to expand Statistical population
Click to collapse Statistical population
This dataset provides comparable rates of change of Multi-factor Productivity for the total economy, computed as the difference between the rate of change of output and the rate of change of total inputs; shares of compensation of labour input and of capital inputs in total costs for the total economy measured at current prices (compensation of labour input corresponds to the compensation of employees and self-employed persons and compensation of capital input is the value of capital services); and total inputs calculated as volume indices of combined labour and capital inputs for the total economy. The indices have been constructed as weighted averages of the rate of change of total hours worked and the rate of change of capital services. Cost shares of inputs averaged over the two periods under consideration serve as weights (Törnqvist index). Price indices for information and communication technology assets are those published by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, corrected for overall inflation in each country.
Click to expand Geographic coverage
Click to collapse Geographic coverage
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States.
Click to expand Sector coverage
Click to collapse Sector coverage
Total economy.
Click to expand Other Aspects
Click to collapse Other Aspects
Click to expand Recommended uses and limitations
Click to collapse Recommended uses and limitations
These data have been compiled for the purpose of international comparisons. They do not necessarily constitute the best source for analysis at the national level. Generally, national sources are to be preferred for single-country analysis.
Click to expand Other comments
Click to collapse Other comments
 Growth in Multi-factor productivity (MFP) has been significantly revised for some countries compared to data previously published in the OECD Productivity database. The revisions impacted mainly output and/or labour input at the whole economy level and reflect the implementation of the classification NACE Rev.2 by European countries into their national accounts, the change of reference year in some OECD member countries, alongside with the possible implementation of other methodological changes. These revisions should be taken into consideration when using these productivity indicators.
Productivity - MultifactorContact person/organisation

For further information, please refer to the OECD Productivity database internet page available at: http://www.oecd.org/statistics/productivity

For any questions or comments, please write to productivity.contact@oecd.org.

Statistical / analytical publication:

OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2013: www.oecd.org/industry/oecd-compendium-of-productivity-indicators.htm

Last update: October 2013.  

 

Data source(s) used
OECD estimates.
Unit of measure used
Per cent
Periodicity
Yearly, series are available from 1985
Statistical population
This dataset provides comparable rates of change of Multi-factor Productivity for the total economy, computed as the difference between the rate of change of output and the rate of change of total inputs; shares of compensation of labour input and of capital inputs in total costs for the total economy measured at current prices (compensation of labour input corresponds to the compensation of employees and self-employed persons and compensation of capital input is the value of capital services); and total inputs calculated as volume indices of combined labour and capital inputs for the total economy. The indices have been constructed as weighted averages of the rate of change of total hours worked and the rate of change of capital services. Cost shares of inputs averaged over the two periods under consideration serve as weights (T&ouml;rnqvist index). Price indices for information and communication technology assets are those published by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, corrected for overall inflation in each country.
Geographic coverage
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States.
Sector coverage
Total economy.
Recommended uses and limitations
These data have been compiled for the purpose of international comparisons. They do not necessarily constitute the best source for analysis at the national level. Generally, national sources are to be preferred for single-country analysis.
Other comments
&nbsp;Growth in Multi-factor productivity (MFP) has been significantly revised for some countries compared to data previously published in the OECD Productivity database. The revisions impacted mainly output and/or labour input at the whole economy level and reflect the implementation of the classification NACE Rev.2 by European countries into their national accounts, the change of reference year in some OECD member countries, alongside with the possible implementation of other methodological changes. These revisions should be taken into consideration when using these productivity indicators.